Hygieia Group Limited

1650.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1650.HK stands at 174M. In comparison, 0393.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1650.HK is priced at HK$0.09, while 0393.HK trades at HK$1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 73.48, whereas 0393.HK's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, 1650.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0393.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1650.HK is more volatile compared to 0393.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1650.HK.Check 0393.HK's competition here

1650.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1650.HK stands at 174M. In comparison, 1568.HK has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1650.HK is priced at HK$0.09, while 1568.HK trades at HK$0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 73.48, whereas 1568.HK's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, 1650.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1568.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1650.HK is less volatile compared to 1568.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1650.HK.Check 1568.HK's competition here

1650.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1650.HK stands at 174M. In comparison, 1867.HK has a market cap of 224.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1650.HK is priced at HK$0.09, while 1867.HK trades at HK$0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 73.48, whereas 1867.HK's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, 1650.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1867.HK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1650.HK is less volatile compared to 1867.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1650.HK.Check 1867.HK's competition here

1650.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1650.HK stands at 174M. In comparison, 1376.HK has a market cap of 116M. Regarding current trading prices, 1650.HK is priced at HK$0.09, while 1376.HK trades at HK$0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 73.48, whereas 1376.HK's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, 1650.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1376.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1650.HK is less volatile compared to 1376.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1650.HK.Check 1376.HK's competition here

1650.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1650.HK stands at 174M. In comparison, 8040.HK has a market cap of 98.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1650.HK is priced at HK$0.09, while 8040.HK trades at HK$0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 73.48, whereas 8040.HK's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, 1650.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 8040.HK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 1650.HK is more volatile compared to 8040.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1650.HK.Check 8040.HK's competition here

1650.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1650.HK stands at 174M. In comparison, 8501.HK has a market cap of 88M. Regarding current trading prices, 1650.HK is priced at HK$0.09, while 8501.HK trades at HK$0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 73.48, whereas 8501.HK's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, 1650.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 8501.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1650.HK is more volatile compared to 8501.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1650.HK.Check 8501.HK's competition here

1650.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1650.HK stands at 174M. In comparison, 8455.HK has a market cap of 54.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1650.HK is priced at HK$0.09, while 8455.HK trades at HK$0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 73.48, whereas 8455.HK's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, 1650.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 8455.HK's ROE of -1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, 1650.HK is less volatile compared to 8455.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1650.HK.Check 8455.HK's competition here

1650.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1650.HK stands at 174M. In comparison, 8173.HK has a market cap of 45.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1650.HK is priced at HK$0.09, while 8173.HK trades at HK$0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 73.48, whereas 8173.HK's P/E ratio is -7.10. In terms of profitability, 1650.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 8173.HK's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 1650.HK is more volatile compared to 8173.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1650.HK.Check 8173.HK's competition here

1650.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1650.HK stands at 174M. In comparison, 3893.HK has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1650.HK is priced at HK$0.09, while 3893.HK trades at HK$0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 73.48, whereas 3893.HK's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, 1650.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3893.HK's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 1650.HK is less volatile compared to 3893.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1650.HK.Check 3893.HK's competition here

1650.HK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1650.HK stands at 174M. In comparison, 8341.HK has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1650.HK is priced at HK$0.09, while 8341.HK trades at HK$0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 73.48, whereas 8341.HK's P/E ratio is 2.21. In terms of profitability, 1650.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 8341.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1650.HK is less volatile compared to 8341.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1650.HK.Check 8341.HK's competition here