Nisshin Seifun Group Inc.
Nisshin Seifun Group Inc. 2002.T Peers
See (2002.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002.T | ¥1,732.00 | +0.55% | 498.8B | 14.67 | ¥117.37 | +3.19% |
| 2802.T | ¥3,916.00 | +0.18% | 3.9T | 112.24 | ¥34.80 | +2.05% |
| 2801.T | ¥1,304.50 | -2.50% | 1.2T | 19.95 | ¥65.00 | +1.62% |
| 2875.T | ¥9,533.00 | -0.54% | 947.5B | 15.17 | ¥626.82 | +2.10% |
| 2897.T | ¥3,079.00 | +2.79% | 867.9B | 16.39 | ¥183.33 | +2.33% |
| 2269.T | ¥3,196.00 | +0.28% | 856B | 16.97 | ¥186.16 | +3.16% |
| 2212.T | ¥3,212.00 | -0.53% | 638.3B | 17.91 | ¥180.45 | +1.18% |
| 2282.T | ¥5,161.00 | +3.39% | 494.8B | 19.00 | ¥263.22 | +2.70% |
| 2809.T | ¥3,537.00 | +4.92% | 472.2B | 16.77 | ¥202.60 | +1.71% |
| 2871.T | ¥1,873.00 | -0.64% | 471.6B | 19.34 | ¥97.29 | +3.27% |
Stock Comparison
2002.T vs 2802.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2802.T has a market cap of 3.9T. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2802.T trades at ¥3,916.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2802.T's P/E ratio is 112.24. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2802.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2802.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2801.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2801.T has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2801.T trades at ¥1,304.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2801.T's P/E ratio is 19.95. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2801.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2801.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2875.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2875.T has a market cap of 947.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2875.T trades at ¥9,533.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2875.T's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2875.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2875.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2897.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2897.T has a market cap of 867.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2897.T trades at ¥3,079.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2897.T's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2897.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2897.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2269.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2269.T has a market cap of 856B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2269.T trades at ¥3,196.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2269.T's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2269.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2269.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2212.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2212.T has a market cap of 638.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2212.T trades at ¥3,212.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2212.T's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2212.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2212.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2282.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2282.T has a market cap of 494.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2282.T trades at ¥5,161.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2282.T's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2282.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2282.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2809.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2809.T has a market cap of 472.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2809.T trades at ¥3,537.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2809.T's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2809.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2809.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2871.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2871.T has a market cap of 471.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2871.T trades at ¥1,873.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2871.T's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2871.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2871.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2229.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2229.T has a market cap of 340.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2229.T trades at ¥2,723.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2229.T's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2229.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2229.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2206.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2206.T has a market cap of 294.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2206.T trades at ¥4,698.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2206.T's P/E ratio is 54.01. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2206.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2206.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2296.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2296.T has a market cap of 279.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2296.T trades at ¥4,975.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2296.T's P/E ratio is 21.34. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2296.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2296.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 1332.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 1332.T has a market cap of 272.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 1332.T trades at ¥887.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 1332.T's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1332.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 1332.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2264.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2264.T has a market cap of 272.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2264.T trades at ¥3,386.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2264.T's P/E ratio is 50.53. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2264.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2264.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2811.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2811.T has a market cap of 265B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2811.T trades at ¥2,871.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2811.T's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2811.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2811.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2810.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2810.T has a market cap of 262.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2810.T trades at ¥2,806.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2810.T's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2810.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2810.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2607.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2607.T has a market cap of 238.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2607.T trades at ¥2,809.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2607.T's P/E ratio is 107.51. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2607.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2607.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2815.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2815.T has a market cap of 209.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2815.T trades at ¥6,510.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2815.T's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2815.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2815.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2270.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2270.T has a market cap of 185.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2270.T trades at ¥2,799.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2270.T's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2270.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2270.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2001.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2001.T has a market cap of 170.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2001.T trades at ¥2,140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2001.T's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2001.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2001.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2602.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2602.T has a market cap of 158.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2602.T trades at ¥4,950.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2602.T's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2602.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2602.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2220.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2220.T has a market cap of 83B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2220.T trades at ¥4,020.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2220.T's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2220.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2220.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 4526.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 4526.T has a market cap of 81.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 4526.T trades at ¥2,735.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 4526.T's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 4526.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 4526.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2805.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2805.T has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2805.T trades at ¥3,070.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2805.T's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2805.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2805.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2613.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2613.T has a market cap of 65B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2613.T trades at ¥1,967.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2613.T's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2613.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2613.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 8043.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 8043.T has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 8043.T trades at ¥1,088.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 8043.T's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8043.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 8043.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2899.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2899.T has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2899.T trades at ¥3,095.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2899.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2899.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is more volatile compared to 2899.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 1301.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 1301.T has a market cap of 53.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 1301.T trades at ¥4,490.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 1301.T's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1301.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 1301.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2226.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2226.T has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2226.T trades at ¥4,760.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2226.T's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2226.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2226.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2053.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2053.T has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2053.T trades at ¥1,602.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2053.T's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2053.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2053.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2908.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2908.T has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2908.T trades at ¥1,591.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2908.T's P/E ratio is 47.66. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2908.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2908.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2288.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2288.T has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2288.T trades at ¥1,816.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2288.T's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2288.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2288.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 1375.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 1375.T has a market cap of 43.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 1375.T trades at ¥1,091.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 1375.T's P/E ratio is 28.15. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1375.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T and 1375.T have similar daily volatility (0.64).
