SAN-A CO.,Ltd.
SAN-A CO.,Ltd. (2659.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (2659.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Department Stores Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2659.T | ¥3,005.00 | -0.17% | 188B | 16.18 | ¥187.85 | +2.63% |
| 8267.T | ¥5,179.00 | +7.16% | 4.5T | 150.75 | ¥33.83 | +0.71% |
| 7453.T | ¥7,430.00 | +3.63% | 2T | 37.90 | ¥195.02 | +0.57% |
| 9005.T | ¥1,730.50 | +1.44% | 996B | 12.86 | ¥134.77 | +1.38% |
| 3099.T | ¥2,270.00 | +5.31% | 807.4B | 15.53 | ¥142.26 | +2.44% |
| 3086.T | ¥2,109.50 | +3.03% | 521B | 13.09 | ¥158.27 | +2.12% |
| 8233.T | ¥1,202.50 | +3.09% | 361.5B | 12.93 | ¥92.15 | +2.77% |
| 8242.T | ¥1,998.00 | +0.08% | 248.7B | 7.04 | ¥289.09 | +1.97% |
| 8273.T | ¥3,249.00 | +1.79% | 231.4B | 19.45 | ¥168.54 | +2.75% |
| 3222.T | ¥960.00 | +1.91% | 187.5B | 71.20 | ¥13.47 | +1.67% |
Stock Comparison
2659.T vs 8267.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 8267.T has a market cap of 4.5T. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 8267.T trades at ¥5,179.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 8267.T's P/E ratio is 150.75. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 8267.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is less volatile compared to 8267.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 8267.T's competition here
2659.T vs 7453.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 7453.T has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 7453.T trades at ¥7,430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 7453.T's P/E ratio is 37.90. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 7453.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is less volatile compared to 7453.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 7453.T's competition here
2659.T vs 9005.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 9005.T has a market cap of 996B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 9005.T trades at ¥1,730.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 9005.T's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 9005.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is less volatile compared to 9005.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 9005.T's competition here
2659.T vs 3099.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 3099.T has a market cap of 807.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 3099.T trades at ¥2,270.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 3099.T's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3099.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is less volatile compared to 3099.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 3099.T's competition here
2659.T vs 3086.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 3086.T has a market cap of 521B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 3086.T trades at ¥2,109.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 3086.T's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3086.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is less volatile compared to 3086.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 3086.T's competition here
2659.T vs 8233.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 8233.T has a market cap of 361.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 8233.T trades at ¥1,202.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 8233.T's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 8233.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is less volatile compared to 8233.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 8233.T's competition here
2659.T vs 8242.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 8242.T has a market cap of 248.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 8242.T trades at ¥1,998.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 8242.T's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 8242.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is less volatile compared to 8242.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 8242.T's competition here
2659.T vs 8273.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 8273.T has a market cap of 231.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 8273.T trades at ¥3,249.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 8273.T's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 8273.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is less volatile compared to 8273.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 8273.T's competition here
2659.T vs 3222.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 3222.T has a market cap of 187.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 3222.T trades at ¥960.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 3222.T's P/E ratio is 71.20. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3222.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is less volatile compared to 3222.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 3222.T's competition here
2659.T vs 8278.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 8278.T has a market cap of 178.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 8278.T trades at ¥2,055.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 8278.T's P/E ratio is 36.70. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 8278.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is more volatile compared to 8278.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 8278.T's competition here
2659.T vs 9948.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 9948.T has a market cap of 166.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 9948.T trades at ¥3,085.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 9948.T's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 9948.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is less volatile compared to 9948.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 9948.T's competition here
2659.T vs 8276.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 8276.T has a market cap of 148.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 8276.T trades at ¥2,973.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 8276.T's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 8276.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is less volatile compared to 8276.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 8276.T's competition here
2659.T vs 9956.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 9956.T has a market cap of 144.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 9956.T trades at ¥2,756.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 9956.T's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 9956.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is less volatile compared to 9956.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 9956.T's competition here
2659.T vs 7512.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 7512.T has a market cap of 127.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 7512.T trades at ¥919.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 7512.T's P/E ratio is 39.15. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 7512.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is less volatile compared to 7512.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 7512.T's competition here
2659.T vs 2733.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 2733.T has a market cap of 108.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 2733.T trades at ¥3,255.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 2733.T's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 2733.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is less volatile compared to 2733.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 2733.T's competition here
2659.T vs 8255.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 8255.T has a market cap of 103.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 8255.T trades at ¥1,159.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 8255.T's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 8255.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is less volatile compared to 8255.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 8255.T's competition here
