Trendzon Holdings Group Limited
Trendzon Holdings Group Limited 1865.HK Peers
See (1865.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1865.HK | $0.33 | N/A | 239.44M | -0.66 | -$0.49 | N/A |
| 0390.HK | $3.49 | -0.57% | 135.87B | 3.14 | $1.11 | +7.14% |
| 1800.HK | $5.05 | -0.79% | 134.71B | 3.37 | $1.50 | +8.71% |
| 1186.HK | $5.10 | -0.39% | 109.17B | 3.42 | $1.49 | +8.16% |
| 3996.HK | $1.02 | -0.97% | 63.17B | 5.10 | $0.20 | +4.46% |
| 1618.HK | $1.52 | N/A | 61.64B | 7.24 | $0.21 | +5.62% |
| 3311.HK | $11.14 | -0.54% | 58.84B | 5.99 | $1.86 | +5.52% |
| 1735.HK | $10.70 | +2.10% | 45.20B | 356.67 | $0.03 | N/A |
| 0659.HK | $7.43 | N/A | 29.76B | 13.04 | $0.57 | +8.75% |
| 2386.HK | $5.50 | +2.12% | 24.15B | 9.17 | $0.60 | +4.41% |
Stock Comparison
1865.HK vs 0390.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 0390.HK has a market cap of 135.87B. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 0390.HK trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 0390.HK's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0390.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 0390.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1800.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1800.HK has a market cap of 134.71B. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1800.HK trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1800.HK's P/E ratio is 3.37. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1800.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1800.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1186.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1186.HK has a market cap of 109.17B. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1186.HK trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1186.HK's P/E ratio is 3.42. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1186.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1186.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 3996.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 3996.HK has a market cap of 63.17B. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 3996.HK trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 3996.HK's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 3996.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 3996.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1618.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1618.HK has a market cap of 61.64B. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1618.HK trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1618.HK's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1618.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1618.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 3311.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 3311.HK has a market cap of 58.84B. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 3311.HK trades at $11.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 3311.HK's P/E ratio is 5.99. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 3311.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 3311.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1735.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1735.HK has a market cap of 45.20B. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1735.HK trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1735.HK's P/E ratio is 356.67. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1735.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1735.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 0659.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 0659.HK has a market cap of 29.76B. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 0659.HK trades at $7.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 0659.HK's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0659.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 0659.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 2386.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 2386.HK has a market cap of 24.15B. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 2386.HK trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 2386.HK's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 2386.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 2386.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 2068.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 2068.HK has a market cap of 12.82B. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 2068.HK trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 2068.HK's P/E ratio is 191.00. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 2068.HK's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 2068.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1783.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1783.HK has a market cap of 11.79B. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1783.HK trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1783.HK's P/E ratio is -123.57. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1783.HK's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1783.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1855.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1855.HK has a market cap of 7.37B. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1855.HK trades at $8.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1855.HK's P/E ratio is 178.60. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1855.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1855.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 9900.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 9900.HK has a market cap of 4.64B. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 9900.HK trades at $12.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 9900.HK's P/E ratio is 155.75. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 9900.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 9900.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 0830.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 0830.HK has a market cap of 3.74B. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 0830.HK trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 0830.HK's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0830.HK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 0830.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 2520.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 2520.HK has a market cap of 2.75B. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 2520.HK trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 2520.HK's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 2520.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 2520.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 9913.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 9913.HK has a market cap of 2.68B. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 9913.HK trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 9913.HK's P/E ratio is 134.00. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 9913.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 9913.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1271.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1271.HK has a market cap of 2.67B. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1271.HK trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1271.HK's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1271.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1271.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 0331.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 0331.HK has a market cap of 2.50B. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 0331.HK trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 0331.HK's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0331.HK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 0331.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 2355.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 2355.HK has a market cap of 2.29B. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 2355.HK trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 2355.HK's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 2355.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 2355.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 2296.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 2296.HK has a market cap of 2.12B. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 2296.HK trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 2296.HK's P/E ratio is 106.00. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 2296.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 2296.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1599.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1599.HK has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1599.HK trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1599.HK's P/E ratio is 3.32. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1599.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1599.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1726.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1726.HK has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1726.HK trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1726.HK's P/E ratio is -17.62. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1726.HK's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1726.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 0240.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 0240.HK has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 0240.HK trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 0240.HK's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0240.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 0240.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1627.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1627.HK has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1627.HK trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1627.HK's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1627.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1627.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 2236.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 2236.HK has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 2236.HK trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 2236.HK's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 2236.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 2236.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1662.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1662.HK has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1662.HK trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1662.HK's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1662.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1662.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 9639.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 9639.HK has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 9639.HK trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 9639.HK's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 9639.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 9639.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1977.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1977.HK has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1977.HK trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1977.HK's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1977.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 1977.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 2262.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 2262.HK has a market cap of 981.60M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 2262.HK trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 2262.HK's P/E ratio is -86.00. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 2262.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 2262.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 3928.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 3928.HK has a market cap of 940.80M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 3928.HK trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 3928.HK's P/E ratio is -196.00. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 3928.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 3928.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 0687.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 0687.HK has a market cap of 858.34M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 0687.HK trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 0687.HK's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0687.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 0687.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 0711.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 0711.HK has a market cap of 833.30M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 0711.HK trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 0711.HK's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0711.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 0711.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1727.