Wharf Real Estate Investment Company Limited
Wharf Real Estate Investment Company Limited 1997.HK Peers
See (1997.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1997.HK | HK$22.55 | +1.12% | 67.4B | 76.55 | HK$0.29 | +5.59% |
| 2423.HK | HK$46.50 | -3.83% | 163B | 34.10 | HK$1.39 | +1.97% |
| 1972.HK | HK$19.68 | -0.10% | 112.8B | -150.77 | -HK$0.13 | +5.61% |
| 1209.HK | HK$38.00 | +0.00% | 86.6B | 21.94 | HK$1.73 | +4.23% |
| 1821.HK | HK$12.94 | +0.15% | 55B | -9.73 | -HK$1.33 | N/A |
| 0101.HK | HK$7.76 | +2.78% | 37.5B | 16.28 | HK$0.46 | +6.94% |
| 2602.HK | HK$21.20 | -0.93% | 24.4B | 19.67 | HK$1.07 | +21.46% |
| 6098.HK | HK$6.54 | -3.25% | 21.2B | 11.12 | HK$0.59 | +2.25% |
| 6049.HK | HK$32.75 | -1.80% | 18.3B | 11.31 | HK$2.93 | +4.38% |
| 2669.HK | HK$5.47 | -1.26% | 18B | 10.96 | HK$0.50 | +3.28% |
Stock Comparison
1997.HK vs 2423.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 2423.HK has a market cap of 163B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 2423.HK trades at HK$46.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 2423.HK's P/E ratio is 34.10. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2423.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 2423.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1972.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 1972.HK has a market cap of 112.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 1972.HK trades at HK$19.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 1972.HK's P/E ratio is -150.77. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1972.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 1972.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1209.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 1209.HK has a market cap of 86.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 1209.HK trades at HK$38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 1209.HK's P/E ratio is 21.94. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1209.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 1209.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1821.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 1821.HK has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 1821.HK trades at HK$12.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 1821.HK's P/E ratio is -9.73. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1821.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 1821.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0101.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0101.HK has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0101.HK trades at HK$7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0101.HK's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0101.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0101.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2602.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 2602.HK has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 2602.HK trades at HK$21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 2602.HK's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2602.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 2602.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 6098.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 6098.HK has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 6098.HK trades at HK$6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 6098.HK's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6098.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 6098.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 6049.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 6049.HK has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 6049.HK trades at HK$32.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 6049.HK's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6049.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 6049.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2669.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 2669.HK has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 2669.HK trades at HK$5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 2669.HK's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2669.HK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 2669.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1686.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 1686.HK has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 1686.HK trades at HK$7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 1686.HK's P/E ratio is 31.50. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1686.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 1686.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0014.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0014.HK has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0014.HK trades at HK$14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0014.HK's P/E ratio is 470.00. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0014.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0014.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2869.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 2869.HK has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 2869.HK trades at HK$4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 2869.HK's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2869.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 2869.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1528.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 1528.HK has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 1528.HK trades at HK$1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 1528.HK's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1528.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 1528.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 6666.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 6666.HK has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 6666.HK trades at HK$0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 6666.HK's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6666.HK's ROE of +3.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 6666.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0071.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0071.HK has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0071.HK trades at HK$9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0071.HK's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0071.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0071.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 3316.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 3316.HK has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 3316.HK trades at HK$23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 3316.HK's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3316.HK's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 3316.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1387.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 1387.HK has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 1387.HK trades at HK$0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 1387.HK's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1387.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 1387.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 9979.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 9979.HK has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 9979.HK trades at HK$2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 9979.HK's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 9979.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 9979.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 3990.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 3990.HK has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 3990.HK trades at HK$3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 3990.HK's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3990.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 3990.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1516.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 1516.HK has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 1516.HK trades at HK$1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 1516.HK's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1516.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 1516.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 6626.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 6626.HK has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 6626.HK trades at HK$2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 6626.HK's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6626.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 6626.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 3319.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 3319.HK has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 3319.HK trades at HK$2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 3319.HK's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3319.HK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 3319.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 9666.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 9666.HK has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 9666.HK trades at HK$6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 9666.HK's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 9666.HK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 9666.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2156.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 2156.HK has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 2156.HK trades at HK$2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 2156.HK's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2156.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 2156.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1995.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 1995.HK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 1995.HK trades at HK$2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 1995.HK's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1995.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 1995.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0565.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0565.HK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0565.HK trades at HK$1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0565.HK's P/E ratio is -14.62. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0565.HK's ROE of -40.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0565.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0029.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0029.HK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0029.HK trades at HK$13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0029.HK's P/E ratio is -57.04. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0029.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0029.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0982.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0982.HK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0982.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0982.HK's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0982.HK's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0982.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0410.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0410.HK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0410.HK trades at HK$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0410.HK's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0410.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0410.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0816.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0816.HK has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0816.HK trades at HK$2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0816.HK's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0816.HK's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0816.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1755.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 1755.HK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 1755.HK trades at HK$2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 1755.HK's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1755.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 1755.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0108.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0108.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0108.HK trades at HK$0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0108.HK's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0108.HK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0108.