Itamiarts.Inc
Itamiarts.Inc (168A.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (168A.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 168A.T | ¥1,278.00 | +0.00% | 1.9B | 4.22 | ¥302.80 | +1.25% |
| 4324.T | ¥2,757.00 | +1.38% | 715.7B | -2.18 | -¥1,261.91 | +5.13% |
| 4751.T | ¥1,341.00 | +1.59% | 679.6B | 22.73 | ¥59.00 | +1.29% |
| 2433.T | ¥1,045.50 | +1.26% | 376.4B | 23.88 | ¥43.78 | +2.78% |
| 4293.T | ¥415.00 | +0.73% | 86.1B | 24.69 | ¥16.81 | +3.48% |
| 4326.T | ¥1,710.00 | -0.35% | 65.3B | 24.11 | ¥70.92 | +2.43% |
| 3978.T | ¥1,274.00 | +0.24% | 48.4B | 0.00 | ¥1,591,260,670.00 | +1.57% |
| 7366.T | ¥1,229.00 | +2.50% | 42.9B | 15.14 | ¥81.16 | +0.73% |
| 2389.T | ¥2,001.00 | +0.05% | 37.4B | N/A | ¥811,605,630.00 | +2.30% |
| 6067.T | ¥4,515.00 | +0.56% | 32.4B | 0.00 | ¥60,139,120.00 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
168A.T vs 4324.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 4324.T has a market cap of 715.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 4324.T trades at ¥2,757.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 4324.T's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 4324.T's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 4324.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 4324.T's competition here
168A.T vs 4751.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 4751.T has a market cap of 679.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 4751.T trades at ¥1,341.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 4751.T's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 4751.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 4751.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 4751.T's competition here
168A.T vs 2433.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 2433.T has a market cap of 376.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 2433.T trades at ¥1,045.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 2433.T's P/E ratio is 23.88. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2433.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 2433.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 2433.T's competition here
168A.T vs 4293.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 4293.T has a market cap of 86.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 4293.T trades at ¥415.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 4293.T's P/E ratio is 24.69. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 4293.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 4293.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 4293.T's competition here
168A.T vs 4326.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 4326.T has a market cap of 65.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 4326.T trades at ¥1,710.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 4326.T's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 4326.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 4326.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 4326.T's competition here
168A.T vs 3978.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 3978.T has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 3978.T trades at ¥1,274.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 3978.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3978.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 3978.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 3978.T's competition here
168A.T vs 7366.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 7366.T has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 7366.T trades at ¥1,229.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 7366.T's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 7366.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 7366.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 7366.T's competition here
168A.T vs 2389.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 2389.T has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 2389.T trades at ¥2,001.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 2389.T's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2389.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 2389.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 2389.T's competition here
168A.T vs 6067.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 6067.T has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 6067.T trades at ¥4,515.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 6067.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6067.T's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 6067.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 6067.T's competition here
168A.T vs 4499.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 4499.T has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 4499.T trades at ¥2,730.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 4499.T's P/E ratio is -32.13. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 4499.T's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is less volatile compared to 4499.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 4499.T's competition here
168A.T vs 2148.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 2148.T has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 2148.T trades at ¥1,567.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 2148.T's P/E ratio is 22.03. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2148.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 2148.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 2148.T's competition here
168A.T vs 2461.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 2461.T has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 2461.T trades at ¥450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 2461.T's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2461.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 2461.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 2461.T's competition here
168A.T vs 6535.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 6535.T has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 6535.T trades at ¥500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 6535.T's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6535.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 6535.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 6535.T's competition here
168A.T vs 9211.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 9211.T has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 9211.T trades at ¥1,487.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 9211.T's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 9211.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 9211.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 9211.T's competition here
168A.T vs 9782.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 9782.T has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 9782.T trades at ¥3,345.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 9782.T's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 9782.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 9782.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 9782.T's competition here
168A.T vs 7095.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 7095.T has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 7095.T trades at ¥1,283.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 7095.T's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 7095.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 7095.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 7095.T's competition here
168A.T vs 378A.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 378A.T has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 378A.T trades at ¥2,417.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 378A.T's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 378A.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is less volatile compared to 378A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 378A.T's competition here
168A.T vs 4767.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 4767.T has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 4767.T trades at ¥371.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 4767.T's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 4767.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 4767.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 4767.T's competition here
168A.T vs 2173.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 2173.T has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 2173.T trades at ¥924.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 2173.T's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2173.T's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 2173.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 2173.T's competition here
168A.T vs 7354.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 7354.T has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 7354.T trades at ¥310.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 7354.T's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 7354.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 7354.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 7354.T's competition here
168A.T vs 7050.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 7050.T has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 7050.T trades at ¥1,546.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 7050.T's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 7050.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 7050.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 7050.T's competition here
168A.T vs 2130.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 2130.T has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 2130.T trades at ¥1,068.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 2130.T's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2130.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 2130.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 2130.T's competition here
168A.T vs 2180.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 2180.T has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 2180.T trades at ¥892.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 2180.T's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2180.T's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 2180.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 2180.T's competition here
168A.T vs 6045.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 6045.T has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 6045.T trades at ¥1,621.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 6045.T's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6045.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 6045.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 6045.T's competition here
168A.T vs 7068.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 7068.T has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 7068.T trades at ¥514.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 7068.T's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 7068.T's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 7068.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 7068.T's competition here
