DIP Corporation
DIP Corporation 2379.T Peers
See (2379.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Staffing & Employment Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2379.T | ¥2,262.00 | +1.57% | 119.2B | 13.53 | ¥168.36 | +4.17% |
| 6098.T | ¥8,100.00 | +2.25% | 11.7T | 29.71 | ¥268.13 | +0.30% |
| 2181.T | ¥278.10 | -1.80% | 624.5B | 17.55 | ¥16.04 | +3.37% |
| 6028.T | ¥4,177.00 | -0.74% | 434.6B | 25.03 | ¥166.64 | +2.04% |
| 9744.T | ¥3,148.00 | -1.04% | 244.2B | 19.15 | ¥165.14 | +0.95% |
| 2427.T | ¥1,749.00 | -0.06% | 220.4B | 0.00 | ¥736,089,920.00 | N/A |
| 2124.T | ¥1,000.00 | +0.40% | 157.9B | 24.48 | ¥40.64 | +2.61% |
| 2154.T | ¥1,714.00 | +0.06% | 148.3B | 13.51 | ¥126.25 | +4.40% |
| 2146.T | ¥2,437.00 | +0.87% | 95.9B | 11.39 | ¥213.36 | +4.62% |
| 9164.T | ¥878.00 | -0.11% | 87.8B | 31.69 | ¥27.71 | +2.39% |
Stock Comparison
2379.T vs 6098.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 6098.T has a market cap of 11.7T. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 6098.T trades at ¥8,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 6098.T's P/E ratio is 29.71. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 6098.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 6098.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 2181.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 2181.T has a market cap of 624.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 2181.T trades at ¥278.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 2181.T's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 2181.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is less volatile compared to 2181.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 6028.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 6028.T has a market cap of 434.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 6028.T trades at ¥4,177.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 6028.T's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 6028.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 6028.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 9744.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 9744.T has a market cap of 244.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 9744.T trades at ¥3,148.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 9744.T's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 9744.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 9744.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 2427.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 2427.T has a market cap of 220.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 2427.T trades at ¥1,749.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 2427.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 2427.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 2427.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 2124.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 2124.T has a market cap of 157.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 2124.T trades at ¥1,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 2124.T's P/E ratio is 24.48. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 2124.T's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is less volatile compared to 2124.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 2154.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 2154.T has a market cap of 148.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 2154.T trades at ¥1,714.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 2154.T's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 2154.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 2154.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 2146.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 2146.T has a market cap of 95.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 2146.T trades at ¥2,437.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 2146.T's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 2146.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 2146.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 9164.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 9164.T has a market cap of 87.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 9164.T trades at ¥878.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 9164.T's P/E ratio is 31.69. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 9164.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 9164.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 2168.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 2168.T has a market cap of 83.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 2168.T trades at ¥2,291.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 2168.T's P/E ratio is 0.97. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 2168.T's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is less volatile compared to 2168.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 4849.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 4849.T has a market cap of 66.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 4849.T trades at ¥1,619.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 4849.T's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 4849.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 4849.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 7088.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 7088.T has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 7088.T trades at ¥1,202.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 7088.T's P/E ratio is 24.20. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 7088.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 7088.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 4848.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 4848.T has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 4848.T trades at ¥1,698.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 4848.T's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 4848.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 4848.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 4641.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 4641.T has a market cap of 53.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 4641.T trades at ¥2,751.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 4641.T's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 4641.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 4641.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 4318.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 4318.T has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 4318.T trades at ¥2,345.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 4318.T's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 4318.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 4318.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 7059.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 7059.T has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 7059.T trades at ¥2,180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 7059.T's P/E ratio is 25.49. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 7059.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is less volatile compared to 7059.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 4377.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 4377.T has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 4377.T trades at ¥2,244.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 4377.T's P/E ratio is 136.11. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 4377.T's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 4377.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 2429.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 2429.T has a market cap of 39.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 2429.T trades at ¥2,275.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 2429.T's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 2429.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is less volatile compared to 2429.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 2475.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 2475.T has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 2475.T trades at ¥1,742.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 2475.T's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 2475.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 2475.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 6569.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 6569.T has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 6569.T trades at ¥775.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 6569.T's P/E ratio is 15.01. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 6569.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is less volatile compared to 6569.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 2471.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 2471.T has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 2471.T trades at ¥334.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 2471.T's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 2471.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is less volatile compared to 2471.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 6070.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 6070.T has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 6070.T trades at ¥2,168.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 6070.T's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 6070.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 6070.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 2301.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 2301.T has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 2301.T trades at ¥1,771.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 2301.T's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 2301.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 2301.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 6539.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 6539.T has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 6539.T trades at ¥928.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 6539.T's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 6539.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 6539.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 6089.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 6089.T has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 6089.T trades at ¥916.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 6089.T's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 6089.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 6089.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 9332.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 9332.T has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 9332.T trades at ¥641.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 9332.T's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 9332.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 9332.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 2163.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 2163.T has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 2163.T trades at ¥1,930.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 2163.T's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 2163.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 2163.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 4433.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 4433.T has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 4433.T trades at ¥969.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 4433.T's P/E ratio is -789.34. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 4433.T's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 4433.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 3900.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 3900.T has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 3900.T trades at ¥1,033.