Daisue Construction Co., Ltd.
Daisue Construction Co., Ltd. 1814.T Peers
See (1814.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Development Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1814.T | ¥2,131.00 | -1.11% | 22.3B | 12.92 | ¥164.93 | +4.65% |
| 1925.T | ¥4,842.00 | -0.21% | 3T | 9.42 | ¥514.08 | +3.04% |
| 8871.T | ¥3,395.00 | +0.74% | 112.8B | 22.49 | ¥150.98 | +2.95% |
| 3480.T | ¥3,795.00 | N/A | 80.1B | 10.80 | ¥351.42 | +1.90% |
| 8897.T | ¥384.00 | -0.78% | 52.2B | 6.18 | ¥62.13 | +7.81% |
| 3299.T | ¥2,058.00 | -1.86% | 47.9B | 7.98 | ¥258.04 | +3.30% |
| 1847.T | ¥3,075.00 | -1.13% | 22.3B | 6.26 | ¥491.38 | +1.79% |
| 146A.T | ¥4,790.00 | -2.54% | 16.6B | 6.92 | ¥692.03 | +2.40% |
| 8887.T | ¥336.00 | -0.88% | 14.8B | 28.26 | ¥11.89 | +1.04% |
| 2981.T | ¥3,385.00 | -1.46% | 9.6B | 11.24 | ¥301.25 | +2.30% |
Stock Comparison
1814.T vs 1925.T Comparison
1814.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1814.T stands at 22.3B. In comparison, 1925.T has a market cap of 3T. Regarding current trading prices, 1814.T is priced at ¥2,131.00, while 1925.T trades at ¥4,842.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1814.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.92, whereas 1925.T's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, 1814.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1925.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1814.T and 1925.T have similar daily volatility (1.36).
1814.T vs 8871.T Comparison
1814.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1814.T stands at 22.3B. In comparison, 8871.T has a market cap of 112.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1814.T is priced at ¥2,131.00, while 8871.T trades at ¥3,395.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1814.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.92, whereas 8871.T's P/E ratio is 22.49. In terms of profitability, 1814.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8871.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1814.T is less volatile compared to 8871.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1814.T.
1814.T vs 3480.T Comparison
1814.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1814.T stands at 22.3B. In comparison, 3480.T has a market cap of 80.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1814.T is priced at ¥2,131.00, while 3480.T trades at ¥3,795.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1814.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.92, whereas 3480.T's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, 1814.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3480.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1814.T is less volatile compared to 3480.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1814.T.
1814.T vs 8897.T Comparison
1814.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1814.T stands at 22.3B. In comparison, 8897.T has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1814.T is priced at ¥2,131.00, while 8897.T trades at ¥384.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1814.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.92, whereas 8897.T's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, 1814.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8897.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1814.T is more volatile compared to 8897.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1814.T.
1814.T vs 3299.T Comparison
1814.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1814.T stands at 22.3B. In comparison, 3299.T has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1814.T is priced at ¥2,131.00, while 3299.T trades at ¥2,058.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1814.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.92, whereas 3299.T's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, 1814.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3299.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 1814.T is less volatile compared to 3299.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1814.T.
1814.T vs 1847.T Comparison
1814.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1814.T stands at 22.3B. In comparison, 1847.T has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1814.T is priced at ¥2,131.00, while 1847.T trades at ¥3,075.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1814.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.92, whereas 1847.T's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, 1814.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1847.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1814.T is less volatile compared to 1847.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1814.T.
1814.T vs 146A.T Comparison
1814.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1814.T stands at 22.3B. In comparison, 146A.T has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1814.T is priced at ¥2,131.00, while 146A.T trades at ¥4,790.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1814.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.92, whereas 146A.T's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, 1814.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 146A.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 1814.T is less volatile compared to 146A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1814.T.
1814.T vs 8887.T Comparison
1814.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1814.T stands at 22.3B. In comparison, 8887.T has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1814.T is priced at ¥2,131.00, while 8887.T trades at ¥336.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1814.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.92, whereas 8887.T's P/E ratio is 28.26. In terms of profitability, 1814.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8887.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1814.T is less volatile compared to 8887.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1814.T.
1814.T vs 2981.T Comparison
1814.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1814.T stands at 22.3B. In comparison, 2981.T has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1814.T is priced at ¥2,131.00, while 2981.T trades at ¥3,385.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1814.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.92, whereas 2981.T's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, 1814.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2981.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1814.T is less volatile compared to 2981.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1814.T.
1814.T vs 2983.T Comparison
1814.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1814.T stands at 22.3B. In comparison, 2983.T has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1814.T is priced at ¥2,131.00, while 2983.T trades at ¥1,703.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1814.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.92, whereas 2983.T's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, 1814.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2983.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 1814.T is less volatile compared to 2983.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1814.T.
1814.T vs 1757.T Comparison
1814.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1814.T stands at 22.3B. In comparison, 1757.T has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1814.T is priced at ¥2,131.00, while 1757.T trades at ¥20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1814.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.92, whereas 1757.T's P/E ratio is -4.08. In terms of profitability, 1814.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1757.T's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, 1814.T is less volatile compared to 1757.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1814.T.
1814.T vs 3293.T Comparison
1814.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1814.T stands at 22.3B. In comparison, 3293.T has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1814.T is priced at ¥2,131.00, while 3293.T trades at ¥731.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1814.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.92, whereas 3293.T's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, 1814.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3293.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1814.T is more volatile compared to 3293.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1814.T.
1814.T vs 2984.T Comparison
1814.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1814.T stands at 22.3B. In comparison, 2984.T has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1814.T is priced at ¥2,131.00, while 2984.T trades at ¥666.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1814.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.92, whereas 2984.T's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, 1814.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2984.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1814.T is more volatile compared to 2984.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1814.T.
1814.T vs 1451.T Comparison
1814.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1814.T stands at 22.3B. In comparison, 1451.T has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1814.T is priced at ¥2,131.00, while 1451.T trades at ¥1,124.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1814.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.92, whereas 1451.T's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, 1814.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1451.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1814.T is more volatile compared to 1451.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1814.T.
1814.T vs 8886.T Comparison
1814.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1814.T stands at 22.3B. In comparison, 8886.T has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1814.T is priced at ¥2,131.00, while 8886.T trades at ¥1,716.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1814.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.92, whereas 8886.T's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, 1814.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8886.T's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, 1814.T is more volatile compared to 8886.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1814.T.
1814.T vs 7837.T Comparison
1814.T plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1814.T stands at 22.3B. In comparison, 7837.T has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1814.T is priced at ¥2,131.00, while 7837.T trades at ¥356.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1814.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.92, whereas 7837.T's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, 1814.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7837.T's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1814.T is less volatile compared to 7837.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1814.T.