Mulsanne Group Holding Limited
Mulsanne Group Holding Limited 1817.HK Peers
See (1817.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1817.HK | HK$0.41 | +12.33% | 389.5M | 10.25 | HK$0.04 | N/A |
| 6288.HK | HK$25.95 | +3.59% | 779.2B | 34.79 | HK$0.73 | +0.50% |
| 6110.HK | HK$3.12 | +9.47% | 18.5B | 12.96 | HK$0.23 | +6.84% |
| 1368.HK | HK$5.69 | +1.79% | 15B | 10.25 | HK$0.55 | +12.38% |
| 3709.HK | HK$7.62 | +1.60% | 5.2B | 10.19 | HK$0.75 | +39.04% |
| 1223.HK | HK$0.81 | +1.25% | 2.4B | -16.00 | -HK$0.05 | +0.63% |
| 0709.HK | HK$1.43 | -1.38% | 2.3B | 11.00 | HK$0.13 | +9.79% |
| 0128.HK | HK$0.26 | +0.00% | 429.2M | -8.67 | -HK$0.03 | N/A |
| 0592.HK | HK$0.11 | -4.50% | 352.2M | -1.77 | -HK$0.06 | N/A |
| 1657.HK | HK$9.80 | +17.51% | 304M | -19.00 | -HK$0.50 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1817.HK vs 6288.HK Comparison
1817.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1817.HK stands at 389.5M. In comparison, 6288.HK has a market cap of 779.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1817.HK is priced at HK$0.41, while 6288.HK trades at HK$25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1817.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas 6288.HK's P/E ratio is 34.79. In terms of profitability, 1817.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 6288.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1817.HK is more volatile compared to 6288.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1817.HK.
1817.HK vs 6110.HK Comparison
1817.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1817.HK stands at 389.5M. In comparison, 6110.HK has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1817.HK is priced at HK$0.41, while 6110.HK trades at HK$3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1817.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas 6110.HK's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, 1817.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 6110.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1817.HK is more volatile compared to 6110.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1817.HK.
1817.HK vs 1368.HK Comparison
1817.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1817.HK stands at 389.5M. In comparison, 1368.HK has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, 1817.HK is priced at HK$0.41, while 1368.HK trades at HK$5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1817.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas 1368.HK's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, 1817.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1368.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1817.HK is more volatile compared to 1368.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1817.HK.
1817.HK vs 3709.HK Comparison
1817.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1817.HK stands at 389.5M. In comparison, 3709.HK has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1817.HK is priced at HK$0.41, while 3709.HK trades at HK$7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1817.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas 3709.HK's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, 1817.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 3709.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1817.HK is more volatile compared to 3709.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1817.HK.
1817.HK vs 1223.HK Comparison
1817.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1817.HK stands at 389.5M. In comparison, 1223.HK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1817.HK is priced at HK$0.41, while 1223.HK trades at HK$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1817.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas 1223.HK's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, 1817.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1223.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1817.HK is more volatile compared to 1223.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1817.HK.
1817.HK vs 0709.HK Comparison
1817.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1817.HK stands at 389.5M. In comparison, 0709.HK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1817.HK is priced at HK$0.41, while 0709.HK trades at HK$1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1817.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas 0709.HK's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, 1817.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0709.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1817.HK is more volatile compared to 0709.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1817.HK.
1817.HK vs 0128.HK Comparison
1817.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1817.HK stands at 389.5M. In comparison, 0128.HK has a market cap of 429.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1817.HK is priced at HK$0.41, while 0128.HK trades at HK$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1817.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas 0128.HK's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, 1817.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0128.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1817.HK is more volatile compared to 0128.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1817.HK.
1817.HK vs 0592.HK Comparison
1817.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1817.HK stands at 389.5M. In comparison, 0592.HK has a market cap of 352.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1817.HK is priced at HK$0.41, while 0592.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1817.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas 0592.HK's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, 1817.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0592.HK's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1817.HK is less volatile compared to 0592.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1817.HK.
1817.HK vs 1657.HK Comparison
1817.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1817.HK stands at 389.5M. In comparison, 1657.HK has a market cap of 304M. Regarding current trading prices, 1817.HK is priced at HK$0.41, while 1657.HK trades at HK$9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1817.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas 1657.HK's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, 1817.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1657.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1817.HK is more volatile compared to 1657.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1817.HK.
1817.HK vs 0330.HK Comparison
1817.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1817.HK stands at 389.5M. In comparison, 0330.HK has a market cap of 277.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1817.HK is priced at HK$0.41, while 0330.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1817.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas 0330.HK's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, 1817.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0330.HK's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, 1817.HK is less volatile compared to 0330.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1817.HK.
1817.HK vs 3860.HK Comparison
1817.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1817.HK stands at 389.5M. In comparison, 3860.HK has a market cap of 253.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1817.HK is priced at HK$0.41, while 3860.HK trades at HK$0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1817.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas 3860.HK's P/E ratio is -48.50. In terms of profitability, 1817.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 3860.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1817.HK is more volatile compared to 3860.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1817.HK.
1817.HK vs 0375.HK Comparison
1817.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1817.HK stands at 389.5M. In comparison, 0375.HK has a market cap of 149.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1817.HK is priced at HK$0.41, while 0375.HK trades at HK$0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1817.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas 0375.HK's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, 1817.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0375.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1817.HK is more volatile compared to 0375.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1817.HK.
1817.HK vs 6116.HK Comparison
1817.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1817.HK stands at 389.5M. In comparison, 6116.HK has a market cap of 136M. Regarding current trading prices, 1817.HK is priced at HK$0.41, while 6116.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1817.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas 6116.HK's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, 1817.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 6116.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1817.HK is less volatile compared to 6116.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1817.HK.
1817.HK vs 0483.HK Comparison
1817.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1817.HK stands at 389.5M. In comparison, 0483.HK has a market cap of 102.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1817.HK is priced at HK$0.41, while 0483.HK trades at HK$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1817.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas 0483.HK's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, 1817.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0483.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1817.HK is more volatile compared to 0483.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1817.HK.
1817.HK vs 2528.HK Comparison
1817.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1817.HK stands at 389.5M. In comparison, 2528.HK has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1817.HK is priced at HK$0.41, while 2528.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1817.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas 2528.HK's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, 1817.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 2528.HK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 1817.HK is more volatile compared to 2528.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1817.HK.
1817.HK vs 1367.HK Comparison
1817.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1817.HK stands at 389.5M. In comparison, 1367.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1817.HK is priced at HK$0.41, while 1367.HK trades at HK$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1817.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas 1367.HK's P/E ratio is -5.54. In terms of profitability, 1817.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1367.HK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1817.HK is more volatile compared to 1367.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1817.HK.
1817.HK vs 0891.HK Comparison
1817.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1817.HK stands at 389.5M. In comparison, 0891.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1817.HK is priced at HK$0.41, while 0891.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1817.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas 0891.HK's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, 1817.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0891.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1817.HK is less volatile compared to 0891.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1817.HK.