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0873.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0873.HK has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0873.HK trades at HK$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0873.HK's P/E ratio is -6.42. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0873.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0873.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0105.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0105.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0105.HK trades at HK$5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0105.HK's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0105.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0105.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0798.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0798.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0798.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0798.HK's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0798.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0798.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 6989.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 6989.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 6989.HK trades at HK$1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 6989.HK's P/E ratio is 5.18. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6989.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 6989.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0878.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0878.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0878.HK trades at HK$5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0878.HK's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0878.HK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0878.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1009.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 1009.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 1009.HK trades at HK$1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 1009.HK's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1009.HK's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 1009.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 3658.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 3658.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 3658.HK trades at HK$1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 3658.HK's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3658.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 3658.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0093.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0093.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0093.HK trades at HK$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0093.HK's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0093.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0093.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1730.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 1730.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 1730.HK trades at HK$4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 1730.HK's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1730.HK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 1730.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0158.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0158.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0158.HK trades at HK$60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0158.HK's P/E ratio is -4.89. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0158.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0158.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 9909.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 9909.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 9909.HK trades at HK$2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 9909.HK's P/E ratio is 5.95. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 9909.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 9909.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 9983.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 9983.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 9983.HK trades at HK$1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 9983.HK's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 9983.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 9983.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 6668.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 6668.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 6668.HK trades at HK$1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 6668.HK's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6668.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 6668.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0163.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0163.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0163.HK trades at HK$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0163.HK's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0163.HK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0163.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1200.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 1200.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 1200.HK trades at HK$1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 1200.HK's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1200.HK's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 1200.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2278.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 2278.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 2278.HK trades at HK$3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 2278.HK's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2278.HK's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 2278.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0720.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0720.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0720.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0720.HK's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0720.HK's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0720.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0266.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0266.HK has a market cap of 996.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0266.HK trades at HK$2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0266.HK's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0266.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0266.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2270.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 2270.HK has a market cap of 864.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 2270.HK trades at HK$1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 2270.HK's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2270.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 2270.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0212.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0212.HK has a market cap of 849.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0212.HK trades at HK$25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0212.HK's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0212.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0212.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1502.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 1502.HK has a market cap of 825.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 1502.HK trades at HK$2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 1502.HK's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1502.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 1502.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2215.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 2215.HK has a market cap of 816.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 2215.HK trades at HK$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 2215.HK's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2215.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 2215.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0237.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0237.HK has a market cap of 810M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0237.HK trades at HK$2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0237.HK's P/E ratio is -3.03. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0237.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0237.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0224.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0224.HK has a market cap of 750.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0224.HK trades at HK$0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0224.HK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0224.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0224.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 6093.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 6093.HK has a market cap of 733.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 6093.HK trades at HK$1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 6093.HK's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6093.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 6093.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0898.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0898.HK has a market cap of 719M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0898.HK trades at HK$0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0898.HK's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0898.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0898.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0277.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0277.HK has a market cap of 667.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0277.HK trades at HK$2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0277.HK's P/E ratio is -12.04. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0277.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0277.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1036.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 1036.HK has a market cap of 642.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 1036.HK trades at HK$1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 1036.HK's P/E ratio is -12.69. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1036.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 1036.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 6677.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 6677.HK has a market cap of 639.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 6677.HK trades at HK$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 6677.HK's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6677.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 6677.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 3913.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 3913.HK has a market cap of 597.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 3913.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 3913.HK's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3913.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 3913.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0367.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0367.HK has a market cap of 593.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0367.HK trades at HK$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0367.HK's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0367.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0367.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0225.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0225.HK has a market cap of 572.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0225.HK trades at HK$5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0225.HK's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0225.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0225.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2152.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 2152.HK has a market cap of 554.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 2152.HK trades at HK$5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 2152.HK's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2152.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 2152.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0655.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0655.HK has a market cap of 539.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0655.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0655.HK's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0655.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0655.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2292.