Nitto Fuji Flour Milling Co.,Ltd.
Nitto Fuji Flour Milling Co.,Ltd. 2003.T Peers
See (2003.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Farm Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003.T | ¥7,140.00 | +0.28% | 65.8B | 16.45 | ¥439.53 | +3.87% |
| 1333.T | ¥3,048.00 | +0.00% | 153.5B | 6.60 | ¥461.77 | +3.61% |
| 1377.T | ¥3,460.00 | -1.28% | 149.2B | 8.13 | ¥424.15 | +149.04% |
| 2004.T | ¥2,961.00 | -0.70% | 95.5B | 8.26 | ¥355.96 | +3.40% |
| 2292.T | ¥2,646.00 | +1.07% | 83.2B | 31.17 | ¥84.30 | +3.39% |
| 2938.T | ¥1,214.00 | -1.14% | 59.7B | 28.26 | ¥42.96 | +1.83% |
| 1379.T | ¥1,798.00 | +0.00% | 55.8B | 14.65 | ¥121.93 | +2.80% |
| 2874.T | ¥866.00 | +0.93% | 50.6B | 11.23 | ¥76.38 | +2.80% |
| 9955.T | ¥2,282.00 | -0.17% | 28B | 19.81 | ¥115.59 | +0.74% |
| 8041.T | ¥3,540.00 | +2.02% | 18.8B | 4.20 | ¥827.93 | +2.76% |
Stock Comparison
2003.T vs 1333.T Comparison
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.8B. In comparison, 1333.T has a market cap of 153.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,140.00, while 1333.T trades at ¥3,048.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.45, whereas 1333.T's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1333.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is more volatile compared to 1333.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.
2003.T vs 1377.T Comparison
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.8B. In comparison, 1377.T has a market cap of 149.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,140.00, while 1377.T trades at ¥3,460.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.45, whereas 1377.T's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1377.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is more volatile compared to 1377.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.
2003.T vs 2004.T Comparison
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.8B. In comparison, 2004.T has a market cap of 95.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,140.00, while 2004.T trades at ¥2,961.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.45, whereas 2004.T's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2004.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is more volatile compared to 2004.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.
2003.T vs 2292.T Comparison
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.8B. In comparison, 2292.T has a market cap of 83.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,140.00, while 2292.T trades at ¥2,646.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.45, whereas 2292.T's P/E ratio is 31.17. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2292.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is more volatile compared to 2292.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.
2003.T vs 2938.T Comparison
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.8B. In comparison, 2938.T has a market cap of 59.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,140.00, while 2938.T trades at ¥1,214.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.45, whereas 2938.T's P/E ratio is 28.26. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2938.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is less volatile compared to 2938.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.
2003.T vs 1379.T Comparison
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.8B. In comparison, 1379.T has a market cap of 55.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,140.00, while 1379.T trades at ¥1,798.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.45, whereas 1379.T's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1379.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is more volatile compared to 1379.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.
2003.T vs 2874.T Comparison
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.8B. In comparison, 2874.T has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,140.00, while 2874.T trades at ¥866.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.45, whereas 2874.T's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2874.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is more volatile compared to 2874.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.
2003.T vs 9955.T Comparison
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.8B. In comparison, 9955.T has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,140.00, while 9955.T trades at ¥2,282.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.45, whereas 9955.T's P/E ratio is 19.81. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9955.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is more volatile compared to 9955.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.
2003.T vs 8041.T Comparison
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.8B. In comparison, 8041.T has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,140.00, while 8041.T trades at ¥3,540.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.45, whereas 8041.T's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8041.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is less volatile compared to 8041.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.
2003.T vs 2924.T Comparison
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.8B. In comparison, 2924.T has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,140.00, while 2924.T trades at ¥2,014.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.45, whereas 2924.T's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2924.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is less volatile compared to 2924.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.
2003.T vs 1381.T Comparison
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.8B. In comparison, 1381.T has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,140.00, while 1381.T trades at ¥2,911.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.45, whereas 1381.T's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1381.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is more volatile compared to 1381.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.
2003.T vs 1384.T Comparison
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.8B. In comparison, 1384.T has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,140.00, while 1384.T trades at ¥1,656.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.45, whereas 1384.T's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1384.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is less volatile compared to 1384.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.
2003.T vs 1383.T Comparison
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.8B. In comparison, 1383.T has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,140.00, while 1383.T trades at ¥2,913.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.45, whereas 1383.T's P/E ratio is -385.73. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1383.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is more volatile compared to 1383.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.
2003.T vs 1380.T Comparison
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.8B. In comparison, 1380.T has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,140.00, while 1380.T trades at ¥981.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.45, whereas 1380.T's P/E ratio is -112.07. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1380.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is more volatile compared to 1380.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.
2003.T vs 7555.T Comparison
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.8B. In comparison, 7555.T has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,140.00, while 7555.T trades at ¥742.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.45, whereas 7555.T's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7555.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is more volatile compared to 7555.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.
2003.T vs 7443.T Comparison
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.8B. In comparison, 7443.T has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,140.00, while 7443.T trades at ¥598.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.45, whereas 7443.T's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7443.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is more volatile compared to 7443.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.
2003.T vs 1382.T Comparison
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.8B. In comparison, 1382.T has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,140.00, while 1382.T trades at ¥1,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 16.45, whereas 1382.T's P/E ratio is 64.44. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1382.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is less volatile compared to 1382.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.