Zhongguancun Science-Tech Leasing Co., Ltd.
Zhongguancun Science-Tech Leasing Co., Ltd. (1601.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (1601.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1601.HK | HK$0.85 | +1.19% | 1.3B | 4.25 | HK$0.20 | +7.60% |
| 3360.HK | HK$7.10 | +0.85% | 33.7B | 7.57 | HK$0.94 | +7.72% |
| 1606.HK | HK$1.50 | +7.91% | 19.2B | 3.38 | HK$0.45 | +6.42% |
| 2858.HK | HK$2.17 | +1.88% | 14.9B | 10.95 | HK$0.20 | +2.97% |
| 2666.HK | HK$5.87 | +1.38% | 11.8B | 4.80 | HK$1.22 | +5.97% |
| 6069.HK | HK$9.46 | +2.94% | 10.1B | 17.52 | HK$0.54 | +10.87% |
| 0373.HK | HK$2.76 | -1.08% | 9.7B | 8.63 | HK$0.32 | N/A |
| 0086.HK | HK$4.21 | +0.00% | 8.3B | 5.23 | HK$0.81 | +6.10% |
| 1905.HK | HK$0.83 | +1.22% | 6.8B | 4.61 | HK$0.18 | +10.73% |
| 0900.HK | HK$8.08 | +0.75% | 3.4B | 7.20 | HK$1.12 | +6.20% |
Stock Comparison
1601.HK vs 3360.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 3360.HK has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 3360.HK trades at HK$7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 3360.HK's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3360.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 3360.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 3360.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 1606.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 1606.HK has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 1606.HK trades at HK$1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 1606.HK's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1606.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 1606.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 1606.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 2858.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 2858.HK has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 2858.HK trades at HK$2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 2858.HK's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2858.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 2858.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 2858.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 2666.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 2666.HK has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 2666.HK trades at HK$5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 2666.HK's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2666.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is more volatile compared to 2666.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 2666.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 6069.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 6069.HK has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 6069.HK trades at HK$9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 6069.HK's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6069.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 6069.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 6069.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 0373.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0373.HK has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 0373.HK trades at HK$2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 0373.HK's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0373.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 0373.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 0373.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 0086.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0086.HK has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 0086.HK trades at HK$4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 0086.HK's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0086.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 0086.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 0086.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 1905.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 1905.HK has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 1905.HK trades at HK$0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 1905.HK's P/E ratio is 4.61. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1905.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 1905.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 1905.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 0900.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0900.HK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 0900.HK trades at HK$8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 0900.HK's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0900.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is more volatile compared to 0900.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 0900.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 1660.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 1660.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 1660.HK trades at HK$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 1660.HK's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1660.HK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 1660.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 1660.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 2473.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 2473.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 2473.HK trades at HK$1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 2473.HK's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2473.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 2473.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 2473.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 3848.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 3848.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 3848.HK trades at HK$11.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 3848.HK's P/E ratio is 1122.00. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3848.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is more volatile compared to 3848.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 3848.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 8239.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 8239.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 8239.HK trades at HK$13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 8239.HK's P/E ratio is 1330.00. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8239.HK's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is more volatile compared to 8239.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 8239.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 0628.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0628.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 0628.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 0628.HK's P/E ratio is 23.40. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0628.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 0628.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 0628.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 0093.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0093.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 0093.HK trades at HK$0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 0093.HK's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0093.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 0093.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 0093.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 2051.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 2051.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 2051.HK trades at HK$0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 2051.HK's P/E ratio is -12.80. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2051.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 2051.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 2051.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 2483.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 2483.HK has a market cap of 925M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 2483.HK trades at HK$1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 2483.HK's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2483.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 2483.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 2483.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 3903.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 3903.HK has a market cap of 772.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 3903.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 3903.HK's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3903.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 3903.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 3903.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 2003.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 2003.HK has a market cap of 694.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 2003.HK trades at HK$1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 2003.HK's P/E ratio is 1.07. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2003.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 2003.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 2003.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 1577.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 1577.HK has a market cap of 680M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 1577.HK trades at HK$1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 1577.HK's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1577.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is more volatile compared to 1577.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 1577.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 0730.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0730.HK has a market cap of 498.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 0730.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 0730.HK's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0730.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 0730.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 0730.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 0668.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0668.HK has a market cap of 439.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 0668.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 0668.HK's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0668.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 0668.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 0668.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 0508.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0508.HK has a market cap of 408.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 0508.HK trades at HK$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 0508.HK's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0508.HK's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 0508.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 0508.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 1669.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 1669.HK has a market cap of 388M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 1669.HK trades at HK$0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 1669.HK's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1669.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is more volatile compared to 1669.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 1669.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 6866.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 6866.HK has a market cap of 365.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 6866.HK trades at HK$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 6866.HK's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6866.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 6866.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 6866.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 1543.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 1543.HK has a market cap of 343.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 1543.HK trades at HK$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 1543.HK's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1543.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is more volatile compared to 1543.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 1543.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 0767.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0767.HK has a market cap of 312M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 0767.HK trades at HK$0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 0767.HK's P/E ratio is -16.33. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0767.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is more volatile compared to 0767.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 0767.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 8525.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 8525.HK has a market cap of 229.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 8525.HK trades at HK$0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 8525.HK's P/E ratio is -12.14. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8525.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 8525.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 8525.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 0764.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0764.HK has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 0764.HK trades at HK$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 0764.HK's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0764.HK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is more volatile compared to 0764.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 0764.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 8223.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 8223.HK has a market cap of 210.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 8223.HK trades at HK$0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 8223.HK's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8223.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is more volatile compared to 8223.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 8223.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 1915.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 1915.HK has a market cap of 159M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 1915.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 1915.HK's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1915.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 1915.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 1915.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 0605.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0605.HK has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 0605.HK trades at HK$0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 0605.HK's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0605.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is more volatile compared to 0605.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 0605.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 0736.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0736.HK has a market cap of 138.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 0736.HK trades at HK$0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 0736.HK's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0736.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is more volatile compared to 0736.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 0736.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 0379.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0379.HK has a market cap of 126.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 0379.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 0379.HK's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0379.HK's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 0379.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 0379.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 8452.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 8452.HK has a market cap of 111.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 8452.HK trades at HK$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 8452.HK's P/E ratio is -10.33. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8452.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is more volatile compared to 8452.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 8452.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 3963.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 3963.HK has a market cap of 98.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 3963.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 3963.HK's P/E ratio is -16.30. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3963.HK's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is more volatile compared to 3963.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 3963.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 0431.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0431.HK has a market cap of 77.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 0431.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 0431.HK's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0431.HK's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is more volatile compared to 0431.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 0431.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 8019.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 8019.HK has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 8019.HK trades at HK$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 8019.HK's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8019.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is more volatile compared to 8019.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 8019.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 6878.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 6878.HK has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 6878.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 6878.HK's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6878.HK's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 6878.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 6878.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 8621.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 8621.HK has a market cap of 34.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 8621.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 8621.HK's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8621.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is more volatile compared to 8621.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 8621.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 8001.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 8001.HK has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 8001.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 8001.HK's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8001.HK's ROE of -8.99%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is more volatile compared to 8001.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 8001.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 8063.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 8063.HK has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 8063.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 8063.HK's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8063.HK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 8063.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 8063.HK's competition here
1601.HK vs 0766.HK Comparison April 2026
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0766.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.85, while 0766.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.25, whereas 0766.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0766.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 0766.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.Check 0766.HK's competition here