Ochi Holdings Co., Ltd.

3166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 3166.T stands at 18.4B. In comparison, 3050.T has a market cap of 199.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3166.T is priced at ¥1,411.00, while 3050.T trades at ¥1,491.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

3166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas 3050.T's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, 3166.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 3050.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3166.T is less volatile compared to 3050.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3166.T.Check 3050.T's competition here

3166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 3166.T stands at 18.4B. In comparison, 8218.T has a market cap of 155.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3166.T is priced at ¥1,411.00, while 8218.T trades at ¥3,270.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

3166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas 8218.T's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, 3166.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 8218.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3166.T is less volatile compared to 8218.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3166.T.Check 8218.T's competition here

3166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 3166.T stands at 18.4B. In comparison, 3191.T has a market cap of 130.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3166.T is priced at ¥1,411.00, while 3191.T trades at ¥2,172.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

3166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas 3191.T's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, 3166.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 3191.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3166.T is less volatile compared to 3191.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3166.T.Check 3191.T's competition here

3166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 3166.T stands at 18.4B. In comparison, 7516.T has a market cap of 114.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3166.T is priced at ¥1,411.00, while 7516.T trades at ¥4,005.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

3166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas 7516.T's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, 3166.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7516.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3166.T is less volatile compared to 7516.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3166.T.Check 7516.T's competition here

3166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 3166.T stands at 18.4B. In comparison, 8168.T has a market cap of 75.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3166.T is priced at ¥1,411.00, while 8168.T trades at ¥1,298.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

3166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas 8168.T's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, 3166.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 8168.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3166.T is more volatile compared to 8168.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3166.T.Check 8168.T's competition here

3166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 3166.T stands at 18.4B. In comparison, 2790.T has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3166.T is priced at ¥1,411.00, while 2790.T trades at ¥1,920.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

3166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas 2790.T's P/E ratio is 273.12. In terms of profitability, 3166.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 2790.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3166.T is less volatile compared to 2790.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3166.T.Check 2790.T's competition here

3166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 3166.T stands at 18.4B. In comparison, 3199.T has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3166.T is priced at ¥1,411.00, while 3199.T trades at ¥1,658.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

3166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas 3199.T's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, 3166.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 3199.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3166.T is less volatile compared to 3199.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3166.T.Check 3199.T's competition here

3166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 3166.T stands at 18.4B. In comparison, 3546.T has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3166.T is priced at ¥1,411.00, while 3546.T trades at ¥1,059.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

3166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas 3546.T's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, 3166.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 3546.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3166.T is less volatile compared to 3546.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3166.T.Check 3546.T's competition here

3166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 3166.T stands at 18.4B. In comparison, 7450.T has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3166.T is priced at ¥1,411.00, while 7450.T trades at ¥1,067.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

3166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas 7450.T's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, 3166.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7450.T's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3166.T is less volatile compared to 7450.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3166.T.Check 7450.T's competition here

3166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 3166.T stands at 18.4B. In comparison, 8208.T has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3166.T is priced at ¥1,411.00, while 8208.T trades at ¥1,245.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

3166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas 8208.T's P/E ratio is -177.10. In terms of profitability, 3166.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 8208.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3166.T is less volatile compared to 8208.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3166.T.Check 8208.T's competition here

3166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 3166.T stands at 18.4B. In comparison, 7590.T has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3166.T is priced at ¥1,411.00, while 7590.T trades at ¥467.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

3166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas 7590.T's P/E ratio is -32.41. In terms of profitability, 3166.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7590.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3166.T is less volatile compared to 7590.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3166.T.Check 7590.T's competition here

3166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 3166.T stands at 18.4B. In comparison, 9903.T has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3166.T is priced at ¥1,411.00, while 9903.T trades at ¥886.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

3166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas 9903.T's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, 3166.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 9903.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3166.T is more volatile compared to 9903.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3166.T.Check 9903.T's competition here

3166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 3166.T stands at 18.4B. In comparison, 9976.T has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3166.T is priced at ¥1,411.00, while 9976.T trades at ¥1,014.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

3166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas 9976.T's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, 3166.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 9976.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3166.T is more volatile compared to 9976.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3166.T.Check 9976.T's competition here

3166.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 3166.T stands at 18.4B. In comparison, 9835.T has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3166.T is priced at ¥1,411.00, while 9835.T trades at ¥494.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

3166.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas 9835.T's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, 3166.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 9835.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3166.T is more volatile compared to 9835.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3166.T.Check 9835.T's competition here