Tilray Brands, Inc.
Tilray Brands, Inc. (2HQ0.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (2HQ0.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2HQ0.DE | €5.66 | +6.39% | 666.4M | -0.45 | -€12.64 | N/A |
| MRK.DE | €109.80 | -0.09% | 47.7B | 18.30 | €6.00 | +2.00% |
| ZOE.DE | €102.00 | +0.47% | 45B | 19.39 | €5.26 | +1.71% |
| 2M7C.F | €1.54 | +4.76% | 3.8B | 19.25 | €0.08 | +2.16% |
| DMP.DE | €47.25 | +1.72% | 2.5B | 21.98 | €2.15 | +1.90% |
| EVT.DE | €4.50 | +0.96% | 800.2M | -5.00 | -€0.90 | N/A |
| PSG.DE | €29.00 | +0.00% | 333.9M | 17.26 | €1.68 | +0.17% |
| 21P.F | €2.99 | +3.10% | 172.2M | -3.22 | -€0.93 | N/A |
| HAEK.DE | €21.40 | -1.83% | 111.5M | 11.57 | €1.85 | N/A |
| APPH.DE | €11.00 | +0.00% | 91.6M | 137.50 | €0.08 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
2HQ0.DE vs MRK.DE Comparison April 2026
2HQ0.DE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HQ0.DE stands at 666.4M. In comparison, MRK.DE has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2HQ0.DE is priced at €5.66, while MRK.DE trades at €109.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HQ0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas MRK.DE's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, 2HQ0.DE's ROE is -1.15%, compared to MRK.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HQ0.DE is more volatile compared to MRK.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HQ0.DE.Check MRK.DE's competition here
2HQ0.DE vs ZOE.DE Comparison April 2026
2HQ0.DE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HQ0.DE stands at 666.4M. In comparison, ZOE.DE has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, 2HQ0.DE is priced at €5.66, while ZOE.DE trades at €102.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HQ0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas ZOE.DE's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, 2HQ0.DE's ROE is -1.15%, compared to ZOE.DE's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HQ0.DE is more volatile compared to ZOE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HQ0.DE.Check ZOE.DE's competition here
2HQ0.DE vs 2M7C.F Comparison April 2026
2HQ0.DE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HQ0.DE stands at 666.4M. In comparison, 2M7C.F has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2HQ0.DE is priced at €5.66, while 2M7C.F trades at €1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HQ0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas 2M7C.F's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, 2HQ0.DE's ROE is -1.15%, compared to 2M7C.F's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HQ0.DE is more volatile compared to 2M7C.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HQ0.DE.Check 2M7C.F's competition here
2HQ0.DE vs DMP.DE Comparison April 2026
2HQ0.DE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HQ0.DE stands at 666.4M. In comparison, DMP.DE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2HQ0.DE is priced at €5.66, while DMP.DE trades at €47.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HQ0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas DMP.DE's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, 2HQ0.DE's ROE is -1.15%, compared to DMP.DE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HQ0.DE is more volatile compared to DMP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HQ0.DE.Check DMP.DE's competition here
2HQ0.DE vs EVT.DE Comparison April 2026
2HQ0.DE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HQ0.DE stands at 666.4M. In comparison, EVT.DE has a market cap of 800.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2HQ0.DE is priced at €5.66, while EVT.DE trades at €4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HQ0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas EVT.DE's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, 2HQ0.DE's ROE is -1.15%, compared to EVT.DE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HQ0.DE is more volatile compared to EVT.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HQ0.DE.Check EVT.DE's competition here
2HQ0.DE vs PSG.DE Comparison April 2026
2HQ0.DE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HQ0.DE stands at 666.4M. In comparison, PSG.DE has a market cap of 333.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2HQ0.DE is priced at €5.66, while PSG.DE trades at €29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HQ0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas PSG.DE's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, 2HQ0.DE's ROE is -1.15%, compared to PSG.DE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HQ0.DE is more volatile compared to PSG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HQ0.DE.Check PSG.DE's competition here
2HQ0.DE vs 21P.F Comparison April 2026
2HQ0.DE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HQ0.DE stands at 666.4M. In comparison, 21P.F has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2HQ0.DE is priced at €5.66, while 21P.F trades at €2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HQ0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas 21P.F's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, 2HQ0.DE's ROE is -1.15%, compared to 21P.F's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HQ0.DE is more volatile compared to 21P.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HQ0.DE.Check 21P.F's competition here
2HQ0.DE vs HAEK.DE Comparison April 2026
