VCREDIT Holdings Limited
VCREDIT Holdings Limited 2003.HK Peers
See (2003.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003.HK | $4.32 | +3.85% | 2.11B | 4.08 | $1.06 | +2.31% |
| 3360.HK | $6.32 | +0.64% | 26.64B | 6.95 | $0.91 | +15.27% |
| 1606.HK | $1.23 | N/A | 15.42B | 3.15 | $0.39 | +8.77% |
| 2858.HK | $2.07 | -1.43% | 13.90B | 15.92 | $0.13 | +3.13% |
| 6069.HK | $12.14 | -1.62% | 12.07B | 28.90 | $0.42 | +7.74% |
| 2666.HK | $5.42 | +0.93% | 10.25B | 4.88 | $1.11 | +5.94% |
| 2473.HK | $6.55 | +1.39% | 10.13B | 218.33 | $0.03 | N/A |
| 0086.HK | $3.07 | N/A | 6.03B | 16.16 | $0.19 | +8.47% |
| 1905.HK | $0.71 | +1.43% | 5.76B | 3.94 | $0.18 | +17.13% |
| 0373.HK | $1.53 | +1.32% | 5.38B | -6.95 | -$0.22 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
2003.HK vs 3360.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 3360.HK has a market cap of 26.64B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 3360.HK trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 3360.HK's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3360.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 3360.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 1606.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 1606.HK has a market cap of 15.42B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 1606.HK trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 1606.HK's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1606.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 1606.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 2858.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 2858.HK has a market cap of 13.90B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 2858.HK trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 2858.HK's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2858.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 2858.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 6069.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 6069.HK has a market cap of 12.07B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 6069.HK trades at $12.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 6069.HK's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6069.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 6069.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 2666.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 2666.HK has a market cap of 10.25B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 2666.HK trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 2666.HK's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2666.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 2666.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 2473.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 2473.HK has a market cap of 10.13B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 2473.HK trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 2473.HK's P/E ratio is 218.33. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2473.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 2473.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 0086.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 0086.HK has a market cap of 6.03B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 0086.HK trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 0086.HK's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0086.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 0086.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 1905.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 1905.HK has a market cap of 5.76B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 1905.HK trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 1905.HK's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1905.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 1905.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 0373.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 0373.HK has a market cap of 5.38B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 0373.HK trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 0373.HK's P/E ratio is -6.95. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0373.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 0373.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 0900.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 0900.HK has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 0900.HK trades at $6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 0900.HK's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0900.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 0900.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 2718.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 2718.HK has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 2718.HK trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 2718.HK's P/E ratio is 38.33. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2718.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 2718.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 3848.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 3848.HK has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 3848.HK trades at $11.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 3848.HK's P/E ratio is 291.50. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3848.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 3848.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 0628.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 0628.HK has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 0628.HK trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 0628.HK's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0628.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 0628.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 1601.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 1601.HK has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 1601.HK trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 1601.HK's P/E ratio is 3.68. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1601.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 1601.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 2483.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 2483.HK has a market cap of 860.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 2483.HK trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 2483.HK's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2483.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 2483.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 3903.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 3903.HK has a market cap of 772.80M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 3903.HK trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 3903.HK's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3903.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 3903.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 1577.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 1577.HK has a market cap of 693.60M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 1577.HK trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 1577.HK's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1577.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 1577.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 8223.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 8223.HK has a market cap of 554.70M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 8223.HK trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 8223.HK's P/E ratio is -10.85. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8223.HK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 8223.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 0730.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 0730.HK has a market cap of 458.66M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 0730.HK trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 0730.HK's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0730.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 0730.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 0668.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 0668.HK has a market cap of 439.54M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 0668.HK trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 0668.HK's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0668.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 0668.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 1543.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 1543.HK has a market cap of 421.41M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 1543.HK trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 1543.HK's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1543.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 1543.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 2051.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 2051.HK has a market cap of 402.61M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 2051.HK trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 2051.HK's P/E ratio is -4.94. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2051.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 2051.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 1563.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 1563.HK has a market cap of 378.76M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 1563.HK trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 1563.HK's P/E ratio is 1.72. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1563.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 1563.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 6866.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 6866.HK has a market cap of 330.40M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 6866.HK trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 6866.HK's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6866.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 6866.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 0508.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 0508.HK has a market cap of 319.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 0508.HK trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 0508.HK's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0508.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 0508.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 1669.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 1669.HK has a market cap of 288.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 1669.HK trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 1669.HK's P/E ratio is 6.55. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1669.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 1669.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 8525.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 8525.HK has a market cap of 256.50M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 8525.HK trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 8525.HK's P/E ratio is -13.57. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8525.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 8525.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 0605.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 0605.HK has a market cap of 238.13M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 0605.HK trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 0605.HK's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0605.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 0605.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 0767.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 0767.HK has a market cap of 196.75M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 0767.HK trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 0767.HK's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0767.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 0767.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 0764.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 0764.HK has a market cap of 171.88M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 0764.HK trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 0764.HK's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0764.HK's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 0764.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 3963.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 3963.HK has a market cap of 160.80M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 3963.HK trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 3963.HK's P/E ratio is -13.25. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3963.HK's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 3963.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 8019.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 8019.HK has a market cap of 160.23M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 8019.HK trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 8019.HK's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8019.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 8019.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 1915.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 1915.HK has a market cap of 159.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 1915.HK trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 1915.HK's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1915.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 1915.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 8452.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 8452.HK has a market cap of 126.01M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 8452.HK trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 8452.HK's P/E ratio is -20.25. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8452.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 8452.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 0379.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 0379.HK has a market cap of 94.49M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 0379.HK trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 0379.HK's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0379.HK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 0379.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 0431.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 0431.HK has a market cap of 77.76M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 0431.HK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 0431.HK's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0431.HK's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 0431.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 8239.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 8239.HK has a market cap of 67.57M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 8239.HK trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 8239.HK's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8239.HK's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 8239.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 8621.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 8621.HK has a market cap of 36.48M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 8621.HK trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 8621.HK's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8621.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 8621.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 6878.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 6878.HK has a market cap of 34.76M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 6878.HK trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 6878.HK's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6878.HK's ROE of -13.76%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 6878.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 0736.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 0736.HK has a market cap of 34.20M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 0736.HK trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 0736.HK's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0736.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 0736.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 8001.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 8001.HK has a market cap of 23.39M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 8001.HK trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 8001.HK's P/E ratio is 1.88. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8001.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 8001.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 8063.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 2.11B. In comparison, 8063.HK has a market cap of 11.24M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at $4.32, while 8063.HK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.08, whereas 8063.HK's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8063.HK's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 8063.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.