168A.T vs 6094.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 6094.T has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 6094.T trades at ¥700.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 6094.T's P/E ratio is 44.28. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6094.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 6094.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 6094.T's competition here
168A.T vs 4286.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 4286.T has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 4286.T trades at ¥1,075.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 4286.T's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 4286.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 4286.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 4286.T's competition here
168A.T vs 6533.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 6533.T has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 6533.T trades at ¥1,035.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 6533.T's P/E ratio is -114.87. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6533.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 6533.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 6533.T's competition here
168A.T vs 2491.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 2491.T has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 2491.T trades at ¥448.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 2491.T's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2491.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 2491.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 2491.T's competition here
168A.T vs 5892.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 5892.T has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 5892.T trades at ¥2,011.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 5892.T's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 5892.T's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is less volatile compared to 5892.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 5892.T's competition here
168A.T vs 9554.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 9554.T has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 9554.T trades at ¥1,481.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 9554.T's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 9554.T's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 9554.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 9554.T's competition here
168A.T vs 2436.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 2436.T has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 2436.T trades at ¥1,017.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 2436.T's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2436.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 2436.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 2436.T's competition here
168A.T vs 156A.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 156A.T has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 156A.T trades at ¥842.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 156A.T's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 156A.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 156A.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 156A.T's competition here
168A.T vs 7368.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 7368.T has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 7368.T trades at ¥1,698.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 7368.T's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 7368.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 7368.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 7368.T's competition here
168A.T vs 2122.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 2122.T has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 2122.T trades at ¥1,216.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 2122.T's P/E ratio is 37.06. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2122.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 2122.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 2122.T's competition here
168A.T vs 2487.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 2487.T has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 2487.T trades at ¥1,309.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 2487.T's P/E ratio is 30.03. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2487.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is less volatile compared to 2487.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 2487.T's competition here
168A.T vs 9159.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 9159.T has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 9159.T trades at ¥2,673.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 9159.T's P/E ratio is 47.65. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 9159.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is less volatile compared to 9159.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 9159.T's competition here
168A.T vs 9162.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 9162.T has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 9162.T trades at ¥264.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 9162.T's P/E ratio is 33.93. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 9162.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is less volatile compared to 9162.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 9162.T's competition here
168A.T vs 6031.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 6031.T has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 6031.T trades at ¥292.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 6031.T's P/E ratio is 32.66. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6031.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 6031.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 6031.T's competition here
168A.T vs 9625.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 9625.T has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 9625.T trades at ¥1,080.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 9625.T's P/E ratio is -9.73. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 9625.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 9625.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 9625.T's competition here
168A.T vs 7857.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 7857.T has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 7857.T trades at ¥1,355.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 7857.T's P/E ratio is 50.33. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 7857.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 7857.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 7857.T's competition here
168A.T vs 7370.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 7370.T has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 7370.T trades at ¥797.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 7370.T's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 7370.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 7370.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 7370.T's competition here
168A.T vs 7804.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 7804.T has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 7804.T trades at ¥2,380.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 7804.T's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 7804.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 7804.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 7804.T's competition here
168A.T vs 6069.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 6069.T has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 6069.T trades at ¥708.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 6069.T's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6069.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 6069.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 6069.T's competition here
168A.T vs 2411.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 2411.T has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 2411.T trades at ¥467.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 2411.T's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2411.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 2411.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 2411.T's competition here
168A.T vs 2656.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 2656.T has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 2656.T trades at ¥206.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 2656.T's P/E ratio is -5.49. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2656.T's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is less volatile compared to 2656.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 2656.T's competition here
168A.T vs 6549.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 6549.T has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 6549.T trades at ¥1,760.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 6549.T's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6549.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is less volatile compared to 6549.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 6549.T's competition here
168A.T vs 6543.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 6543.T has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 6543.T trades at ¥1,209.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 6543.T's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6543.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 6543.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 6543.T's competition here
168A.T vs 6038.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 6038.T has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 6038.T trades at ¥924.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 6038.T's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6038.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 6038.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 6038.T's competition here
168A.T vs 9235.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 9235.T has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 9235.T trades at ¥548.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 9235.T's P/E ratio is -32.62. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 9235.T's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is less volatile compared to 9235.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 9235.T's competition here
168A.T vs 7357.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 7357.T has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 7357.T trades at ¥1,510.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 7357.T's P/E ratio is 413.70. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 7357.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 7357.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 7357.T's competition here
168A.T vs 7078.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 7078.T has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 7078.T trades at ¥389.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 7078.T's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 7078.T's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 7078.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 7078.T's competition here