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 3900.T's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 3900.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 3900.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 6194.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 6194.T has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 6194.T trades at ¥670.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 6194.T's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 6194.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 6194.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 3991.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 3991.T has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 3991.T trades at ¥1,326.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 3991.T's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 3991.T's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is less volatile compared to 3991.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 2410.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 2410.T has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 2410.T trades at ¥1,885.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 2410.T's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 2410.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 2410.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 7374.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 7374.T has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 7374.T trades at ¥1,584.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 7374.T's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 7374.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 7374.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 7781.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 7781.T has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 7781.T trades at ¥1,080.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 7781.T's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 7781.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 7781.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 151A.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 151A.T has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 151A.T trades at ¥954.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 151A.T's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 151A.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is less volatile compared to 151A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 7367.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 7367.T has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 7367.T trades at ¥354.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 7367.T's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 7367.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 7367.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 9346.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 9346.T has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 9346.T trades at ¥1,540.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 9346.T's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 9346.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 9346.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 6551.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 6551.T has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 6551.T trades at ¥632.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 6551.T's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 6551.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is less volatile compared to 6551.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 7080.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 7080.T has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 7080.T trades at ¥716.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 7080.T's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 7080.T's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 7080.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 7089.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 7089.T has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 7089.T trades at ¥1,479.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 7089.T's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 7089.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is less volatile compared to 7089.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 4177.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 4177.T has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 4177.T trades at ¥1,215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 4177.T's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 4177.T's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 4177.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 2136.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 2136.T has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 2136.T trades at ¥1,182.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 2136.T's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 2136.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 2136.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 6538.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 6538.T has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 6538.T trades at ¥227.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 6538.T's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 6538.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is less volatile compared to 6538.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 9344.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 9344.T has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 9344.T trades at ¥762.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 9344.T's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 9344.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 9344.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 7361.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 7361.T has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 7361.T trades at ¥1,149.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 7361.T's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 7361.T's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 7361.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 6563.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 6563.T has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 6563.T trades at ¥600.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 6563.T's P/E ratio is 35.39. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 6563.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 6563.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 4766.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 4766.T has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 4766.T trades at ¥286.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 4766.T's P/E ratio is 40.64. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 4766.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is less volatile compared to 4766.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 7064.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 7064.T has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 7064.T trades at ¥2,246.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 7064.T's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 7064.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 7064.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 6198.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 6198.T has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 6198.T trades at ¥317.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 6198.T's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 6198.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 6198.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 7043.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 7043.T has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 7043.T trades at ¥772.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 7043.T's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 7043.T's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 7043.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 6558.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 6558.T has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 6558.T trades at ¥645.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 6558.T's P/E ratio is 676.04. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 6558.T's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 6558.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 9331.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 9331.T has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 9331.T trades at ¥904.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 9331.T's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 9331.T's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 9331.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 142A.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 142A.T has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 142A.T trades at ¥572.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 142A.T's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 142A.T's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is less volatile compared to 142A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 9253.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 9253.T has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 9253.T trades at ¥678.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 9253.T's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 9253.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 9253.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 7041.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 7041.T has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 7041.T trades at ¥331.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 7041.T's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 7041.T's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is less volatile compared to 7041.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 9242.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 9242.T has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 9242.T trades at ¥1,351.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 9242.T's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 9242.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 9242.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 4265.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 4265.T has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 4265.T trades at ¥321.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 4265.T's P/E ratio is -53.70. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 4265.T's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 4265.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 9610.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 9610.T has a market cap of 741.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 9610.T trades at ¥122.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 9610.T's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 9610.T's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is less volatile compared to 9610.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.
2379.T vs 2412.T Comparison
2379.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2379.T stands at 119.2B. In comparison, 2412.T has a market cap of 15.2K. Regarding current trading prices, 2379.T is priced at ¥2,262.00, while 2412.T trades at ¥2,168.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2379.T currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas 2412.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 2379.T's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 2412.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2379.T is more volatile compared to 2412.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2379.T.