Asante Gold Corporation
Asante Gold Corporation 1A9.F Peers
See (1A9.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1A9.F | $0.70 | -2.80% | 348.26M | -4.96 | -$0.14 | N/A |
| NMM.DE | $43.33 | -3.48% | 48.22B | 11.08 | $3.91 | +2.01% |
| ABR.DE | $16.99 | +0.46% | 29.22B | 14.65 | $1.16 | +2.15% |
| KIN2.DE | $11.95 | -2.96% | 14.70B | 13.74 | $0.87 | +0.92% |
| RNY.DE | $5.39 | N/A | 5.19B | -5.74 | -$0.94 | N/A |
| CDM1.DE | $6.59 | -3.68% | 4.22B | 25.35 | $0.26 | N/A |
| HCL.DE | $4.24 | -7.73% | 2.68B | 38.51 | $0.11 | +0.78% |
| RKVA.F | $10.62 | -1.80% | 1.59B | 18.31 | $0.58 | N/A |
| V46.F | $1.26 | -2.33% | 256.99M | -14.00 | -$0.09 | N/A |
| 1I1.F | $0.64 | -7.00% | 132.63M | -31.90 | -$0.02 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1A9.F vs NMM.DE Comparison
1A9.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1A9.F stands at 348.26M. In comparison, NMM.DE has a market cap of 48.22B. Regarding current trading prices, 1A9.F is priced at $0.70, while NMM.DE trades at $43.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1A9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.96, whereas NMM.DE's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, 1A9.F's ROE is -6.76%, compared to NMM.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1A9.F is less volatile compared to NMM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1A9.F.
1A9.F vs ABR.DE Comparison
1A9.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1A9.F stands at 348.26M. In comparison, ABR.DE has a market cap of 29.22B. Regarding current trading prices, 1A9.F is priced at $0.70, while ABR.DE trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1A9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.96, whereas ABR.DE's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, 1A9.F's ROE is -6.76%, compared to ABR.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1A9.F is more volatile compared to ABR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1A9.F.
1A9.F vs KIN2.DE Comparison
1A9.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1A9.F stands at 348.26M. In comparison, KIN2.DE has a market cap of 14.70B. Regarding current trading prices, 1A9.F is priced at $0.70, while KIN2.DE trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1A9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.96, whereas KIN2.DE's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, 1A9.F's ROE is -6.76%, compared to KIN2.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1A9.F is less volatile compared to KIN2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1A9.F.
1A9.F vs RNY.DE Comparison
1A9.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1A9.F stands at 348.26M. In comparison, RNY.DE has a market cap of 5.19B. Regarding current trading prices, 1A9.F is priced at $0.70, while RNY.DE trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1A9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.96, whereas RNY.DE's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, 1A9.F's ROE is -6.76%, compared to RNY.DE's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 1A9.F is less volatile compared to RNY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1A9.F.
1A9.F vs CDM1.DE Comparison
1A9.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1A9.F stands at 348.26M. In comparison, CDM1.DE has a market cap of 4.22B. Regarding current trading prices, 1A9.F is priced at $0.70, while CDM1.DE trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1A9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.96, whereas CDM1.DE's P/E ratio is 25.35. In terms of profitability, 1A9.F's ROE is -6.76%, compared to CDM1.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1A9.F is less volatile compared to CDM1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1A9.F.
1A9.F vs HCL.DE Comparison
1A9.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1A9.F stands at 348.26M. In comparison, HCL.DE has a market cap of 2.68B. Regarding current trading prices, 1A9.F is priced at $0.70, while HCL.DE trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1A9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.96, whereas HCL.DE's P/E ratio is 38.51. In terms of profitability, 1A9.F's ROE is -6.76%, compared to HCL.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1A9.F is less volatile compared to HCL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1A9.F.
1A9.F vs RKVA.F Comparison
1A9.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1A9.F stands at 348.26M. In comparison, RKVA.F has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, 1A9.F is priced at $0.70, while RKVA.F trades at $10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1A9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.96, whereas RKVA.F's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, 1A9.F's ROE is -6.76%, compared to RKVA.F's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 1A9.F is less volatile compared to RKVA.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1A9.F.
1A9.F vs V46.F Comparison
1A9.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1A9.F stands at 348.26M. In comparison, V46.F has a market cap of 256.99M. Regarding current trading prices, 1A9.F is priced at $0.70, while V46.F trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1A9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.96, whereas V46.F's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, 1A9.F's ROE is -6.76%, compared to V46.F's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1A9.F is less volatile compared to V46.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1A9.F.
1A9.F vs 1I1.F Comparison
1A9.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1A9.F stands at 348.26M. In comparison, 1I1.F has a market cap of 132.63M. Regarding current trading prices, 1A9.F is priced at $0.70, while 1I1.F trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1A9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.96, whereas 1I1.F's P/E ratio is -31.90. In terms of profitability, 1A9.F's ROE is -6.76%, compared to 1I1.F's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1A9.F is more volatile compared to 1I1.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1A9.F.
1A9.F vs BBDB.DE Comparison
1A9.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1A9.F stands at 348.26M. In comparison, BBDB.DE has a market cap of 77.99M. Regarding current trading prices, 1A9.F is priced at $0.70, while BBDB.DE trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1A9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.96, whereas BBDB.DE's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, 1A9.F's ROE is -6.76%, compared to BBDB.DE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1A9.F is less volatile compared to BBDB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1A9.F.
1A9.F vs 0GC0.F Comparison
1A9.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1A9.F stands at 348.26M. In comparison, 0GC0.F has a market cap of 18.88M. Regarding current trading prices, 1A9.F is priced at $0.70, while 0GC0.F trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1A9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.96, whereas 0GC0.F's P/E ratio is -12.90. In terms of profitability, 1A9.F's ROE is -6.76%, compared to 0GC0.F's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1A9.F is more volatile compared to 0GC0.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1A9.F.
1A9.F vs T23A.F Comparison
1A9.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1A9.F stands at 348.26M. In comparison, T23A.F has a market cap of 11.89M. Regarding current trading prices, 1A9.F is priced at $0.70, while T23A.F trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1A9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.96, whereas T23A.F's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, 1A9.F's ROE is -6.76%, compared to T23A.F's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 1A9.F is more volatile compared to T23A.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1A9.F.
1A9.F vs 1ET.F Comparison
1A9.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1A9.F stands at 348.26M. In comparison, 1ET.F has a market cap of 4.80M. Regarding current trading prices, 1A9.F is priced at $0.70, while 1ET.F trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1A9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.96, whereas 1ET.F's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, 1A9.F's ROE is -6.76%, compared to 1ET.F's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 1A9.F is more volatile compared to 1ET.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1A9.F.
1A9.F vs 0MZ.F Comparison
1A9.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1A9.F stands at 348.26M. In comparison, 0MZ.F has a market cap of 552046.00. Regarding current trading prices, 1A9.F is priced at $0.70, while 0MZ.F trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1A9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.96, whereas 0MZ.F's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, 1A9.F's ROE is -6.76%, compared to 0MZ.F's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 1A9.F is more volatile compared to 0MZ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1A9.F.