Loading...

China Oilfield Services Limited

2883.HKHKSE
Energy
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
HK$6.62
HK$-0.06(-0.90%)

China Oilfield Services Limited 2883.HK Peers

See (2883.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.

Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry

Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.

SymbolPriceChange %Market CapP/E RatioEPSDividend Yield
2883.HKHK$6.62-0.90%54.9B8.49HK$0.78+4.14%
3899.HKHK$6.22-2.05%12.6B11.11HK$0.56+4.82%
1921.HKHK$6.70-0.30%10B-134.00-HK$0.05N/A
3337.HKHK$1.48-1.33%4.3B16.44HK$0.09+1.69%
0568.HKHK$5.43-3.89%3.9B-108.60-HK$0.05N/A
0196.HKHK$0.20-2.88%1.8B-6.73-HK$0.03N/A
3303.HKHK$0.72+1.41%1.5B7.20HK$0.10+4.17%
0554.HKHK$0.29-3.39%1.2B-5.70-HK$0.05+41.31%
0206.HKHK$0.22-3.91%712.1M11.05HK$0.02+4.52%
0353.HKHK$0.42-3.57%453.8M8.40HK$0.05N/A
Showing 1 to 10 of 14 results
1

Stock Comparison

Select a stock to compare (requires JavaScript). Showing default comparison.

2883.HK vs 3899.HK Comparison

2883.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 2883.HK stands at 54.9B. In comparison, 3899.HK has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2883.HK is priced at HK$6.62, while 3899.HK trades at HK$6.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

2883.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.49, whereas 3899.HK's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, 2883.HK's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3899.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2883.HK is more volatile compared to 3899.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2883.HK.

Stock Price Comparison

Loading...

Frequently Asked Questions

;