S.A.I. Leisure Group Company Limited
S.A.I. Leisure Group Company Limited 1832.HK Peers
See (1832.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Lodging Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1832.HK | HK$0.44 | -1.14% | 156.6M | -1.04 | -HK$0.42 | N/A |
| 1179.HK | HK$26.05 | -1.88% | 81.9B | 23.50 | HK$1.13 | +2.90% |
| 0069.HK | HK$4.32 | +1.17% | 15.4B | 12.34 | HK$0.35 | +3.47% |
| 0045.HK | HK$5.56 | +1.09% | 9.3B | -9.75 | -HK$0.57 | N/A |
| 1270.HK | HK$0.56 | +5.66% | 1.9B | 7.71 | HK$0.07 | +2.86% |
| 6090.HK | HK$2.20 | +2.33% | 1.8B | 4.23 | HK$0.52 | N/A |
| 1221.HK | HK$1.40 | +2.94% | 1.6B | 19.43 | HK$0.07 | +2.14% |
| 0184.HK | HK$2.27 | +0.44% | 772.3M | 3.03 | HK$0.75 | +5.29% |
| 0201.HK | HK$0.07 | +0.00% | 653.1M | -7.30 | -HK$0.01 | N/A |
| 0078.HK | HK$0.65 | +4.84% | 584.2M | -0.22 | -HK$3.02 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1832.HK vs 1179.HK Comparison
1832.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1832.HK stands at 156.6M. In comparison, 1179.HK has a market cap of 81.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1832.HK is priced at HK$0.44, while 1179.HK trades at HK$26.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1832.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas 1179.HK's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, 1832.HK's ROE is -0.50%, compared to 1179.HK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 1832.HK is less volatile compared to 1179.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1832.HK.
1832.HK vs 0069.HK Comparison
1832.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1832.HK stands at 156.6M. In comparison, 0069.HK has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1832.HK is priced at HK$0.44, while 0069.HK trades at HK$4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1832.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas 0069.HK's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, 1832.HK's ROE is -0.50%, compared to 0069.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1832.HK is less volatile compared to 0069.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1832.HK.
1832.HK vs 0045.HK Comparison
1832.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1832.HK stands at 156.6M. In comparison, 0045.HK has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1832.HK is priced at HK$0.44, while 0045.HK trades at HK$5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1832.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas 0045.HK's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, 1832.HK's ROE is -0.50%, compared to 0045.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1832.HK is less volatile compared to 0045.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1832.HK.
1832.HK vs 1270.HK Comparison
1832.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1832.HK stands at 156.6M. In comparison, 1270.HK has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1832.HK is priced at HK$0.44, while 1270.HK trades at HK$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1832.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas 1270.HK's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, 1832.HK's ROE is -0.50%, compared to 1270.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1832.HK is less volatile compared to 1270.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1832.HK.
1832.HK vs 6090.HK Comparison
1832.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1832.HK stands at 156.6M. In comparison, 6090.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1832.HK is priced at HK$0.44, while 6090.HK trades at HK$2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1832.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas 6090.HK's P/E ratio is 4.23. In terms of profitability, 1832.HK's ROE is -0.50%, compared to 6090.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1832.HK is less volatile compared to 6090.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1832.HK.
1832.HK vs 1221.HK Comparison
1832.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1832.HK stands at 156.6M. In comparison, 1221.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1832.HK is priced at HK$0.44, while 1221.HK trades at HK$1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1832.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas 1221.HK's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, 1832.HK's ROE is -0.50%, compared to 1221.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1832.HK is more volatile compared to 1221.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1832.HK.
1832.HK vs 0184.HK Comparison
1832.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1832.HK stands at 156.6M. In comparison, 0184.HK has a market cap of 772.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1832.HK is priced at HK$0.44, while 0184.HK trades at HK$2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1832.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas 0184.HK's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, 1832.HK's ROE is -0.50%, compared to 0184.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1832.HK is more volatile compared to 0184.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1832.HK.
1832.HK vs 0201.HK Comparison
1832.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1832.HK stands at 156.6M. In comparison, 0201.HK has a market cap of 653.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1832.HK is priced at HK$0.44, while 0201.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1832.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas 0201.HK's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, 1832.HK's ROE is -0.50%, compared to 0201.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1832.HK is less volatile compared to 0201.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1832.HK.
1832.HK vs 0078.HK Comparison
1832.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1832.HK stands at 156.6M. In comparison, 0078.HK has a market cap of 584.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1832.HK is priced at HK$0.44, while 0078.HK trades at HK$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1832.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas 0078.HK's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, 1832.HK's ROE is -0.50%, compared to 0078.HK's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 1832.HK is less volatile compared to 0078.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1832.HK.
1832.HK vs 0022.HK Comparison
1832.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1832.HK stands at 156.6M. In comparison, 0022.HK has a market cap of 391.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1832.HK is priced at HK$0.44, while 0022.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1832.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas 0022.HK's P/E ratio is -9.95. In terms of profitability, 1832.HK's ROE is -0.50%, compared to 0022.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1832.HK is less volatile compared to 0022.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1832.HK.
1832.HK vs 0617.HK Comparison
1832.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1832.HK stands at 156.6M. In comparison, 0617.HK has a market cap of 345.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1832.HK is priced at HK$0.44, while 0617.HK trades at HK$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1832.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas 0617.HK's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, 1832.HK's ROE is -0.50%, compared to 0617.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1832.HK is less volatile compared to 0617.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1832.HK.
