China SCE Group Holdings Limited
China SCE Group Holdings Limited 1966.HK Peers
See (1966.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Development Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1966.HK | HK$0.11 | +0.90% | 473M | -0.05 | -HK$2.04 | N/A |
| 0016.HK | HK$90.05 | -0.55% | 260.9B | 14.98 | HK$6.01 | +4.16% |
| 1109.HK | HK$26.60 | -0.37% | 189.7B | 6.79 | HK$3.92 | +5.41% |
| 0688.HK | HK$13.62 | -0.44% | 149.1B | 9.02 | HK$1.51 | +4.41% |
| 1113.HK | HK$34.60 | -1.00% | 121.1B | 8.89 | HK$3.89 | +5.03% |
| 2202.HK | HK$4.89 | -1.01% | 78.8B | -0.96 | -HK$5.10 | N/A |
| 0083.HK | HK$8.35 | -1.30% | 76.4B | 19.88 | HK$0.42 | +6.95% |
| 0004.HK | HK$23.90 | +1.70% | 73B | -22.76 | -HK$1.05 | +1.67% |
| 0960.HK | HK$9.26 | -2.83% | 63.2B | 5.38 | HK$1.72 | +2.58% |
| 0247.HK | HK$19.18 | -0.10% | 41.9B | 19.57 | HK$0.98 | +3.02% |
Stock Comparison
1966.HK vs 0016.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0016.HK has a market cap of 260.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0016.HK trades at HK$90.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0016.HK's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0016.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0016.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 1109.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 1109.HK has a market cap of 189.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1109.HK trades at HK$26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1109.HK's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 1109.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 1109.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0688.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0688.HK has a market cap of 149.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0688.HK trades at HK$13.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0688.HK's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0688.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0688.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 1113.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 1113.HK has a market cap of 121.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1113.HK trades at HK$34.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1113.HK's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 1113.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 1113.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 2202.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 2202.HK has a market cap of 78.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 2202.HK trades at HK$4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 2202.HK's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 2202.HK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 2202.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0083.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0083.HK has a market cap of 76.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0083.HK trades at HK$8.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0083.HK's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0083.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0083.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0004.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0004.HK has a market cap of 73B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0004.HK trades at HK$23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0004.HK's P/E ratio is -22.76. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0004.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0004.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0960.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0960.HK has a market cap of 63.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0960.HK trades at HK$9.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0960.HK's P/E ratio is 5.38. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0960.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0960.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0247.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0247.HK has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0247.HK trades at HK$19.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0247.HK's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0247.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0247.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 1908.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 1908.HK has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1908.HK trades at HK$15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1908.HK's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 1908.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 1908.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0683.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0683.HK has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0683.HK trades at HK$20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0683.HK's P/E ratio is 36.16. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0683.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0683.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 3900.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 3900.HK has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 3900.HK trades at HK$9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 3900.HK's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 3900.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 3900.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0123.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0123.HK has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0123.HK trades at HK$4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0123.HK's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0123.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0123.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 1030.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 1030.HK has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1030.HK trades at HK$2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1030.HK's P/E ratio is 29.13. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 1030.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 1030.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0817.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0817.HK has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0817.HK trades at HK$1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0817.HK's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0817.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0817.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 1918.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 1918.HK has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1918.HK trades at HK$1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1918.HK's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 1918.HK's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 1918.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0754.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0754.HK has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0754.HK trades at HK$3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0754.HK's P/E ratio is 110.67. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0754.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0754.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 9993.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 9993.HK has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 9993.HK trades at HK$3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 9993.HK's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 9993.HK's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 9993.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 2007.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 2007.HK has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 2007.HK trades at HK$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 2007.HK's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 2007.HK's ROE of -3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 2007.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0604.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0604.HK has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0604.HK trades at HK$0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0604.HK's P/E ratio is -4.45. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0604.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is less volatile compared to 0604.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0081.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0081.HK has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0081.HK trades at HK$1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0081.HK's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0081.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0081.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0028.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0028.HK has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0028.HK trades at HK$4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0028.HK's P/E ratio is -30.86. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0028.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0028.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0173.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0173.HK has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0173.HK trades at HK$1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0173.HK's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0173.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0173.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0272.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0272.HK has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0272.HK trades at HK$0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0272.HK's P/E ratio is 36.00. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0272.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0272.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0119.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0119.HK has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0119.HK trades at HK$1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0119.HK's P/E ratio is 30.20. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0119.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0119.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0588.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0588.HK has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0588.HK trades at HK$0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0588.HK's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0588.HK's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0588.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0535.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0535.HK has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0535.HK trades at HK$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0535.HK's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0535.HK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is less volatile compared to 0535.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 3380.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 3380.HK has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 3380.HK trades at HK$0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 3380.HK's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 3380.HK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is less volatile compared to 3380.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 1224.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 1224.HK has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1224.HK trades at HK$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1224.HK's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 1224.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 1224.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0034.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0034.HK has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0034.HK trades at HK$2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0034.HK's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0034.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0034.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 2777.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 2777.HK has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 2777.HK trades at HK$0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 2777.HK's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 2777.HK's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 2777.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 1396.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 1396.HK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1396.HK trades at HK$3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1396.HK's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 1396.HK's ROE of -2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 1396.