168A.T vs 3622.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 3622.T has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 3622.T trades at ¥546.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 3622.T's P/E ratio is 24.61. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3622.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 3622.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 3622.T's competition here
168A.T vs 7044.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 7044.T has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 7044.T trades at ¥531.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 7044.T's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 7044.T's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 7044.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 7044.T's competition here
168A.T vs 331A.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 331A.T has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 331A.T trades at ¥486.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 331A.T's P/E ratio is 4.48. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 331A.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 331A.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 331A.T's competition here
168A.T vs 4196.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 4196.T has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 4196.T trades at ¥1,430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 4196.T's P/E ratio is 133.02. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 4196.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 4196.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 4196.T's competition here
168A.T vs 2139.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 2139.T has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 2139.T trades at ¥513.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 2139.T's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2139.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 2139.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 2139.T's competition here
168A.T vs 3690.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 3690.T has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 3690.T trades at ¥546.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 3690.T's P/E ratio is -23.75. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3690.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 3690.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 3690.T's competition here
168A.T vs 7036.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 7036.T has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 7036.T trades at ¥835.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 7036.T's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 7036.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 7036.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 7036.T's competition here
168A.T vs 7069.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 7069.T has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 7069.T trades at ¥760.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 7069.T's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 7069.T's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 7069.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 7069.T's competition here
168A.T vs 9466.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 9466.T has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 9466.T trades at ¥233.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 9466.T's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 9466.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 9466.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 9466.T's competition here
168A.T vs 4170.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 4170.T has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 4170.T trades at ¥170.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 4170.T's P/E ratio is 99.42. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 4170.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 4170.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 4170.T's competition here
168A.T vs 6195.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 6195.T has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 6195.T trades at ¥207.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 6195.T's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6195.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 6195.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 6195.T's competition here
168A.T vs 7063.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 7063.T has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 7063.T trades at ¥125.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 7063.T's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 7063.T's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is less volatile compared to 7063.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 7063.T's competition here
168A.T vs 9258.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 9258.T has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 9258.T trades at ¥350.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 9258.T's P/E ratio is -22.71. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 9258.T's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is less volatile compared to 9258.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 9258.T's competition here
168A.T vs 6573.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 6573.T has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 6573.T trades at ¥58.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 6573.T's P/E ratio is -7.11. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6573.T's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is less volatile compared to 6573.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 6573.T's competition here
168A.T vs 6177.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 6177.T has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 6177.T trades at ¥107.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 6177.T's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6177.T's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 6177.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 6177.T's competition here
168A.T vs 7067.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 7067.T has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 7067.T trades at ¥1,006.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 7067.T's P/E ratio is 43.31. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 7067.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 7067.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 7067.T's competition here
168A.T vs 9254.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 9254.T has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 9254.T trades at ¥1,150.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 9254.T's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 9254.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 9254.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 9254.T's competition here
168A.T vs 2156.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 2156.T has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 2156.T trades at ¥299.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 2156.T's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2156.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 2156.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 2156.T's competition here
168A.T vs 143A.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 143A.T has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 143A.T trades at ¥750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 143A.T's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 143A.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is less volatile compared to 143A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 143A.T's competition here
168A.T vs 9244.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 9244.T has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 9244.T trades at ¥997.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 9244.T's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 9244.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is less volatile compared to 9244.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 9244.T's competition here
168A.T vs 7689.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 7689.T has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 7689.T trades at ¥464.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 7689.T's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 7689.T's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 7689.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 7689.T's competition here
168A.T vs 9238.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 9238.T has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 9238.T trades at ¥589.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 9238.T's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 9238.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 9238.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 9238.T's competition here
168A.T vs 4760.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 4760.T has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 4760.T trades at ¥1,590.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 4760.T's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 4760.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 4760.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 4760.T's competition here
168A.T vs 9330.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 9330.T has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 9330.T trades at ¥870.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 9330.T's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 9330.T's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 9330.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 9330.T's competition here
168A.T vs 9241.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 9241.T has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 9241.T trades at ¥1,322.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 9241.T's P/E ratio is 40.38. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 9241.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is less volatile compared to 9241.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 9241.T's competition here
168A.T vs 5242.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 5242.T has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 5242.T trades at ¥1,041.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 5242.T's P/E ratio is -15.63. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 5242.T's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 5242.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 5242.T's competition here
168A.T vs 6175.T Comparison April 2026
168A.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 168A.T stands at 1.9B. In comparison, 6175.T has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 168A.T is priced at ¥1,278.00, while 6175.T trades at ¥897.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
168A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas 6175.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 168A.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6175.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 168A.T is more volatile compared to 6175.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 168A.T.Check 6175.T's competition here