Daiwa House Industry Co., Ltd.
Daiwa House Industry Co., Ltd. (1925.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (1925.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Development Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1925.T | ¥5,002.00 | +1.48% | 3T | 10.00 | ¥491.91 | +3.15% |
| 2983.T | ¥1,529.00 | +2.27% | 247.8B | 8.27 | ¥175.51 | +4.48% |
| 8871.T | ¥3,425.00 | +2.54% | 110.8B | 18.10 | ¥184.21 | +2.69% |
| 3480.T | ¥5,170.00 | +8.84% | 105B | 20.48 | ¥243.46 | +2.11% |
| 8897.T | ¥413.00 | +4.29% | 54B | 6.39 | ¥62.13 | +4.47% |
| 3299.T | ¥2,240.00 | +1.96% | 51B | 7.66 | ¥283.41 | +4.61% |
| 1847.T | ¥2,629.00 | +0.23% | 36.7B | 7.02 | ¥359.61 | +7.82% |
| 1814.T | ¥3,675.00 | +1.80% | 36.6B | 12.37 | ¥284.61 | +4.44% |
| 146A.T | ¥3,905.00 | +3.17% | 28.6B | 7.47 | ¥496.75 | +1.68% |
| 8887.T | ¥396.00 | +3.13% | 16B | 4.50 | ¥85.56 | +1.95% |
Stock Comparison
1925.T vs 2983.T Comparison April 2026
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3T. In comparison, 2983.T has a market cap of 247.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,002.00, while 2983.T trades at ¥1,529.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 2983.T's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 2983.T's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is less volatile compared to 2983.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 2983.T's competition here
1925.T vs 8871.T Comparison April 2026
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3T. In comparison, 8871.T has a market cap of 110.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,002.00, while 8871.T trades at ¥3,425.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 8871.T's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 8871.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is less volatile compared to 8871.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 8871.T's competition here
1925.T vs 3480.T Comparison April 2026
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3T. In comparison, 3480.T has a market cap of 105B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,002.00, while 3480.T trades at ¥5,170.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 3480.T's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3480.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is less volatile compared to 3480.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 3480.T's competition here
1925.T vs 8897.T Comparison April 2026
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3T. In comparison, 8897.T has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,002.00, while 8897.T trades at ¥413.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 8897.T's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 8897.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is less volatile compared to 8897.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 8897.T's competition here
1925.T vs 3299.T Comparison April 2026
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3T. In comparison, 3299.T has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,002.00, while 3299.T trades at ¥2,240.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 3299.T's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3299.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is less volatile compared to 3299.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 3299.T's competition here
1925.T vs 1847.T Comparison April 2026
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3T. In comparison, 1847.T has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,002.00, while 1847.T trades at ¥2,629.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 1847.T's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 1847.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is less volatile compared to 1847.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 1847.T's competition here
1925.T vs 1814.T Comparison April 2026
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3T. In comparison, 1814.T has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,002.00, while 1814.T trades at ¥3,675.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 1814.T's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 1814.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is less volatile compared to 1814.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 1814.T's competition here
1925.T vs 146A.T Comparison April 2026
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3T. In comparison, 146A.T has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,002.00, while 146A.T trades at ¥3,905.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 146A.T's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 146A.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is less volatile compared to 146A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 146A.T's competition here
1925.T vs 8887.T Comparison April 2026
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3T. In comparison, 8887.T has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,002.00, while 8887.T trades at ¥396.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 8887.T's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 8887.T's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is less volatile compared to 8887.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 8887.T's competition here
1925.T vs 2981.T Comparison April 2026
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3T. In comparison, 2981.T has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,002.00, while 2981.T trades at ¥2,225.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 2981.T's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 2981.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is less volatile compared to 2981.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 2981.T's competition here
1925.T vs 3293.T Comparison April 2026
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3T. In comparison, 3293.T has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,002.00, while 3293.T trades at ¥781.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 3293.T's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3293.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is more volatile compared to 3293.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 3293.T's competition here
1925.T vs 2984.T Comparison April 2026
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3T. In comparison, 2984.T has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,002.00, while 2984.T trades at ¥704.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 2984.T's P/E ratio is 43.05. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 2984.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is less volatile compared to 2984.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 2984.T's competition here
1925.T vs 1451.T Comparison April 2026
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3T. In comparison, 1451.T has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,002.00, while 1451.T trades at ¥1,124.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 1451.T's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 1451.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is more volatile compared to 1451.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 1451.T's competition here
1925.T vs 8886.T Comparison April 2026
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3T. In comparison, 8886.T has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,002.00, while 8886.T trades at ¥1,715.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 8886.T's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 8886.T's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is more volatile compared to 8886.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 8886.T's competition here
1925.T vs 7837.T Comparison April 2026
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3T. In comparison, 7837.T has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,002.00, while 7837.T trades at ¥338.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 7837.T's P/E ratio is -3.48. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 7837.T's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is less volatile compared to 7837.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 7837.T's competition here
1925.T vs 1757.T Comparison April 2026
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3T. In comparison, 1757.T has a market cap of 297.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,002.00, while 1757.T trades at ¥1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas 1757.T's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 1757.T's ROE of -2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is more volatile compared to 1757.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 1757.T's competition here