Samsonite International S.A.
Samsonite International S.A. 1910.HK Peers
See (1910.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Footwear & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910.HK | HK$13.84 | N/A | 19.1B | 7.73 | HK$1.79 | +1.51% |
| 0551.HK | HK$10.78 | +2.47% | 17.3B | 5.64 | HK$1.91 | +12.06% |
| 1836.HK | HK$14.18 | -1.66% | 11.8B | 8.75 | HK$1.62 | +8.11% |
| 1361.HK | HK$4.49 | +1.58% | 9.3B | 7.36 | HK$0.61 | +6.45% |
| 1121.HK | HK$1.59 | -0.63% | 2.9B | -9.35 | -HK$0.17 | N/A |
| 3813.HK | HK$0.49 | +1.03% | 2.5B | 4.90 | HK$0.10 | +9.34% |
| 1731.HK | HK$0.75 | +1.35% | 840M | 3.57 | HK$0.21 | +6.67% |
| 0210.HK | HK$0.40 | +3.95% | 781.5M | 6.58 | HK$0.06 | +2.53% |
| 0676.HK | HK$1.01 | N/A | 738M | -101.00 | -HK$0.01 | +0.99% |
| 2033.HK | HK$0.35 | +4.55% | 710M | 34.50 | HK$0.01 | +4.93% |
Stock Comparison
1910.HK vs 0551.HK Comparison
1910.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1910.HK stands at 19.1B. In comparison, 0551.HK has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1910.HK is priced at HK$13.84, while 0551.HK trades at HK$10.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1910.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 0551.HK's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, 1910.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 0551.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1910.HK is less volatile compared to 0551.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1910.HK.
1910.HK vs 1836.HK Comparison
1910.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1910.HK stands at 19.1B. In comparison, 1836.HK has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1910.HK is priced at HK$13.84, while 1836.HK trades at HK$14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1910.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 1836.HK's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, 1910.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1836.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1910.HK is less volatile compared to 1836.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1910.HK.
1910.HK vs 1361.HK Comparison
1910.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1910.HK stands at 19.1B. In comparison, 1361.HK has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1910.HK is priced at HK$13.84, while 1361.HK trades at HK$4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1910.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 1361.HK's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, 1910.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1361.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1910.HK is more volatile compared to 1361.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1910.HK.
1910.HK vs 1121.HK Comparison
1910.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1910.HK stands at 19.1B. In comparison, 1121.HK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1910.HK is priced at HK$13.84, while 1121.HK trades at HK$1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1910.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 1121.HK's P/E ratio is -9.35. In terms of profitability, 1910.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1121.HK's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 1910.HK is less volatile compared to 1121.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1910.HK.
1910.HK vs 3813.HK Comparison
1910.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1910.HK stands at 19.1B. In comparison, 3813.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1910.HK is priced at HK$13.84, while 3813.HK trades at HK$0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1910.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 3813.HK's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, 1910.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 3813.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1910.HK is less volatile compared to 3813.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1910.HK.
1910.HK vs 1731.HK Comparison
1910.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1910.HK stands at 19.1B. In comparison, 1731.HK has a market cap of 840M. Regarding current trading prices, 1910.HK is priced at HK$13.84, while 1731.HK trades at HK$0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1910.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 1731.HK's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, 1910.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1731.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1910.HK is more volatile compared to 1731.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1910.HK.
1910.HK vs 0210.HK Comparison
1910.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1910.HK stands at 19.1B. In comparison, 0210.HK has a market cap of 781.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1910.HK is priced at HK$13.84, while 0210.HK trades at HK$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1910.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 0210.HK's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, 1910.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 0210.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1910.HK is less volatile compared to 0210.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1910.HK.
1910.HK vs 0676.HK Comparison
1910.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1910.HK stands at 19.1B. In comparison, 0676.HK has a market cap of 738M. Regarding current trading prices, 1910.HK is priced at HK$13.84, while 0676.HK trades at HK$1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1910.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 0676.HK's P/E ratio is -101.00. In terms of profitability, 1910.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 0676.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1910.HK is less volatile compared to 0676.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1910.HK.
1910.HK vs 2033.HK Comparison
1910.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1910.HK stands at 19.1B. In comparison, 2033.HK has a market cap of 710M. Regarding current trading prices, 1910.HK is priced at HK$13.84, while 2033.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1910.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 2033.HK's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, 1910.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 2033.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1910.HK is less volatile compared to 2033.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1910.HK.
1910.HK vs 0264.HK Comparison
1910.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1910.HK stands at 19.1B. In comparison, 0264.HK has a market cap of 690.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1910.HK is priced at HK$13.84, while 0264.HK trades at HK$1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1910.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 0264.HK's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, 1910.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 0264.HK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1910.HK is less volatile compared to 0264.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1910.HK.
