VCREDIT Holdings Limited
VCREDIT Holdings Limited (2003.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (2003.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003.HK | HK$3.36 | -1.47% | 1.6B | 3.14 | HK$1.07 | +5.95% |
| 3360.HK | HK$7.96 | -0.50% | 37B | 8.65 | HK$0.92 | +6.91% |
| 1606.HK | HK$1.64 | -2.38% | 21.2B | 4.21 | HK$0.39 | +5.95% |
| 2858.HK | HK$2.55 | +1.19% | 17.2B | 19.62 | HK$0.13 | +2.78% |
| 6069.HK | HK$13.28 | -5.41% | 13.2B | 30.88 | HK$0.43 | N/A |
| 2666.HK | HK$6.35 | -1.24% | 12B | 5.67 | HK$1.12 | +5.51% |
| 2473.HK | HK$6.06 | -2.73% | 9.4B | 202.00 | HK$0.03 | N/A |
| 1905.HK | HK$0.84 | +0.00% | 7.2B | 4.42 | HK$0.19 | +10.25% |
| 0086.HK | HK$3.48 | -1.69% | 6.8B | 18.32 | HK$0.19 | +7.47% |
| 0373.HK | HK$1.62 | -2.41% | 5.7B | -7.36 | -HK$0.22 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
2003.HK vs 3360.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 3360.HK has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 3360.HK trades at HK$7.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 3360.HK's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3360.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 3360.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 3360.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 1606.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 1606.HK has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 1606.HK trades at HK$1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 1606.HK's P/E ratio is 4.21. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1606.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 1606.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 1606.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 2858.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 2858.HK has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 2858.HK trades at HK$2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 2858.HK's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2858.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 2858.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 2858.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 6069.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 6069.HK has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 6069.HK trades at HK$13.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 6069.HK's P/E ratio is 30.88. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6069.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 6069.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 6069.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 2666.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 2666.HK has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 2666.HK trades at HK$6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 2666.HK's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2666.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 2666.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 2666.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 2473.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 2473.HK has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 2473.HK trades at HK$6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 2473.HK's P/E ratio is 202.00. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2473.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 2473.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 2473.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 1905.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 1905.HK has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 1905.HK trades at HK$0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 1905.HK's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1905.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 1905.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 1905.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 0086.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 0086.HK has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 0086.HK trades at HK$3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 0086.HK's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0086.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 0086.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 0086.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 0373.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 0373.HK has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 0373.HK trades at HK$1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 0373.HK's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0373.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 0373.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 0373.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 0900.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 0900.HK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 0900.HK trades at HK$7.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 0900.HK's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0900.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 0900.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 0900.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 2718.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 2718.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 2718.HK trades at HK$1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 2718.HK's P/E ratio is 38.33. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2718.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 2718.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 2718.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 3848.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 3848.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 3848.HK trades at HK$13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 3848.HK's P/E ratio is 326.50. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3848.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 3848.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 3848.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 0628.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 0628.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 0628.HK trades at HK$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 0628.HK's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0628.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 0628.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 0628.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 1601.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 1601.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 1601.HK trades at HK$0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 1601.HK's P/E ratio is 4.14. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1601.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 1601.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 1601.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 2483.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 2483.HK has a market cap of 850M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 2483.HK trades at HK$1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 2483.HK's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2483.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 2483.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 2483.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 3903.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 3903.HK has a market cap of 772.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 3903.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 3903.HK's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3903.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 3903.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 3903.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 2051.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 2051.HK has a market cap of 643.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 2051.HK trades at HK$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 2051.HK's P/E ratio is -7.90. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2051.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 2051.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 2051.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 1577.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 1577.HK has a market cap of 612M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 1577.HK trades at HK$0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 1577.HK's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1577.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 1577.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 1577.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 1543.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 1543.HK has a market cap of 522.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 1543.HK trades at HK$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 1543.HK's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1543.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 1543.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 1543.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 0730.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 0730.HK has a market cap of 486.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 0730.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 0730.HK's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0730.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 0730.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 0730.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 0668.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 0668.HK has a market cap of 439.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 0668.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 0668.HK's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0668.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 0668.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 0668.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 1563.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 1563.HK has a market cap of 388.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 1563.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 1563.HK's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1563.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 1563.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 1563.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 8223.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 8223.HK has a market cap of 348.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 8223.HK trades at HK$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 8223.HK's P/E ratio is -6.23. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8223.HK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 8223.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 8223.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 6866.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 6866.HK has a market cap of 342.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 6866.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 6866.HK's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6866.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 6866.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 6866.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 8239.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 8239.HK has a market cap of 329.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 8239.HK trades at HK$3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 8239.HK's P/E ratio is -17.55. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8239.HK's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 8239.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 8239.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 0767.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 0767.HK has a market cap of 308.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 0767.HK trades at HK$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 0767.HK's P/E ratio is -12.12. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0767.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 0767.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 0767.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 1669.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 1669.HK has a market cap of 308M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 1669.HK trades at HK$0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 1669.HK's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1669.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 1669.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 1669.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 0605.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 0605.HK has a market cap of 274.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 0605.HK trades at HK$1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 0605.HK's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0605.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 0605.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 0605.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 0508.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 0508.HK has a market cap of 272.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 0508.HK trades at HK$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 0508.HK's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0508.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 0508.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 0508.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 8525.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 8525.HK has a market cap of 229.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 8525.HK trades at HK$0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 8525.HK's P/E ratio is -12.14. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8525.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 8525.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 8525.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 0764.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 0764.HK has a market cap of 229.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 0764.HK trades at HK$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 0764.HK's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0764.HK's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 0764.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 0764.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 3963.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 3963.HK has a market cap of 191.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 3963.HK trades at HK$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 3963.HK's P/E ratio is -31.50. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3963.HK's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 3963.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 3963.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 1915.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 1915.HK has a market cap of 159M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 1915.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 1915.HK's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1915.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 1915.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 1915.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 8452.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 8452.HK has a market cap of 125.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 8452.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 8452.HK's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8452.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 8452.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 8452.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 0379.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 0379.HK has a market cap of 118.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 0379.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 0379.HK's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0379.HK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 0379.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 0379.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 8019.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 8019.HK has a market cap of 86.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 8019.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 8019.HK's P/E ratio is -8.07. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8019.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 8019.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 8019.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 0431.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 0431.HK has a market cap of 77.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 0431.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 0431.HK's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0431.HK's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 0431.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 0431.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 0736.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 0736.HK has a market cap of 52.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 0736.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 0736.HK's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0736.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 0736.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 0736.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 8621.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 8621.HK has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 8621.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 8621.HK's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8621.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 8621.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 8621.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 6878.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 6878.HK has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 6878.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 6878.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6878.HK's ROE of -13.76%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 6878.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 6878.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 8001.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 8001.HK has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 8001.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 8001.HK's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8001.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is more volatile compared to 8001.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 8001.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 8063.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 8063.HK has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 8063.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 8063.HK's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8063.HK's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 8063.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 8063.HK's competition here
2003.HK vs 0766.HK Comparison August 2025
2003.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2003.HK stands at 1.6B. In comparison, 0766.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2003.HK is priced at HK$3.36, while 0766.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2003.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.14, whereas 0766.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2003.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0766.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2003.HK is less volatile compared to 0766.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2003.HK.Check 0766.HK's competition here