Nippon Dry-Chemical Co., Ltd.
Nippon Dry-Chemical Co., Ltd. 1909.T Peers
See (1909.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Security & Protection Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1909.T | ¥5,160.00 | +0.00% | 34.3B | 10.16 | ¥503.98 | +1.07% |
| 9735.T | ¥5,183.00 | +0.00% | 2.2T | 21.57 | ¥242.89 | +1.86% |
| 2331.T | ¥1,008.50 | +0.00% | 490.9B | 18.27 | ¥55.43 | +1.32% |
| 6744.T | ¥3,655.00 | +0.00% | 214.5B | 19.13 | ¥190.51 | +2.09% |
| 7734.T | ¥3,025.00 | +0.00% | 140.6B | 17.77 | ¥172.17 | +1.31% |
| 9740.T | ¥2,226.00 | +0.00% | 32.4B | 10.08 | ¥222.13 | +2.68% |
| 6809.T | ¥1,016.00 | +0.00% | 30.3B | 22.80 | ¥44.21 | +3.97% |
| 9686.T | ¥1,333.00 | +0.00% | 13.8B | 19.86 | ¥67.03 | +3.01% |
| 6797.T | ¥1,105.00 | +0.00% | 12.9B | 6.58 | ¥166.63 | +3.87% |
| 6870.T | ¥1,694.00 | +0.00% | 9.4B | 8.45 | ¥199.07 | +4.40% |
Stock Comparison
1909.T vs 9735.T Comparison
1909.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1909.T stands at 34.3B. In comparison, 9735.T has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, 1909.T is priced at ¥5,160.00, while 9735.T trades at ¥5,183.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1909.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.16, whereas 9735.T's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, 1909.T's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 9735.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1909.T is more volatile compared to 9735.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1909.T.
1909.T vs 2331.T Comparison
1909.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1909.T stands at 34.3B. In comparison, 2331.T has a market cap of 490.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1909.T is priced at ¥5,160.00, while 2331.T trades at ¥1,008.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1909.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.16, whereas 2331.T's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, 1909.T's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 2331.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1909.T is more volatile compared to 2331.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1909.T.
1909.T vs 6744.T Comparison
1909.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1909.T stands at 34.3B. In comparison, 6744.T has a market cap of 214.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1909.T is priced at ¥5,160.00, while 6744.T trades at ¥3,655.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1909.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.16, whereas 6744.T's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, 1909.T's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 6744.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1909.T is more volatile compared to 6744.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1909.T.
1909.T vs 7734.T Comparison
1909.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1909.T stands at 34.3B. In comparison, 7734.T has a market cap of 140.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1909.T is priced at ¥5,160.00, while 7734.T trades at ¥3,025.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1909.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.16, whereas 7734.T's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, 1909.T's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 7734.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1909.T is less volatile compared to 7734.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1909.T.
1909.T vs 9740.T Comparison
1909.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1909.T stands at 34.3B. In comparison, 9740.T has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1909.T is priced at ¥5,160.00, while 9740.T trades at ¥2,226.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1909.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.16, whereas 9740.T's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, 1909.T's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 9740.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1909.T is more volatile compared to 9740.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1909.T.
1909.T vs 6809.T Comparison
1909.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1909.T stands at 34.3B. In comparison, 6809.T has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1909.T is priced at ¥5,160.00, while 6809.T trades at ¥1,016.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1909.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.16, whereas 6809.T's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, 1909.T's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 6809.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1909.T is more volatile compared to 6809.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1909.T.
1909.T vs 9686.T Comparison
1909.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1909.T stands at 34.3B. In comparison, 9686.T has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1909.T is priced at ¥5,160.00, while 9686.T trades at ¥1,333.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1909.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.16, whereas 9686.T's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, 1909.T's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 9686.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1909.T is more volatile compared to 9686.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1909.T.
1909.T vs 6797.T Comparison
1909.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1909.T stands at 34.3B. In comparison, 6797.T has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1909.T is priced at ¥5,160.00, while 6797.T trades at ¥1,105.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1909.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.16, whereas 6797.T's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, 1909.T's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 6797.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1909.T is more volatile compared to 6797.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1909.T.
1909.T vs 6870.T Comparison
1909.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1909.T stands at 34.3B. In comparison, 6870.T has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1909.T is priced at ¥5,160.00, while 6870.T trades at ¥1,694.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1909.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.16, whereas 6870.T's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, 1909.T's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 6870.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1909.T is more volatile compared to 6870.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1909.T.
1909.T vs 4264.T Comparison
1909.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1909.T stands at 34.3B. In comparison, 4264.T has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1909.T is priced at ¥5,160.00, while 4264.T trades at ¥1,622.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1909.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.16, whereas 4264.T's P/E ratio is 32.51. In terms of profitability, 1909.T's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 4264.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1909.T is less volatile compared to 4264.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1909.T.
1909.T vs 4754.T Comparison
1909.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1909.T stands at 34.3B. In comparison, 4754.T has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1909.T is priced at ¥5,160.00, while 4754.T trades at ¥1,392.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1909.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.16, whereas 4754.T's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, 1909.T's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 4754.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1909.T is more volatile compared to 4754.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1909.T.
1909.T vs 7058.T Comparison
1909.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1909.T stands at 34.3B. In comparison, 7058.T has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1909.T is priced at ¥5,160.00, while 7058.T trades at ¥2,446.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1909.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.16, whereas 7058.T's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, 1909.T's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 7058.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1909.T is less volatile compared to 7058.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1909.T.
1909.T vs 7464.T Comparison
1909.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1909.T stands at 34.3B. In comparison, 7464.T has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1909.T is priced at ¥5,160.00, while 7464.T trades at ¥1,610.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1909.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.16, whereas 7464.T's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, 1909.T's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 7464.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1909.T is more volatile compared to 7464.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1909.T.
1909.T vs 7116.T Comparison
1909.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1909.T stands at 34.3B. In comparison, 7116.T has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1909.T is priced at ¥5,160.00, while 7116.T trades at ¥749.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1909.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.16, whereas 7116.T's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, 1909.T's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 7116.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1909.T is more volatile compared to 7116.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1909.T.
1909.T vs 3782.T Comparison
1909.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1909.T stands at 34.3B. In comparison, 3782.T has a market cap of 429.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1909.T is priced at ¥5,160.00, while 3782.T trades at ¥8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1909.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.16, whereas 3782.T's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, 1909.T's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 3782.T's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 1909.T is less volatile compared to 3782.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1909.T.