China Sunshine Paper Holdings Company Limited
China Sunshine Paper Holdings Company Limited 2002.HK Peers
See (2002.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002.HK | $1.92 | N/A | 2.05B | 6.86 | $0.28 | N/A |
| 2689.HK | $3.04 | N/A | 14.26B | 14.48 | $0.21 | N/A |
| 2314.HK | $2.12 | -0.47% | 9.11B | 6.84 | $0.31 | +5.05% |
| 1812.HK | $0.65 | -1.52% | 3.98B | -0.20 | -$3.19 | N/A |
| 1885.HK | $0.90 | -32.33% | 900.00M | 18.00 | $0.05 | N/A |
| 1412.HK | $1.26 | N/A | 670.32M | 5.25 | $0.24 | +8.73% |
| 0731.HK | $0.19 | N/A | 273.02M | 9.65 | $0.02 | N/A |
| 3363.HK | $0.37 | N/A | 185.00M | 5.29 | $0.07 | +2.97% |
| 1580.HK | $0.14 | -0.71% | 153.40M | -2.33 | -$0.06 | N/A |
| 8481.HK | $0.30 | -6.25% | 135.00M | 2.73 | $0.11 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
2002.HK vs 2689.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2.05B. In comparison, 2689.HK has a market cap of 14.26B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at $1.92, while 2689.HK trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.86, whereas 2689.HK's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2689.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is less volatile compared to 2689.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 2314.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2.05B. In comparison, 2314.HK has a market cap of 9.11B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at $1.92, while 2314.HK trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.86, whereas 2314.HK's P/E ratio is 6.84. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2314.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is more volatile compared to 2314.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 1812.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2.05B. In comparison, 1812.HK has a market cap of 3.98B. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at $1.92, while 1812.HK trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.86, whereas 1812.HK's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1812.HK's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is less volatile compared to 1812.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 1885.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2.05B. In comparison, 1885.HK has a market cap of 900.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at $1.92, while 1885.HK trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.86, whereas 1885.HK's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1885.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is less volatile compared to 1885.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 1412.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2.05B. In comparison, 1412.HK has a market cap of 670.32M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at $1.92, while 1412.HK trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.86, whereas 1412.HK's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1412.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is more volatile compared to 1412.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 0731.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2.05B. In comparison, 0731.HK has a market cap of 273.02M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at $1.92, while 0731.HK trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.86, whereas 0731.HK's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0731.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is more volatile compared to 0731.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 3363.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2.05B. In comparison, 3363.HK has a market cap of 185.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at $1.92, while 3363.HK trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.86, whereas 3363.HK's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3363.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is less volatile compared to 3363.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 1580.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2.05B. In comparison, 1580.HK has a market cap of 153.40M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at $1.92, while 1580.HK trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.86, whereas 1580.HK's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1580.HK's ROE of +7.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is less volatile compared to 1580.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 8481.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2.05B. In comparison, 8481.HK has a market cap of 135.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at $1.92, while 8481.HK trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.86, whereas 8481.HK's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8481.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is more volatile compared to 8481.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 1822.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2.05B. In comparison, 1822.HK has a market cap of 98.69M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at $1.92, while 1822.HK trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.86, whereas 1822.HK's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1822.HK's ROE of -26.74%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is less volatile compared to 1822.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 0094.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2.05B. In comparison, 0094.HK has a market cap of 68.63M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at $1.92, while 0094.HK trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.86, whereas 0094.HK's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0094.HK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is more volatile compared to 0094.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 0794.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2.05B. In comparison, 0794.HK has a market cap of 65.55M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at $1.92, while 0794.HK trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.86, whereas 0794.HK's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0794.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is more volatile compared to 0794.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 1069.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2.05B. In comparison, 1069.HK has a market cap of 52.41M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at $1.92, while 1069.HK trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.86, whereas 1069.HK's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1069.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is less volatile compared to 1069.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 8003.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2.05B. In comparison, 8003.HK has a market cap of 26.91M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at $1.92, while 8003.HK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.86, whereas 8003.HK's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8003.HK's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is less volatile compared to 8003.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 8186.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2.05B. In comparison, 8186.HK has a market cap of 25.62M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at $1.92, while 8186.HK trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.86, whereas 8186.HK's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8186.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is more volatile compared to 8186.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 8277.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2.05B. In comparison, 8277.HK has a market cap of 22.31M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at $1.92, while 8277.HK trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.86, whereas 8277.HK's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8277.HK's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is less volatile compared to 8277.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.
2002.HK vs 8191.HK Comparison
2002.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2002.HK stands at 2.05B. In comparison, 8191.HK has a market cap of 9.95M. Regarding current trading prices, 2002.HK is priced at $1.92, while 8191.HK trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2002.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.86, whereas 8191.HK's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, 2002.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8191.HK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 2002.HK is less volatile compared to 8191.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2002.HK.