2002.T vs 2918.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2918.T has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2918.T trades at ¥2,435.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2918.T's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2918.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2918.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2910.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2910.T has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2910.T trades at ¥1,560.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2910.T's P/E ratio is 52.81. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2910.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2910.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2060.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2060.T has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2060.T trades at ¥992.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2060.T's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2060.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2060.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 3139.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 3139.T has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 3139.T trades at ¥3,680.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 3139.T's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3139.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 3139.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2923.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2923.T has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2923.T trades at ¥7,160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2923.T's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2923.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2923.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2820.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2820.T has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2820.T trades at ¥4,975.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2820.T's P/E ratio is 30.03. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2820.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2820.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2612.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2612.T has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2612.T trades at ¥3,630.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2612.T's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2612.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2612.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2669.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2669.T has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2669.T trades at ¥3,330.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2669.T's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2669.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is more volatile compared to 2669.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2831.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2831.T has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2831.T trades at ¥3,235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2831.T's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2831.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is more volatile compared to 2831.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 7475.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 7475.T has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 7475.T trades at ¥2,980.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 7475.T's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7475.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 7475.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2884.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2884.T has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2884.T trades at ¥1,058.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2884.T's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2884.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2884.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2915.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2915.T has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2915.T trades at ¥1,737.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2915.T's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2915.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2915.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2922.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2922.T has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2922.T trades at ¥2,006.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2922.T's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2922.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is more volatile compared to 2922.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2933.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2933.T has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2933.T trades at ¥1,087.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2933.T's P/E ratio is 7.22. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2933.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2933.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2819.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2819.T has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2819.T trades at ¥2,509.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2819.T's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2819.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is more volatile compared to 2819.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2266.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2266.T has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2266.T trades at ¥1,304.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2266.T's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2266.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2266.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2804.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2804.T has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2804.T trades at ¥1,810.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2804.T's P/E ratio is 87.68. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2804.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2804.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2936.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2936.T has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2936.T trades at ¥443.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2936.T's P/E ratio is 218.81. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2936.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2936.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2932.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2932.T has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2932.T trades at ¥1,302.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2932.T's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2932.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2932.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2830.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2830.T has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2830.T trades at ¥2,615.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2830.T's P/E ratio is 74.21. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2830.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is more volatile compared to 2830.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2009.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2009.T has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2009.T trades at ¥906.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2009.T's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2009.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2009.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 4404.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 4404.T has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 4404.T trades at ¥1,767.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 4404.T's P/E ratio is 6.48. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 4404.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 4404.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 8091.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 8091.T has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 8091.T trades at ¥2,170.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 8091.T's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8091.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 8091.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2204.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2204.T has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2204.T trades at ¥3,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2204.T's P/E ratio is 25.20. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2204.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2204.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2892.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2892.T has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2892.T trades at ¥3,430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2892.T's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2892.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2892.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2812.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2812.T has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2812.T trades at ¥1,433.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2812.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2812.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is more volatile compared to 2812.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2903.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2903.T has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2903.T trades at ¥1,403.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2903.T's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2903.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2903.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2806.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2806.T has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2806.T trades at ¥2,080.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2806.T's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2806.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is more volatile compared to 2806.