VCREDIT Holdings Limited
VCREDIT Holdings Limited 2003.HK Peers
See (2003.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003.HK | HK$3.61 | -3.73% | 1.8B | 3.37 | HK$1.07 | +8.31% |
| 3360.HK | HK$6.55 | +2.18% | 27.8B | 7.12 | HK$0.92 | +7.69% |
| 1606.HK | HK$1.42 | -2.07% | 17.6B | 3.64 | HK$0.39 | +8.30% |
| 2858.HK | HK$2.20 | -2.22% | 14.8B | 16.92 | HK$0.13 | +2.95% |
| 6069.HK | HK$11.28 | -2.76% | 11.2B | 26.23 | HK$0.43 | +6.13% |
| 2666.HK | HK$5.38 | +1.51% | 10.2B | 4.85 | HK$1.11 | +46.74% |
| 2473.HK | HK$6.44 | +0.47% | 10B | 214.67 | HK$0.03 | N/A |
| 1905.HK | HK$0.79 | +3.95% | 6.3B | 4.16 | HK$0.19 | +10.05% |
| 0086.HK | HK$3.05 | -0.65% | 6B | 16.05 | HK$0.19 | +8.52% |
| 0373.HK | HK$1.63 | +1.88% | 5.7B | -7.41 | -HK$0.22 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
2003.HK vs 3360.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3360.HK has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 3360.HK trades at HK$6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 3360.HK's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3360.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 3360.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 1606.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1606.HK has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 1606.HK trades at HK$1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 1606.HK's P/E ratio is 3.64. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1606.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 1606.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 2858.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 2858.HK has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 2858.HK trades at HK$2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 2858.HK's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2858.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 2858.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 6069.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 6069.HK has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 6069.HK trades at HK$11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 6069.HK's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6069.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 6069.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 2666.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 2666.HK has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 2666.HK trades at HK$5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 2666.HK's P/E ratio is 4.85. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2666.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 2666.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 2473.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 2473.HK has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 2473.HK trades at HK$6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 2473.HK's P/E ratio is 214.67. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2473.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 2473.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 1905.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1905.HK has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 1905.HK trades at HK$0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 1905.HK's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1905.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 1905.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 0086.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0086.HK has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 0086.HK trades at HK$3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 0086.HK's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0086.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 0086.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 0373.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0373.HK has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 0373.HK trades at HK$1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 0373.HK's P/E ratio is -7.41. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0373.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 0373.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 0900.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0900.HK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 0900.HK trades at HK$6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 0900.HK's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0900.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 0900.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 2718.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 2718.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 2718.HK trades at HK$1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 2718.HK's P/E ratio is 38.33. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2718.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 2718.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 3848.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3848.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 3848.HK trades at HK$11.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 3848.HK's P/E ratio is 276.50. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3848.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 3848.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 0628.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0628.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 0628.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 0628.HK's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0628.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 0628.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 1601.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1601.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 1601.HK trades at HK$0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 1601.HK's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1601.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 1601.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 2483.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 2483.HK has a market cap of 860M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 2483.HK trades at HK$1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 2483.HK's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2483.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 2483.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 3903.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3903.HK has a market cap of 772.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 3903.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 3903.HK's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3903.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 3903.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 8223.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8223.HK has a market cap of 739.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 8223.HK trades at HK$1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 8223.HK's P/E ratio is -13.23. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8223.HK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 8223.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 1577.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1577.HK has a market cap of 649.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 1577.HK trades at HK$0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 1577.HK's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1577.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 1577.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 2051.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 2051.HK has a market cap of 636.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 2051.HK trades at HK$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 2051.HK's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2051.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 2051.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 1543.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1543.HK has a market cap of 468.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 1543.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 1543.HK's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1543.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 1543.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 0730.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0730.HK has a market cap of 446.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 0730.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 0730.HK's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0730.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 0730.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 0668.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0668.HK has a market cap of 439.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 0668.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 0668.HK's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0668.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 0668.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 1563.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1563.HK has a market cap of 361.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 1563.HK trades at HK$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 1563.HK's P/E ratio is 1.65. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1563.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 1563.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 6866.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 6866.HK has a market cap of 348.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 6866.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 6866.HK's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6866.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 6866.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 0508.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0508.HK has a market cap of 340.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 0508.HK trades at HK$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 0508.HK's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0508.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 0508.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 1669.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1669.HK has a market cap of 316M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 1669.HK trades at HK$0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 1669.HK's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1669.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 1669.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 0767.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0767.HK has a market cap of 306.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 0767.HK trades at HK$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 0767.HK's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0767.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 0767.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 0605.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0605.HK has a market cap of 295.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 0605.HK trades at HK$1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 0605.HK's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0605.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 0605.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 8525.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8525.HK has a market cap of 229.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 8525.HK trades at HK$0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 8525.HK's P/E ratio is -12.14. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8525.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 8525.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 0764.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0764.HK has a market cap of 206.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 0764.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 0764.HK's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0764.HK's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 0764.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 3963.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3963.HK has a market cap of 169.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 3963.HK trades at HK$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 3963.HK's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3963.HK's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 3963.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 1915.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1915.HK has a market cap of 159M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 1915.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 1915.HK's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1915.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 1915.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 8452.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8452.HK has a market cap of 140.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 8452.HK trades at HK$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 8452.HK's P/E ratio is -19.50. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8452.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 8452.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 0379.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0379.HK has a market cap of 126.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 0379.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 0379.HK's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0379.HK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 0379.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 8019.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8019.HK has a market cap of 105M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 8019.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 8019.HK's P/E ratio is -9.83. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8019.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 8019.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 0431.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0431.HK has a market cap of 77.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 0431.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 0431.HK's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0431.HK's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 0431.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 8239.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8239.HK has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 8239.HK trades at HK$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 8239.HK's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8239.HK's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 8239.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 0736.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0736.HK has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 0736.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 0736.HK's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0736.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 0736.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 6878.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 6878.HK has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 6878.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 6878.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6878.HK's ROE of -13.76%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 6878.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 8621.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8621.HK has a market cap of 34.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 8621.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 8621.HK's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8621.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 8621.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 8001.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8001.HK has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 8001.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 8001.HK's P/E ratio is 1.88. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8001.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 8001.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 8063.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8063.HK has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 8063.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 8063.HK's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8063.HK's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 8063.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.
2003.HK vs 0766.HK Comparison
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0766.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.61, while 0766.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas 0766.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0766.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 0766.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.