1910.HK vs 1100.HK Comparison
1910.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1910.HK stands at 19.1B. In comparison, 1100.HK has a market cap of 557.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1910.HK is priced at HK$13.84, while 1100.HK trades at HK$1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1910.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 1100.HK's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, 1910.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1100.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1910.HK is more volatile compared to 1100.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1910.HK.
1910.HK vs 1028.HK Comparison
1910.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1910.HK stands at 19.1B. In comparison, 1028.HK has a market cap of 517.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1910.HK is priced at HK$13.84, while 1028.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1910.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 1028.HK's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, 1910.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1028.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1910.HK is less volatile compared to 1028.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1910.HK.
1910.HK vs 1023.HK Comparison
1910.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1910.HK stands at 19.1B. In comparison, 1023.HK has a market cap of 501.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1910.HK is priced at HK$13.84, while 1023.HK trades at HK$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1910.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 1023.HK's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, 1910.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1023.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1910.HK is more volatile compared to 1023.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1910.HK.
1910.HK vs 1170.HK Comparison
1910.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1910.HK stands at 19.1B. In comparison, 1170.HK has a market cap of 405.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1910.HK is priced at HK$13.84, while 1170.HK trades at HK$0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1910.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 1170.HK's P/E ratio is -30.50. In terms of profitability, 1910.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1170.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1910.HK is more volatile compared to 1170.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1910.HK.
1910.HK vs 1027.HK Comparison
1910.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1910.HK stands at 19.1B. In comparison, 1027.HK has a market cap of 400.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1910.HK is priced at HK$13.84, while 1027.HK trades at HK$0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1910.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 1027.HK's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, 1910.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1027.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1910.HK is more volatile compared to 1027.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1910.HK.
1910.HK vs 2683.HK Comparison
1910.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1910.HK stands at 19.1B. In comparison, 2683.HK has a market cap of 220.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1910.HK is priced at HK$13.84, while 2683.HK trades at HK$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1910.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 2683.HK's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, 1910.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 2683.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1910.HK is more volatile compared to 2683.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1910.HK.
1910.HK vs 0738.HK Comparison
1910.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1910.HK stands at 19.1B. In comparison, 0738.HK has a market cap of 164.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1910.HK is priced at HK$13.84, while 0738.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1910.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 0738.HK's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, 1910.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 0738.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1910.HK is less volatile compared to 0738.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1910.HK.
1910.HK vs 1058.HK Comparison
1910.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1910.HK stands at 19.1B. In comparison, 1058.HK has a market cap of 150.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1910.HK is priced at HK$13.84, while 1058.HK trades at HK$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1910.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 1058.HK's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, 1910.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1058.HK's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1910.HK is more volatile compared to 1058.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1910.HK.
1910.HK vs 8187.HK Comparison
1910.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1910.HK stands at 19.1B. In comparison, 8187.HK has a market cap of 132M. Regarding current trading prices, 1910.HK is priced at HK$13.84, while 8187.HK trades at HK$0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1910.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 8187.HK's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, 1910.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 8187.HK's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, 1910.HK is more volatile compared to 8187.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1910.HK.
1910.HK vs 1255.HK Comparison
1910.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1910.HK stands at 19.1B. In comparison, 1255.HK has a market cap of 72.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1910.HK is priced at HK$13.84, while 1255.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1910.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 1255.HK's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, 1910.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1255.HK's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 1910.HK is more volatile compared to 1255.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1910.HK.
1910.HK vs 1842.HK Comparison
1910.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1910.HK stands at 19.1B. In comparison, 1842.HK has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1910.HK is priced at HK$13.84, while 1842.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1910.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 1842.HK's P/E ratio is 64.44. In terms of profitability, 1910.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1842.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1910.HK is more volatile compared to 1842.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1910.HK.
1910.HK vs 8285.HK Comparison
1910.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1910.HK stands at 19.1B. In comparison, 8285.HK has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, 1910.HK is priced at HK$13.84, while 8285.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1910.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 8285.HK's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, 1910.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 8285.HK's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 1910.HK is less volatile compared to 8285.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1910.HK.
1910.HK vs 1386.HK Comparison
1910.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1910.HK stands at 19.1B. In comparison, 1386.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1910.HK is priced at HK$13.84, while 1386.HK trades at HK$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1910.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 1386.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1910.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1386.HK's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, 1910.HK is less volatile compared to 1386.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1910.HK.
1910.HK vs 1096.HK Comparison
1910.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1910.HK stands at 19.1B. In comparison, 1096.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1910.HK is priced at HK$13.84, while 1096.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1910.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 1096.HK's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, 1910.HK's ROE is +0.18%, compared to 1096.HK's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 1910.HK is less volatile compared to 1096.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1910.HK.