Asante Gold Corporation
Asante Gold Corporation 1A9.F Peers
See (1A9.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1A9.F | €0.93 | +0.00% | 463.6M | -7.71 | -€0.12 | N/A |
| NMM.DE | €50.35 | +1.21% | 56B | 13.22 | €3.81 | +1.89% |
| ABR.DE | €16.99 | +0.46% | 29.2B | 14.40 | €1.18 | +2.07% |
| KIN2.DE | €13.16 | -0.42% | 16.1B | 15.48 | €0.85 | +0.82% |
| RNY.DE | €5.39 | +0.00% | 5.2B | -5.74 | -€0.94 | N/A |
| CDM1.DE | €7.47 | -1.79% | 4.8B | 29.87 | €0.25 | N/A |
| HCL.DE | €5.07 | +0.24% | 3.2B | 50.74 | €0.10 | +0.67% |
| RKVA.F | €11.45 | -1.76% | 1.7B | 14.68 | €0.78 | N/A |
| V46.F | €1.39 | +3.73% | 283.6M | -13.90 | -€0.10 | N/A |
| 1I1.F | €0.75 | +5.06% | 150.3M | -37.40 | -€0.02 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1A9.F vs NMM.DE Comparison
1A9.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1A9.F stands at 463.6M. In comparison, NMM.DE has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, 1A9.F is priced at €0.93, while NMM.DE trades at €50.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1A9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -7.71, whereas NMM.DE's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, 1A9.F's ROE is -23.59%, compared to NMM.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1A9.F is less volatile compared to NMM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1A9.F.
1A9.F vs ABR.DE Comparison
1A9.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1A9.F stands at 463.6M. In comparison, ABR.DE has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1A9.F is priced at €0.93, while ABR.DE trades at €16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1A9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -7.71, whereas ABR.DE's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, 1A9.F's ROE is -23.59%, compared to ABR.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1A9.F is less volatile compared to ABR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1A9.F.
1A9.F vs KIN2.DE Comparison
1A9.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1A9.F stands at 463.6M. In comparison, KIN2.DE has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1A9.F is priced at €0.93, while KIN2.DE trades at €13.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1A9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -7.71, whereas KIN2.DE's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, 1A9.F's ROE is -23.59%, compared to KIN2.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1A9.F is less volatile compared to KIN2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1A9.F.
1A9.F vs RNY.DE Comparison
1A9.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1A9.F stands at 463.6M. In comparison, RNY.DE has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1A9.F is priced at €0.93, while RNY.DE trades at €5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1A9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -7.71, whereas RNY.DE's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, 1A9.F's ROE is -23.59%, compared to RNY.DE's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 1A9.F is less volatile compared to RNY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1A9.F.
1A9.F vs CDM1.DE Comparison
1A9.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1A9.F stands at 463.6M. In comparison, CDM1.DE has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1A9.F is priced at €0.93, while CDM1.DE trades at €7.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1A9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -7.71, whereas CDM1.DE's P/E ratio is 29.87. In terms of profitability, 1A9.F's ROE is -23.59%, compared to CDM1.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1A9.F is less volatile compared to CDM1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1A9.F.
1A9.F vs HCL.DE Comparison
1A9.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1A9.F stands at 463.6M. In comparison, HCL.DE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1A9.F is priced at €0.93, while HCL.DE trades at €5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1A9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -7.71, whereas HCL.DE's P/E ratio is 50.74. In terms of profitability, 1A9.F's ROE is -23.59%, compared to HCL.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1A9.F is less volatile compared to HCL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1A9.F.
1A9.F vs RKVA.F Comparison
1A9.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1A9.F stands at 463.6M. In comparison, RKVA.F has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1A9.F is priced at €0.93, while RKVA.F trades at €11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1A9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -7.71, whereas RKVA.F's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, 1A9.F's ROE is -23.59%, compared to RKVA.F's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 1A9.F is less volatile compared to RKVA.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1A9.F.
1A9.F vs V46.F Comparison
1A9.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1A9.F stands at 463.6M. In comparison, V46.F has a market cap of 283.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1A9.F is priced at €0.93, while V46.F trades at €1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1A9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -7.71, whereas V46.F's P/E ratio is -13.90. In terms of profitability, 1A9.F's ROE is -23.59%, compared to V46.F's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1A9.F is less volatile compared to V46.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1A9.F.
1A9.F vs 1I1.F Comparison
1A9.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1A9.F stands at 463.6M. In comparison, 1I1.F has a market cap of 150.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1A9.F is priced at €0.93, while 1I1.F trades at €0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1A9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -7.71, whereas 1I1.F's P/E ratio is -37.40. In terms of profitability, 1A9.F's ROE is -23.59%, compared to 1I1.F's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1A9.F is less volatile compared to 1I1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1A9.F.
1A9.F vs BBDB.DE Comparison
1A9.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1A9.F stands at 463.6M. In comparison, BBDB.DE has a market cap of 78M. Regarding current trading prices, 1A9.F is priced at €0.93, while BBDB.DE trades at €0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1A9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -7.71, whereas BBDB.DE's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, 1A9.F's ROE is -23.59%, compared to BBDB.DE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1A9.F is less volatile compared to BBDB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1A9.F.
1A9.F vs 0GC0.F Comparison
1A9.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1A9.F stands at 463.6M. In comparison, 0GC0.F has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1A9.F is priced at €0.93, while 0GC0.F trades at €0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1A9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -7.71, whereas 0GC0.F's P/E ratio is -10.70. In terms of profitability, 1A9.F's ROE is -23.59%, compared to 0GC0.F's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1A9.F is less volatile compared to 0GC0.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1A9.F.
1A9.F vs 1ET.F Comparison
1A9.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1A9.F stands at 463.6M. In comparison, 1ET.F has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1A9.F is priced at €0.93, while 1ET.F trades at €0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1A9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -7.71, whereas 1ET.F's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, 1A9.F's ROE is -23.59%, compared to 1ET.F's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, 1A9.F and 1ET.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
1A9.F vs T23A.F Comparison
1A9.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1A9.F stands at 463.6M. In comparison, T23A.F has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1A9.F is priced at €0.93, while T23A.F trades at €0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1A9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -7.71, whereas T23A.F's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, 1A9.F's ROE is -23.59%, compared to T23A.F's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 1A9.F and T23A.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
1A9.F vs 0MZ.F Comparison
1A9.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1A9.F stands at 463.6M. In comparison, 0MZ.F has a market cap of 496.6K. Regarding current trading prices, 1A9.F is priced at €0.93, while 0MZ.F trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1A9.F currently has a P/E ratio of -7.71, whereas 0MZ.F's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, 1A9.F's ROE is -23.59%, compared to 0MZ.F's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 1A9.F and 0MZ.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).