SMI Culture & Travel Group Holdings Limited
SMI Culture & Travel Group Holdings Limited 2366.HK Peers
See (2366.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2366.HK | HK$0.06 | -1.67% | 0 | -0.36 | -HK$0.16 | N/A |
| 0136.HK | HK$2.25 | +2.74% | 34.9B | -112.50 | -HK$0.02 | N/A |
| 1060.HK | HK$0.96 | N/A | 28.7B | 96.00 | HK$0.01 | N/A |
| 0326.HK | HK$1.63 | +14.79% | 4B | -11.64 | -HK$0.14 | N/A |
| 2306.HK | HK$3.90 | +16.42% | 3.2B | 55.71 | HK$0.07 | N/A |
| 0547.HK | HK$0.39 | N/A | 3.1B | -9.62 | -HK$0.04 | N/A |
| 1970.HK | HK$8.30 | -0.60% | 2.8B | 17.66 | HK$0.47 | N/A |
| 0680.HK | HK$0.04 | -5.41% | 2.4B | -1.75 | -HK$0.02 | N/A |
| 1981.HK | HK$1.42 | +1.43% | 2.3B | 23.67 | HK$0.06 | +2.31% |
| 2309.HK | HK$2.46 | -0.40% | 2.3B | -7.24 | -HK$0.34 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
2366.HK vs 0136.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 0136.HK has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 0136.HK trades at HK$2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 0136.HK's P/E ratio is -112.50. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 0136.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 0136.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 1060.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 1060.HK has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1060.HK trades at HK$0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 1060.HK's P/E ratio is 96.00. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 1060.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 1060.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 0326.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 0326.HK has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 0326.HK trades at HK$1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 0326.HK's P/E ratio is -11.64. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 0326.HK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 0326.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 2306.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 2306.HK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 2306.HK trades at HK$3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 2306.HK's P/E ratio is 55.71. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 2306.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 2306.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 0547.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 0547.HK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 0547.HK trades at HK$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 0547.HK's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 0547.HK's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 0547.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 1970.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 1970.HK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1970.HK trades at HK$8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 1970.HK's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 1970.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 1970.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 0680.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 0680.HK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 0680.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 0680.HK's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 0680.HK's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 0680.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 1981.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 1981.HK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1981.HK trades at HK$1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 1981.HK's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 1981.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 1981.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 2309.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 2309.HK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 2309.HK trades at HK$2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 2309.HK's P/E ratio is -7.24. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 2309.HK's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 2309.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 3636.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 3636.HK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 3636.HK trades at HK$8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 3636.HK's P/E ratio is -10.15. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 3636.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 3636.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 1003.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 1003.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1003.HK trades at HK$0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 1003.HK's P/E ratio is -6.14. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 1003.HK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 1003.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 6698.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 6698.HK has a market cap of 829M. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 6698.HK trades at HK$2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 6698.HK's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 6698.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 6698.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 8075.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 8075.HK has a market cap of 740.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 8075.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 8075.HK's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 8075.HK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 8075.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 2230.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 2230.HK has a market cap of 625M. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 2230.HK trades at HK$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 2230.HK's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 2230.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 2230.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 0391.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 0391.HK has a market cap of 580.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 0391.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 0391.HK's P/E ratio is -9.80. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 0391.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 0391.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 8368.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 8368.HK has a market cap of 496.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 8368.HK trades at HK$0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 8368.HK's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 8368.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 8368.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 2125.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 2125.HK has a market cap of 414.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 2125.HK trades at HK$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 2125.HK's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 2125.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 2125.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 1159.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 1159.HK has a market cap of 412.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1159.HK trades at HK$3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 1159.HK's P/E ratio is -12.03. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 1159.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 1159.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 1046.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 1046.HK has a market cap of 349.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1046.HK trades at HK$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 1046.HK's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 1046.HK's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 1046.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 8220.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 8220.HK has a market cap of 340.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 8220.HK trades at HK$3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 8220.HK's P/E ratio is -18.44. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 8220.HK's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 8220.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 1097.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 1097.HK has a market cap of 271.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1097.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 1097.HK's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 1097.HK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 1097.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 8082.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 8082.HK has a market cap of 176.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 8082.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 8082.HK's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 8082.HK's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 8082.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 0953.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 0953.HK has a market cap of 170.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 0953.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 0953.HK's P/E ratio is -54.74. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 0953.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 0953.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 8175.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 8175.HK has a market cap of 157.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 8175.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 8175.HK's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 8175.HK's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 8175.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 0491.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 0491.HK has a market cap of 141.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 0491.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 0491.HK's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 0491.HK's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 0491.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 1859.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 1859.HK has a market cap of 128M. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1859.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 1859.HK's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 1859.HK's ROE of -16.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 1859.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 8172.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 8172.HK has a market cap of 126.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 8172.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 8172.HK's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 8172.HK's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK and 8172.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
2366.HK vs 1132.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 1132.HK has a market cap of 123.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1132.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 1132.HK's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 1132.HK's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 1132.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 1661.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 1661.HK has a market cap of 119.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1661.HK trades at HK$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 1661.HK's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 1661.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 1661.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 8087.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 8087.HK has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 8087.HK trades at HK$0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 8087.HK's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 8087.HK's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 8087.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 1326.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 1326.HK has a market cap of 101.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1326.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 1326.HK's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 1326.HK's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 1326.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 8446.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 8446.HK has a market cap of 97.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 8446.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 8446.HK's P/E ratio is 2.14. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 8446.HK's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 8446.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 0571.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 0571.HK has a market cap of 96.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 0571.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 0571.HK's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 0571.HK's ROE of -4.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK and 0571.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
2366.HK vs 1740.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 1740.HK has a market cap of 75.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1740.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 1740.HK's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 1740.HK's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 1740.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 1616.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 1616.HK has a market cap of 73.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1616.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 1616.HK's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 1616.HK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 1616.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 1566.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 1566.HK has a market cap of 60.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1566.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 1566.HK's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 1566.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 1566.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 8280.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 8280.HK has a market cap of 38.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 8280.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 8280.HK's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 8280.HK's ROE of +8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 8280.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 9958.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 9958.HK has a market cap of 35.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 9958.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 9958.HK's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 9958.HK's ROE of -7.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 9958.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 8078.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 8078.HK has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 8078.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 8078.HK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 8078.HK's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK is less volatile compared to 8078.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2366.HK.
2366.HK vs 2975.HK Comparison
2366.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2366.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 2975.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2366.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 2975.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2366.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas 2975.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2366.HK's ROE is -1.38%, compared to 2975.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 2366.HK and 2975.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).