Watts Co., Ltd.
Watts Co., Ltd. (2735.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (2735.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Grocery Stores Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2735.T | ¥634.00 | -0.16% | 8.4B | 9.61 | ¥65.98 | +3.15% |
| 3382.T | ¥2,041.00 | +0.62% | 4.9T | 21.65 | ¥94.27 | +2.45% |
| 3038.T | ¥3,763.00 | -0.08% | 834.3B | 26.29 | ¥143.11 | +0.80% |
| 8279.T | ¥9,644.00 | +4.68% | 392.7B | 19.53 | ¥493.77 | +1.37% |
| 8194.T | ¥2,483.00 | +0.36% | 214.8B | 11.95 | ¥207.82 | +2.62% |
| 9974.T | ¥7,450.00 | +0.27% | 155.2B | 12.57 | ¥592.91 | +1.66% |
| 9919.T | ¥2,593.00 | -2.59% | 148B | 26.25 | ¥98.79 | +4.55% |
| 8198.T | ¥3,535.00 | -0.70% | 112.7B | 10.23 | ¥345.45 | +2.40% |
| 2742.T | ¥4,340.00 | +0.93% | 92.6B | 10.35 | ¥419.43 | +1.57% |
| 9823.T | ¥1,443.00 | -2.04% | 72.2B | 13.76 | ¥104.88 | +1.46% |
Stock Comparison
2735.T vs 3382.T Comparison March 2026
2735.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2735.T stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 3382.T has a market cap of 4.9T. Regarding current trading prices, 2735.T is priced at ¥634.00, while 3382.T trades at ¥2,041.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.61, whereas 3382.T's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, 2735.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3382.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2735.T is less volatile compared to 3382.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2735.T.Check 3382.T's competition here
2735.T vs 3038.T Comparison March 2026
2735.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2735.T stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 3038.T has a market cap of 834.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2735.T is priced at ¥634.00, while 3038.T trades at ¥3,763.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.61, whereas 3038.T's P/E ratio is 26.29. In terms of profitability, 2735.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3038.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 2735.T is less volatile compared to 3038.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2735.T.Check 3038.T's competition here
2735.T vs 8279.T Comparison March 2026
2735.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2735.T stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 8279.T has a market cap of 392.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2735.T is priced at ¥634.00, while 8279.T trades at ¥9,644.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.61, whereas 8279.T's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, 2735.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8279.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2735.T is less volatile compared to 8279.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2735.T.Check 8279.T's competition here
2735.T vs 8194.T Comparison March 2026
2735.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2735.T stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 8194.T has a market cap of 214.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2735.T is priced at ¥634.00, while 8194.T trades at ¥2,483.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.61, whereas 8194.T's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, 2735.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8194.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2735.T is less volatile compared to 8194.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2735.T.Check 8194.T's competition here
2735.T vs 9974.T Comparison March 2026
2735.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2735.T stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 9974.T has a market cap of 155.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2735.T is priced at ¥634.00, while 9974.T trades at ¥7,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.61, whereas 9974.T's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, 2735.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9974.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2735.T is less volatile compared to 9974.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2735.T.Check 9974.T's competition here
2735.T vs 9919.T Comparison March 2026
2735.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2735.T stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 9919.T has a market cap of 148B. Regarding current trading prices, 2735.T is priced at ¥634.00, while 9919.T trades at ¥2,593.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.61, whereas 9919.T's P/E ratio is 26.25. In terms of profitability, 2735.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9919.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2735.T is less volatile compared to 9919.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2735.T.Check 9919.T's competition here
2735.T vs 8198.T Comparison March 2026
2735.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2735.T stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 8198.T has a market cap of 112.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2735.T is priced at ¥634.00, while 8198.T trades at ¥3,535.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.61, whereas 8198.T's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, 2735.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8198.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2735.T is less volatile compared to 8198.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2735.T.Check 8198.T's competition here
2735.T vs 2742.T Comparison March 2026
2735.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2735.T stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 2742.T has a market cap of 92.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2735.T is priced at ¥634.00, while 2742.T trades at ¥4,340.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.61, whereas 2742.T's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, 2735.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2742.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2735.T is less volatile compared to 2742.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2735.T.Check 2742.T's competition here
2735.T vs 9823.T Comparison March 2026
2735.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2735.T stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 9823.T has a market cap of 72.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2735.T is priced at ¥634.00, while 9823.T trades at ¥1,443.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.61, whereas 9823.T's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, 2735.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9823.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2735.T is less volatile compared to 9823.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2735.T.Check 9823.T's competition here
2735.T vs 2791.T Comparison March 2026
2735.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2735.T stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 2791.T has a market cap of 65.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2735.T is priced at ¥634.00, while 2791.T trades at ¥4,870.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.61, whereas 2791.T's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, 2735.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2791.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2735.T is less volatile compared to 2791.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2735.T.Check 2791.T's competition here
2735.T vs 7508.T Comparison March 2026
2735.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2735.T stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 7508.T has a market cap of 60.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2735.T is priced at ¥634.00, while 7508.T trades at ¥1,374.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.61, whereas 7508.T's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, 2735.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7508.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2735.T is less volatile compared to 7508.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2735.T.Check 7508.T's competition here
2735.T vs 8182.T Comparison March 2026
2735.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2735.T stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 8182.T has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2735.T is priced at ¥634.00, while 8182.T trades at ¥1,215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.61, whereas 8182.T's P/E ratio is 25.91. In terms of profitability, 2735.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8182.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2735.T is more volatile compared to 8182.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2735.T.Check 8182.T's competition here
2735.T vs 8167.T Comparison March 2026
2735.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2735.T stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 8167.T has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2735.T is priced at ¥634.00, while 8167.T trades at ¥1,242.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.61, whereas 8167.T's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, 2735.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8167.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2735.T is less volatile compared to 8167.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2735.T.Check 8167.T's competition here
2735.T vs 3539.T Comparison March 2026