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0169.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0169.HK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0169.HK trades at HK$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0169.HK's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0169.HK's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0169.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0051.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0051.HK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0051.HK trades at HK$4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0051.HK's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0051.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0051.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0813.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0813.HK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0813.HK trades at HK$0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0813.HK's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0813.HK's ROE of +10.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0813.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0884.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0884.HK has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0884.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0884.HK's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0884.HK's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0884.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0035.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0035.HK has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0035.HK trades at HK$0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0035.HK's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0035.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0035.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0026.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0026.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0026.HK trades at HK$54.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0026.HK's P/E ratio is -18.19. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0026.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0026.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 3333.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 3333.HK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 3333.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 3333.HK's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 3333.HK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is less volatile compared to 3333.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 3383.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 3383.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 3383.HK trades at HK$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 3383.HK's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 3383.HK's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is less volatile compared to 3383.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0369.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0369.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0369.HK trades at HK$1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0369.HK's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0369.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0369.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 2183.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 2183.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 2183.HK trades at HK$4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 2183.HK's P/E ratio is 3.12. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 2183.HK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 2183.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0088.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0088.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0088.HK trades at HK$3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0088.HK's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0088.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0088.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 2118.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 2118.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 2118.HK trades at HK$1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 2118.HK's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 2118.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 2118.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 2103.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 2103.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 2103.HK trades at HK$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 2103.HK's P/E ratio is 0.82. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 2103.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is less volatile compared to 2103.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0194.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0194.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0194.HK trades at HK$4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0194.HK's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0194.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0194.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0563.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0563.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0563.HK trades at HK$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0563.HK's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0563.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0563.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0230.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0230.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0230.HK trades at HK$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0230.HK's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0230.HK's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0230.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0095.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0095.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0095.HK trades at HK$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0095.HK's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0095.HK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is less volatile compared to 0095.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 1668.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 1668.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1668.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1668.HK's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 1668.HK's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 1668.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 1238.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 1238.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1238.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1238.HK's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 1238.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 1238.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 2768.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 2768.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 2768.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 2768.HK's P/E ratio is 1.33. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 2768.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 2768.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 1321.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 1321.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1321.HK trades at HK$0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1321.HK's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 1321.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is less volatile compared to 1321.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 1638.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 1638.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1638.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1638.HK's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 1638.HK's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 1638.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 1813.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 1813.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1813.HK trades at HK$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1813.HK's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 1813.HK's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 1813.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 1278.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 1278.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1278.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1278.HK's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 1278.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is less volatile compared to 1278.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0147.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0147.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0147.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0147.HK's P/E ratio is -17.24. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0147.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0147.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0131.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0131.HK has a market cap of 979M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0131.HK trades at HK$1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0131.HK's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0131.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0131.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 8030.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 8030.HK has a market cap of 919.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 8030.HK trades at HK$2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 8030.HK's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 8030.HK's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is less volatile compared to 8030.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 1838.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 1838.HK has a market cap of 750.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1838.HK trades at HK$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1838.HK's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 1838.HK's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 1838.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0160.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0160.HK has a market cap of 720.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0160.HK trades at HK$1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0160.HK's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0160.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0160.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 2329.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 2329.HK has a market cap of 688.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 2329.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 2329.HK's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 2329.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is less volatile compared to 2329.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 2117.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 2117.HK has a market cap of 681.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 2117.HK trades at HK$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 2117.HK's P/E ratio is 1.19. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 2117.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is less volatile compared to 2117.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0846.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0846.HK has a market cap of 670.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0846.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0846.HK's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0846.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0846.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0496.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0496.HK has a market cap of 661.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0496.HK trades at HK$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0496.HK's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0496.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is less volatile compared to 0496.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 1176.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 1176.HK has a market cap of 593M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1176.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1176.HK's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 1176.HK's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is less volatile compared to 1176.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 2599.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 2599.HK has a market cap of 532.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 2599.