Akatsuki Eazima Co., Ltd.
Akatsuki Eazima Co., Ltd. 1997.T Peers
See (1997.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1997.T | ¥2,795.00 | -1.52% | 5.7B | 8.54 | ¥327.22 | +2.68% |
| 1812.T | ¥3,795.00 | +0.61% | 1.8T | 14.24 | ¥266.48 | +2.74% |
| 1802.T | ¥2,177.00 | +0.62% | 1.5T | 10.68 | ¥203.87 | +3.67% |
| 1801.T | ¥8,595.00 | +1.28% | 1.5T | 12.58 | ¥683.10 | +2.44% |
| 1803.T | ¥1,610.50 | -0.37% | 1.1T | 16.98 | ¥94.86 | +2.17% |
| 1944.T | ¥4,388.00 | -0.23% | 872.1B | 18.56 | ¥236.45 | +1.14% |
| 1942.T | ¥3,398.00 | +0.41% | 694.5B | 16.38 | ¥207.46 | +2.35% |
| 1959.T | ¥6,128.00 | +0.23% | 433.4B | 15.01 | ¥408.17 | +2.28% |
| 1721.T | ¥3,335.00 | -0.09% | 389.7B | 13.09 | ¥252.96 | +3.45% |
| 1951.T | ¥1,833.00 | +0.33% | 379.2B | 14.23 | ¥128.85 | +3.44% |
Stock Comparison
1997.T vs 1812.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1812.T has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1812.T trades at ¥3,795.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1812.T's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1812.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1812.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1802.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1802.T has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1802.T trades at ¥2,177.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1802.T's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1802.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1802.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1801.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1801.T has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1801.T trades at ¥8,595.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1801.T's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1801.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1801.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1803.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1803.T has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1803.T trades at ¥1,610.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1803.T's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1803.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1803.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1944.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1944.T has a market cap of 872.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1944.T trades at ¥4,388.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1944.T's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1944.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1944.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1942.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1942.T has a market cap of 694.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1942.T trades at ¥3,398.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1942.T's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1942.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1942.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1959.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1959.T has a market cap of 433.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1959.T trades at ¥6,128.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1959.T's P/E ratio is 15.01. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1959.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1959.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1721.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1721.T has a market cap of 389.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1721.T trades at ¥3,335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1721.T's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1721.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1721.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1951.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1951.T has a market cap of 379.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1951.T trades at ¥1,833.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1951.T's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1951.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1951.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 5076.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 5076.T has a market cap of 307.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 5076.T trades at ¥1,236.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 5076.T's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 5076.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is less volatile compared to 5076.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1963.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1963.T has a market cap of 297.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1963.T trades at ¥1,230.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1963.T's P/E ratio is -768.75. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1963.T's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1963.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1860.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1860.T has a market cap of 277.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1860.T trades at ¥925.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1860.T's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1860.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1860.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1893.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1893.T has a market cap of 259.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1893.T trades at ¥921.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1893.T's P/E ratio is 20.91. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1893.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1893.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1414.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1414.T has a market cap of 236.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1414.T trades at ¥4,656.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1414.T's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1414.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1414.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1949.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1949.T has a market cap of 229.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1949.T trades at ¥6,530.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1949.T's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1949.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is less volatile compared to 1949.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1719.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1719.T has a market cap of 227.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1719.T trades at ¥1,477.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1719.T's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1719.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1719.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1417.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1417.T has a market cap of 226.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1417.T trades at ¥2,538.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1417.T's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1417.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1417.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1961.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1961.T has a market cap of 211.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1961.T trades at ¥4,090.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1961.T's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1961.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1961.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1980.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1980.T has a market cap of 192.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1980.T trades at ¥4,485.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1980.T's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1980.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1980.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1820.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1820.T has a market cap of 190.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1820.T trades at ¥4,821.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1820.T's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1820.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1820.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1941.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1941.T has a market cap of 182.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1941.T trades at ¥3,365.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1941.T's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1941.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1941.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1861.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1861.T has a market cap of 178.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1861.T trades at ¥4,160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1861.T's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1861.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1861.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1833.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1833.T has a market cap of 155.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1833.T trades at ¥4,295.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1833.T's P/E ratio is 57.31. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1833.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1833.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1934.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1934.T has a market cap of 148.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1934.T trades at ¥2,160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1934.T's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1934.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1934.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 6055.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 6055.T has a market cap of 148.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 6055.T trades at ¥1,442.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 6055.T's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6055.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 6055.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1890.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1890.T has a market cap of 138B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1890.T trades at ¥1,469.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1890.T's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1890.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1890.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1835.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1835.T has a market cap of 135B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1835.T trades at ¥3,920.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1835.T's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1835.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1835.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1926.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1926.T has a market cap of 131.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1926.T trades at ¥2,945.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1926.T's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1926.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1926.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1885.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1885.T has a market cap of 129.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1885.T trades at ¥1,628.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1885.T's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1885.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1885.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1946.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1946.T has a market cap of 116.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1946.T trades at ¥1,256.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1946.T's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1946.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1946.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1720.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1720.T has a market cap of 112.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1720.T trades at ¥1,045.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1720.T's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1720.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1720.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1952.