1832.HK vs 0557.HK Comparison
1832.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1832.HK stands at 156.6M. In comparison, 0557.HK has a market cap of 311.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1832.HK is priced at HK$0.44, while 0557.HK trades at HK$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1832.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas 0557.HK's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, 1832.HK's ROE is -0.50%, compared to 0557.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1832.HK is more volatile compared to 0557.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1832.HK.
1832.HK vs 0219.HK Comparison
1832.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1832.HK stands at 156.6M. In comparison, 0219.HK has a market cap of 307M. Regarding current trading prices, 1832.HK is priced at HK$0.44, while 0219.HK trades at HK$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1832.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas 0219.HK's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, 1832.HK's ROE is -0.50%, compared to 0219.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1832.HK is more volatile compared to 0219.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1832.HK.
1832.HK vs 0355.HK Comparison
1832.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1832.HK stands at 156.6M. In comparison, 0355.HK has a market cap of 225.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1832.HK is priced at HK$0.44, while 0355.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1832.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas 0355.HK's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, 1832.HK's ROE is -0.50%, compared to 0355.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1832.HK is less volatile compared to 0355.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1832.HK.
1832.HK vs 0042.HK Comparison
1832.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1832.HK stands at 156.6M. In comparison, 0042.HK has a market cap of 213.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1832.HK is priced at HK$0.44, while 0042.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1832.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas 0042.HK's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, 1832.HK's ROE is -0.50%, compared to 0042.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1832.HK is less volatile compared to 0042.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1832.HK.
1832.HK vs 0199.HK Comparison
1832.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1832.HK stands at 156.6M. In comparison, 0199.HK has a market cap of 199.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1832.HK is priced at HK$0.44, while 0199.HK trades at HK$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1832.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas 0199.HK's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, 1832.HK's ROE is -0.50%, compared to 0199.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1832.HK is less volatile compared to 0199.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1832.HK.
1832.HK vs 1215.HK Comparison
1832.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1832.HK stands at 156.6M. In comparison, 1215.HK has a market cap of 178.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1832.HK is priced at HK$0.44, while 1215.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1832.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas 1215.HK's P/E ratio is -70.00. In terms of profitability, 1832.HK's ROE is -0.50%, compared to 1215.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1832.HK is less volatile compared to 1215.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1832.HK.
1832.HK vs 0253.HK Comparison
1832.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1832.HK stands at 156.6M. In comparison, 0253.HK has a market cap of 145.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1832.HK is priced at HK$0.44, while 0253.HK trades at HK$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1832.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas 0253.HK's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, 1832.HK's ROE is -0.50%, compared to 0253.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1832.HK is more volatile compared to 0253.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1832.HK.
1832.HK vs 1355.HK Comparison
1832.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1832.HK stands at 156.6M. In comparison, 1355.HK has a market cap of 113.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1832.HK is priced at HK$0.44, while 1355.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1832.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas 1355.HK's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, 1832.HK's ROE is -0.50%, compared to 1355.HK's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 1832.HK is more volatile compared to 1355.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1832.HK.
1832.HK vs 0181.HK Comparison
1832.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1832.HK stands at 156.6M. In comparison, 0181.HK has a market cap of 87.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1832.HK is priced at HK$0.44, while 0181.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1832.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas 0181.HK's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, 1832.HK's ROE is -0.50%, compared to 0181.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1832.HK is less volatile compared to 0181.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1832.HK.
1832.HK vs 0559.HK Comparison
1832.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1832.HK stands at 156.6M. In comparison, 0559.HK has a market cap of 77.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1832.HK is priced at HK$0.44, while 0559.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1832.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas 0559.HK's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, 1832.HK's ROE is -0.50%, compared to 0559.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1832.HK is less volatile compared to 0559.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1832.HK.
1832.HK vs 0193.HK Comparison
1832.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1832.HK stands at 156.6M. In comparison, 0193.HK has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1832.HK is priced at HK$0.44, while 0193.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1832.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas 0193.HK's P/E ratio is -6.02. In terms of profitability, 1832.HK's ROE is -0.50%, compared to 0193.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1832.HK is more volatile compared to 0193.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1832.HK.
1832.HK vs 1189.HK Comparison
1832.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1832.HK stands at 156.6M. In comparison, 1189.HK has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1832.HK is priced at HK$0.44, while 1189.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1832.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas 1189.HK's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, 1832.HK's ROE is -0.50%, compared to 1189.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1832.HK is less volatile compared to 1189.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1832.HK.
1832.HK vs 8237.HK Comparison
1832.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1832.HK stands at 156.6M. In comparison, 8237.HK has a market cap of 33.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1832.HK is priced at HK$0.44, while 8237.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1832.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas 8237.HK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, 1832.HK's ROE is -0.50%, compared to 8237.HK's ROE of +5.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 1832.HK is less volatile compared to 8237.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1832.HK.
1832.HK vs 2006.HK Comparison
1832.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1832.HK stands at 156.6M. In comparison, 2006.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1832.HK is priced at HK$0.44, while 2006.HK trades at HK$3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1832.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas 2006.HK's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, 1832.HK's ROE is -0.50%, compared to 2006.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1832.HK is more volatile compared to 2006.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1832.HK.