Nitto Fuji Flour Milling Co.,Ltd.
Nitto Fuji Flour Milling Co.,Ltd. (2003.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (2003.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Farm Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003.T | ¥7,150.00 | -2.72% | 65.1B | 18.32 | ¥390.29 | +3.92% |
| 1333.T | ¥3,187.00 | +1.50% | 160.5B | 6.90 | ¥461.99 | +3.45% |
| 1377.T | ¥3,565.00 | +4.85% | 150.6B | 16.01 | ¥222.70 | +1.82% |
| 2004.T | ¥3,090.00 | +1.81% | 100.3B | 8.68 | ¥356.01 | +3.24% |
| 2292.T | ¥2,705.00 | +1.42% | 85.6B | 21.00 | ¥128.82 | +3.29% |
| 2874.T | ¥1,083.00 | +2.75% | 63.9B | 14.17 | ¥76.41 | +2.22% |
| 2938.T | ¥1,197.00 | +2.75% | 58.9B | 27.84 | ¥42.99 | +2.38% |
| 1379.T | ¥1,873.00 | +1.46% | 58.5B | 15.35 | ¥122.02 | +2.67% |
| 9955.T | ¥2,409.00 | -0.37% | 29.5B | 20.84 | ¥115.58 | +0.71% |
| 8041.T | ¥3,845.00 | -3.63% | 20.8B | 4.58 | ¥839.39 | +2.50% |
Stock Comparison
2003.T vs 1333.T Comparison August 2025
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.1B. In comparison, 1333.T has a market cap of 160.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,150.00, while 1333.T trades at ¥3,187.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas 1333.T's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1333.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is more volatile compared to 1333.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.Check 1333.T's competition here
2003.T vs 1377.T Comparison August 2025
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.1B. In comparison, 1377.T has a market cap of 150.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,150.00, while 1377.T trades at ¥3,565.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas 1377.T's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1377.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is less volatile compared to 1377.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.Check 1377.T's competition here
2003.T vs 2004.T Comparison August 2025
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.1B. In comparison, 2004.T has a market cap of 100.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,150.00, while 2004.T trades at ¥3,090.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas 2004.T's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2004.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is more volatile compared to 2004.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.Check 2004.T's competition here
2003.T vs 2292.T Comparison August 2025
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.1B. In comparison, 2292.T has a market cap of 85.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,150.00, while 2292.T trades at ¥2,705.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas 2292.T's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2292.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is more volatile compared to 2292.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.Check 2292.T's competition here
2003.T vs 2874.T Comparison August 2025
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.1B. In comparison, 2874.T has a market cap of 63.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,150.00, while 2874.T trades at ¥1,083.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas 2874.T's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2874.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is less volatile compared to 2874.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.Check 2874.T's competition here
2003.T vs 2938.T Comparison August 2025
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.1B. In comparison, 2938.T has a market cap of 58.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,150.00, while 2938.T trades at ¥1,197.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas 2938.T's P/E ratio is 27.84. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2938.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is more volatile compared to 2938.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.Check 2938.T's competition here
2003.T vs 1379.T Comparison August 2025
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.1B. In comparison, 1379.T has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,150.00, while 1379.T trades at ¥1,873.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas 1379.T's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1379.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is more volatile compared to 1379.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.Check 1379.T's competition here
2003.T vs 9955.T Comparison August 2025
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.1B. In comparison, 9955.T has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,150.00, while 9955.T trades at ¥2,409.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas 9955.T's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9955.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is less volatile compared to 9955.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.Check 9955.T's competition here
2003.T vs 8041.T Comparison August 2025
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.1B. In comparison, 8041.T has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,150.00, while 8041.T trades at ¥3,845.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas 8041.T's P/E ratio is 4.58. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8041.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is more volatile compared to 8041.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.Check 8041.T's competition here
2003.T vs 2924.T Comparison August 2025
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.1B. In comparison, 2924.T has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,150.00, while 2924.T trades at ¥2,277.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas 2924.T's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2924.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is more volatile compared to 2924.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.Check 2924.T's competition here
2003.T vs 1381.T Comparison August 2025
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.1B. In comparison, 1381.T has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,150.00, while 1381.T trades at ¥3,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas 1381.T's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1381.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is more volatile compared to 1381.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.Check 1381.T's competition here
2003.T vs 1384.T Comparison August 2025
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.1B. In comparison, 1384.T has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,150.00, while 1384.T trades at ¥1,643.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas 1384.T's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1384.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is more volatile compared to 1384.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.Check 1384.T's competition here
2003.T vs 1383.T Comparison August 2025
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.1B. In comparison, 1383.T has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,150.00, while 1383.T trades at ¥2,995.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas 1383.T's P/E ratio is -403.10. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1383.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is more volatile compared to 1383.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.Check 1383.T's competition here
2003.T vs 1380.T Comparison August 2025
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.1B. In comparison, 1380.T has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,150.00, while 1380.T trades at ¥1,023.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas 1380.T's P/E ratio is 150.22. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1380.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is more volatile compared to 1380.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.Check 1380.T's competition here
2003.T vs 7555.T Comparison August 2025
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.1B. In comparison, 7555.T has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,150.00, while 7555.T trades at ¥749.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas 7555.T's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7555.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is more volatile compared to 7555.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.Check 7555.T's competition here
2003.T vs 7443.T Comparison August 2025
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.1B. In comparison, 7443.T has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,150.00, while 7443.T trades at ¥601.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas 7443.T's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7443.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is more volatile compared to 7443.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.Check 7443.T's competition here
2003.T vs 1382.T Comparison August 2025
2003.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.T stands at 65.1B. In comparison, 1382.T has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.T is priced at ¥7,150.00, while 1382.T trades at ¥1,765.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas 1382.T's P/E ratio is 57.79. In terms of profitability, 2003.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1382.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.T is more volatile compared to 1382.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.T.Check 1382.T's competition here