Maoyan Entertainment
Maoyan Entertainment 1896.HK Peers
See (1896.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1896.HK | HK$7.65 | +1.86% | 8.8B | 45.00 | HK$0.17 | N/A |
| 0700.HK | HK$505.50 | +1.51% | 4.6T | 22.57 | HK$22.40 | +6.49% |
| 1024.HK | HK$56.45 | +0.27% | 234.8B | 14.86 | HK$3.80 | N/A |
| 9888.HK | HK$82.90 | +0.91% | 232.9B | 8.36 | HK$9.92 | N/A |
| 1357.HK | HK$7.81 | +1.96% | 35.7B | 39.05 | HK$0.20 | +2.14% |
| 0772.HK | HK$29.05 | N/A | 29.6B | -126.30 | -HK$0.23 | N/A |
| 2518.HK | HK$50.90 | -0.39% | 24.1B | 14.30 | HK$3.56 | +6.56% |
| 9898.HK | HK$74.45 | +0.68% | 18B | 6.87 | HK$10.83 | +8.70% |
| 2390.HK | HK$9.72 | +0.73% | 2.5B | -108.00 | -HK$0.09 | N/A |
| 3700.HK | HK$1.18 | +8.26% | 2.3B | 10.73 | HK$0.11 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1896.HK vs 0700.HK Comparison
1896.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1896.HK stands at 8.8B. In comparison, 0700.HK has a market cap of 4.6T. Regarding current trading prices, 1896.HK is priced at HK$7.65, while 0700.HK trades at HK$505.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1896.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas 0700.HK's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, 1896.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0700.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1896.HK is less volatile compared to 0700.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1896.HK.
1896.HK vs 1024.HK Comparison
1896.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1896.HK stands at 8.8B. In comparison, 1024.HK has a market cap of 234.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1896.HK is priced at HK$7.65, while 1024.HK trades at HK$56.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1896.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas 1024.HK's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, 1896.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1024.HK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 1896.HK is more volatile compared to 1024.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1896.HK.
1896.HK vs 9888.HK Comparison
1896.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1896.HK stands at 8.8B. In comparison, 9888.HK has a market cap of 232.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1896.HK is priced at HK$7.65, while 9888.HK trades at HK$82.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1896.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas 9888.HK's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, 1896.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9888.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1896.HK is more volatile compared to 9888.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1896.HK.
1896.HK vs 1357.HK Comparison
1896.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1896.HK stands at 8.8B. In comparison, 1357.HK has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1896.HK is priced at HK$7.65, while 1357.HK trades at HK$7.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1896.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas 1357.HK's P/E ratio is 39.05. In terms of profitability, 1896.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1357.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1896.HK is less volatile compared to 1357.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1896.HK.
1896.HK vs 0772.HK Comparison
1896.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1896.HK stands at 8.8B. In comparison, 0772.HK has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1896.HK is priced at HK$7.65, while 0772.HK trades at HK$29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1896.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas 0772.HK's P/E ratio is -126.30. In terms of profitability, 1896.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0772.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1896.HK is less volatile compared to 0772.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1896.HK.
1896.HK vs 2518.HK Comparison
1896.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1896.HK stands at 8.8B. In comparison, 2518.HK has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1896.HK is priced at HK$7.65, while 2518.HK trades at HK$50.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1896.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas 2518.HK's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, 1896.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2518.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1896.HK is more volatile compared to 2518.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1896.HK.
1896.HK vs 9898.HK Comparison
1896.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1896.HK stands at 8.8B. In comparison, 9898.HK has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, 1896.HK is priced at HK$7.65, while 9898.HK trades at HK$74.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1896.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas 9898.HK's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, 1896.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9898.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1896.HK is less volatile compared to 9898.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1896.HK.
1896.HK vs 2390.HK Comparison
1896.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1896.HK stands at 8.8B. In comparison, 2390.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1896.HK is priced at HK$7.65, while 2390.HK trades at HK$9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1896.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas 2390.HK's P/E ratio is -108.00. In terms of profitability, 1896.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2390.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1896.HK is more volatile compared to 2390.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1896.HK.
1896.HK vs 3700.HK Comparison
1896.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1896.HK stands at 8.8B. In comparison, 3700.HK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1896.HK is priced at HK$7.65, while 3700.HK trades at HK$1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1896.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas 3700.HK's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, 1896.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3700.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1896.HK is less volatile compared to 3700.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1896.HK.
1896.HK vs 1980.HK Comparison
1896.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1896.HK stands at 8.8B. In comparison, 1980.HK has a market cap of 750.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1896.HK is priced at HK$7.65, while 1980.HK trades at HK$0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1896.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas 1980.HK's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, 1896.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1980.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1896.HK is less volatile compared to 1980.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1896.HK.
1896.HK vs 2008.HK Comparison
1896.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1896.HK stands at 8.8B. In comparison, 2008.HK has a market cap of 554.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1896.HK is priced at HK$7.65, while 2008.HK trades at HK$1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1896.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas 2008.HK's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, 1896.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2008.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1896.HK is more volatile compared to 2008.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1896.HK.
1896.HK vs 1761.HK Comparison
1896.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1896.HK stands at 8.8B. In comparison, 1761.HK has a market cap of 440.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1896.HK is priced at HK$7.65, while 1761.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1896.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas 1761.HK's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, 1896.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1761.HK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 1896.HK is less volatile compared to 1761.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1896.HK.
1896.HK vs 0543.HK Comparison
1896.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1896.HK stands at 8.8B. In comparison, 0543.HK has a market cap of 436.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1896.HK is priced at HK$7.65, while 0543.HK trades at HK$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1896.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas 0543.HK's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, 1896.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0543.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1896.HK is less volatile compared to 0543.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1896.HK.
1896.HK vs 0150.HK Comparison
1896.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1896.HK stands at 8.8B. In comparison, 0150.HK has a market cap of 321.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1896.HK is priced at HK$7.65, while 0150.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1896.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas 0150.HK's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, 1896.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0150.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1896.HK is less volatile compared to 0150.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1896.HK.
1896.HK vs 3601.HK Comparison
1896.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1896.HK stands at 8.8B. In comparison, 3601.HK has a market cap of 255.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1896.HK is priced at HK$7.65, while 3601.HK trades at HK$0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1896.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas 3601.HK's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, 1896.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3601.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1896.HK is more volatile compared to 3601.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1896.HK.
1896.HK vs 1739.HK Comparison
1896.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1896.HK stands at 8.8B. In comparison, 1739.HK has a market cap of 169.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1896.HK is priced at HK$7.65, while 1739.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1896.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas 1739.HK's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, 1896.HK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1739.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1896.HK is more volatile compared to 1739.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1896.HK.