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1952.T has a market cap of 111.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1952.T trades at ¥2,469.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1952.T's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1952.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is less volatile compared to 1952.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1884.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1884.T has a market cap of 110.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1884.T trades at ¥2,507.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1884.T's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1884.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1884.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1762.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1762.T has a market cap of 103.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1762.T trades at ¥2,964.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1762.T's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1762.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1762.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 9716.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 9716.T has a market cap of 102.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 9716.T trades at ¥915.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 9716.T's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9716.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 9716.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 5911.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 5911.T has a market cap of 101.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 5911.T trades at ¥2,533.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 5911.T's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 5911.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 5911.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 9161.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 9161.T has a market cap of 97.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 9161.T trades at ¥6,480.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 9161.T's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9161.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 9161.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 9663.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 9663.T has a market cap of 97.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 9663.T trades at ¥6,240.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 9663.T's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9663.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is less volatile compared to 9663.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1879.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1879.T has a market cap of 95.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1879.T trades at ¥1,638.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1879.T's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1879.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1879.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 6366.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 6366.T has a market cap of 85.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 6366.T trades at ¥331.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 6366.T's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6366.T's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 6366.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1982.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1982.T has a market cap of 81.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1982.T trades at ¥3,710.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1982.T's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1982.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1982.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1871.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1871.T has a market cap of 81.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1871.T trades at ¥1,745.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1871.T's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1871.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1871.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1965.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1965.T has a market cap of 80.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1965.T trades at ¥3,820.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1965.T's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1965.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is less volatile compared to 1965.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 9621.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 9621.T has a market cap of 78.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 9621.T trades at ¥2,836.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 9621.T's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9621.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 9621.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1870.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1870.T has a market cap of 76.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1870.T trades at ¥1,784.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1870.T's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1870.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is less volatile compared to 1870.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1822.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1822.T has a market cap of 72.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1822.T trades at ¥801.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1822.T's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1822.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1822.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1976.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1976.T has a market cap of 71.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1976.T trades at ¥1,496.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1976.T's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1976.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1976.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1882.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1882.T has a market cap of 70.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1882.T trades at ¥1,514.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1882.T's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1882.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1882.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 9755.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 9755.T has a market cap of 69.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 9755.T trades at ¥3,015.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 9755.T's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9755.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 9755.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 3443.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 3443.T has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 3443.T trades at ¥3,820.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 3443.T's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3443.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 3443.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 6226.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 6226.T has a market cap of 65.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 6226.T trades at ¥3,725.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 6226.T's P/E ratio is 29.62. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6226.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is less volatile compared to 6226.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1775.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1775.T has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1775.T trades at ¥7,160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1775.T's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1775.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1775.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1939.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1939.T has a market cap of 61.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1939.T trades at ¥1,294.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1939.T's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1939.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1939.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1852.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1852.T has a market cap of 61.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1852.T trades at ¥758.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1852.T's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1852.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1852.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1799.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1799.T has a market cap of 58.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1799.T trades at ¥2,979.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1799.T's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1799.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is less volatile compared to 1799.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1954.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1954.T has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1954.T trades at ¥3,740.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1954.T's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1954.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1954.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1888.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1888.T has a market cap of 55.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1888.T trades at ¥4,335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1888.T's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1888.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is less volatile compared to 1888.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 6330.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 6330.T has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 6330.T trades at ¥928.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 6330.T's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6330.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is less volatile compared to 6330.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1921.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1921.T has a market cap of 53.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1921.T trades at ¥1,441.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1921.T's P/E ratio is 3.93. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1921.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is less volatile compared to 1921.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1898.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1898.T has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1898.T trades at ¥1,438.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1898.T's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1898.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1898.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 3431.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 3431.T has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 3431.T trades at ¥1,872.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 3431.T's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3431.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 3431.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1786.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1786.T has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1786.T trades at ¥366.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1786.T's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1786.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1786.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1929.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1929.T has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1929.T trades at ¥1,102.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1929.T's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1929.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1929.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1945.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1945.T has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1945.T trades at ¥1,361.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1945.T's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1945.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T and 1945.T have similar daily volatility (3.27).
