NEXT FUNDS TOPIX Banks Exchange Traded Fund
NEXT FUNDS TOPIX Banks Exchange Traded Fund 1615.T Peers
See (1615.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1615.T | ¥408.30 | +0.00% | 227.7B | 11.79 | ¥34.68 | +2.23% |
| 1306.T | ¥3,030.00 | +0.00% | 23.6T | 14.37 | ¥209.33 | +1.92% |
| 1330.T | ¥42,510.00 | +0.00% | 5.1T | 19.47 | ¥2,153.60 | +1.51% |
| 1475.T | ¥295.00 | +0.00% | 1.9T | 14.40 | ¥20.37 | +10.23% |
| 1591.T | ¥25,950.00 | +0.00% | 1.6T | 14.83 | ¥1,733.88 | +2.23% |
| 8473.T | ¥5,030.00 | +0.00% | 1.5T | 9.69 | ¥512.46 | +3.42% |
| 1329.T | ¥4,215.00 | +0.00% | 1.4T | 19.45 | ¥213.89 | +17.31% |
| 1364.T | ¥2,670.00 | +0.00% | 376B | 14.87 | ¥178.37 | +10.86% |
| 8595.T | ¥2,464.50 | +0.00% | 135.3B | 14.11 | ¥175.67 | +3.55% |
| 8616.T | ¥495.00 | +0.00% | 123.7B | 11.22 | ¥43.92 | +5.68% |
Stock Comparison
1615.T vs 1306.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 1306.T has a market cap of 23.6T. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 1306.T trades at ¥3,030.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 1306.T's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1306.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is more volatile compared to 1306.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 1330.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 1330.T has a market cap of 5.1T. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 1330.T trades at ¥42,510.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 1330.T's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1330.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is more volatile compared to 1330.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 1475.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 1475.T has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 1475.T trades at ¥295.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 1475.T's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1475.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is more volatile compared to 1475.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 1591.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 1591.T has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 1591.T trades at ¥25,950.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 1591.T's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1591.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is more volatile compared to 1591.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 8473.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 8473.T has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 8473.T trades at ¥5,030.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 8473.T's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 8473.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is less volatile compared to 8473.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 1329.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 1329.T has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 1329.T trades at ¥4,215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 1329.T's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1329.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is more volatile compared to 1329.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 1364.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 1364.T has a market cap of 376B. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 1364.T trades at ¥2,670.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 1364.T's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1364.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is more volatile compared to 1364.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 8595.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 8595.T has a market cap of 135.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 8595.T trades at ¥2,464.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 8595.T's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 8595.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is more volatile compared to 8595.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 8616.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 8616.T has a market cap of 123.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 8616.T trades at ¥495.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 8616.T's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 8616.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is less volatile compared to 8616.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 7342.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 7342.T has a market cap of 115.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 7342.T trades at ¥1,942.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 7342.T's P/E ratio is 222.20. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 7342.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is more volatile compared to 7342.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 5842.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 5842.T has a market cap of 104.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 5842.T trades at ¥3,195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 5842.T's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 5842.T's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is less volatile compared to 5842.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 8739.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 8739.T has a market cap of 57.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 8739.T trades at ¥1,478.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 8739.T's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 8739.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is less volatile compared to 8739.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 6620.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 6620.T has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 6620.T trades at ¥1,124.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 6620.T's P/E ratio is 103.25. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6620.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is less volatile compared to 6620.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 2134.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 2134.T has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 2134.T trades at ¥102.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 2134.T's P/E ratio is -23.34. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2134.T's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is less volatile compared to 2134.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 2998.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 2998.T has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 2998.T trades at ¥5,180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 2998.T's P/E ratio is 29.15. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2998.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is less volatile compared to 2998.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 8624.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 8624.T has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 8624.T trades at ¥813.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 8624.T's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 8624.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is less volatile compared to 8624.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 4310.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 4310.T has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 4310.T trades at ¥2,324.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 4310.T's P/E ratio is 118.01. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 4310.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is less volatile compared to 4310.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 3772.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 3772.T has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 3772.T trades at ¥1,010.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 3772.T's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3772.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is more volatile compared to 3772.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 8737.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 8737.T has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 8737.T trades at ¥504.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 8737.T's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 8737.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is less volatile compared to 8737.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 7347.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 7347.T has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 7347.T trades at ¥787.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 7347.T's P/E ratio is 29.82. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 7347.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is less volatile compared to 7347.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 3454.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 3454.T has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 3454.T trades at ¥1,010.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 3454.T's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3454.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is less volatile compared to 3454.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 9257.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 9257.T has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 9257.T trades at ¥627.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 9257.T's P/E ratio is -42.35. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 9257.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is less volatile compared to 9257.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 4479.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 4479.T has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 4479.T trades at ¥900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 4479.T's P/E ratio is 53.21. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 4479.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is less volatile compared to 4479.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 3121.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 3121.T has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 3121.T trades at ¥354.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 3121.T's P/E ratio is 60.45. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3121.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is less volatile compared to 3121.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 8462.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 8462.T has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 8462.T trades at ¥985.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 8462.T's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 8462.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is less volatile compared to 8462.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 8783.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 8783.T has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 8783.T trades at ¥287.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 8783.T's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 8783.T's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is less volatile compared to 8783.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 3113.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 3113.T has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 3113.T trades at ¥83.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 3113.T's P/E ratio is -4.18. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3113.T's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is less volatile compared to 3113.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 8518.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 8518.T has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 8518.T trades at ¥236.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 8518.T's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 8518.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is less volatile compared to 8518.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 7162.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 7162.T has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 7162.T trades at ¥259.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 7162.T's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 7162.T's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is less volatile compared to 7162.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 3266.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 3266.T has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 3266.T trades at ¥87.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 3266.T's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3266.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is less volatile compared to 3266.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 7345.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 7345.T has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 7345.T trades at ¥539.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 7345.T's P/E ratio is 1102.04. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 7345.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is less volatile compared to 7345.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 0P00001CIF.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 0P00001CIF.T has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 0P00001CIF.T trades at ¥48,166.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 0P00001CIF.T's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00001CIF.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is more volatile compared to 0P00001CIF.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 0P00001CGE.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 0P00001CGE.T has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 0P00001CGE.T trades at ¥22,430.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 0P00001CGE.T's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00001CGE.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is more volatile compared to 0P00001CGE.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.
1615.T vs 0P00012I6C.T Comparison
1615.T plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1615.T stands at 227.7B. In comparison, 0P00012I6C.T has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1615.T is priced at ¥408.30, while 0P00012I6C.T trades at ¥28,531.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1615.T currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas 0P00012I6C.T's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1615.T's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00012I6C.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1615.T is more volatile compared to 0P00012I6C.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1615.T.