Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company 2HP.DE Peers
See (2HP.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2HP.DE | $15.84 | +2.06% | 20.81B | 8.52 | $1.86 | +3.16% |
CIS.DE | $55.73 | -1.35% | 221.71B | 25.45 | $2.19 | +2.62% |
MTLA.DE | $247.80 | N/A | 41.35B | 36.82 | $6.73 | N/A |
ERCB.DE | $7.81 | +0.44% | 25.87B | 195.25 | $0.04 | +1.67% |
ERCG.DE | $7.54 | +6.20% | 25.43B | 188.50 | $0.04 | +1.72% |
NOA3.DE | $4.69 | +0.51% | 24.55B | 21.33 | $0.22 | +2.78% |
CIE1.DE | $85.74 | -0.21% | 12.32B | 61.68 | $1.39 | N/A |
JNP.DE | $34.69 | -0.77% | 11.42B | 34.01 | $1.02 | +1.99% |
ADV.DE | $20.50 | N/A | 1.07B | -45.56 | -$0.45 | +2.54% |
ADVV.F | $16.10 | N/A | 837.73M | 15.38 | $1.05 | +2.54% |
Stock Comparison
2HP.DE vs CIS.DE Comparison
2HP.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HP.DE stands at 20.81B. In comparison, CIS.DE has a market cap of 221.71B. Regarding current trading prices, 2HP.DE is priced at $15.84, while CIS.DE trades at $55.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HP.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CIS.DE's P/E ratio is 25.45. In terms of profitability, 2HP.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIS.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HP.DE is more volatile compared to CIS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HP.DE.
2HP.DE vs MTLA.DE Comparison
2HP.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HP.DE stands at 20.81B. In comparison, MTLA.DE has a market cap of 41.35B. Regarding current trading prices, 2HP.DE is priced at $15.84, while MTLA.DE trades at $247.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HP.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas MTLA.DE's P/E ratio is 36.82. In terms of profitability, 2HP.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTLA.DE's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HP.DE is more volatile compared to MTLA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HP.DE.
2HP.DE vs ERCB.DE Comparison
2HP.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HP.DE stands at 20.81B. In comparison, ERCB.DE has a market cap of 25.87B. Regarding current trading prices, 2HP.DE is priced at $15.84, while ERCB.DE trades at $7.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HP.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas ERCB.DE's P/E ratio is 195.25. In terms of profitability, 2HP.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ERCB.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HP.DE is more volatile compared to ERCB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HP.DE.
2HP.DE vs ERCG.DE Comparison
2HP.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HP.DE stands at 20.81B. In comparison, ERCG.DE has a market cap of 25.43B. Regarding current trading prices, 2HP.DE is priced at $15.84, while ERCG.DE trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HP.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas ERCG.DE's P/E ratio is 188.50. In terms of profitability, 2HP.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ERCG.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HP.DE is more volatile compared to ERCG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HP.DE.
2HP.DE vs NOA3.DE Comparison
2HP.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HP.DE stands at 20.81B. In comparison, NOA3.DE has a market cap of 24.55B. Regarding current trading prices, 2HP.DE is priced at $15.84, while NOA3.DE trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HP.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas NOA3.DE's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, 2HP.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOA3.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HP.DE is more volatile compared to NOA3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HP.DE.
2HP.DE vs CIE1.DE Comparison
2HP.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HP.DE stands at 20.81B. In comparison, CIE1.DE has a market cap of 12.32B. Regarding current trading prices, 2HP.DE is priced at $15.84, while CIE1.DE trades at $85.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HP.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CIE1.DE's P/E ratio is 61.68. In terms of profitability, 2HP.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIE1.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HP.DE is more volatile compared to CIE1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HP.DE.
2HP.DE vs JNP.DE Comparison
2HP.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HP.DE stands at 20.81B. In comparison, JNP.DE has a market cap of 11.42B. Regarding current trading prices, 2HP.DE is priced at $15.84, while JNP.DE trades at $34.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HP.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas JNP.DE's P/E ratio is 34.01. In terms of profitability, 2HP.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JNP.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HP.DE is more volatile compared to JNP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HP.DE.
