China Tourism Group Duty Free Corporation Limited
China Tourism Group Duty Free Corporation Limited 1880.HK Peers
See (1880.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880.HK | HK$56.55 | +5.01% | 144.5B | 27.45 | HK$2.06 | +2.02% |
| 9988.HK | HK$117.90 | +1.81% | 2.2T | 16.08 | HK$7.33 | +3.04% |
| 89988.HK | HK$107.70 | +1.80% | 2.1T | N/A | N/A | +1.67% |
| 3690.HK | HK$130.80 | +2.75% | 802.9B | 21.13 | HK$6.19 | N/A |
| 9618.HK | HK$130.90 | +2.11% | 377.1B | 8.00 | HK$16.36 | +23.29% |
| 9896.HK | HK$34.65 | -1.42% | 42.8B | 16.12 | HK$2.15 | +3.38% |
| 1280.HK | HK$3.96 | +1.28% | 7.2B | -1.44 | -HK$2.75 | N/A |
| 2148.HK | HK$5.57 | +0.72% | 6.3B | 8.31 | HK$0.67 | +1.59% |
| 2411.HK | HK$2.00 | -0.99% | 3.7B | -7.14 | -HK$0.28 | +0.35% |
| 0370.HK | HK$1.65 | -1.20% | 3.5B | -27.50 | -HK$0.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1880.HK vs 9988.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 9988.HK has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 9988.HK trades at HK$117.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 9988.HK's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9988.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is more volatile compared to 9988.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 89988.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 89988.HK has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 89988.HK trades at HK$107.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 89988.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 89988.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is more volatile compared to 89988.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 3690.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 3690.HK has a market cap of 802.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 3690.HK trades at HK$130.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 3690.HK's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3690.HK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is more volatile compared to 3690.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 9618.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 9618.HK has a market cap of 377.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 9618.HK trades at HK$130.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 9618.HK's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9618.HK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is more volatile compared to 9618.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 9896.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 9896.HK has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 9896.HK trades at HK$34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 9896.HK's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9896.HK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is more volatile compared to 9896.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 1280.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 1280.HK has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 1280.HK trades at HK$3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 1280.HK's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1280.HK's ROE of +63.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is more volatile compared to 1280.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 2148.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 2148.HK has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 2148.HK trades at HK$5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 2148.HK's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2148.HK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is more volatile compared to 2148.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 2411.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 2411.HK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 2411.HK trades at HK$2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 2411.HK's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2411.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is more volatile compared to 2411.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 0370.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 0370.HK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 0370.HK trades at HK$1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 0370.HK's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0370.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is less volatile compared to 0370.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 1939.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 1939.HK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 1939.HK trades at HK$4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 1939.HK's P/E ratio is -116.00. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1939.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is less volatile compared to 1939.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 2209.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 2209.HK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 2209.HK trades at HK$5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 2209.HK's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2209.HK's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is less volatile compared to 2209.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 0178.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 0178.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 0178.HK trades at HK$0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 0178.HK's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0178.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is more volatile compared to 0178.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 2420.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 2420.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 2420.HK trades at HK$3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 2420.HK's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2420.HK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is less volatile compared to 2420.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 1137.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 1137.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 1137.HK trades at HK$1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 1137.HK's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1137.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is less volatile compared to 1137.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 9991.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 9991.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 9991.HK trades at HK$7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 9991.HK's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9991.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is more volatile compared to 9991.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 0493.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 0493.HK has a market cap of 946.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 0493.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 0493.HK's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0493.HK's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is more volatile compared to 0493.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 2101.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 2101.HK has a market cap of 629.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 2101.HK trades at HK$1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 2101.HK's P/E ratio is 30.80. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2101.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is more volatile compared to 2101.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 1861.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 1861.HK has a market cap of 369.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 1861.HK trades at HK$1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 1861.HK's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1861.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is more volatile compared to 1861.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 8395.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 8395.HK has a market cap of 364.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 8395.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 8395.HK's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8395.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is more volatile compared to 8395.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 0620.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 0620.HK has a market cap of 360.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 0620.HK trades at HK$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 0620.HK's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0620.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is less volatile compared to 0620.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 6188.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 6188.HK has a market cap of 359M. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 6188.HK trades at HK$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 6188.HK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6188.HK's ROE of +2.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is less volatile compared to 6188.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 2347.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 2347.HK has a market cap of 334.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 2347.HK trades at HK$0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 2347.HK's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2347.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is more volatile compared to 2347.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 6033.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 6033.HK has a market cap of 274.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 6033.HK trades at HK$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 6033.HK's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6033.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is more volatile compared to 6033.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 1020.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 1020.HK has a market cap of 240.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 1020.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 1020.HK's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1020.HK's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is more volatile compared to 1020.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 1759.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 1759.HK has a market cap of 211.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 1759.HK trades at HK$0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 1759.HK's P/E ratio is -16.33. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1759.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is less volatile compared to 1759.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 1572.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 1572.HK has a market cap of 177.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 1572.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 1572.HK's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1572.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is less volatile compared to 1572.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 0104.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 0104.HK has a market cap of 172.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 0104.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 0104.HK's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0104.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is less volatile compared to 0104.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 1545.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 1545.HK has a market cap of 166M. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 1545.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 1545.HK's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1545.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is less volatile compared to 1545.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 8473.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 8473.HK has a market cap of 149M. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 8473.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 8473.HK's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8473.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is more volatile compared to 8473.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 0915.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 0915.HK has a market cap of 137.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 0915.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 0915.HK's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0915.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is less volatile compared to 0915.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 0814.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 0814.HK has a market cap of 103.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 0814.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 0814.HK's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0814.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is more volatile compared to 0814.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 1039.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 1039.HK has a market cap of 85.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 1039.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 1039.HK's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1039.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is less volatile compared to 1039.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 2122.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 2122.HK has a market cap of 69.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 2122.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 2122.HK's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2122.HK's ROE of +6.62%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is more volatile compared to 2122.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 8536.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 8536.HK has a market cap of 62.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 8536.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 8536.HK's P/E ratio is -4.92. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8536.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is less volatile compared to 8536.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 6880.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 6880.HK has a market cap of 58.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 6880.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 6880.HK's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6880.HK's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is less volatile compared to 6880.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 1711.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 1711.HK has a market cap of 51.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 1711.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 1711.HK's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1711.HK's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is more volatile compared to 1711.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 0653.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 0653.HK has a market cap of 46.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 0653.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 0653.HK's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0653.HK's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is more volatile compared to 0653.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.
1880.HK vs 0395.HK Comparison
1880.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1880.HK stands at 144.5B. In comparison, 0395.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1880.HK is priced at HK$56.55, while 0395.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1880.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.45, whereas 0395.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1880.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0395.HK's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 1880.HK is less volatile compared to 0395.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1880.HK.