Wharf Real Estate Investment Company Limited
Wharf Real Estate Investment Company Limited 1997.HK Peers
See (1997.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1997.HK | HK$23.80 | +1.28% | 72.3B | 82.07 | HK$0.29 | +5.21% |
| 2423.HK | HK$50.05 | +0.70% | 170.6B | 35.25 | HK$1.42 | +1.86% |
| 1972.HK | HK$20.40 | +0.74% | 117.5B | -156.92 | -HK$0.13 | +5.39% |
| 1209.HK | HK$37.35 | +0.54% | 85.3B | 21.47 | HK$1.74 | +4.38% |
| 1821.HK | HK$12.94 | +0.15% | 54.9B | -9.73 | -HK$1.33 | N/A |
| 0101.HK | HK$7.50 | +0.00% | 37.5B | 16.30 | HK$0.46 | +6.93% |
| 2602.HK | HK$23.30 | +1.97% | 26.9B | 21.78 | HK$1.07 | +19.38% |
| 6098.HK | HK$6.87 | +1.33% | 22.2B | 11.64 | HK$0.59 | +4.71% |
| 6049.HK | HK$34.95 | +1.30% | 19.1B | 11.93 | HK$2.93 | +4.16% |
| 2669.HK | HK$5.64 | +1.26% | 18.5B | 11.28 | HK$0.50 | +4.70% |
Stock Comparison
1997.HK vs 2423.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 2423.HK has a market cap of 170.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 2423.HK trades at HK$50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 2423.HK's P/E ratio is 35.25. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2423.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 2423.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1972.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 1972.HK has a market cap of 117.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 1972.HK trades at HK$20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 1972.HK's P/E ratio is -156.92. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1972.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 1972.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1209.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 1209.HK has a market cap of 85.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 1209.HK trades at HK$37.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 1209.HK's P/E ratio is 21.47. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1209.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 1209.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1821.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 1821.HK has a market cap of 54.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 1821.HK trades at HK$12.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 1821.HK's P/E ratio is -9.73. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1821.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 1821.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0101.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0101.HK has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0101.HK trades at HK$7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0101.HK's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0101.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0101.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2602.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 2602.HK has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 2602.HK trades at HK$23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 2602.HK's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2602.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 2602.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 6098.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 6098.HK has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 6098.HK trades at HK$6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 6098.HK's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6098.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 6098.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 6049.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 6049.HK has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 6049.HK trades at HK$34.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 6049.HK's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6049.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 6049.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2669.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 2669.HK has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 2669.HK trades at HK$5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 2669.HK's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2669.HK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 2669.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1686.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 1686.HK has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 1686.HK trades at HK$7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 1686.HK's P/E ratio is 32.08. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1686.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 1686.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0014.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0014.HK has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0014.HK trades at HK$15.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0014.HK's P/E ratio is 504.67. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0014.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0014.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2869.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 2869.HK has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 2869.HK trades at HK$4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 2869.HK's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2869.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 2869.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1528.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 1528.HK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 1528.HK trades at HK$1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 1528.HK's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1528.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 1528.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 6666.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 6666.HK has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 6666.HK trades at HK$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 6666.HK's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6666.HK's ROE of +3.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 6666.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 3316.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 3316.HK has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 3316.HK trades at HK$24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 3316.HK's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3316.HK's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 3316.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0071.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0071.HK has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0071.HK trades at HK$9.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0071.HK's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0071.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0071.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 3990.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 3990.HK has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 3990.HK trades at HK$4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 3990.HK's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3990.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK and 3990.HK have similar daily volatility (2.72).