2HP.DE vs ADV.DE Comparison
2HP.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HP.DE stands at 20.81B. In comparison, ADV.DE has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, 2HP.DE is priced at $15.84, while ADV.DE trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HP.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas ADV.DE's P/E ratio is -45.56. In terms of profitability, 2HP.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADV.DE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HP.DE is more volatile compared to ADV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HP.DE.
2HP.DE vs ADVV.F Comparison
2HP.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HP.DE stands at 20.81B. In comparison, ADVV.F has a market cap of 837.73M. Regarding current trading prices, 2HP.DE is priced at $15.84, while ADVV.F trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HP.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas ADVV.F's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, 2HP.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADVV.F's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HP.DE is less volatile compared to ADVV.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HP.DE.
2HP.DE vs FQT.DE Comparison
2HP.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HP.DE stands at 20.81B. In comparison, FQT.DE has a market cap of 590.49M. Regarding current trading prices, 2HP.DE is priced at $15.84, while FQT.DE trades at $44.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HP.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas FQT.DE's P/E ratio is 26.97. In terms of profitability, 2HP.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FQT.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HP.DE is more volatile compared to FQT.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HP.DE.
2HP.DE vs CEK.DE Comparison
2HP.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HP.DE stands at 20.81B. In comparison, CEK.DE has a market cap of 116.11M. Regarding current trading prices, 2HP.DE is priced at $15.84, while CEK.DE trades at $14.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HP.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CEK.DE's P/E ratio is 37.31. In terms of profitability, 2HP.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CEK.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HP.DE is less volatile compared to CEK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HP.DE.
2HP.DE vs CEA.DE Comparison
2HP.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HP.DE stands at 20.81B. In comparison, CEA.DE has a market cap of 77.42M. Regarding current trading prices, 2HP.DE is priced at $15.84, while CEA.DE trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HP.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CEA.DE's P/E ratio is -12.40. In terms of profitability, 2HP.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CEA.DE's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HP.DE is more volatile compared to CEA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HP.DE.
2HP.DE vs TLFP.BE Comparison
2HP.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HP.DE stands at 20.81B. In comparison, TLFP.BE has a market cap of 26.20M. Regarding current trading prices, 2HP.DE is priced at $15.84, while TLFP.BE trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HP.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas TLFP.BE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2HP.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TLFP.BE's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HP.DE is more volatile compared to TLFP.BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HP.DE.
2HP.DE vs CFC.DE Comparison
2HP.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HP.DE stands at 20.81B. In comparison, CFC.DE has a market cap of 14.37M. Regarding current trading prices, 2HP.DE is priced at $15.84, while CFC.DE trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HP.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CFC.DE's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, 2HP.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFC.DE's ROE of -6.70%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HP.DE is more volatile compared to CFC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HP.DE.
2HP.DE vs M0YN.DE Comparison
2HP.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HP.DE stands at 20.81B. In comparison, M0YN.DE has a market cap of 4.51M. Regarding current trading prices, 2HP.DE is priced at $15.84, while M0YN.DE trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HP.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas M0YN.DE's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, 2HP.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to M0YN.DE's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HP.DE is more volatile compared to M0YN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HP.DE.
2HP.DE vs GGS.DE Comparison
2HP.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HP.DE stands at 20.81B. In comparison, GGS.DE has a market cap of 3.97M. Regarding current trading prices, 2HP.DE is priced at $15.84, while GGS.DE trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HP.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas GGS.DE's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, 2HP.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GGS.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HP.DE is more volatile compared to GGS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HP.DE.
2HP.DE vs TLIK.DE Comparison
2HP.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2HP.DE stands at 20.81B. In comparison, TLIK.DE has a market cap of 3.74M. Regarding current trading prices, 2HP.DE is priced at $15.84, while TLIK.DE trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2HP.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas TLIK.DE's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, 2HP.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TLIK.DE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 2HP.DE is more volatile compared to TLIK.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2HP.DE.