China Coal Energy Company Limited
China Coal Energy Company Limited 1898.HK Peers
See (1898.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Coal Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1898.HK | HK$8.74 | +1.27% | 146.3B | 6.15 | HK$1.42 | +9.08% |
| 1088.HK | HK$34.60 | +1.32% | 818.6B | 11.23 | HK$3.08 | +7.20% |
| 1171.HK | HK$8.47 | +4.57% | 121.5B | 5.88 | HK$1.44 | +26.43% |
| 3668.HK | HK$29.85 | +3.29% | 39.4B | 6.35 | HK$4.70 | +8.40% |
| 3948.HK | HK$17.42 | +0.11% | 37.5B | 4.77 | HK$3.65 | N/A |
| 0639.HK | HK$2.70 | N/A | 13.7B | 8.71 | HK$0.31 | +3.33% |
| 1277.HK | HK$1.16 | +0.87% | 9.8B | 4.30 | HK$0.27 | +9.46% |
| 0975.HK | HK$6.30 | -1.25% | 6.5B | 3.68 | HK$1.71 | N/A |
| 0866.HK | HK$1.48 | +4.23% | 3.8B | 7.05 | HK$0.21 | +1.35% |
| 1733.HK | HK$0.80 | -1.23% | 2.1B | 2.29 | HK$0.35 | +9.12% |
Stock Comparison
1898.HK vs 1088.HK Comparison
1898.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1898.HK stands at 146.3B. In comparison, 1088.HK has a market cap of 818.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1898.HK is priced at HK$8.74, while 1088.HK trades at HK$34.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1898.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.15, whereas 1088.HK's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, 1898.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1088.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1898.HK and 1088.HK have similar daily volatility (2.18).
1898.HK vs 1171.HK Comparison
1898.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1898.HK stands at 146.3B. In comparison, 1171.HK has a market cap of 121.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1898.HK is priced at HK$8.74, while 1171.HK trades at HK$8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1898.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.15, whereas 1171.HK's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, 1898.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1171.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1898.HK is less volatile compared to 1171.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1898.HK.
1898.HK vs 3668.HK Comparison
1898.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1898.HK stands at 146.3B. In comparison, 3668.HK has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1898.HK is priced at HK$8.74, while 3668.HK trades at HK$29.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1898.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.15, whereas 3668.HK's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, 1898.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3668.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1898.HK is less volatile compared to 3668.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1898.HK.
1898.HK vs 3948.HK Comparison
1898.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1898.HK stands at 146.3B. In comparison, 3948.HK has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1898.HK is priced at HK$8.74, while 3948.HK trades at HK$17.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1898.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.15, whereas 3948.HK's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, 1898.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3948.HK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1898.HK is more volatile compared to 3948.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1898.HK.
1898.HK vs 0639.HK Comparison
1898.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1898.HK stands at 146.3B. In comparison, 0639.HK has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1898.HK is priced at HK$8.74, while 0639.HK trades at HK$2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1898.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.15, whereas 0639.HK's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, 1898.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0639.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1898.HK is more volatile compared to 0639.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1898.HK.
1898.HK vs 1277.HK Comparison
1898.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1898.HK stands at 146.3B. In comparison, 1277.HK has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1898.HK is priced at HK$8.74, while 1277.HK trades at HK$1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1898.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.15, whereas 1277.HK's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, 1898.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1277.HK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 1898.HK is less volatile compared to 1277.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1898.HK.
1898.HK vs 0975.HK Comparison
1898.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1898.HK stands at 146.3B. In comparison, 0975.HK has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1898.HK is priced at HK$8.74, while 0975.HK trades at HK$6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1898.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.15, whereas 0975.HK's P/E ratio is 3.68. In terms of profitability, 1898.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0975.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1898.HK is less volatile compared to 0975.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1898.HK.
1898.HK vs 0866.HK Comparison
1898.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1898.HK stands at 146.3B. In comparison, 0866.HK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1898.HK is priced at HK$8.74, while 0866.HK trades at HK$1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1898.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.15, whereas 0866.HK's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, 1898.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0866.HK's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, 1898.HK is less volatile compared to 0866.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1898.HK.
1898.HK vs 1733.HK Comparison
1898.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1898.HK stands at 146.3B. In comparison, 1733.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1898.HK is priced at HK$8.74, while 1733.HK trades at HK$0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1898.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.15, whereas 1733.HK's P/E ratio is 2.29. In terms of profitability, 1898.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1733.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1898.HK is less volatile compared to 1733.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1898.HK.
1898.HK vs 2798.HK Comparison
1898.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1898.HK stands at 146.3B. In comparison, 2798.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1898.HK is priced at HK$8.74, while 2798.HK trades at HK$0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1898.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.15, whereas 2798.HK's P/E ratio is 2.47. In terms of profitability, 1898.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2798.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1898.HK is more volatile compared to 2798.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1898.HK.
1898.HK vs 1878.HK Comparison
1898.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1898.HK stands at 146.3B. In comparison, 1878.HK has a market cap of 620.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1898.HK is priced at HK$8.74, while 1878.HK trades at HK$2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1898.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.15, whereas 1878.HK's P/E ratio is 1.41. In terms of profitability, 1898.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1878.HK's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, 1898.HK is less volatile compared to 1878.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1898.HK.