1997.HK vs 9979.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 9979.HK has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 9979.HK trades at HK$2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 9979.HK's P/E ratio is 6.77. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 9979.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 9979.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1387.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 1387.HK has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 1387.HK trades at HK$0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 1387.HK's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1387.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 1387.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1516.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 1516.HK has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 1516.HK trades at HK$1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 1516.HK's P/E ratio is -11.62. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1516.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 1516.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 6626.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 6626.HK has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 6626.HK trades at HK$3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 6626.HK's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6626.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 6626.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 3319.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 3319.HK has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 3319.HK trades at HK$2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 3319.HK's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3319.HK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 3319.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 9666.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 9666.HK has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 9666.HK trades at HK$6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 9666.HK's P/E ratio is -6.43. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 9666.HK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 9666.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2156.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 2156.HK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 2156.HK trades at HK$2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 2156.HK's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2156.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 2156.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1995.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 1995.HK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 1995.HK trades at HK$2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 1995.HK's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1995.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 1995.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0029.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0029.HK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0029.HK trades at HK$13.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0029.HK's P/E ratio is -57.74. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0029.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0029.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0565.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0565.HK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0565.HK trades at HK$1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0565.HK's P/E ratio is -14.37. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0565.HK's ROE of -40.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0565.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0410.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0410.HK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0410.HK trades at HK$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0410.HK's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0410.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0410.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0982.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0982.HK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0982.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0982.HK's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0982.HK's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0982.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0108.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0108.HK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0108.HK trades at HK$0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0108.HK's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0108.HK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0108.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0816.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0816.HK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0816.HK trades at HK$3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0816.HK's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0816.HK's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0816.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1755.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 1755.HK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 1755.HK trades at HK$2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 1755.HK's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1755.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 1755.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1730.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 1730.HK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 1730.HK trades at HK$5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 1730.HK's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1730.HK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 1730.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0873.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0873.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0873.HK trades at HK$0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0873.HK's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0873.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0873.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0798.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0798.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0798.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0798.HK's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0798.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0798.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0105.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0105.HK has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0105.HK trades at HK$5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0105.HK's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0105.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0105.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 6989.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 6989.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 6989.HK trades at HK$1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 6989.HK's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6989.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 6989.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0878.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0878.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0878.HK trades at HK$6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0878.HK's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0878.HK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0878.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1009.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 1009.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 1009.HK trades at HK$1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 1009.HK's P/E ratio is -8.64. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1009.HK's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 1009.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 3658.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 3658.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 3658.HK trades at HK$2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 3658.HK's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3658.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 3658.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 9909.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 9909.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 9909.HK trades at HK$2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 9909.HK's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 9909.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 9909.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0158.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0158.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0158.HK trades at HK$63.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0158.HK's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0158.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0158.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0093.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0093.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0093.HK trades at HK$0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0093.HK's P/E ratio is 58.00. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0093.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0093.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 9983.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 9983.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 9983.HK trades at HK$1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 9983.HK's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 9983.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 9983.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 6668.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 6668.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 6668.HK trades at HK$1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 6668.HK's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6668.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 6668.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1200.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 1200.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 1200.HK trades at HK$1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 1200.HK's P/E ratio is 3.60. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1200.HK's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 1200.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0163.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0163.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0163.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0163.HK's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0163.HK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0163.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2278.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 2278.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 2278.HK trades at HK$3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 2278.HK's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2278.HK's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 2278.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0266.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0266.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0266.HK trades at HK$2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0266.HK's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0266.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0266.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0720.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0720.HK has a market cap of 950.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0720.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0720.HK's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0720.HK's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0720.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0237.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0237.HK has a market cap of 907.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0237.HK trades at HK$2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0237.HK's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0237.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0237.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1502.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 1502.HK has a market cap of 900.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 1502.HK trades at HK$2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 1502.HK's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1502.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 1502.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2270.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 2270.HK has a market cap of 875.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 2270.HK trades at HK$1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 2270.HK's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2270.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 2270.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0212.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0212.HK has a market cap of 849.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0212.HK trades at HK$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0212.HK's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0212.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0212.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0898.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0898.HK has a market cap of 777.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0898.HK trades at HK$0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0898.HK's P/E ratio is 3.32. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0898.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0898.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 6677.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 6677.HK has a market cap of 734.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 6677.HK trades at HK$0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 6677.HK's P/E ratio is 20.67. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6677.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 6677.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2215.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 2215.HK has a market cap of 725.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 2215.HK trades at HK$0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 2215.HK's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2215.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 2215.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0224.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0224.HK has a market cap of 715.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0224.HK trades at HK$0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0224.HK's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0224.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0224.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0277.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0277.HK has a market cap of 667.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0277.HK trades at HK$2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0277.HK's P/E ratio is -12.04. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0277.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0277.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1036.