Jinxin Fertility Group Limited
Jinxin Fertility Group Limited 1951.HK Peers
See (1951.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Care Facilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1951.HK | HK$2.98 | +1.02% | 8B | 27.09 | HK$0.11 | +2.00% |
| 6618.HK | HK$42.35 | +4.05% | 135.5B | 29.41 | HK$1.44 | N/A |
| 6078.HK | HK$15.46 | -0.90% | 9.4B | 14.87 | HK$1.04 | N/A |
| 2273.HK | HK$35.50 | -0.28% | 8.3B | 26.69 | HK$1.33 | +0.37% |
| 2373.HK | HK$24.00 | +1.27% | 5.7B | 22.22 | HK$1.08 | +1.79% |
| 1515.HK | HK$4.16 | +2.72% | 5.4B | 8.49 | HK$0.49 | +3.47% |
| 2453.HK | HK$6.90 | +1.47% | 5.1B | -10.15 | -HK$0.68 | N/A |
| 3309.HK | HK$1.78 | +0.56% | 2.2B | -16.18 | -HK$0.11 | N/A |
| 2219.HK | HK$2.82 | -0.70% | 1.9B | 9.10 | HK$0.31 | +9.69% |
| 0708.HK | HK$0.17 | +1.19% | 1.8B | -0.07 | -HK$2.54 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1951.HK vs 6618.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 6618.HK has a market cap of 135.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 6618.HK trades at HK$42.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 6618.HK's P/E ratio is 29.41. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 6618.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is less volatile compared to 6618.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 6078.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 6078.HK has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 6078.HK trades at HK$15.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 6078.HK's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 6078.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is more volatile compared to 6078.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 2273.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 2273.HK has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 2273.HK trades at HK$35.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 2273.HK's P/E ratio is 26.69. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2273.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is more volatile compared to 2273.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 2373.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 2373.HK has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 2373.HK trades at HK$24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 2373.HK's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2373.HK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is less volatile compared to 2373.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 1515.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 1515.HK has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 1515.HK trades at HK$4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 1515.HK's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1515.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is less volatile compared to 1515.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 2453.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 2453.HK has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 2453.HK trades at HK$6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 2453.HK's P/E ratio is -10.15. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2453.HK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is less volatile compared to 2453.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 3309.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 3309.HK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 3309.HK trades at HK$1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 3309.HK's P/E ratio is -16.18. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3309.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is more volatile compared to 3309.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 2219.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 2219.HK has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 2219.HK trades at HK$2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 2219.HK's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2219.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is more volatile compared to 2219.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 0708.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 0708.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 0708.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 0708.HK's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0708.HK's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is less volatile compared to 0708.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 1526.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 1526.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 1526.HK trades at HK$1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 1526.HK's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1526.HK's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is less volatile compared to 1526.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 3886.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 3886.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 3886.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 3886.HK's P/E ratio is -8.17. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3886.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is less volatile compared to 3886.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 9960.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 9960.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 9960.HK trades at HK$1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 9960.HK's P/E ratio is -20.57. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 9960.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is less volatile compared to 9960.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 6639.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 6639.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 6639.HK trades at HK$2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 6639.HK's P/E ratio is 43.60. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 6639.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is more volatile compared to 6639.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 1846.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 1846.HK has a market cap of 941.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 1846.HK trades at HK$3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 1846.HK's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1846.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is less volatile compared to 1846.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 3869.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 3869.HK has a market cap of 921M. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 3869.HK trades at HK$6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 3869.HK's P/E ratio is -21.94. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3869.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is less volatile compared to 3869.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 9906.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 9906.HK has a market cap of 900M. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 9906.HK trades at HK$1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 9906.HK's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 9906.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is more volatile compared to 9906.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 0383.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 0383.HK has a market cap of 865.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 0383.HK trades at HK$0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 0383.HK's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0383.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is more volatile compared to 0383.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 1989.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 1989.HK has a market cap of 812.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 1989.HK trades at HK$0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 1989.HK's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1989.HK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is more volatile compared to 1989.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 3689.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 3689.HK has a market cap of 685.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 3689.HK trades at HK$2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 3689.HK's P/E ratio is 43.20. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3689.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is less volatile compared to 3689.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 2120.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 2120.HK has a market cap of 676.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 2120.HK trades at HK$9.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 2120.HK's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2120.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is less volatile compared to 2120.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 1518.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 1518.HK has a market cap of 536.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 1518.HK trades at HK$1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 1518.HK's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1518.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is less volatile compared to 1518.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 2389.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 2389.HK has a market cap of 490.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 2389.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 2389.HK's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2389.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is more volatile compared to 2389.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 2189.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 2189.HK has a market cap of 470M. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 2189.HK trades at HK$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 2189.HK's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2189.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is more volatile compared to 2189.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 0722.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 0722.HK has a market cap of 371.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 0722.HK trades at HK$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 0722.HK's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0722.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is more volatile compared to 0722.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 1419.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 1419.HK has a market cap of 315M. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 1419.HK trades at HK$0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 1419.HK's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1419.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is more volatile compared to 1419.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 8405.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 8405.HK has a market cap of 276M. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 8405.HK trades at HK$0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 8405.HK's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 8405.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is more volatile compared to 8405.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 0286.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 0286.HK has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 0286.HK trades at HK$1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 0286.HK's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0286.HK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is more volatile compared to 0286.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 2293.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 2293.HK has a market cap of 199.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 2293.HK trades at HK$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 2293.HK's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2293.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is more volatile compared to 2293.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 8143.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 8143.HK has a market cap of 158.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 8143.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 8143.HK's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 8143.HK's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is less volatile compared to 8143.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 8357.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 8357.HK has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 8357.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 8357.HK's P/E ratio is -18.60. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 8357.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is less volatile compared to 8357.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 8307.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 8307.HK has a market cap of 75.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 8307.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 8307.HK's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 8307.HK's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is more volatile compared to 8307.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 2135.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 2135.HK has a market cap of 69.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 2135.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 2135.HK's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2135.HK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is more volatile compared to 2135.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 8161.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 8161.HK has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 8161.HK trades at HK$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 8161.HK's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 8161.HK's ROE of -2.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is more volatile compared to 8161.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.
1951.HK vs 8437.HK Comparison
1951.HK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1951.HK stands at 8B. In comparison, 8437.HK has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1951.HK is priced at HK$2.98, while 8437.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1951.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.09, whereas 8437.HK's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, 1951.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 8437.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1951.HK is more volatile compared to 8437.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1951.HK.