2HQ0.DE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HQ0.DE stands at 666.4M. In comparison, HAEK.DE has a market cap of 111.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2HQ0.DE is priced at €5.66, while HAEK.DE trades at €21.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HQ0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas HAEK.DE's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, 2HQ0.DE's ROE is -1.15%, compared to HAEK.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HQ0.DE is more volatile compared to HAEK.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HQ0.DE.Check HAEK.DE's competition here
2HQ0.DE vs APPH.DE Comparison April 2026
2HQ0.DE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HQ0.DE stands at 666.4M. In comparison, APPH.DE has a market cap of 91.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2HQ0.DE is priced at €5.66, while APPH.DE trades at €11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HQ0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas APPH.DE's P/E ratio is 137.50. In terms of profitability, 2HQ0.DE's ROE is -1.15%, compared to APPH.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HQ0.DE is more volatile compared to APPH.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HQ0.DE.Check APPH.DE's competition here
2HQ0.DE vs 93M1.DE Comparison April 2026
2HQ0.DE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HQ0.DE stands at 666.4M. In comparison, 93M1.DE has a market cap of 80.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2HQ0.DE is priced at €5.66, while 93M1.DE trades at €18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HQ0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas 93M1.DE's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, 2HQ0.DE's ROE is -1.15%, compared to 93M1.DE's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HQ0.DE is more volatile compared to 93M1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HQ0.DE.Check 93M1.DE's competition here
2HQ0.DE vs 2HQ.DE Comparison April 2026
2HQ0.DE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HQ0.DE stands at 666.4M. In comparison, 2HQ.DE has a market cap of 78.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2HQ0.DE is priced at €5.66, while 2HQ.DE trades at €0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HQ0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas 2HQ.DE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, 2HQ0.DE's ROE is -1.15%, compared to 2HQ.DE's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HQ0.DE is more volatile compared to 2HQ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HQ0.DE.Check 2HQ.DE's competition here
2HQ0.DE vs B8F.DE Comparison April 2026
2HQ0.DE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HQ0.DE stands at 666.4M. In comparison, B8F.DE has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2HQ0.DE is priced at €5.66, while B8F.DE trades at €6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HQ0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas B8F.DE's P/E ratio is -32.40. In terms of profitability, 2HQ0.DE's ROE is -1.15%, compared to B8F.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HQ0.DE is less volatile compared to B8F.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HQ0.DE.Check B8F.DE's competition here
2HQ0.DE vs 21P1.F Comparison April 2026
2HQ0.DE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HQ0.DE stands at 666.4M. In comparison, 21P1.F has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2HQ0.DE is priced at €5.66, while 21P1.F trades at €0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HQ0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas 21P1.F's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, 2HQ0.DE's ROE is -1.15%, compared to 21P1.F's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HQ0.DE is more volatile compared to 21P1.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HQ0.DE.Check 21P1.F's competition here
2HQ0.DE vs HOB0.F Comparison April 2026
2HQ0.DE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HQ0.DE stands at 666.4M. In comparison, HOB0.F has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, 2HQ0.DE is priced at €5.66, while HOB0.F trades at €0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HQ0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas HOB0.F's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, 2HQ0.DE's ROE is -1.15%, compared to HOB0.F's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HQ0.DE is more volatile compared to HOB0.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HQ0.DE.Check HOB0.F's competition here
2HQ0.DE vs B8FK.DE Comparison April 2026
2HQ0.DE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HQ0.DE stands at 666.4M. In comparison, B8FK.DE has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2HQ0.DE is priced at €5.66, while B8FK.DE trades at €2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HQ0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas B8FK.DE's P/E ratio is -6.92. In terms of profitability, 2HQ0.DE's ROE is -1.15%, compared to B8FK.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HQ0.DE is more volatile compared to B8FK.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HQ0.DE.Check B8FK.DE's competition here
2HQ0.DE vs SBX.DE Comparison April 2026
