CREAL Inc.
CREAL Inc. (2998.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (2998.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2998.T | ¥722.00 | +3.00% | 22.6B | 20.43 | ¥36.17 | +0.86% |
| 1557.T | ¥103,000.00 | +1.33% | 98.1T | 8.75 | ¥11,854.00 | +1.09% |
| 1330.T | ¥54,990.00 | +2.61% | 7.9T | 19.99 | ¥2,817.15 | +1.27% |
| 1306.T | ¥383.00 | +3.12% | 3.5T | 1.61 | ¥241.62 | +17.86% |
| 1475.T | ¥373.60 | +3.38% | 2.9T | 17.47 | ¥21.75 | +1.74% |
| 1591.T | ¥33,100.00 | +2.86% | 2.4T | 16.31 | ¥2,058.66 | +1.82% |
| 8473.T | ¥2,935.50 | +3.04% | 2T | 6.97 | ¥431.05 | +2.66% |
| 1364.T | ¥3,372.00 | +2.87% | 533.8B | 17.96 | ¥190.78 | +1.73% |
| 1615.T | ¥602.30 | +5.02% | 255.8B | 14.81 | ¥40.26 | +3.36% |
| 8616.T | ¥728.00 | +2.25% | 186B | 14.91 | ¥49.56 | +6.00% |
Stock Comparison
2998.T vs 1557.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 1557.T has a market cap of 98.1T. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 1557.T trades at ¥103,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 1557.T's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 1557.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 1557.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 1557.T's competition here
2998.T vs 1330.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 1330.T has a market cap of 7.9T. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 1330.T trades at ¥54,990.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 1330.T's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 1330.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 1330.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 1330.T's competition here
2998.T vs 1306.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 1306.T has a market cap of 3.5T. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 1306.T trades at ¥383.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 1306.T's P/E ratio is 1.61. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 1306.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 1306.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 1306.T's competition here
2998.T vs 1475.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 1475.T has a market cap of 2.9T. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 1475.T trades at ¥373.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 1475.T's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 1475.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 1475.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 1475.T's competition here
2998.T vs 1591.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 1591.T has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 1591.T trades at ¥33,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 1591.T's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 1591.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 1591.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 1591.T's competition here
2998.T vs 8473.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 8473.T has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 8473.T trades at ¥2,935.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 8473.T's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 8473.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 8473.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 8473.T's competition here
2998.T vs 1364.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 1364.T has a market cap of 533.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 1364.T trades at ¥3,372.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 1364.T's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 1364.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 1364.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 1364.T's competition here
2998.T vs 1615.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 1615.T has a market cap of 255.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 1615.T trades at ¥602.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 1615.T's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 1615.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 1615.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 1615.T's competition here
2998.T vs 8616.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 8616.T has a market cap of 186B. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 8616.T trades at ¥728.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 8616.T's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 8616.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 8616.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 8616.T's competition here
2998.T vs 319A.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 319A.T has a market cap of 161.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 319A.T trades at ¥11,360.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 319A.T's P/E ratio is 191.24. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 319A.T's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 319A.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 319A.T's competition here
2998.T vs 8595.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 8595.T has a market cap of 120.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 8595.T trades at ¥2,270.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 8595.T's P/E ratio is 18.89. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 8595.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 8595.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 8595.T's competition here
2998.T vs 7342.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 7342.T has a market cap of 115.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 7342.T trades at ¥1,942.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 7342.T's P/E ratio is 222.20. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 7342.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 7342.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 7342.T's competition here
2998.T vs 5842.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 5842.T has a market cap of 110.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 5842.T trades at ¥3,185.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 5842.T's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 5842.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 5842.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 5842.T's competition here
2998.T vs 8739.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 8739.T has a market cap of 76B. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 8739.T trades at ¥1,923.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 8739.T's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 8739.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 8739.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 8739.T's competition here
2998.T vs 8624.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 8624.T has a market cap of 49.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 8624.T trades at ¥1,512.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 8624.T's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 8624.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 8624.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 8624.T's competition here
2998.T vs 6620.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 6620.T has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 6620.T trades at ¥705.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 6620.T's P/E ratio is 124.57. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 6620.T's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 6620.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 6620.T's competition here
2998.T vs 4310.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 4310.T has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 4310.T trades at ¥2,542.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 4310.T's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 4310.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 4310.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 4310.T's competition here
2998.T vs 3772.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 3772.T has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 3772.T trades at ¥1,055.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 3772.T's P/E ratio is 108.10. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 3772.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 3772.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 3772.T's competition here
