China Sunshine Paper Holdings Company Limited
China Sunshine Paper Holdings Company Limited 2002.HK Peers
See (2002.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002.HK | HK$1.76 | +0.57% | 1.9B | 6.29 | HK$0.28 | N/A |
| 2689.HK | HK$3.39 | +4.63% | 15.2B | 14.68 | HK$0.22 | N/A |
| 2314.HK | HK$2.34 | +2.63% | 9.7B | 7.32 | HK$0.31 | +4.71% |
| 1812.HK | HK$0.68 | +0.00% | 4.1B | -0.21 | -HK$3.32 | N/A |
| 1885.HK | HK$0.90 | -32.33% | 900M | 18.00 | HK$0.05 | N/A |
| 1412.HK | HK$1.51 | +0.67% | 798M | 6.25 | HK$0.24 | +9.33% |
| 0731.HK | HK$0.19 | +0.00% | 267.4M | 9.45 | HK$0.02 | N/A |
| 8481.HK | HK$0.52 | -1.89% | 250.2M | 4.73 | HK$0.11 | N/A |
| 3363.HK | HK$0.40 | +11.73% | 200M | 5.00 | HK$0.08 | +5.50% |
| 1580.HK | HK$0.15 | -2.68% | 163.3M | -2.48 | -HK$0.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
2002.HK vs 2689.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 2689.HK has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.76, while 2689.HK trades at HK$3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas 2689.HK's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2689.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is less volatile compared to 2689.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 2314.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 2314.HK has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.76, while 2314.HK trades at HK$2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas 2314.HK's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2314.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is less volatile compared to 2314.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 1812.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 1812.HK has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.76, while 1812.HK trades at HK$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas 1812.HK's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1812.HK's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is less volatile compared to 1812.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 1885.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 1885.HK has a market cap of 900M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.76, while 1885.HK trades at HK$0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas 1885.HK's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1885.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is less volatile compared to 1885.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 1412.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 1412.HK has a market cap of 798M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.76, while 1412.HK trades at HK$1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas 1412.HK's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1412.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is less volatile compared to 1412.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 0731.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 0731.HK has a market cap of 267.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.76, while 0731.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas 0731.HK's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0731.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is less volatile compared to 0731.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 8481.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 8481.HK has a market cap of 250.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.76, while 8481.HK trades at HK$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas 8481.HK's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8481.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is more volatile compared to 8481.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 3363.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 3363.HK has a market cap of 200M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.76, while 3363.HK trades at HK$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas 3363.HK's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3363.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is more volatile compared to 3363.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 1580.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 1580.HK has a market cap of 163.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.76, while 1580.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas 1580.HK's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1580.HK's ROE of +7.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is more volatile compared to 1580.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 0094.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 0094.HK has a market cap of 130.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.76, while 0094.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas 0094.HK's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0094.HK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is less volatile compared to 0094.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 1822.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 1822.HK has a market cap of 128.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.76, while 1822.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas 1822.HK's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1822.HK's ROE of -26.74%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is less volatile compared to 1822.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 0794.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 0794.HK has a market cap of 55.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.76, while 0794.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas 0794.HK's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0794.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is more volatile compared to 0794.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 8003.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 8003.HK has a market cap of 46.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.76, while 8003.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas 8003.HK's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8003.HK's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is more volatile compared to 8003.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 1069.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 1069.HK has a market cap of 36.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.76, while 1069.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas 1069.HK's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1069.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is less volatile compared to 1069.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 8277.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 8277.HK has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.76, while 8277.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas 8277.HK's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8277.HK's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is more volatile compared to 8277.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 8186.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 8186.HK has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.76, while 8186.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas 8186.HK's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8186.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is more volatile compared to 8186.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 8191.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 8191.HK has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at HK$1.76, while 8191.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas 8191.HK's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8191.HK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is more volatile compared to 8191.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.