China Sunshine Paper Holdings Company Limited
China Sunshine Paper Holdings Company Limited (2002.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (2002.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002.HK | HK$1.96 | +1.55% | 2B | 6.82 | HK$0.28 | +2.62% |
| 2689.HK | HK$4.43 | +2.55% | 21B | 20.36 | HK$0.22 | N/A |
| 2314.HK | HK$2.57 | -1.53% | 11.4B | 8.58 | HK$0.31 | +4.02% |
| 1812.HK | HK$0.81 | +5.19% | 4.3B | -0.23 | -HK$3.32 | N/A |
| 1885.HK | HK$0.90 | -32.33% | 900M | 18.00 | HK$0.05 | N/A |
| 1412.HK | HK$1.59 | -2.45% | 845.9M | 6.63 | HK$0.24 | +8.81% |
| 0731.HK | HK$0.19 | -3.00% | 274.4M | 9.70 | HK$0.02 | N/A |
| 8481.HK | HK$0.50 | -1.00% | 245.2M | 4.50 | HK$0.11 | N/A |
| 3363.HK | HK$0.47 | +5.68% | 240M | 6.00 | HK$0.08 | +4.58% |
| 1580.HK | HK$0.15 | -5.77% | 161.1M | -14.70 | -HK$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
2002.HK vs 2689.HK Comparison August 2025
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2B. In comparison, 2689.HK has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.96, while 2689.HK trades at HK$4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.82, whereas 2689.HK's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2689.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is more volatile compared to 2689.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.Check 2689.HK's competition here
2002.HK vs 2314.HK Comparison August 2025
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2B. In comparison, 2314.HK has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.96, while 2314.HK trades at HK$2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.82, whereas 2314.HK's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2314.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is less volatile compared to 2314.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.Check 2314.HK's competition here
2002.HK vs 1812.HK Comparison August 2025
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2B. In comparison, 1812.HK has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.96, while 1812.HK trades at HK$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.82, whereas 1812.HK's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1812.HK's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is less volatile compared to 1812.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.Check 1812.HK's competition here
2002.HK vs 1885.HK Comparison August 2025
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2B. In comparison, 1885.HK has a market cap of 900M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.96, while 1885.HK trades at HK$0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.82, whereas 1885.HK's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1885.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is less volatile compared to 1885.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.Check 1885.HK's competition here
2002.HK vs 1412.HK Comparison August 2025
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2B. In comparison, 1412.HK has a market cap of 845.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.96, while 1412.HK trades at HK$1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.82, whereas 1412.HK's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1412.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is less volatile compared to 1412.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.Check 1412.HK's competition here
2002.HK vs 0731.HK Comparison August 2025
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2B. In comparison, 0731.HK has a market cap of 274.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.96, while 0731.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.82, whereas 0731.HK's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0731.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is less volatile compared to 0731.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.Check 0731.HK's competition here
2002.HK vs 8481.HK Comparison August 2025
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2B. In comparison, 8481.HK has a market cap of 245.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.96, while 8481.HK trades at HK$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.82, whereas 8481.HK's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8481.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is more volatile compared to 8481.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.Check 8481.HK's competition here
2002.HK vs 3363.HK Comparison August 2025
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2B. In comparison, 3363.HK has a market cap of 240M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.96, while 3363.HK trades at HK$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.82, whereas 3363.HK's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3363.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is less volatile compared to 3363.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.Check 3363.HK's competition here
2002.HK vs 1580.HK Comparison August 2025
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2B. In comparison, 1580.HK has a market cap of 161.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.96, while 1580.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.82, whereas 1580.HK's P/E ratio is -14.70. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1580.HK's ROE of +7.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is less volatile compared to 1580.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.Check 1580.HK's competition here
2002.HK vs 0094.HK Comparison August 2025
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2B. In comparison, 0094.HK has a market cap of 158.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.96, while 0094.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.82, whereas 0094.HK's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0094.HK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is more volatile compared to 0094.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.Check 0094.HK's competition here
2002.HK vs 1822.HK Comparison August 2025
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2B. In comparison, 1822.HK has a market cap of 115.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.96, while 1822.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.82, whereas 1822.HK's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1822.HK's ROE of -26.74%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is more volatile compared to 1822.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.Check 1822.HK's competition here
2002.HK vs 0794.HK Comparison August 2025
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2B. In comparison, 0794.HK has a market cap of 52.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.96, while 0794.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.82, whereas 0794.HK's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0794.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is more volatile compared to 0794.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.Check 0794.HK's competition here
2002.HK vs 8186.HK Comparison August 2025
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2B. In comparison, 8186.HK has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.96, while 8186.HK trades at HK$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.82, whereas 8186.HK's P/E ratio is -9.87. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8186.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is less volatile compared to 8186.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.Check 8186.HK's competition here
2002.HK vs 8003.HK Comparison August 2025
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2B. In comparison, 8003.HK has a market cap of 34.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.96, while 8003.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.82, whereas 8003.HK's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8003.HK's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is more volatile compared to 8003.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.Check 8003.HK's competition here
2002.HK vs 1069.HK Comparison August 2025
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2B. In comparison, 1069.HK has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.96, while 1069.HK trades at HK$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.82, whereas 1069.HK's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1069.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is less volatile compared to 1069.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.Check 1069.HK's competition here
2002.HK vs 8277.HK Comparison August 2025
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2B. In comparison, 8277.HK has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.96, while 8277.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.82, whereas 8277.HK's P/E ratio is 0.60. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8277.HK's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is more volatile compared to 8277.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.Check 8277.HK's competition here
2002.HK vs 8191.HK Comparison August 2025
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2B. In comparison, 8191.HK has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.96, while 8191.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.82, whereas 8191.HK's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8191.HK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is more volatile compared to 8191.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.Check 8191.HK's competition here