Vico International Holdings Limited
Vico International Holdings Limited 1621.HK Peers
See (1621.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1621.HK | HK$0.07 | N/A | 70M | 7.00 | HK$0.01 | N/A |
| 0135.HK | HK$7.90 | -0.75% | 68.4B | 10.53 | HK$0.75 | +4.28% |
| 0338.HK | HK$1.24 | +0.81% | 26.8B | 62.00 | HK$0.02 | N/A |
| 0931.HK | HK$0.26 | -3.70% | 1.7B | -13.00 | -HK$0.02 | N/A |
| 2337.HK | HK$1.96 | +1.03% | 734M | 9.80 | HK$0.20 | +4.08% |
| 8479.HK | HK$0.75 | -6.25% | 697.5M | 15.00 | HK$0.05 | N/A |
| 0603.HK | HK$0.14 | -0.70% | 658M | 4.70 | HK$0.03 | N/A |
| 1142.HK | HK$2.61 | +5.67% | 378.5M | -13.74 | -HK$0.19 | N/A |
| 0852.HK | HK$0.17 | -6.74% | 352.5M | -4.15 | -HK$0.04 | +48.19% |
| 0567.HK | HK$0.11 | -12.00% | 177.5M | -14.86 | -HK$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1621.HK vs 0135.HK Comparison
1621.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1621.HK stands at 70M. In comparison, 0135.HK has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1621.HK is priced at HK$0.07, while 0135.HK trades at HK$7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1621.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas 0135.HK's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, 1621.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0135.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1621.HK is less volatile compared to 0135.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1621.HK.
1621.HK vs 0338.HK Comparison
1621.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1621.HK stands at 70M. In comparison, 0338.HK has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1621.HK is priced at HK$0.07, while 0338.HK trades at HK$1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1621.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas 0338.HK's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, 1621.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0338.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1621.HK is less volatile compared to 0338.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1621.HK.
1621.HK vs 0931.HK Comparison
1621.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1621.HK stands at 70M. In comparison, 0931.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1621.HK is priced at HK$0.07, while 0931.HK trades at HK$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1621.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas 0931.HK's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, 1621.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0931.HK's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, 1621.HK is less volatile compared to 0931.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1621.HK.
1621.HK vs 2337.HK Comparison
1621.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1621.HK stands at 70M. In comparison, 2337.HK has a market cap of 734M. Regarding current trading prices, 1621.HK is priced at HK$0.07, while 2337.HK trades at HK$1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1621.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas 2337.HK's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, 1621.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2337.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1621.HK is less volatile compared to 2337.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1621.HK.
1621.HK vs 8479.HK Comparison
1621.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1621.HK stands at 70M. In comparison, 8479.HK has a market cap of 697.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1621.HK is priced at HK$0.07, while 8479.HK trades at HK$0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1621.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas 8479.HK's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, 1621.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8479.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1621.HK is less volatile compared to 8479.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1621.HK.
1621.HK vs 0603.HK Comparison
1621.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1621.HK stands at 70M. In comparison, 0603.HK has a market cap of 658M. Regarding current trading prices, 1621.HK is priced at HK$0.07, while 0603.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1621.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas 0603.HK's P/E ratio is 4.70. In terms of profitability, 1621.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0603.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1621.HK is less volatile compared to 0603.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1621.HK.
1621.HK vs 1142.HK Comparison
1621.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1621.HK stands at 70M. In comparison, 1142.HK has a market cap of 378.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1621.HK is priced at HK$0.07, while 1142.HK trades at HK$2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1621.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas 1142.HK's P/E ratio is -13.74. In terms of profitability, 1621.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1142.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1621.HK is less volatile compared to 1142.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1621.HK.
1621.HK vs 0852.HK Comparison
1621.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1621.HK stands at 70M. In comparison, 0852.HK has a market cap of 352.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1621.HK is priced at HK$0.07, while 0852.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1621.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas 0852.HK's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, 1621.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0852.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1621.HK is less volatile compared to 0852.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1621.HK.
1621.HK vs 0567.HK Comparison
1621.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1621.HK stands at 70M. In comparison, 0567.HK has a market cap of 177.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1621.HK is priced at HK$0.07, while 0567.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1621.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas 0567.HK's P/E ratio is -14.86. In terms of profitability, 1621.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0567.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1621.HK and 0567.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
1621.HK vs 0332.HK Comparison
1621.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1621.HK stands at 70M. In comparison, 0332.HK has a market cap of 137.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1621.HK is priced at HK$0.07, while 0332.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1621.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas 0332.HK's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, 1621.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0332.HK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 1621.HK is less volatile compared to 0332.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1621.HK.
1621.HK vs 8270.HK Comparison
1621.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1621.HK stands at 70M. In comparison, 8270.HK has a market cap of 115.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1621.HK is priced at HK$0.07, while 8270.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1621.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas 8270.HK's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, 1621.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8270.HK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1621.HK is less volatile compared to 8270.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1621.HK.
1621.HK vs 2728.HK Comparison
1621.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1621.HK stands at 70M. In comparison, 2728.HK has a market cap of 111.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1621.HK is priced at HK$0.07, while 2728.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1621.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas 2728.HK's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, 1621.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2728.HK's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 1621.HK is less volatile compared to 2728.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1621.HK.
1621.HK vs 8631.HK Comparison
1621.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1621.HK stands at 70M. In comparison, 8631.HK has a market cap of 66M. Regarding current trading prices, 1621.HK is priced at HK$0.07, while 8631.HK trades at HK$0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1621.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas 8631.HK's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, 1621.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8631.HK's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, 1621.HK and 8631.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
1621.HK vs 0342.HK Comparison
1621.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1621.HK stands at 70M. In comparison, 0342.HK has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1621.HK is priced at HK$0.07, while 0342.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1621.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas 0342.HK's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, 1621.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0342.HK's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, 1621.HK is less volatile compared to 0342.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1621.HK.
1621.HK vs 8009.HK Comparison
1621.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1621.HK stands at 70M. In comparison, 8009.HK has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1621.HK is priced at HK$0.07, while 8009.HK trades at HK$0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1621.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas 8009.HK's P/E ratio is 1.88. In terms of profitability, 1621.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8009.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1621.HK is less volatile compared to 8009.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1621.HK.
1621.HK vs 8347.HK Comparison
1621.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1621.HK stands at 70M. In comparison, 8347.HK has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1621.HK is priced at HK$0.07, while 8347.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1621.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas 8347.HK's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, 1621.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8347.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1621.HK and 8347.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
1621.HK vs 8007.HK Comparison
1621.HK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1621.HK stands at 70M. In comparison, 8007.HK has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1621.HK is priced at HK$0.07, while 8007.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1621.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.00, whereas 8007.HK's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, 1621.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8007.HK's ROE of +1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, 1621.HK is less volatile compared to 8007.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1621.HK.