Man Wah Holdings Limited
Man Wah Holdings Limited 1999.HK Peers
See (1999.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1999.HK | $4.18 | -1.65% | 16.21B | 7.89 | $0.53 | +7.18% |
| 0300.HK | $82.15 | +0.55% | 657.78B | 13.21 | $6.22 | N/A |
| 6690.HK | $23.95 | +0.42% | 250.90B | 10.55 | $2.27 | +4.00% |
| 0921.HK | $27.05 | +1.50% | 42.04B | 9.77 | $2.77 | +4.37% |
| 1691.HK | $2.00 | +1.52% | 6.88B | 100.00 | $0.02 | N/A |
| 2519.HK | $9.56 | +2.80% | 3.73B | 6.83 | $1.40 | +2.84% |
| 0837.HK | $6.00 | N/A | 1.49B | 8.00 | $0.75 | +6.44% |
| 0531.HK | $0.48 | -1.04% | 1.44B | 47.50 | $0.01 | N/A |
| 0776.HK | $1.79 | +7.19% | 668.10M | -13.77 | -$0.13 | N/A |
| 1373.HK | $0.92 | N/A | 659.56M | 7.67 | $0.12 | +4.35% |
Stock Comparison
1999.HK vs 0300.HK Comparison
1999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1999.HK stands at 16.21B. In comparison, 0300.HK has a market cap of 657.78B. Regarding current trading prices, 1999.HK is priced at $4.18, while 0300.HK trades at $82.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas 0300.HK's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, 1999.HK's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0300.HK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1999.HK is more volatile compared to 0300.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1999.HK.
1999.HK vs 6690.HK Comparison
1999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1999.HK stands at 16.21B. In comparison, 6690.HK has a market cap of 250.90B. Regarding current trading prices, 1999.HK is priced at $4.18, while 6690.HK trades at $23.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas 6690.HK's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, 1999.HK's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6690.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1999.HK is more volatile compared to 6690.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1999.HK.
1999.HK vs 0921.HK Comparison
1999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1999.HK stands at 16.21B. In comparison, 0921.HK has a market cap of 42.04B. Regarding current trading prices, 1999.HK is priced at $4.18, while 0921.HK trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas 0921.HK's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, 1999.HK's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0921.HK's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 1999.HK is more volatile compared to 0921.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1999.HK.
1999.HK vs 1691.HK Comparison
1999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1999.HK stands at 16.21B. In comparison, 1691.HK has a market cap of 6.88B. Regarding current trading prices, 1999.HK is priced at $4.18, while 1691.HK trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas 1691.HK's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, 1999.HK's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 1691.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1999.HK is more volatile compared to 1691.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1999.HK.
1999.HK vs 2519.HK Comparison
1999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1999.HK stands at 16.21B. In comparison, 2519.HK has a market cap of 3.73B. Regarding current trading prices, 1999.HK is priced at $4.18, while 2519.HK trades at $9.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas 2519.HK's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, 1999.HK's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 2519.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1999.HK is more volatile compared to 2519.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1999.HK.
1999.HK vs 0837.HK Comparison
1999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1999.HK stands at 16.21B. In comparison, 0837.HK has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, 1999.HK is priced at $4.18, while 0837.HK trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas 0837.HK's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, 1999.HK's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0837.HK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1999.HK is more volatile compared to 0837.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1999.HK.
1999.HK vs 0531.HK Comparison
1999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1999.HK stands at 16.21B. In comparison, 0531.HK has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, 1999.HK is priced at $4.18, while 0531.HK trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas 0531.HK's P/E ratio is 47.50. In terms of profitability, 1999.HK's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0531.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1999.HK is more volatile compared to 0531.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1999.HK.
1999.HK vs 0776.HK Comparison
1999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1999.HK stands at 16.21B. In comparison, 0776.HK has a market cap of 668.10M. Regarding current trading prices, 1999.HK is priced at $4.18, while 0776.HK trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas 0776.HK's P/E ratio is -13.77. In terms of profitability, 1999.HK's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0776.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1999.HK is less volatile compared to 0776.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1999.HK.
1999.HK vs 1373.HK Comparison
1999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1999.HK stands at 16.21B. In comparison, 1373.HK has a market cap of 659.56M. Regarding current trading prices, 1999.HK is priced at $4.18, while 1373.HK trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas 1373.HK's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, 1999.HK's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 1373.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1999.HK is more volatile compared to 1373.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1999.HK.
1999.HK vs 1198.HK Comparison
1999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1999.HK stands at 16.21B. In comparison, 1198.HK has a market cap of 656.64M. Regarding current trading prices, 1999.HK is priced at $4.18, while 1198.HK trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas 1198.HK's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, 1999.HK's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 1198.HK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1999.HK is more volatile compared to 1198.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1999.HK.
1999.HK vs 1418.HK Comparison
1999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1999.HK stands at 16.21B. In comparison, 1418.HK has a market cap of 498.75M. Regarding current trading prices, 1999.HK is priced at $4.18, while 1418.HK trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas 1418.HK's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, 1999.HK's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 1418.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1999.HK is less volatile compared to 1418.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1999.HK.