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 1036.HK has a market cap of 650.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 1036.HK trades at HK$1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 1036.HK's P/E ratio is -12.85. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1036.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 1036.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0655.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0655.HK has a market cap of 649.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0655.HK trades at HK$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0655.HK's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0655.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0655.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 3913.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 3913.HK has a market cap of 638.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 3913.HK trades at HK$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 3913.HK's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3913.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 3913.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0225.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0225.HK has a market cap of 628M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0225.HK trades at HK$5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0225.HK's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0225.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0225.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 6093.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 6093.HK has a market cap of 621.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 6093.HK trades at HK$1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 6093.HK's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6093.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 6093.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2152.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 2152.HK has a market cap of 606.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 2152.HK trades at HK$6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 2152.HK's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2152.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 2152.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0606.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0606.HK has a market cap of 580.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0606.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0606.HK's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0606.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0606.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0367.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0367.HK has a market cap of 577M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0367.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0367.HK's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0367.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0367.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 9928.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 9928.HK has a market cap of 559.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 9928.HK trades at HK$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 9928.HK's P/E ratio is 57.00. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 9928.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 9928.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0021.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0021.HK has a market cap of 540.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0021.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0021.HK's P/E ratio is -13.60. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0021.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0021.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0089.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0089.HK has a market cap of 535.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0089.HK trades at HK$1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0089.HK's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0089.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0089.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2292.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 2292.HK has a market cap of 525.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 2292.HK trades at HK$0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 2292.HK's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2292.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 2292.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0278.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0278.HK has a market cap of 518.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0278.HK trades at HK$4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0278.HK's P/E ratio is -19.50. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0278.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0278.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2165.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 2165.HK has a market cap of 494.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 2165.HK trades at HK$1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 2165.HK's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2165.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 2165.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2205.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 2205.HK has a market cap of 483M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 2205.HK trades at HK$0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 2205.HK's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2205.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 2205.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0727.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0727.HK has a market cap of 454.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0727.HK trades at HK$1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0727.HK's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0727.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0727.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 9982.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 9982.HK has a market cap of 425.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 9982.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 9982.HK's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 9982.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 9982.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0432.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0432.HK has a market cap of 424M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0432.HK trades at HK$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0432.HK's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0432.HK's ROE of +2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0432.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2376.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 2376.HK has a market cap of 422.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 2376.HK trades at HK$3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 2376.HK's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2376.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 2376.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0938.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0938.HK has a market cap of 414.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0938.HK trades at HK$0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0938.HK's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0938.HK's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0938.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 3662.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 3662.HK has a market cap of 406.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 3662.HK trades at HK$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 3662.HK's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3662.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 3662.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0715.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0715.HK has a market cap of 403.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0715.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0715.HK's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0715.HK's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0715.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 9608.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 9608.HK has a market cap of 403.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 9608.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 9608.HK's P/E ratio is 33.03. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 9608.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 9608.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2107.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 2107.HK has a market cap of 391.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 2107.HK trades at HK$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 2107.HK's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2107.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 2107.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0063.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0063.HK has a market cap of 387.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0063.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0063.HK's P/E ratio is 67.78. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0063.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0063.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0583.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0583.HK has a market cap of 370M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0583.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0583.HK's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0583.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0583.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1778.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 1778.HK has a market cap of 365.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 1778.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 1778.HK's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1778.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 1778.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1922.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 1922.HK has a market cap of 363.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 1922.HK trades at HK$1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 1922.HK's P/E ratio is 2.83. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1922.HK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 1922.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0037.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0037.HK has a market cap of 361.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0037.HK trades at HK$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0037.HK's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0037.HK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0037.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0519.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0519.HK has a market cap of 348.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0519.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0519.HK's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0519.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0519.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1538.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 1538.HK has a market cap of 329M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 1538.HK trades at HK$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 1538.HK's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1538.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 1538.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0674.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0674.HK has a market cap of 308.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0674.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0674.HK's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0674.HK's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 0674.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2207.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 2207.HK has a market cap of 304.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 2207.HK trades at HK$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 2207.HK's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2207.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 2207.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1895.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 1895.HK has a market cap of 296.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 1895.HK trades at HK$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 1895.HK's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1895.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 1895.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 1153.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 1153.HK has a market cap of 272.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 1153.HK trades at HK$0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 1153.HK's P/E ratio is 44.50. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1153.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 1153.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0733.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0733.HK has a market cap of 269.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0733.HK trades at HK$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0733.HK's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0733.HK's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0733.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2168.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 2168.HK has a market cap of 249.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 2168.HK trades at HK$1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 2168.HK's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2168.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 2168.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 0171.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 0171.HK has a market cap of 225.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 0171.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 0171.HK's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0171.HK's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is less volatile compared to 0171.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 8426.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 8426.HK has a market cap of 216M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 8426.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 8426.HK's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 8426.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 8426.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.
1997.HK vs 2048.HK Comparison
1997.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1997.HK stands at 72.3B. In comparison, 2048.HK has a market cap of 209.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1997.HK is priced at HK$23.80, while 2048.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1997.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 82.07, whereas 2048.HK's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, 1997.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2048.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1997.HK is more volatile compared to 2048.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1997.HK.