Global International Credit Group Limited
Global International Credit Group Limited 1669.HK Peers
See (1669.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1669.HK | HK$0.74 | +2.78% | 292M | 6.64 | HK$0.11 | +6.76% |
| 3360.HK | HK$7.26 | +6.45% | 32.9B | 7.89 | HK$0.92 | +7.58% |
| 1606.HK | HK$1.69 | -2.87% | 21B | 4.46 | HK$0.39 | +6.39% |
| 2858.HK | HK$2.35 | +0.86% | 15.8B | 18.08 | HK$0.13 | +3.02% |
| 6069.HK | HK$12.08 | +2.72% | 12B | 28.09 | HK$0.43 | +25.66% |
| 2666.HK | HK$5.72 | +2.14% | 10.8B | 5.11 | HK$1.12 | +6.12% |
| 2473.HK | HK$5.62 | -10.08% | 8.7B | 187.33 | HK$0.03 | N/A |
| 1905.HK | HK$0.92 | +1.10% | 7.8B | 4.84 | HK$0.19 | +9.36% |
| 0086.HK | HK$3.42 | +0.59% | 6.7B | 18.00 | HK$0.19 | +7.60% |
| 0373.HK | HK$1.65 | +1.85% | 5.8B | -7.50 | -HK$0.22 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1669.HK vs 3360.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 3360.HK has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 3360.HK trades at HK$7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 3360.HK's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3360.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 3360.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 1606.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 1606.HK has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 1606.HK trades at HK$1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 1606.HK's P/E ratio is 4.46. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1606.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 1606.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 2858.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 2858.HK has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 2858.HK trades at HK$2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 2858.HK's P/E ratio is 18.08. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2858.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 2858.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 6069.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 6069.HK has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 6069.HK trades at HK$12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 6069.HK's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6069.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 6069.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 2666.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 2666.HK has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 2666.HK trades at HK$5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 2666.HK's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2666.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 2666.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 2473.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 2473.HK has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 2473.HK trades at HK$5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 2473.HK's P/E ratio is 187.33. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2473.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 2473.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 1905.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 1905.HK has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 1905.HK trades at HK$0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 1905.HK's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1905.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 1905.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 0086.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 0086.HK has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 0086.HK trades at HK$3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 0086.HK's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0086.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 0086.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 0373.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 0373.HK has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 0373.HK trades at HK$1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 0373.HK's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0373.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 0373.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 0900.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 0900.HK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 0900.HK trades at HK$7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 0900.HK's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0900.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 0900.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 2718.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 2718.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 2718.HK trades at HK$1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 2718.HK's P/E ratio is 38.33. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2718.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 2718.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 2003.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 2003.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 2003.HK trades at HK$3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 2003.HK's P/E ratio is 3.52. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2003.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 2003.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 3848.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 3848.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 3848.HK trades at HK$11.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 3848.HK's P/E ratio is 284.00. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3848.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 3848.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 0628.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 0628.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 0628.HK trades at HK$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 0628.HK's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0628.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 0628.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 1601.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 1601.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 1601.HK trades at HK$0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 1601.HK's P/E ratio is 4.18. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1601.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 1601.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 2483.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 2483.HK has a market cap of 840M. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 2483.HK trades at HK$1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 2483.HK's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2483.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 2483.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 3903.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 3903.HK has a market cap of 772.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 3903.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 3903.HK's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3903.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 3903.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 2051.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 2051.HK has a market cap of 676.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 2051.HK trades at HK$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 2051.HK's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2051.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 2051.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 1577.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 1577.HK has a market cap of 614M. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 1577.HK trades at HK$0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 1577.HK's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1577.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 1577.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 8223.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 8223.HK has a market cap of 582.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 8223.HK trades at HK$1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 8223.HK's P/E ratio is -10.08. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8223.HK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 8223.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 1543.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 1543.HK has a market cap of 468.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 1543.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 1543.HK's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1543.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 1543.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 0668.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 0668.HK has a market cap of 439.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 0668.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 0668.HK's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0668.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 0668.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 0730.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 0730.HK has a market cap of 438.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 0730.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 0730.HK's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0730.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 0730.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 6866.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 6866.HK has a market cap of 330.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 6866.HK trades at HK$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 6866.HK's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6866.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 6866.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 1563.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 1563.HK has a market cap of 329.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 1563.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 1563.HK's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1563.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 1563.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 0508.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 0508.HK has a market cap of 310.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 0508.HK trades at HK$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 0508.HK's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0508.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 0508.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 0605.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 0605.HK has a market cap of 282.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 0605.HK trades at HK$1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 0605.HK's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0605.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 0605.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 0767.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 0767.HK has a market cap of 273.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 0767.HK trades at HK$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 0767.HK's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0767.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 0767.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 8525.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 8525.HK has a market cap of 229.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 8525.HK trades at HK$0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 8525.HK's P/E ratio is -12.14. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8525.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 8525.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 1915.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 1915.HK has a market cap of 159M. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 1915.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 1915.HK's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1915.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 1915.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 3963.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 3963.HK has a market cap of 139.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 3963.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 3963.HK's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3963.HK's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 3963.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 0379.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 0379.HK has a market cap of 113M. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 0379.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 0379.HK's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0379.HK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 0379.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 8019.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 8019.HK has a market cap of 106.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 8019.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 8019.HK's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8019.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 8019.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 8452.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 8452.HK has a market cap of 95.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 8452.HK trades at HK$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 8452.HK's P/E ratio is -12.75. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8452.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 8452.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 8239.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 8239.HK has a market cap of 78.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 8239.HK trades at HK$0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 8239.HK's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8239.HK's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 8239.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 0431.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 0431.HK has a market cap of 77.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 0431.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 0431.HK's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0431.HK's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK and 0431.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
1669.HK vs 0736.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 0736.HK has a market cap of 47.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 0736.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 0736.HK's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0736.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 0736.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 8621.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 8621.HK has a market cap of 38.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 8621.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 8621.HK's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8621.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK and 8621.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
1669.HK vs 6878.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 6878.HK has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 6878.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 6878.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6878.HK's ROE of -13.76%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 6878.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 8001.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 8001.HK has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 8001.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 8001.HK's P/E ratio is 1.88. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8001.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 8001.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 0764.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 0764.HK has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 0764.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 0764.HK's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0764.HK's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 0764.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 8063.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 8063.HK has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 8063.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 8063.HK's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8063.HK's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 8063.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.
1669.HK vs 0766.HK Comparison
1669.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1669.HK stands at 292M. In comparison, 0766.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1669.HK is priced at HK$0.74, while 0766.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1669.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 6.64, whereas 0766.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1669.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0766.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1669.HK is less volatile compared to 0766.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1669.HK.