1999.HK vs 0229.HK Comparison
1999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1999.HK stands at 16.21B. In comparison, 0229.HK has a market cap of 471.25M. Regarding current trading prices, 1999.HK is priced at $4.18, while 0229.HK trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas 0229.HK's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, 1999.HK's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0229.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1999.HK is less volatile compared to 0229.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1999.HK.
1999.HK vs 2222.HK Comparison
1999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1999.HK stands at 16.21B. In comparison, 2222.HK has a market cap of 426.11M. Regarding current trading prices, 1999.HK is priced at $4.18, while 2222.HK trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas 2222.HK's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, 1999.HK's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 2222.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1999.HK is more volatile compared to 2222.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1999.HK.
1999.HK vs 6822.HK Comparison
1999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1999.HK stands at 16.21B. In comparison, 6822.HK has a market cap of 280.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 1999.HK is priced at $4.18, while 6822.HK trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas 6822.HK's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, 1999.HK's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6822.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1999.HK is more volatile compared to 6822.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1999.HK.
1999.HK vs 0684.HK Comparison
1999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1999.HK stands at 16.21B. In comparison, 0684.HK has a market cap of 226.48M. Regarding current trading prices, 1999.HK is priced at $4.18, while 0684.HK trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas 0684.HK's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, 1999.HK's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0684.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1999.HK is more volatile compared to 0684.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1999.HK.
1999.HK vs 1575.HK Comparison
1999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1999.HK stands at 16.21B. In comparison, 1575.HK has a market cap of 203.12M. Regarding current trading prices, 1999.HK is priced at $4.18, while 1575.HK trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas 1575.HK's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, 1999.HK's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 1575.HK's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 1999.HK is more volatile compared to 1575.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1999.HK.
1999.HK vs 2381.HK Comparison
1999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1999.HK stands at 16.21B. In comparison, 2381.HK has a market cap of 202.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 1999.HK is priced at $4.18, while 2381.HK trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas 2381.HK's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, 1999.HK's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 2381.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1999.HK and 2381.HK have similar daily volatility (4.00).
1999.HK vs 1715.HK Comparison
1999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1999.HK stands at 16.21B. In comparison, 1715.HK has a market cap of 132.07M. Regarding current trading prices, 1999.HK is priced at $4.18, while 1715.HK trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas 1715.HK's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, 1999.HK's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 1715.HK's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, 1999.HK is less volatile compared to 1715.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1999.HK.
1999.HK vs 2127.HK Comparison
1999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1999.HK stands at 16.21B. In comparison, 2127.HK has a market cap of 84.71M. Regarding current trading prices, 1999.HK is priced at $4.18, while 2127.HK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas 2127.HK's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, 1999.HK's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 2127.HK's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 1999.HK is less volatile compared to 2127.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1999.HK.
1999.HK vs 0396.HK Comparison
1999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1999.HK stands at 16.21B. In comparison, 0396.HK has a market cap of 78.39M. Regarding current trading prices, 1999.HK is priced at $4.18, while 0396.HK trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas 0396.HK's P/E ratio is 4.85. In terms of profitability, 1999.HK's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0396.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1999.HK is less volatile compared to 0396.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1999.HK.
1999.HK vs 8125.HK Comparison
1999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1999.HK stands at 16.21B. In comparison, 8125.HK has a market cap of 63.21M. Regarding current trading prices, 1999.HK is priced at $4.18, while 8125.HK trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas 8125.HK's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, 1999.HK's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 8125.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1999.HK is less volatile compared to 8125.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1999.HK.
1999.HK vs 8547.HK Comparison
1999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1999.HK stands at 16.21B. In comparison, 8547.HK has a market cap of 61.58M. Regarding current trading prices, 1999.HK is priced at $4.18, while 8547.HK trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas 8547.HK's P/E ratio is 3.75. In terms of profitability, 1999.HK's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 8547.HK's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 1999.HK is more volatile compared to 8547.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1999.HK.
1999.HK vs 8118.HK Comparison
1999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1999.HK stands at 16.21B. In comparison, 8118.HK has a market cap of 36.50M. Regarding current trading prices, 1999.HK is priced at $4.18, while 8118.HK trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas 8118.HK's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, 1999.HK's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 8118.HK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1999.HK is more volatile compared to 8118.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1999.HK.
1999.HK vs 1237.HK Comparison
1999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1999.HK stands at 16.21B. In comparison, 1237.HK has a market cap of 34.09M. Regarding current trading prices, 1999.HK is priced at $4.18, while 1237.HK trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas 1237.HK's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, 1999.HK's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 1237.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1999.HK is more volatile compared to 1237.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1999.HK.
1999.HK vs 8392.HK Comparison
1999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1999.HK stands at 16.21B. In comparison, 8392.HK has a market cap of 25.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 1999.HK is priced at $4.18, while 8392.HK trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas 8392.HK's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, 1999.HK's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 8392.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1999.HK is more volatile compared to 8392.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1999.HK.
1999.HK vs 8222.HK Comparison
1999.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1999.HK stands at 16.21B. In comparison, 8222.HK has a market cap of 22.55M. Regarding current trading prices, 1999.HK is priced at $4.18, while 8222.HK trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1999.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.89, whereas 8222.HK's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, 1999.HK's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 8222.HK's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, 1999.HK is less volatile compared to 8222.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1999.HK.