Daiwa House Industry Co., Ltd.
Daiwa House Industry Co., Ltd. (1925.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (1925.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Development Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1925.T | ¥5,254.00 | -1.30% | 3.3T | 10.22 | ¥513.98 | +2.76% |
| 8871.T | ¥3,420.00 | -1.58% | 113.7B | 22.68 | ¥150.82 | +2.88% |
| 3480.T | ¥4,000.00 | +0.25% | 84.4B | 14.59 | ¥274.11 | +1.80% |
| 8897.T | ¥395.00 | -1.00% | 53.7B | 6.36 | ¥62.12 | +7.52% |
| 3299.T | ¥2,056.00 | -1.20% | 48.1B | 7.60 | ¥270.53 | +5.43% |
| 1814.T | ¥2,572.00 | -1.27% | 26.9B | 13.03 | ¥197.46 | +3.80% |
| 1847.T | ¥3,580.00 | -0.69% | 26B | 5.53 | ¥647.10 | +3.61% |
| 146A.T | ¥3,380.00 | -1.17% | 23.5B | 9.68 | ¥349.18 | +1.68% |
| 8887.T | ¥452.00 | -0.44% | 18.8B | 38.02 | ¥11.89 | +0.77% |
| 2981.T | ¥2,342.00 | -4.64% | 13.3B | 9.51 | ¥246.34 | +3.18% |
Stock Comparison
1925.T vs 8871.T Comparison August 2025
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3.3T. In comparison, 8871.T has a market cap of 113.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,254.00, while 8871.T trades at ¥3,420.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas 8871.T's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 8871.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is less volatile compared to 8871.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 8871.T's competition here
1925.T vs 3480.T Comparison August 2025
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3.3T. In comparison, 3480.T has a market cap of 84.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,254.00, while 3480.T trades at ¥4,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas 3480.T's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3480.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is less volatile compared to 3480.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 3480.T's competition here
1925.T vs 8897.T Comparison August 2025
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3.3T. In comparison, 8897.T has a market cap of 53.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,254.00, while 8897.T trades at ¥395.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas 8897.T's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 8897.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is less volatile compared to 8897.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 8897.T's competition here
1925.T vs 3299.T Comparison August 2025
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3.3T. In comparison, 3299.T has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,254.00, while 3299.T trades at ¥2,056.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas 3299.T's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3299.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is less volatile compared to 3299.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 3299.T's competition here
1925.T vs 1814.T Comparison August 2025
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3.3T. In comparison, 1814.T has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,254.00, while 1814.T trades at ¥2,572.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas 1814.T's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1814.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is less volatile compared to 1814.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 1814.T's competition here
1925.T vs 1847.T Comparison August 2025
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3.3T. In comparison, 1847.T has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,254.00, while 1847.T trades at ¥3,580.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas 1847.T's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1847.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is less volatile compared to 1847.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 1847.T's competition here
1925.T vs 146A.T Comparison August 2025
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3.3T. In comparison, 146A.T has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,254.00, while 146A.T trades at ¥3,380.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas 146A.T's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 146A.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is less volatile compared to 146A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 146A.T's competition here
1925.T vs 8887.T Comparison August 2025
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3.3T. In comparison, 8887.T has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,254.00, while 8887.T trades at ¥452.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas 8887.T's P/E ratio is 38.02. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 8887.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is less volatile compared to 8887.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 8887.T's competition here
1925.T vs 2981.T Comparison August 2025
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3.3T. In comparison, 2981.T has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,254.00, while 2981.T trades at ¥2,342.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas 2981.T's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2981.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is less volatile compared to 2981.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 2981.T's competition here
1925.T vs 2983.T Comparison August 2025
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3.3T. In comparison, 2983.T has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,254.00, while 2983.T trades at ¥2,073.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas 2983.T's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2983.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is less volatile compared to 2983.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 2983.T's competition here
1925.T vs 2984.T Comparison August 2025
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3.3T. In comparison, 2984.T has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,254.00, while 2984.T trades at ¥711.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas 2984.T's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2984.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is more volatile compared to 2984.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 2984.T's competition here
1925.T vs 3293.T Comparison August 2025
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3.3T. In comparison, 3293.T has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,254.00, while 3293.T trades at ¥763.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas 3293.T's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3293.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is less volatile compared to 3293.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 3293.T's competition here
1925.T vs 1451.T Comparison August 2025
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3.3T. In comparison, 1451.T has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,254.00, while 1451.T trades at ¥1,124.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas 1451.T's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1451.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is more volatile compared to 1451.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 1451.T's competition here
1925.T vs 8886.T Comparison August 2025
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3.3T. In comparison, 8886.T has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,254.00, while 8886.T trades at ¥1,715.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas 8886.T's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 8886.T's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is more volatile compared to 8886.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 8886.T's competition here
1925.T vs 1757.T Comparison August 2025
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3.3T. In comparison, 1757.T has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,254.00, while 1757.T trades at ¥6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas 1757.T's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1757.T's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is less volatile compared to 1757.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 1757.T's competition here
1925.T vs 7837.T Comparison August 2025
1925.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.T stands at 3.3T. In comparison, 7837.T has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.T is priced at ¥5,254.00, while 7837.T trades at ¥398.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.22, whereas 7837.T's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, 1925.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7837.T's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.T is more volatile compared to 7837.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.T.Check 7837.T's competition here