1898.HK vs 1303.HK Comparison
1898.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1898.HK stands at 146.3B. In comparison, 1303.HK has a market cap of 536.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1898.HK is priced at HK$8.74, while 1303.HK trades at HK$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1898.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.15, whereas 1303.HK's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, 1898.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1303.HK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1898.HK is more volatile compared to 1303.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1898.HK.
1898.HK vs 6885.HK Comparison
1898.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1898.HK stands at 146.3B. In comparison, 6885.HK has a market cap of 519.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1898.HK is priced at HK$8.74, while 6885.HK trades at HK$0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1898.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.15, whereas 6885.HK's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, 1898.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6885.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1898.HK is less volatile compared to 6885.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1898.HK.
1898.HK vs 0985.HK Comparison
1898.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1898.HK stands at 146.3B. In comparison, 0985.HK has a market cap of 478.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1898.HK is priced at HK$8.74, while 0985.HK trades at HK$0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1898.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.15, whereas 0985.HK's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, 1898.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0985.HK's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, 1898.HK is more volatile compared to 0985.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1898.HK.
1898.HK vs 1393.HK Comparison
1898.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1898.HK stands at 146.3B. In comparison, 1393.HK has a market cap of 340.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1898.HK is priced at HK$8.74, while 1393.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1898.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.15, whereas 1393.HK's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, 1898.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1393.HK's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, 1898.HK is less volatile compared to 1393.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1898.HK.
1898.HK vs 1229.HK Comparison
1898.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1898.HK stands at 146.3B. In comparison, 1229.HK has a market cap of 222M. Regarding current trading prices, 1898.HK is priced at HK$8.74, while 1229.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1898.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.15, whereas 1229.HK's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, 1898.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1229.HK's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 1898.HK is less volatile compared to 1229.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1898.HK.
1898.HK vs 8203.HK Comparison
1898.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1898.HK stands at 146.3B. In comparison, 8203.HK has a market cap of 193.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1898.HK is priced at HK$8.74, while 8203.HK trades at HK$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1898.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.15, whereas 8203.HK's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, 1898.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8203.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1898.HK is less volatile compared to 8203.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1898.HK.
1898.HK vs 1738.HK Comparison
1898.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1898.HK stands at 146.3B. In comparison, 1738.HK has a market cap of 138.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1898.HK is priced at HK$8.74, while 1738.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1898.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.15, whereas 1738.HK's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, 1898.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1738.HK's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 1898.HK is more volatile compared to 1738.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1898.HK.
1898.HK vs 0276.HK Comparison
1898.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1898.HK stands at 146.3B. In comparison, 0276.HK has a market cap of 133.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1898.HK is priced at HK$8.74, while 0276.HK trades at HK$0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1898.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.15, whereas 0276.HK's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, 1898.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0276.HK's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, 1898.HK is less volatile compared to 0276.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1898.HK.
1898.HK vs 0702.HK Comparison
1898.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1898.HK stands at 146.3B. In comparison, 0702.HK has a market cap of 113.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1898.HK is priced at HK$8.74, while 0702.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1898.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.15, whereas 0702.HK's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, 1898.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0702.HK's ROE of +4.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 1898.HK is more volatile compared to 0702.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1898.HK.
1898.HK vs 0065.HK Comparison
1898.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1898.HK stands at 146.3B. In comparison, 0065.HK has a market cap of 97.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1898.HK is priced at HK$8.74, while 0065.HK trades at HK$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1898.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.15, whereas 0065.HK's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, 1898.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0065.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1898.HK is more volatile compared to 0065.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1898.HK.
1898.HK vs 0704.HK Comparison
1898.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1898.HK stands at 146.3B. In comparison, 0704.HK has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1898.HK is priced at HK$8.74, while 0704.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1898.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.15, whereas 0704.HK's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, 1898.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0704.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1898.HK is less volatile compared to 0704.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1898.HK.
1898.HK vs 0645.HK Comparison
1898.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1898.HK stands at 146.3B. In comparison, 0645.HK has a market cap of 62.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1898.HK is priced at HK$8.74, while 0645.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1898.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.15, whereas 0645.HK's P/E ratio is -6.10. In terms of profitability, 1898.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0645.HK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1898.HK is more volatile compared to 0645.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1898.HK.
1898.HK vs 0061.HK Comparison
1898.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1898.HK stands at 146.3B. In comparison, 0061.HK has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1898.HK is priced at HK$8.74, while 0061.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1898.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.15, whereas 0061.HK's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, 1898.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0061.HK's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 1898.HK is more volatile compared to 0061.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1898.HK.
1898.HK vs 8250.HK Comparison
1898.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1898.HK stands at 146.3B. In comparison, 8250.HK has a market cap of 47.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1898.HK is priced at HK$8.74, while 8250.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1898.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.15, whereas 8250.HK's P/E ratio is -13.10. In terms of profitability, 1898.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8250.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1898.HK is more volatile compared to 8250.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1898.HK.
1898.HK vs 1131.HK Comparison
1898.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1898.HK stands at 146.3B. In comparison, 1131.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1898.HK is priced at HK$8.74, while 1131.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1898.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.15, whereas 1131.HK's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, 1898.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1131.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1898.HK is less volatile compared to 1131.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1898.HK.
1898.HK vs 0578.HK Comparison
1898.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1898.HK stands at 146.3B. In comparison, 0578.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1898.HK is priced at HK$8.74, while 0578.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1898.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.15, whereas 0578.HK's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, 1898.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0578.HK's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, 1898.HK is more volatile compared to 0578.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1898.HK.