International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.

1I1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1I1.F stands at 141.1M. In comparison, NMM.DE has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1I1.F is priced at €0.71, while NMM.DE trades at €49.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1I1.F currently has a P/E ratio of -35.10, whereas NMM.DE's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, 1I1.F's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NMM.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1I1.F is less volatile compared to NMM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1I1.F.

1I1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1I1.F stands at 141.1M. In comparison, ABR.DE has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1I1.F is priced at €0.71, while ABR.DE trades at €16.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1I1.F currently has a P/E ratio of -35.10, whereas ABR.DE's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, 1I1.F's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ABR.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1I1.F is less volatile compared to ABR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1I1.F.

1I1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1I1.F stands at 141.1M. In comparison, KIN2.DE has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1I1.F is priced at €0.71, while KIN2.DE trades at €13.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1I1.F currently has a P/E ratio of -35.10, whereas KIN2.DE's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, 1I1.F's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KIN2.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1I1.F is less volatile compared to KIN2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1I1.F.

1I1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1I1.F stands at 141.1M. In comparison, RNY.DE has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1I1.F is priced at €0.71, while RNY.DE trades at €5.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1I1.F currently has a P/E ratio of -35.10, whereas RNY.DE's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, 1I1.F's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RNY.DE's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 1I1.F is less volatile compared to RNY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1I1.F.

1I1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1I1.F stands at 141.1M. In comparison, CDM1.DE has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1I1.F is priced at €0.71, while CDM1.DE trades at €7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1I1.F currently has a P/E ratio of -35.10, whereas CDM1.DE's P/E ratio is 30.42. In terms of profitability, 1I1.F's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CDM1.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1I1.F is less volatile compared to CDM1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1I1.F.

1I1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1I1.F stands at 141.1M. In comparison, HCL.DE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1I1.F is priced at €0.71, while HCL.DE trades at €5.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1I1.F currently has a P/E ratio of -35.10, whereas HCL.DE's P/E ratio is 50.58. In terms of profitability, 1I1.F's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HCL.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1I1.F is less volatile compared to HCL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1I1.F.

1I1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1I1.F stands at 141.1M. In comparison, RKVA.F has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1I1.F is priced at €0.71, while RKVA.F trades at €11.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1I1.F currently has a P/E ratio of -35.10, whereas RKVA.F's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, 1I1.F's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RKVA.F's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 1I1.F and RKVA.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).

1I1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1I1.F stands at 141.1M. In comparison, 1A9.F has a market cap of 463.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1I1.F is priced at €0.71, while 1A9.F trades at €0.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1I1.F currently has a P/E ratio of -35.10, whereas 1A9.F's P/E ratio is -7.71. In terms of profitability, 1I1.F's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 1A9.F's ROE of -23.59%. Regarding short-term risk, 1I1.F is less volatile compared to 1A9.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1I1.F.

1I1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1I1.F stands at 141.1M. In comparison, V46.F has a market cap of 271.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1I1.F is priced at €0.71, while V46.F trades at €1.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1I1.F currently has a P/E ratio of -35.10, whereas V46.F's P/E ratio is -13.30. In terms of profitability, 1I1.F's ROE is -0.06%, compared to V46.F's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1I1.F and V46.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).

1I1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1I1.F stands at 141.1M. In comparison, BBDB.DE has a market cap of 78M. Regarding current trading prices, 1I1.F is priced at €0.71, while BBDB.DE trades at €0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1I1.F currently has a P/E ratio of -35.10, whereas BBDB.DE's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, 1I1.F's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BBDB.DE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1I1.F is less volatile compared to BBDB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1I1.F.

1I1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1I1.F stands at 141.1M. In comparison, 0GC0.F has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1I1.F is priced at €0.71, while 0GC0.F trades at €0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1I1.F currently has a P/E ratio of -35.10, whereas 0GC0.F's P/E ratio is -11.80. In terms of profitability, 1I1.F's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0GC0.F's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1I1.F and 0GC0.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).

1I1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1I1.F stands at 141.1M. In comparison, 1ET.F has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1I1.F is priced at €0.71, while 1ET.F trades at €0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1I1.F currently has a P/E ratio of -35.10, whereas 1ET.F's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, 1I1.F's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 1ET.F's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, 1I1.F and 1ET.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).

1I1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1I1.F stands at 141.1M. In comparison, T23A.F has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1I1.F is priced at €0.71, while T23A.F trades at €0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1I1.F currently has a P/E ratio of -35.10, whereas T23A.F's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, 1I1.F's ROE is -0.06%, compared to T23A.F's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 1I1.F and T23A.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).

1I1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1I1.F stands at 141.1M. In comparison, 0MZ.F has a market cap of 630.2K. Regarding current trading prices, 1I1.F is priced at €0.71, while 0MZ.F trades at €0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1I1.F currently has a P/E ratio of -35.10, whereas 0MZ.F's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, 1I1.F's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0MZ.F's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 1I1.F and 0MZ.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).