Renaissance,Incorporated

2378.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 2378.T stands at 22.3B. In comparison, 6417.T has a market cap of 622.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2378.T is priced at ¥1,201.00, while 6417.T trades at ¥2,892.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

2378.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.45, whereas 6417.T's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, 2378.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6417.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 2378.T is less volatile compared to 6417.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2378.T.Check 6417.T's competition here

2378.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 2378.T stands at 22.3B. In comparison, 4681.T has a market cap of 405.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2378.T is priced at ¥1,201.00, while 4681.T trades at ¥1,945.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

2378.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.45, whereas 4681.T's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, 2378.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 4681.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 2378.T is less volatile compared to 4681.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2378.T.Check 4681.T's competition here

2378.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 2378.T stands at 22.3B. In comparison, 2767.T has a market cap of 147.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2378.T is priced at ¥1,201.00, while 2767.T trades at ¥2,427.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

2378.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.45, whereas 2767.T's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, 2378.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2767.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 2378.T is less volatile compared to 2767.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2378.T.Check 2767.T's competition here

2378.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 2378.T stands at 22.3B. In comparison, 9672.T has a market cap of 134B. Regarding current trading prices, 2378.T is priced at ¥1,201.00, while 9672.T trades at ¥5,050.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

2378.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.45, whereas 9672.T's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, 2378.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9672.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2378.T is more volatile compared to 9672.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2378.T.Check 9672.T's competition here

2378.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 2378.T stands at 22.3B. In comparison, 6419.T has a market cap of 55.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2378.T is priced at ¥1,201.00, while 6419.T trades at ¥3,055.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

2378.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.45, whereas 6419.T's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, 2378.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6419.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2378.T is more volatile compared to 6419.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2378.T.Check 6419.T's competition here

2378.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 2378.T stands at 22.3B. In comparison, 5261.T has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2378.T is priced at ¥1,201.00, while 5261.T trades at ¥5,200.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

2378.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.45, whereas 5261.T's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, 2378.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 5261.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2378.T is more volatile compared to 5261.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2378.T.Check 5261.T's competition here

2378.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 2378.T stands at 22.3B. In comparison, 6040.T has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2378.T is priced at ¥1,201.00, while 6040.T trades at ¥540.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

2378.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.45, whereas 6040.T's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, 2378.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6040.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 2378.T is less volatile compared to 6040.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2378.T.Check 6040.T's competition here

2378.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 2378.T stands at 22.3B. In comparison, 6257.T has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2378.T is priced at ¥1,201.00, while 6257.T trades at ¥1,065.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

2378.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.45, whereas 6257.T's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, 2378.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6257.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2378.T is more volatile compared to 6257.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2378.T.Check 6257.T's competition here

2378.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 2378.T stands at 22.3B. In comparison, 9675.T has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2378.T is priced at ¥1,201.00, while 9675.T trades at ¥1,643.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

2378.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.45, whereas 9675.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 2378.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9675.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2378.T is more volatile compared to 9675.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2378.T.Check 9675.T's competition here

2378.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 2378.T stands at 22.3B. In comparison, 9656.T has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2378.T is priced at ¥1,201.00, while 9656.T trades at ¥619.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

2378.T currently has a P/E ratio of 34.45, whereas 9656.T's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, 2378.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9656.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2378.T is more volatile compared to 9656.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2378.T.Check 9656.T's competition here