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 2599.HK's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 2599.HK's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is less volatile compared to 2599.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 3883.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 3883.HK has a market cap of 530.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 3883.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 3883.HK's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 3883.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 3883.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 1243.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 1243.HK has a market cap of 501.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1243.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1243.HK's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 1243.HK's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is less volatile compared to 1243.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 1622.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 1622.HK has a market cap of 500.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1622.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1622.HK's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 1622.HK's ROE of +1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is less volatile compared to 1622.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 1628.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 1628.HK has a market cap of 492.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1628.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1628.HK's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 1628.HK's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is less volatile compared to 1628.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0618.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0618.HK has a market cap of 481.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0618.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0618.HK's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0618.HK's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is less volatile compared to 0618.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 3688.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 3688.HK has a market cap of 466.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 3688.HK trades at HK$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 3688.HK's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 3688.HK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is less volatile compared to 3688.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0337.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0337.HK has a market cap of 462.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0337.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0337.HK's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0337.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0337.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0542.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0542.HK has a market cap of 422.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0542.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0542.HK's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0542.HK's ROE of +2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0542.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 1233.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 1233.HK has a market cap of 403.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1233.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1233.HK's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 1233.HK's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 1233.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 1777.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 1777.HK has a market cap of 386.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1777.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1777.HK's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 1777.HK's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 1777.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 1125.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 1125.HK has a market cap of 374.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1125.HK trades at HK$1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1125.HK's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 1125.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 1125.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0124.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0124.HK has a market cap of 371.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0124.HK trades at HK$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0124.HK's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0124.HK's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0124.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 3301.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 3301.HK has a market cap of 350.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 3301.HK trades at HK$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 3301.HK's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 3301.HK's ROE of +1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 3301.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 2772.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 2772.HK has a market cap of 338.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 2772.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 2772.HK's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 2772.HK's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 2772.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0989.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0989.HK has a market cap of 338.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0989.HK trades at HK$0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0989.HK's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0989.HK's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is less volatile compared to 0989.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0216.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0216.HK has a market cap of 336.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0216.HK trades at HK$0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0216.HK's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0216.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0216.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 3616.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 3616.HK has a market cap of 312M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 3616.HK trades at HK$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 3616.HK's P/E ratio is 1.73. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 3616.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 3616.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 2892.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 2892.HK has a market cap of 296.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 2892.HK trades at HK$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 2892.HK's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 2892.HK's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 2892.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0865.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0865.HK has a market cap of 280.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0865.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0865.HK's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0865.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is less volatile compared to 0865.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 1570.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 1570.HK has a market cap of 276.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1570.HK trades at HK$1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1570.HK's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 1570.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 1570.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0832.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0832.HK has a market cap of 270.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0832.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0832.HK's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0832.HK's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0832.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0298.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0298.HK has a market cap of 267.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0298.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0298.HK's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0298.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0298.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 1207.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 1207.HK has a market cap of 267.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1207.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1207.HK's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 1207.HK's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is less volatile compared to 1207.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 2231.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 2231.HK has a market cap of 266.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 2231.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 2231.HK's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 2231.HK's ROE of +17.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 2231.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 2019.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 2019.HK has a market cap of 252.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 2019.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 2019.HK's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 2019.HK's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 2019.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0726.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0726.HK has a market cap of 204.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0726.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0726.HK's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0726.HK's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0726.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 6158.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 6158.HK has a market cap of 174.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 6158.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 6158.HK's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 6158.HK's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 6158.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 1218.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 1218.HK has a market cap of 155.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1218.HK trades at HK$2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1218.HK's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 1218.HK's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 1218.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 3639.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 3639.HK has a market cap of 155M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 3639.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 3639.HK's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 3639.HK's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is less volatile compared to 3639.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 1996.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 1996.HK has a market cap of 150.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 1996.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1996.HK's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 1996.HK's ROE of -4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is less volatile compared to 1996.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 3366.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 3366.HK has a market cap of 148.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 3366.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 3366.HK's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 3366.HK's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 3366.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.
1966.HK vs 0185.HK Comparison
1966.HK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1966.HK stands at 473M. In comparison, 0185.HK has a market cap of 145.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1966.HK is priced at HK$0.11, while 0185.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1966.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0185.HK's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, 1966.HK's ROE is -2.19%, compared to 0185.HK's ROE of -2.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1966.HK is more volatile compared to 0185.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1966.HK.