2HQ0.DE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HQ0.DE stands at 666.4M. In comparison, SBX.DE has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2HQ0.DE is priced at €5.66, while SBX.DE trades at €1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HQ0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas SBX.DE's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, 2HQ0.DE's ROE is -1.15%, compared to SBX.DE's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HQ0.DE is more volatile compared to SBX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HQ0.DE.Check SBX.DE's competition here
2HQ0.DE vs Z6A.F Comparison April 2026
2HQ0.DE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HQ0.DE stands at 666.4M. In comparison, Z6A.F has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2HQ0.DE is priced at €5.66, while Z6A.F trades at €0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HQ0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas Z6A.F's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, 2HQ0.DE's ROE is -1.15%, compared to Z6A.F's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HQ0.DE is more volatile compared to Z6A.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HQ0.DE.Check Z6A.F's competition here
2HQ0.DE vs PA8.DE Comparison April 2026
2HQ0.DE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HQ0.DE stands at 666.4M. In comparison, PA8.DE has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2HQ0.DE is priced at €5.66, while PA8.DE trades at €0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HQ0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas PA8.DE's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, 2HQ0.DE's ROE is -1.15%, compared to PA8.DE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HQ0.DE is more volatile compared to PA8.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HQ0.DE.Check PA8.DE's competition here
2HQ0.DE vs 2NU.F Comparison April 2026
2HQ0.DE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HQ0.DE stands at 666.4M. In comparison, 2NU.F has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2HQ0.DE is priced at €5.66, while 2NU.F trades at €0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HQ0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas 2NU.F's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, 2HQ0.DE's ROE is -1.15%, compared to 2NU.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 2HQ0.DE is less volatile compared to 2NU.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HQ0.DE.Check 2NU.F's competition here
2HQ0.DE vs ERV2.F Comparison April 2026
2HQ0.DE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HQ0.DE stands at 666.4M. In comparison, ERV2.F has a market cap of 329.9K. Regarding current trading prices, 2HQ0.DE is priced at €5.66, while ERV2.F trades at €0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HQ0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas ERV2.F's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, 2HQ0.DE's ROE is -1.15%, compared to ERV2.F's ROE of +2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HQ0.DE is more volatile compared to ERV2.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HQ0.DE.Check ERV2.F's competition here
2HQ0.DE vs PA8.F Comparison April 2026
2HQ0.DE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HQ0.DE stands at 666.4M. In comparison, PA8.F has a market cap of 261.1K. Regarding current trading prices, 2HQ0.DE is priced at €5.66, while PA8.F trades at €0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HQ0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas PA8.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2HQ0.DE's ROE is -1.15%, compared to PA8.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HQ0.DE is more volatile compared to PA8.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HQ0.DE.Check PA8.F's competition here
2HQ0.DE vs MCD.DE Comparison April 2026
2HQ0.DE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HQ0.DE stands at 666.4M. In comparison, MCD.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2HQ0.DE is priced at €5.66, while MCD.DE trades at €0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HQ0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas MCD.DE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, 2HQ0.DE's ROE is -1.15%, compared to MCD.DE's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HQ0.DE is less volatile compared to MCD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HQ0.DE.Check MCD.DE's competition here
2HQ0.DE vs 4XT.DE Comparison April 2026
2HQ0.DE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HQ0.DE stands at 666.4M. In comparison, 4XT.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2HQ0.DE is priced at €5.66, while 4XT.DE trades at €0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HQ0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas 4XT.DE's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, 2HQ0.DE's ROE is -1.15%, compared to 4XT.DE's ROE of -7.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HQ0.DE is more volatile compared to 4XT.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HQ0.DE.Check 4XT.DE's competition here
2HQ0.DE vs BIO1.F Comparison April 2026
2HQ0.DE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HQ0.DE stands at 666.4M. In comparison, BIO1.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2HQ0.DE is priced at €5.66, while BIO1.F trades at €36.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HQ0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas BIO1.F's P/E ratio is -22.85. In terms of profitability, 2HQ0.DE's ROE is -1.15%, compared to BIO1.F's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HQ0.DE is more volatile compared to BIO1.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HQ0.DE.Check BIO1.F's competition here