2659.T vs 2653.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 2653.T has a market cap of 103.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 2653.T trades at ¥3,050.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 2653.T's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 2653.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is less volatile compared to 2653.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 2653.T's competition here
2659.T vs 3612.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 3612.T has a market cap of 96.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 3612.T trades at ¥2,804.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 3612.T's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3612.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is less volatile compared to 3612.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 3612.T's competition here
2659.T vs 8244.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 8244.T has a market cap of 73.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 8244.T trades at ¥1,852.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 8244.T's P/E ratio is 35.48. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 8244.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is less volatile compared to 8244.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 8244.T's competition here
2659.T vs 8173.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 8173.T has a market cap of 64.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 8173.T trades at ¥2,517.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 8173.T's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 8173.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is less volatile compared to 8173.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 8173.T's competition here
2659.T vs 8237.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 8237.T has a market cap of 61.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 8237.T trades at ¥1,170.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 8237.T's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 8237.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is less volatile compared to 8237.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 8237.T's competition here
2659.T vs 2698.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 2698.T has a market cap of 59.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 2698.T trades at ¥3,735.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 2698.T's P/E ratio is 481.31. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 2698.T's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is less volatile compared to 2698.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 2698.T's competition here
2659.T vs 9946.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 9946.T has a market cap of 59.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 9946.T trades at ¥2,060.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 9946.T's P/E ratio is -8.74. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 9946.T's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is less volatile compared to 9946.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 9946.T's competition here
2659.T vs 8217.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 8217.T has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 8217.T trades at ¥956.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 8217.T's P/E ratio is -17.42. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 8217.T's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is less volatile compared to 8217.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 8217.T's competition here
2659.T vs 7444.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 7444.T has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 7444.T trades at ¥1,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 7444.T's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 7444.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is less volatile compared to 7444.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 7444.T's competition here
2659.T vs 7506.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 7506.T has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 7506.T trades at ¥1,367.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 7506.T's P/E ratio is 80.74. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 7506.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is more volatile compared to 7506.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 7506.T's competition here
2659.T vs 8260.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 8260.T has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 8260.T trades at ¥428.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 8260.T's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 8260.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is more volatile compared to 8260.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 8260.T's competition here
2659.T vs 3169.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 3169.T has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 3169.T trades at ¥639.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 3169.T's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3169.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is more volatile compared to 3169.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 3169.T's competition here
2659.T vs 3583.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 3583.T has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 3583.T trades at ¥1,338.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 3583.T's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3583.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is less volatile compared to 3583.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 3583.T's competition here
2659.T vs 8254.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 8254.T has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 8254.T trades at ¥461.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 8254.T's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 8254.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is less volatile compared to 8254.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 8254.T's competition here
2659.T vs 8247.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 8247.T has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 8247.T trades at ¥404.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 8247.T's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 8247.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is less volatile compared to 8247.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 8247.T's competition here
2659.T vs 4558.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 4558.T has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 4558.T trades at ¥202.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 4558.T's P/E ratio is 48.11. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 4558.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is more volatile compared to 4558.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 4558.T's competition here
2659.T vs 7601.T Comparison August 2025
2659.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2659.T stands at 188B. In comparison, 7601.T has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2659.T is priced at ¥3,005.00, while 7601.T trades at ¥182.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2659.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas 7601.T's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, 2659.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 7601.T's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 2659.T is more volatile compared to 7601.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2659.T.Check 7601.T's competition here