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2937.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2937.T has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2937.T trades at ¥1,520.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2937.T's P/E ratio is 48.28. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2937.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is more volatile compared to 2937.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2904.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2904.T has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2904.T trades at ¥748.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2904.T's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2904.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2904.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2901.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2901.T has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2901.T trades at ¥623.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2901.T's P/E ratio is 28.93. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2901.T's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2901.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2935.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2935.T has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2935.T trades at ¥972.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2935.T's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2935.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2935.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2597.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2597.T has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2597.T trades at ¥917.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2597.T's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2597.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is more volatile compared to 2597.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2927.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2927.T has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2927.T trades at ¥860.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2927.T's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2927.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is more volatile compared to 2927.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2818.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2818.T has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2818.T trades at ¥1,738.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2818.T's P/E ratio is 146.95. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2818.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is more volatile compared to 2818.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 7559.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 7559.T has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 7559.T trades at ¥2,012.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 7559.T's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7559.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is more volatile compared to 7559.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2224.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2224.T has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2224.T trades at ¥3,130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2224.T's P/E ratio is 66.46. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2224.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T and 2224.T have similar daily volatility (0.64).
2002.T vs 3392.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 3392.T has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 3392.T trades at ¥599.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 3392.T's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3392.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 3392.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2813.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2813.T has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2813.T trades at ¥3,745.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2813.T's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2813.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2813.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2907.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2907.T has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2907.T trades at ¥1,215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2907.T's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2907.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is more volatile compared to 2907.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2877.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2877.T has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2877.T trades at ¥740.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2877.T's P/E ratio is 31.14. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2877.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2877.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2814.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2814.T has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2814.T trades at ¥2,331.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2814.T's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2814.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2814.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 8045.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 8045.T has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 8045.T trades at ¥1,001.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 8045.T's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8045.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 8045.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2055.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2055.T has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2055.T trades at ¥314.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2055.T's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2055.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T and 2055.T have similar daily volatility (0.64).
2002.T vs 7427.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 7427.T has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 7427.T trades at ¥914.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 7427.T's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7427.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 7427.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2894.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2894.T has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2894.T trades at ¥313.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2894.T's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2894.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T and 2894.T have similar daily volatility (0.64).
2002.T vs 2293.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2293.T has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2293.T trades at ¥2,517.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2293.T's P/E ratio is -24.68. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2293.T's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is more volatile compared to 2293.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2654.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2654.T has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2654.T trades at ¥365.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2654.T's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2654.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2654.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2917.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2917.T has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2917.T trades at ¥960.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2917.T's P/E ratio is -89.41. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2917.T's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2917.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2286.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2286.T has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2286.T trades at ¥511.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2286.T's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2286.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2286.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2911.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2911.T has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2911.T trades at ¥2,241.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2911.T's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2911.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2911.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2700.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2700.T has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2700.T trades at ¥2,210.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2700.T's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2700.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2700.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2876.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2876.T has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2876.T trades at ¥406.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2876.T's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2876.T's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2876.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2215.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2215.T has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2215.T trades at ¥531.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2215.T's P/E ratio is 1.78. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2215.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2215.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2291.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2291.T has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2291.T trades at ¥1,072.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2291.T's P/E ratio is -7.34. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2291.T's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is more volatile compared to 2291.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2872.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2872.T has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2872.T trades at ¥2,369.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2872.T's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2872.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2872.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 7413.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 7413.T has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 7413.T trades at ¥2,745.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 7413.T's P/E ratio is 136.09. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7413.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is more volatile compared to 7413.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2926.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2926.T has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2926.T trades at ¥103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2926.T's P/E ratio is -480.95. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2926.T's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2926.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.
2002.T vs 2925.T Comparison
2002.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.T stands at 498.8B. In comparison, 2925.T has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.T is priced at ¥1,732.00, while 2925.T trades at ¥1,177.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.67, whereas 2925.T's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, 2002.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2925.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.T is less volatile compared to 2925.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.T.