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1727.HK has a market cap of 766.20M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1727.HK trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1727.HK's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1727.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1727.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1283.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1283.HK has a market cap of 761.47M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1283.HK trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1283.HK's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1283.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1283.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1499.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1499.HK has a market cap of 746.50M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1499.HK trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1499.HK's P/E ratio is -13.90. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1499.HK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1499.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1683.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1683.HK has a market cap of 676.51M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1683.HK trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1683.HK's P/E ratio is -21.75. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1683.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1683.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1609.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1609.HK has a market cap of 643.76M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1609.HK trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1609.HK's P/E ratio is 66.00. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1609.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1609.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 0611.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 0611.HK has a market cap of 629.69M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 0611.HK trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 0611.HK's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0611.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 0611.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1780.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1780.HK has a market cap of 620.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1780.HK trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1780.HK's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1780.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1780.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 6829.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 6829.HK has a market cap of 573.12M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 6829.HK trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 6829.HK's P/E ratio is 99.50. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 6829.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 6829.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1656.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1656.HK has a market cap of 547.28M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1656.HK trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1656.HK's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1656.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 1656.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1903.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1903.HK has a market cap of 525.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1903.HK trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1903.HK's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1903.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1903.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1746.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1746.HK has a market cap of 495.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1746.HK trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1746.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1746.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1746.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1556.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1556.HK has a market cap of 495.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1556.HK trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1556.HK's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1556.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 1556.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 0610.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 0610.HK has a market cap of 491.74M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 0610.HK trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 0610.HK's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0610.HK's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 0610.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 2789.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 2789.HK has a market cap of 478.07M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 2789.HK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 2789.HK's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 2789.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 2789.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1301.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1301.HK has a market cap of 474.13M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1301.HK trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1301.HK's P/E ratio is 75.00. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1301.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1301.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 8246.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 8246.HK has a market cap of 467.90M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 8246.HK trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 8246.HK's P/E ratio is -11.60. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 8246.HK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 8246.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1183.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1183.HK has a market cap of 465.74M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1183.HK trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1183.HK's P/E ratio is -11.70. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1183.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1183.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 2503.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 2503.HK has a market cap of 426.25M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 2503.HK trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 2503.HK's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 2503.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 2503.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 0924.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 0924.HK has a market cap of 425.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 0924.HK trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 0924.HK's P/E ratio is -42.50. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0924.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 0924.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 0406.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 0406.HK has a market cap of 416.15M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 0406.HK trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 0406.HK's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0406.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 0406.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1372.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1372.HK has a market cap of 367.69M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1372.HK trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1372.HK's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1372.HK's ROE of +8.84%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1372.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 8305.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 8305.HK has a market cap of 359.10M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 8305.HK trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 8305.HK's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 8305.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 8305.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 8021.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 8021.HK has a market cap of 344.81M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 8021.HK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 8021.HK's P/E ratio is -30.77. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 8021.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 8021.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 8629.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 8629.HK has a market cap of 329.07M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 8629.HK trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 8629.HK's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 8629.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 8629.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 6063.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 6063.HK has a market cap of 320.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 6063.HK trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 6063.HK's P/E ratio is 94.12. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 6063.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 6063.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 8188.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 8188.HK has a market cap of 312.97M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 8188.HK trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 8188.HK's P/E ratio is 3.88. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 8188.HK's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 8188.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 2163.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 2163.HK has a market cap of 292.58M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 2163.HK trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 2163.HK's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 2163.HK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 2163.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 0896.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 0896.HK has a market cap of 268.27M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 0896.HK trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 0896.HK's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0896.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 0896.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 2863.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 2863.HK has a market cap of 243.38M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 2863.HK trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 2863.HK's P/E ratio is -36.50. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 2863.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 2863.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1034.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1034.HK has a market cap of 240.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1034.HK trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1034.HK's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1034.HK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1034.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 6038.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 6038.HK has a market cap of 232.70M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 6038.HK trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 6038.HK's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 6038.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 6038.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 0385.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 0385.HK has a market cap of 229.04M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 0385.HK trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 0385.HK's P/E ratio is 4.28. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0385.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 0385.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 0368.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 0368.HK has a market cap of 228.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 0368.HK trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 0368.HK's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0368.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 0368.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1447.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1447.HK has a market cap of 224.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1447.HK trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1447.HK's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1447.