2998.T vs 8737.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 8737.T has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 8737.T trades at ¥654.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 8737.T's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 8737.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 8737.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 8737.T's competition here
2998.T vs 3454.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 3454.T has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 3454.T trades at ¥1,189.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 3454.T's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 3454.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 3454.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 3454.T's competition here
2998.T vs 9257.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 9257.T has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 9257.T trades at ¥750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 9257.T's P/E ratio is -93.32. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 9257.T's ROE of +3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 9257.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 9257.T's competition here
2998.T vs 2134.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 2134.T has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 2134.T trades at ¥33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 2134.T's P/E ratio is -12.24. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 2134.T's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is less volatile compared to 2134.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 2134.T's competition here
2998.T vs 7347.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 7347.T has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 7347.T trades at ¥721.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 7347.T's P/E ratio is 203.64. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 7347.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 7347.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 7347.T's competition here
2998.T vs 4479.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 4479.T has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 4479.T trades at ¥883.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 4479.T's P/E ratio is 28.71. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 4479.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 4479.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 4479.T's competition here
2998.T vs 254A.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 254A.T has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 254A.T trades at ¥1,071.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 254A.T's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 254A.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 254A.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 254A.T's competition here
2998.T vs 8462.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 8462.T has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 8462.T trades at ¥985.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 8462.T's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 8462.T's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 8462.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 8462.T's competition here
2998.T vs 1329.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 1329.T has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 1329.T trades at ¥5,463.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 1329.T's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 1329.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 1329.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 1329.T's competition here
2998.T vs 8783.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 8783.T has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 8783.T trades at ¥201.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 8783.T's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 8783.T's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 8783.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 8783.T's competition here
2998.T vs 3113.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 3113.T has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 3113.T trades at ¥88.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 3113.T's P/E ratio is -7.76. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 3113.T's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is less volatile compared to 3113.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 3113.T's competition here
2998.T vs 3121.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 3121.T has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 3121.T trades at ¥224.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 3121.T's P/E ratio is -76.12. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 3121.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 3121.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 3121.T's competition here
2998.T vs 7345.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 7345.T has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 7345.T trades at ¥1,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 7345.T's P/E ratio is 1395.29. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 7345.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is less volatile compared to 7345.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 7345.T's competition here
2998.T vs 8518.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 8518.T has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 8518.T trades at ¥155.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 8518.T's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 8518.T's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 8518.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 8518.T's competition here
2998.T vs 3266.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 3266.T has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 3266.T trades at ¥88.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 3266.T's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 3266.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 3266.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 3266.T's competition here
2998.T vs 7162.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 7162.T has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 7162.T trades at ¥226.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 7162.T's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 7162.T's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 7162.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 7162.T's competition here
2998.T vs 0P00001CGE.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 0P00001CGE.T has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 0P00001CGE.T trades at ¥28,905.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 0P00001CGE.T's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0P00001CGE.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 0P00001CGE.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 0P00001CGE.T's competition here
2998.T vs 0P00001CIF.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 0P00001CIF.T has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 0P00001CIF.T trades at ¥62,069.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 0P00001CIF.T's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0P00001CIF.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 0P00001CIF.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 0P00001CIF.T's competition here
2998.T vs 0P00012I6C.T Comparison April 2026
2998.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2998.T stands at 22.6B. In comparison, 0P00012I6C.T has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2998.T is priced at ¥722.00, while 0P00012I6C.T trades at ¥36,778.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2998.T currently has a P/E ratio of 20.43, whereas 0P00012I6C.T's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2998.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0P00012I6C.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 2998.T is more volatile compared to 0P00012I6C.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2998.T.Check 0P00012I6C.T's competition here