2735.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2735.T stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 3539.T has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2735.T is priced at ¥634.00, while 3539.T trades at ¥1,583.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.61, whereas 3539.T's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, 2735.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3539.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 2735.T is less volatile compared to 3539.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2735.T.Check 3539.T's competition here
2735.T vs 7596.T Comparison March 2026
2735.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2735.T stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 7596.T has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, 2735.T is priced at ¥634.00, while 7596.T trades at ¥2,292.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.61, whereas 7596.T's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, 2735.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7596.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2735.T is less volatile compared to 7596.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2735.T.Check 7596.T's competition here
2735.T vs 7643.T Comparison March 2026
2735.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2735.T stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 7643.T has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2735.T is priced at ¥634.00, while 7643.T trades at ¥1,709.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.61, whereas 7643.T's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, 2735.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7643.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2735.T is less volatile compared to 7643.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2735.T.Check 7643.T's competition here
2735.T vs 3096.T Comparison March 2026
2735.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2735.T stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 3096.T has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2735.T is priced at ¥634.00, while 3096.T trades at ¥1,740.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.61, whereas 3096.T's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, 2735.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3096.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2735.T is more volatile compared to 3096.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2735.T.Check 3096.T's competition here
2735.T vs 9993.T Comparison March 2026
2735.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2735.T stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 9993.T has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2735.T is priced at ¥634.00, while 9993.T trades at ¥1,158.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.61, whereas 9993.T's P/E ratio is -15.47. In terms of profitability, 2735.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9993.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2735.T is more volatile compared to 9993.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2735.T.Check 9993.T's competition here
2735.T vs 9890.T Comparison March 2026
2735.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2735.T stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 9890.T has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2735.T is priced at ¥634.00, while 9890.T trades at ¥1,236.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.61, whereas 9890.T's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, 2735.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9890.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2735.T is less volatile compared to 9890.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2735.T.Check 9890.T's competition here
2735.T vs 9846.T Comparison March 2026
2735.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2735.T stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 9846.T has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2735.T is priced at ¥634.00, while 9846.T trades at ¥965.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.61, whereas 9846.T's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, 2735.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9846.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2735.T is more volatile compared to 9846.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2735.T.Check 9846.T's competition here
2735.T vs 3094.T Comparison March 2026
2735.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2735.T stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 3094.T has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 2735.T is priced at ¥634.00, while 3094.T trades at ¥792.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.61, whereas 3094.T's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, 2735.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3094.T's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, 2735.T is more volatile compared to 3094.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2735.T.Check 3094.T's competition here
2735.T vs 4380.T Comparison March 2026
2735.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2735.T stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 4380.T has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2735.T is priced at ¥634.00, while 4380.T trades at ¥1,244.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.61, whereas 4380.T's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, 2735.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 4380.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 2735.T is less volatile compared to 4380.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2735.T.Check 4380.T's competition here
2735.T vs 9259.T Comparison March 2026
2735.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2735.T stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 9259.T has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2735.T is priced at ¥634.00, while 9259.T trades at ¥989.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.61, whereas 9259.T's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, 2735.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9259.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2735.T is less volatile compared to 9259.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2735.T.Check 9259.T's competition here
2735.T vs 7544.T Comparison March 2026
2735.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2735.T stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 7544.T has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2735.T is priced at ¥634.00, while 7544.T trades at ¥581.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.61, whereas 7544.T's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, 2735.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7544.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2735.T is less volatile compared to 7544.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2735.T.Check 7544.T's competition here
2735.T vs 7515.T Comparison March 2026
2735.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2735.T stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 7515.T has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2735.T is priced at ¥634.00, while 7515.T trades at ¥4,570.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.61, whereas 7515.T's P/E ratio is 62.50. In terms of profitability, 2735.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7515.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2735.T is more volatile compared to 7515.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2735.T.Check 7515.T's competition here
2735.T vs 2747.T Comparison March 2026
2735.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2735.T stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 2747.T has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2735.T is priced at ¥634.00, while 2747.T trades at ¥3,015.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.61, whereas 2747.T's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, 2735.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2747.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2735.T is more volatile compared to 2747.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2735.T.Check 2747.T's competition here
2735.T vs 2687.T Comparison March 2026
2735.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2735.T stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 2687.T has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2735.T is priced at ¥634.00, while 2687.T trades at ¥491.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.61, whereas 2687.T's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, 2735.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2687.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2735.T is less volatile compared to 2687.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2735.T.Check 2687.T's competition here
2735.T vs 5616.T Comparison March 2026
2735.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2735.T stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 5616.T has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2735.T is priced at ¥634.00, while 5616.T trades at ¥777.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2735.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.61, whereas 5616.T's P/E ratio is -39.26. In terms of profitability, 2735.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 5616.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2735.T is less volatile compared to 5616.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2735.T.Check 5616.T's competition here