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1447.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1459.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1459.HK has a market cap of 213.34M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1459.HK trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1459.HK's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1459.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1459.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1582.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1582.HK has a market cap of 205.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1582.HK trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1582.HK's P/E ratio is 3.73. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1582.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 1582.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 8023.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 8023.HK has a market cap of 203.13M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 8023.HK trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 8023.HK's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 8023.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 8023.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1757.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1757.HK has a market cap of 201.60M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1757.HK trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1757.HK's P/E ratio is 84.00. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1757.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 1757.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 2545.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 2545.HK has a market cap of 201.60M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 2545.HK trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 2545.HK's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 2545.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 2545.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 8316.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 8316.HK has a market cap of 195.44M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 8316.HK trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 8316.HK's P/E ratio is -20.50. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 8316.HK's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 8316.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 8601.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 8601.HK has a market cap of 192.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 8601.HK trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 8601.HK's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 8601.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 8601.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1707.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1707.HK has a market cap of 191.52M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1707.HK trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1707.HK's P/E ratio is -11.40. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1707.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1707.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1870.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1870.HK has a market cap of 184.20M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1870.HK trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1870.HK's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1870.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1870.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 8128.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 8128.HK has a market cap of 184.03M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 8128.HK trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 8128.HK's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 8128.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 8128.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 8360.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 8360.HK has a market cap of 178.34M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 8360.HK trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 8360.HK's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 8360.HK's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 8360.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1559.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1559.HK has a market cap of 173.83M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1559.HK trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1559.HK's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1559.HK's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 1559.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 8268.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 8268.HK has a market cap of 172.80M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 8268.HK trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 8268.HK's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 8268.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 8268.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1547.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1547.HK has a market cap of 171.20M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1547.HK trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1547.HK's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1547.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1547.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 2663.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 2663.HK has a market cap of 167.08M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 2663.HK trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 2663.HK's P/E ratio is 3.75. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 2663.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 2663.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 6182.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 6182.HK has a market cap of 160.80M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 6182.HK trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 6182.HK's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 6182.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 6182.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 8170.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 8170.HK has a market cap of 156.26M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 8170.HK trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 8170.HK's P/E ratio is 37.25. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 8170.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 8170.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 2017.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 2017.HK has a market cap of 154.63M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 2017.HK trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 2017.HK's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 2017.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 2017.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1552.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1552.HK has a market cap of 151.20M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1552.HK trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1552.HK's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1552.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 1552.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1987.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1987.HK has a market cap of 146.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1987.HK trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1987.HK's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1987.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1987.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1615.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1615.HK has a market cap of 143.40M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1615.HK trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1615.HK's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1615.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 1615.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1920.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1920.HK has a market cap of 137.28M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1920.HK trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1920.HK's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1920.HK's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1920.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1960.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1960.HK has a market cap of 137.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1960.HK trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1960.HK's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1960.HK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1960.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 0871.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 0871.HK has a market cap of 135.35M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 0871.HK trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 0871.HK's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0871.HK's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 0871.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1420.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1420.HK has a market cap of 133.92M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1420.HK trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1420.HK's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1420.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 1420.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 8275.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 8275.HK has a market cap of 130.32M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 8275.HK trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 8275.HK's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 8275.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 8275.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1741.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1741.HK has a market cap of 129.60M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1741.HK trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1741.HK's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1741.HK's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 1741.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1793.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1793.HK has a market cap of 126.91M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1793.HK trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1793.HK's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1793.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 1793.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 2266.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 2266.HK has a market cap of 126.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 2266.HK trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 2266.HK's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 2266.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 2266.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 0589.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 0589.HK has a market cap of 118.75M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 0589.HK trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 0589.HK's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 0589.HK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 0589.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 9929.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 9929.HK has a market cap of 110.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 9929.HK trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 9929.HK's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 9929.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 9929.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1690.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1690.HK has a market cap of 109.84M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1690.HK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1690.HK's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1690.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is more volatile compared to 1690.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.
1865.HK vs 1953.HK Comparison
1865.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1865.HK stands at 239.44M. In comparison, 1953.HK has a market cap of 105.84M. Regarding current trading prices, 1865.HK is priced at $0.33, while 1953.HK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1865.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.66, whereas 1953.HK's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, 1865.HK's ROE is -0.15%, compared to 1953.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1865.HK is less volatile compared to 1953.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1865.HK.