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 2292.HK has a market cap of 532.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 2292.HK trades at HK$0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 2292.HK's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2292.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 2292.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0089.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0089.HK has a market cap of 532.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0089.HK trades at HK$1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0089.HK's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0089.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0089.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 9928.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 9928.HK has a market cap of 520.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 9928.HK trades at HK$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 9928.HK's P/E ratio is 53.00. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 9928.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 9928.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0278.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0278.HK has a market cap of 518.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0278.HK trades at HK$4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0278.HK's P/E ratio is -19.50. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0278.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0278.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0606.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0606.HK has a market cap of 503.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0606.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0606.HK's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0606.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0606.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2205.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 2205.HK has a market cap of 476M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 2205.HK trades at HK$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 2205.HK's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2205.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 2205.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0021.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0021.HK has a market cap of 465.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0021.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0021.HK's P/E ratio is -11.70. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0021.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0021.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0727.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0727.HK has a market cap of 457.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0727.HK trades at HK$1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0727.HK's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0727.HK's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0727.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0938.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0938.HK has a market cap of 427.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0938.HK trades at HK$0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0938.HK's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0938.HK's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0938.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 9982.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 9982.HK has a market cap of 425.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 9982.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 9982.HK's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 9982.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 9982.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0432.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0432.HK has a market cap of 419.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0432.HK trades at HK$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0432.HK's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0432.HK's ROE of +2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0432.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0063.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0063.HK has a market cap of 406.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0063.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0063.HK's P/E ratio is 71.11. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0063.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0063.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0715.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0715.HK has a market cap of 403.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0715.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0715.HK's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0715.HK's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0715.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 3662.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 3662.HK has a market cap of 399.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 3662.HK trades at HK$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 3662.HK's P/E ratio is 3.93. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3662.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 3662.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2165.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 2165.HK has a market cap of 382.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 2165.HK trades at HK$1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 2165.HK's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2165.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 2165.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0674.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0674.HK has a market cap of 377.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0674.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0674.HK's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0674.HK's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0674.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0037.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0037.HK has a market cap of 376.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0037.HK trades at HK$0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0037.HK's P/E ratio is -8.33. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0037.HK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0037.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0583.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0583.HK has a market cap of 370M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0583.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0583.HK's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0583.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0583.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2107.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 2107.HK has a market cap of 367.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 2107.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 2107.HK's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2107.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 2107.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1922.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 1922.HK has a market cap of 363.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 1922.HK trades at HK$1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 1922.HK's P/E ratio is 2.83. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1922.HK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 1922.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 9608.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 9608.HK has a market cap of 357.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 9608.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 9608.HK's P/E ratio is 29.25. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 9608.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 9608.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0519.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0519.HK has a market cap of 326.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0519.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0519.HK's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0519.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0519.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1153.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 1153.HK has a market cap of 318.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 1153.HK trades at HK$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 1153.HK's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1153.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 1153.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1778.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 1778.HK has a market cap of 315.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 1778.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 1778.HK's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1778.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 1778.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2207.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 2207.HK has a market cap of 304.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 2207.HK trades at HK$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 2207.HK's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2207.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 2207.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1538.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 1538.HK has a market cap of 303.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 1538.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 1538.HK's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1538.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 1538.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1895.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 1895.HK has a market cap of 284.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 1895.HK trades at HK$0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 1895.HK's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1895.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 1895.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2376.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 2376.HK has a market cap of 280M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 2376.HK trades at HK$2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 2376.HK's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2376.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 2376.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0733.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0733.HK has a market cap of 239.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0733.HK trades at HK$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0733.HK's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0733.HK's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0733.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2168.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 2168.HK has a market cap of 234.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 2168.HK trades at HK$1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 2168.HK's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2168.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 2168.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2048.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 2048.HK has a market cap of 227.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 2048.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 2048.HK's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2048.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 2048.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0271.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 0271.HK has a market cap of 204.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 0271.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 0271.HK's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0271.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0271.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1663.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 67.4B. In comparison, 1663.HK has a market cap of 204.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$22.55, while 1663.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 76.55, whereas 1663.HK's P/E ratio is 2.77. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1663.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 1663.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.