1997.T vs 1967.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1967.T has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1967.T trades at ¥1,715.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1967.T's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1967.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is less volatile compared to 1967.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1899.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1899.T has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1899.T trades at ¥4,970.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1899.T's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1899.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1899.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1815.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1815.T has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1815.T trades at ¥2,907.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1815.T's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1815.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1815.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 5959.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 5959.T has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 5959.T trades at ¥833.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 5959.T's P/E ratio is -44.10. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 5959.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 5959.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1887.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1887.T has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1887.T trades at ¥472.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1887.T's P/E ratio is 64.13. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1887.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1887.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 256A.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 256A.T has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 256A.T trades at ¥1,846.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 256A.T's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 256A.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 256A.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1813.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1813.T has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1813.T trades at ¥2,335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1813.T's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1813.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1813.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1930.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1930.T has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1930.T trades at ¥1,209.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1930.T's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1930.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is less volatile compared to 1930.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1810.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1810.T has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1810.T trades at ¥1,147.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1810.T's P/E ratio is 33.19. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1810.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is less volatile compared to 1810.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1793.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1793.T has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1793.T trades at ¥1,244.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1793.T's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1793.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1793.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1811.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1811.T has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1811.T trades at ¥4,235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1811.T's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1811.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1811.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 9622.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 9622.T has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 9622.T trades at ¥1,139.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 9622.T's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9622.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 9622.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1805.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1805.T has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1805.T trades at ¥1,439.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1805.T's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1805.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1805.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1866.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1866.T has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1866.T trades at ¥4,350.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1866.T's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1866.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is less volatile compared to 1866.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 2153.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 2153.T has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 2153.T trades at ¥1,468.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 2153.T's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2153.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 2153.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1827.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1827.T has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1827.T trades at ¥720.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1827.T's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1827.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1827.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1780.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1780.T has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1780.T trades at ¥1,265.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1780.T's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1780.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1780.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1828.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1828.T has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1828.T trades at ¥2,197.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1828.T's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1828.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1828.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 9788.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 9788.T has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 9788.T trades at ¥550.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 9788.T's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9788.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 9788.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 9768.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 9768.T has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 9768.T trades at ¥3,090.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 9768.T's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9768.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 9768.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1948.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1948.T has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1948.T trades at ¥2,360.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1948.T's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1948.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1948.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 9233.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 9233.T has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 9233.T trades at ¥1,118.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 9233.T's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9233.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 9233.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 9163.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 9163.T has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 9163.T trades at ¥2,256.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 9163.T's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9163.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 9163.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 6540.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 6540.T has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 6540.T trades at ¥1,688.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 6540.T's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6540.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is less volatile compared to 6540.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1826.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1826.T has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1826.T trades at ¥1,093.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1826.T's P/E ratio is 46.55. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1826.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1826.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 9765.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 9765.T has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 9765.T trades at ¥1,040.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 9765.T's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9765.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 9765.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1726.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1726.T has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1726.T trades at ¥323.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1726.T's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1726.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1726.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1776.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1776.T has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1776.T trades at ¥1,560.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1776.T's P/E ratio is 37.29. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1776.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1776.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1716.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1716.T has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1716.T trades at ¥1,269.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1716.T's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1716.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1716.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 5918.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 5918.T has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 5918.T trades at ¥6,740.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 5918.T's P/E ratio is 27.54. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 5918.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 5918.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1770.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1770.T has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1770.T trades at ¥1,490.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1770.T's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1770.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1770.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1960.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1960.T has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1960.T trades at ¥868.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1960.T's P/E ratio is 132.72. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1960.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1960.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1867.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1867.T has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1867.T trades at ¥1,997.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1867.T's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1867.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1867.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 5079.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 5079.T has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 5079.T trades at ¥2,485.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 5079.T's P/E ratio is 332.66. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 5079.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 5079.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.
1997.T vs 1914.T Comparison
1997.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.T stands at 5.7B. In comparison, 1914.T has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.T is priced at ¥2,795.00, while 1914.T trades at ¥647.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.54, whereas 1914.T's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, 1997.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1914.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.T is more volatile compared to 1914.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.T.