Exro Technologies Inc.
Exro Technologies Inc. 1O2.F Peers
See (1O2.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1O2.F | €0.03 | +3.22% | 21.1M | -0.08 | -€0.39 | N/A |
| DLSF.F | €19.30 | N/A | 241.1B | 643.33 | €0.03 | N/A |
| LU2.DE | €75.90 | -0.78% | 5.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| PLUN.F | €0.97 | +3.38% | 1.1B | -0.46 | -€2.11 | N/A |
| PLUN.DE | €0.95 | +0.49% | 1.1B | -0.45 | -€2.12 | N/A |
| KTEK.DE | €15.10 | +0.33% | 218.1M | -167.78 | -€0.09 | N/A |
| T9Z.DE | €4.78 | -2.15% | 203.3M | 12.57 | €0.38 | +5.24% |
| 6I4.F | €1.66 | +1.96% | 161.6M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| HNL.DE | €9.70 | +1.68% | 58.8M | -4.55 | -€2.13 | N/A |
| VAR1.DE | €1.21 | -3.04% | 51.6M | -0.17 | -€7.18 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1O2.F vs DLSF.F Comparison
1O2.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1O2.F stands at 21.1M. In comparison, DLSF.F has a market cap of 241.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1O2.F is priced at €0.03, while DLSF.F trades at €19.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1O2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas DLSF.F's P/E ratio is 643.33. In terms of profitability, 1O2.F's ROE is -3.43%, compared to DLSF.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1O2.F is less volatile compared to DLSF.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1O2.F.
1O2.F vs LU2.DE Comparison
1O2.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1O2.F stands at 21.1M. In comparison, LU2.DE has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1O2.F is priced at €0.03, while LU2.DE trades at €75.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1O2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas LU2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1O2.F's ROE is -3.43%, compared to LU2.DE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1O2.F and LU2.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
1O2.F vs PLUN.F Comparison
1O2.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1O2.F stands at 21.1M. In comparison, PLUN.F has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1O2.F is priced at €0.03, while PLUN.F trades at €0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1O2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas PLUN.F's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, 1O2.F's ROE is -3.43%, compared to PLUN.F's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, 1O2.F is less volatile compared to PLUN.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1O2.F.
1O2.F vs PLUN.DE Comparison
1O2.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1O2.F stands at 21.1M. In comparison, PLUN.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1O2.F is priced at €0.03, while PLUN.DE trades at €0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1O2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas PLUN.DE's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, 1O2.F's ROE is -3.43%, compared to PLUN.DE's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, 1O2.F is less volatile compared to PLUN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1O2.F.
1O2.F vs KTEK.DE Comparison
1O2.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1O2.F stands at 21.1M. In comparison, KTEK.DE has a market cap of 218.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1O2.F is priced at €0.03, while KTEK.DE trades at €15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1O2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas KTEK.DE's P/E ratio is -167.78. In terms of profitability, 1O2.F's ROE is -3.43%, compared to KTEK.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1O2.F is less volatile compared to KTEK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1O2.F.
1O2.F vs T9Z.DE Comparison
1O2.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1O2.F stands at 21.1M. In comparison, T9Z.DE has a market cap of 203.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1O2.F is priced at €0.03, while T9Z.DE trades at €4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1O2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas T9Z.DE's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, 1O2.F's ROE is -3.43%, compared to T9Z.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1O2.F and T9Z.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
1O2.F vs 6I4.F Comparison
1O2.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1O2.F stands at 21.1M. In comparison, 6I4.F has a market cap of 161.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1O2.F is priced at €0.03, while 6I4.F trades at €1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1O2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas 6I4.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1O2.F's ROE is -3.43%, compared to 6I4.F's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1O2.F is less volatile compared to 6I4.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1O2.F.
1O2.F vs HNL.DE Comparison
1O2.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1O2.F stands at 21.1M. In comparison, HNL.DE has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1O2.F is priced at €0.03, while HNL.DE trades at €9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1O2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas HNL.DE's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, 1O2.F's ROE is -3.43%, compared to HNL.DE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1O2.F is less volatile compared to HNL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1O2.F.
1O2.F vs VAR1.DE Comparison
1O2.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1O2.F stands at 21.1M. In comparison, VAR1.DE has a market cap of 51.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1O2.F is priced at €0.03, while VAR1.DE trades at €1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1O2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas VAR1.DE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, 1O2.F's ROE is -3.43%, compared to VAR1.DE's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, 1O2.F is less volatile compared to VAR1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1O2.F.
1O2.F vs LMIA.DE Comparison
1O2.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1O2.F stands at 21.1M. In comparison, LMIA.DE has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1O2.F is priced at €0.03, while LMIA.DE trades at €1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1O2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas LMIA.DE's P/E ratio is -20.67. In terms of profitability, 1O2.F's ROE is -3.43%, compared to LMIA.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1O2.F and LMIA.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
1O2.F vs LMIA.F Comparison
1O2.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1O2.F stands at 21.1M. In comparison, LMIA.F has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1O2.F is priced at €0.03, while LMIA.F trades at €1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1O2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas LMIA.F's P/E ratio is -19.50. In terms of profitability, 1O2.F's ROE is -3.43%, compared to LMIA.F's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1O2.F and LMIA.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
1O2.F vs 0E9.F Comparison
1O2.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1O2.F stands at 21.1M. In comparison, 0E9.F has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1O2.F is priced at €0.03, while 0E9.F trades at €0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1O2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas 0E9.F's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, 1O2.F's ROE is -3.43%, compared to 0E9.F's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 1O2.F and 0E9.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
1O2.F vs LEO.DE Comparison
1O2.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1O2.F stands at 21.1M. In comparison, LEO.DE has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1O2.F is priced at €0.03, while LEO.DE trades at €0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1O2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas LEO.DE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, 1O2.F's ROE is -3.43%, compared to LEO.DE's ROE of +8.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1O2.F is less volatile compared to LEO.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1O2.F.
1O2.F vs C0M.F Comparison
1O2.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1O2.F stands at 21.1M. In comparison, C0M.F has a market cap of 657K. Regarding current trading prices, 1O2.F is priced at €0.03, while C0M.F trades at €0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1O2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas C0M.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1O2.F's ROE is -3.43%, compared to C0M.F's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1O2.F is less volatile compared to C0M.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1O2.F.
1O2.F vs ZSOL.DE Comparison
1O2.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1O2.F stands at 21.1M. In comparison, ZSOL.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1O2.F is priced at €0.03, while ZSOL.DE trades at €1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1O2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ZSOL.DE's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, 1O2.F's ROE is -3.43%, compared to ZSOL.DE's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, 1O2.F is less volatile compared to ZSOL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1O2.F.
1O2.F vs ASL.DE Comparison
1O2.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1O2.F stands at 21.1M. In comparison, ASL.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1O2.F is priced at €0.03, while ASL.DE trades at €121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1O2.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ASL.DE's P/E ratio is -41.06. In terms of profitability, 1O2.F's ROE is -3.43%, compared to ASL.DE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1O2.F and ASL.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).