Nihon House Holdings Co., Ltd.
Nihon House Holdings Co., Ltd. 1873.T Peers
See (1873.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Residential Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1873.T | ¥292.00 | -1.02% | 11.7B | 15.93 | ¥18.33 | +300.41% |
| 1928.T | ¥3,238.00 | +1.73% | 2.1T | 10.29 | ¥309.37 | +4.24% |
| 1808.T | ¥2,205.00 | +1.92% | 594.6B | 17.28 | ¥126.14 | +3.90% |
| 3291.T | ¥2,087.50 | +2.71% | 569.8B | 11.39 | ¥181.10 | +4.36% |
| 1911.T | ¥1,511.50 | +3.63% | 294.3B | 2.57 | ¥559.21 | +819.24% |
| 1419.T | ¥3,440.00 | +3.77% | 95.5B | 23.78 | ¥138.56 | +864.36% |
| 8892.T | ¥998.00 | +0.71% | 95.3B | 8.51 | ¥117.00 | +4.82% |
| 3284.T | ¥1,259.00 | +1.21% | 44.5B | 11.11 | ¥112.75 | +4.95% |
| 6073.T | ¥1,622.00 | -0.37% | 15.8B | 34.03 | ¥47.51 | +3.83% |
| 8917.T | ¥1,015.00 | +0.79% | 14.1B | 5.47 | ¥184.97 | +4.25% |
Stock Comparison
1873.T vs 1928.T Comparison
1873.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1873.T stands at 11.7B. In comparison, 1928.T has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, 1873.T is priced at ¥292.00, while 1928.T trades at ¥3,238.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1873.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.93, whereas 1928.T's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, 1873.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1928.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1873.T is less volatile compared to 1928.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1873.T.
1873.T vs 1808.T Comparison
1873.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1873.T stands at 11.7B. In comparison, 1808.T has a market cap of 594.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1873.T is priced at ¥292.00, while 1808.T trades at ¥2,205.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1873.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.93, whereas 1808.T's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, 1873.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1808.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1873.T is less volatile compared to 1808.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1873.T.
1873.T vs 3291.T Comparison
1873.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1873.T stands at 11.7B. In comparison, 3291.T has a market cap of 569.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1873.T is priced at ¥292.00, while 3291.T trades at ¥2,087.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1873.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.93, whereas 3291.T's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, 1873.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3291.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1873.T is less volatile compared to 3291.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1873.T.
1873.T vs 1911.T Comparison
1873.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1873.T stands at 11.7B. In comparison, 1911.T has a market cap of 294.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1873.T is priced at ¥292.00, while 1911.T trades at ¥1,511.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1873.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.93, whereas 1911.T's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, 1873.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1911.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1873.T is less volatile compared to 1911.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1873.T.
1873.T vs 1419.T Comparison
1873.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1873.T stands at 11.7B. In comparison, 1419.T has a market cap of 95.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1873.T is priced at ¥292.00, while 1419.T trades at ¥3,440.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1873.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.93, whereas 1419.T's P/E ratio is 23.78. In terms of profitability, 1873.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1419.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1873.T is less volatile compared to 1419.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1873.T.
1873.T vs 8892.T Comparison
1873.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1873.T stands at 11.7B. In comparison, 8892.T has a market cap of 95.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1873.T is priced at ¥292.00, while 8892.T trades at ¥998.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1873.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.93, whereas 8892.T's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, 1873.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8892.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1873.T is more volatile compared to 8892.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1873.T.
1873.T vs 3284.T Comparison
1873.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1873.T stands at 11.7B. In comparison, 3284.T has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1873.T is priced at ¥292.00, while 3284.T trades at ¥1,259.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1873.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.93, whereas 3284.T's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, 1873.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3284.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1873.T is less volatile compared to 3284.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1873.T.
1873.T vs 6073.T Comparison
1873.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1873.T stands at 11.7B. In comparison, 6073.T has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1873.T is priced at ¥292.00, while 6073.T trades at ¥1,622.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1873.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.93, whereas 6073.T's P/E ratio is 34.03. In terms of profitability, 1873.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 6073.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1873.T is more volatile compared to 6073.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1873.T.
1873.T vs 8917.T Comparison
1873.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1873.T stands at 11.7B. In comparison, 8917.T has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1873.T is priced at ¥292.00, while 8917.T trades at ¥1,015.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1873.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.93, whereas 8917.T's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, 1873.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8917.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1873.T is more volatile compared to 8917.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1873.T.
1873.T vs 8904.T Comparison
1873.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1873.T stands at 11.7B. In comparison, 8904.T has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1873.T is priced at ¥292.00, while 8904.T trades at ¥800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1873.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.93, whereas 8904.T's P/E ratio is 47.99. In terms of profitability, 1873.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8904.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1873.T is more volatile compared to 8904.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1873.T.
1873.T vs 1430.T Comparison
1873.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1873.T stands at 11.7B. In comparison, 1430.T has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1873.T is priced at ¥292.00, while 1430.T trades at ¥848.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1873.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.93, whereas 1430.T's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, 1873.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1430.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1873.T is more volatile compared to 1430.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1873.T.
1873.T vs 1420.T Comparison
1873.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1873.T stands at 11.7B. In comparison, 1420.T has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1873.T is priced at ¥292.00, while 1420.T trades at ¥687.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1873.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.93, whereas 1420.T's P/E ratio is 15.52. In terms of profitability, 1873.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1420.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1873.T is less volatile compared to 1420.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1873.T.
1873.T vs 1840.T Comparison
1873.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1873.T stands at 11.7B. In comparison, 1840.T has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1873.T is priced at ¥292.00, while 1840.T trades at ¥231.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1873.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.93, whereas 1840.T's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, 1873.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1840.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1873.T is less volatile compared to 1840.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1873.T.
1873.T vs 2999.T Comparison
1873.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1873.T stands at 11.7B. In comparison, 2999.T has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1873.T is priced at ¥292.00, while 2999.T trades at ¥548.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1873.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.93, whereas 2999.T's P/E ratio is -13.83. In terms of profitability, 1873.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2999.T's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1873.T is less volatile compared to 2999.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1873.T.
1873.T vs 205A.T Comparison
1873.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1873.T stands at 11.7B. In comparison, 205A.T has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1873.T is priced at ¥292.00, while 205A.T trades at ¥1,071.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1873.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.93, whereas 205A.T's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, 1873.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 205A.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1873.T is less volatile compared to 205A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1873.T.
1873.T vs 1444.T Comparison
1873.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1873.T stands at 11.7B. In comparison, 1444.T has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1873.T is priced at ¥292.00, while 1444.T trades at ¥2,821.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1873.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.93, whereas 1444.T's P/E ratio is 26.54. In terms of profitability, 1873.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1444.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1873.T is less volatile compared to 1444.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1873.T.
1873.T vs 3477.T Comparison
1873.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1873.T stands at 11.7B. In comparison, 3477.T has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1873.T is priced at ¥292.00, while 3477.T trades at ¥677.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1873.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.93, whereas 3477.T's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, 1873.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3477.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1873.T is more volatile compared to 3477.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1873.T.
1873.T vs 1413.T Comparison
1873.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1873.T stands at 11.7B. In comparison, 1413.T has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1873.T is priced at ¥292.00, while 1413.T trades at ¥2,337.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1873.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.93, whereas 1413.T's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, 1873.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1413.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1873.T is more volatile compared to 1413.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1873.T.