CSMall Group Limited
CSMall Group Limited 1815.HK Peers
See (1815.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1815.HK | HK$1.87 | +0.54% | 2.3B | 93.50 | HK$0.02 | N/A |
| 6181.HK | HK$1,008.00 | +14.94% | 174.1B | 97.30 | HK$10.36 | +0.68% |
| 1929.HK | HK$13.42 | +0.30% | 134B | 22.75 | HK$0.59 | +3.73% |
| 1913.HK | HK$48.70 | +2.31% | 124.6B | 16.51 | HK$2.95 | +2.94% |
| 0590.HK | HK$20.05 | -0.25% | 11.8B | 10.72 | HK$1.87 | +5.94% |
| 0116.HK | HK$8.52 | -1.96% | 5.7B | 7.47 | HK$1.14 | +5.99% |
| 0887.HK | HK$0.44 | -8.33% | 3.2B | 11.00 | HK$0.04 | +2.50% |
| 0113.HK | HK$6.86 | +0.29% | 2.6B | 13.72 | HK$0.50 | +6.56% |
| 0256.HK | HK$0.45 | -17.59% | 1.9B | -7.42 | -HK$0.06 | N/A |
| 0398.HK | HK$3.41 | -2.01% | 1.7B | 8.32 | HK$0.41 | +13.96% |
Stock Comparison
1815.HK vs 6181.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 6181.HK has a market cap of 174.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 6181.HK trades at HK$1,008.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 6181.HK's P/E ratio is 97.30. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 6181.HK's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is less volatile compared to 6181.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 1929.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 1929.HK has a market cap of 134B. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 1929.HK trades at HK$13.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 1929.HK's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1929.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is more volatile compared to 1929.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 1913.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 1913.HK has a market cap of 124.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 1913.HK trades at HK$48.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 1913.HK's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1913.HK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is more volatile compared to 1913.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 0590.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 0590.HK has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 0590.HK trades at HK$20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 0590.HK's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0590.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is more volatile compared to 0590.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 0116.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 0116.HK has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 0116.HK trades at HK$8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 0116.HK's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0116.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is more volatile compared to 0116.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 0887.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 0887.HK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 0887.HK trades at HK$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 0887.HK's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0887.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is less volatile compared to 0887.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 0113.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 0113.HK has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 0113.HK trades at HK$6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 0113.HK's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0113.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is more volatile compared to 0113.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 0256.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 0256.HK has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 0256.HK trades at HK$0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 0256.HK's P/E ratio is -7.42. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0256.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is less volatile compared to 0256.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 0398.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 0398.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 0398.HK trades at HK$3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 0398.HK's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0398.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is more volatile compared to 0398.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 0860.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 0860.HK has a market cap of 848.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 0860.HK trades at HK$0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 0860.HK's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0860.HK's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is more volatile compared to 0860.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 1466.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 1466.HK has a market cap of 517.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 1466.HK trades at HK$0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 1466.HK's P/E ratio is -33.50. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1466.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is more volatile compared to 1466.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 3389.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 3389.HK has a market cap of 506.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 3389.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 3389.HK's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 3389.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is less volatile compared to 3389.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 0789.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 0789.HK has a market cap of 410.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 0789.HK trades at HK$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 0789.HK's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0789.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is more volatile compared to 0789.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 0280.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 0280.HK has a market cap of 395.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 0280.HK trades at HK$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 0280.HK's P/E ratio is 4.83. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0280.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is less volatile compared to 0280.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 0213.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 0213.HK has a market cap of 356.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 0213.HK trades at HK$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 0213.HK's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0213.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is less volatile compared to 0213.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 1856.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 1856.HK has a market cap of 342.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 1856.HK trades at HK$0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 1856.HK's P/E ratio is -7.31. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1856.HK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is less volatile compared to 1856.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 8026.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 8026.HK has a market cap of 323.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 8026.HK trades at HK$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 8026.HK's P/E ratio is -7.10. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 8026.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is more volatile compared to 8026.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 3326.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 3326.HK has a market cap of 313.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 3326.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 3326.HK's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 3326.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is more volatile compared to 3326.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 0417.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 0417.HK has a market cap of 174.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 0417.HK trades at HK$0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 0417.HK's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0417.HK's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is more volatile compared to 0417.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 1150.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 1150.HK has a market cap of 172.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 1150.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 1150.HK's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1150.HK's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is more volatile compared to 1150.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 6838.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 6838.HK has a market cap of 148.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 6838.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 6838.HK's P/E ratio is -8.27. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 6838.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is less volatile compared to 6838.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 2882.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 2882.HK has a market cap of 148.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 2882.HK trades at HK$0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 2882.HK's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 2882.HK's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is less volatile compared to 2882.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 0986.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 0986.HK has a market cap of 121.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 0986.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 0986.HK's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0986.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is less volatile compared to 0986.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 0442.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 0442.HK has a market cap of 114M. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 0442.HK trades at HK$0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 0442.HK's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0442.HK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is less volatile compared to 0442.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 0513.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 0513.HK has a market cap of 109.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 0513.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 0513.HK's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0513.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is more volatile compared to 0513.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 0125.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 0125.HK has a market cap of 97.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 0125.HK trades at HK$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 0125.HK's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0125.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is more volatile compared to 0125.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 0084.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 0084.HK has a market cap of 68.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 0084.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 0084.HK's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0084.HK's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is more volatile compared to 0084.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 0444.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 0444.HK has a market cap of 60.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 0444.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 0444.HK's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0444.HK's ROE of +52.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is more volatile compared to 0444.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 1327.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 1327.HK has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 1327.HK trades at HK$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 1327.HK's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1327.HK's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is more volatile compared to 1327.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 8537.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 8537.HK has a market cap of 50.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 8537.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 8537.HK's P/E ratio is 1.11. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 8537.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is more volatile compared to 8537.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 8219.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 8219.HK has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 8219.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 8219.HK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 8219.HK's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is more volatile compared to 8219.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.
1815.HK vs 1470.HK Comparison
1815.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1815.HK stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 1470.HK has a market cap of 38.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1815.HK is priced at HK$1.87, while 1470.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1815.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 93.50, whereas 1470.HK's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, 1815.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1470.HK's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 1815.HK is more volatile compared to 1470.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1815.HK.