Zhongguancun Science-Tech Leasing Co., Ltd.
Zhongguancun Science-Tech Leasing Co., Ltd. 1601.HK Peers
See (1601.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1601.HK | HK$0.81 | +1.25% | 1.1B | 3.68 | HK$0.22 | N/A |
| 3360.HK | HK$6.29 | -0.63% | 26.5B | 6.76 | HK$0.93 | +15.26% |
| 1606.HK | HK$1.29 | +2.38% | 16.2B | 3.31 | HK$0.39 | +9.15% |
| 2858.HK | HK$1.91 | +0.53% | 12.8B | 14.69 | HK$0.13 | +3.39% |
| 6069.HK | HK$11.98 | +0.17% | 11.9B | 28.52 | HK$0.42 | +5.76% |
| 2666.HK | HK$5.40 | -0.55% | 10.2B | 4.86 | HK$1.11 | +5.92% |
| 2473.HK | HK$6.50 | +4.00% | 10.1B | 216.67 | HK$0.03 | N/A |
| 0086.HK | HK$3.06 | +0.66% | 6B | 16.11 | HK$0.19 | +8.50% |
| 1905.HK | HK$0.73 | N/A | 5.9B | 3.84 | HK$0.19 | +16.57% |
| 0373.HK | HK$1.60 | +1.91% | 5.6B | -7.27 | -HK$0.22 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1601.HK vs 3360.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 3360.HK has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 3360.HK trades at HK$6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 3360.HK's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3360.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 3360.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 1606.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 1606.HK has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 1606.HK trades at HK$1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 1606.HK's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1606.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 1606.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 2858.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 2858.HK has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 2858.HK trades at HK$1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 2858.HK's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2858.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 2858.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 6069.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 6069.HK has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 6069.HK trades at HK$11.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 6069.HK's P/E ratio is 28.52. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6069.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 6069.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 2666.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 2666.HK has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 2666.HK trades at HK$5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 2666.HK's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2666.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 2666.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 2473.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 2473.HK has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 2473.HK trades at HK$6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 2473.HK's P/E ratio is 216.67. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2473.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 2473.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 0086.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 0086.HK has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 0086.HK trades at HK$3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 0086.HK's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0086.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 0086.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 1905.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 1905.HK has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 1905.HK trades at HK$0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 1905.HK's P/E ratio is 3.84. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1905.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 1905.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 0373.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 0373.HK has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 0373.HK trades at HK$1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 0373.HK's P/E ratio is -7.27. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0373.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 0373.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 0900.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 0900.HK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 0900.HK trades at HK$6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 0900.HK's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0900.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is more volatile compared to 0900.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 2718.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 2718.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 2718.HK trades at HK$1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 2718.HK's P/E ratio is 38.33. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2718.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 2718.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 2003.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 2003.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 2003.HK trades at HK$4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 2003.HK's P/E ratio is 3.86. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2003.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 2003.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 3848.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 3848.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 3848.HK trades at HK$12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 3848.HK's P/E ratio is 312.50. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3848.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 3848.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 0628.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 0628.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 0628.HK trades at HK$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 0628.HK's P/E ratio is 31.50. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0628.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 0628.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 2483.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 2483.HK has a market cap of 845M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 2483.HK trades at HK$1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 2483.HK's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2483.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is more volatile compared to 2483.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 3903.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 3903.HK has a market cap of 772.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 3903.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 3903.HK's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3903.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 3903.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 8223.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 8223.HK has a market cap of 663.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 8223.HK trades at HK$1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 8223.HK's P/E ratio is -11.75. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8223.HK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 8223.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 1577.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 1577.HK has a market cap of 640.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 1577.HK trades at HK$0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 1577.HK's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1577.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 1577.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 2051.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 2051.HK has a market cap of 603.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 2051.HK trades at HK$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 2051.HK's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2051.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 2051.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 1543.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 1543.HK has a market cap of 479.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 1543.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 1543.HK's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1543.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 1543.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 0668.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 0668.HK has a market cap of 439.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 0668.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 0668.HK's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0668.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 0668.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 0730.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 0730.HK has a market cap of 434.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 0730.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 0730.HK's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0730.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 0730.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 1563.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 1563.HK has a market cap of 421M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 1563.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 1563.HK's P/E ratio is 1.92. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1563.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 1563.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 0508.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 0508.HK has a market cap of 340.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 0508.HK trades at HK$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 0508.HK's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0508.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 0508.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 6866.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 6866.HK has a market cap of 330.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 6866.HK trades at HK$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 6866.HK's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6866.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is more volatile compared to 6866.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 1669.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 1669.HK has a market cap of 312M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 1669.HK trades at HK$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 1669.HK's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1669.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 1669.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 8525.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 8525.HK has a market cap of 237.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 8525.HK trades at HK$0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 8525.HK's P/E ratio is -12.57. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8525.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 8525.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 0605.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 0605.HK has a market cap of 236.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 0605.HK trades at HK$1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 0605.HK's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0605.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 0605.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 0764.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 0764.HK has a market cap of 179.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 0764.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 0764.HK's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0764.HK's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 0764.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 3963.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 3963.HK has a market cap of 172.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 3963.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 3963.HK's P/E ratio is -14.25. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3963.HK's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 3963.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 0767.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 0767.HK has a market cap of 166.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 0767.HK trades at HK$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 0767.HK's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0767.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 0767.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 1915.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 1915.HK has a market cap of 159M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 1915.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 1915.HK's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1915.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 1915.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 8019.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 8019.HK has a market cap of 140.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 8019.HK trades at HK$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 8019.HK's P/E ratio is -13.17. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8019.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 8019.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 8452.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 8452.HK has a market cap of 124.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 8452.HK trades at HK$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 8452.HK's P/E ratio is -20.25. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8452.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is more volatile compared to 8452.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 0379.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 0379.HK has a market cap of 96.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 0379.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 0379.HK's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0379.HK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 0379.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 0431.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 0431.HK has a market cap of 77.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 0431.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 0431.HK's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0431.HK's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is more volatile compared to 0431.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 8239.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 8239.HK has a market cap of 63.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 8239.HK trades at HK$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 8239.HK's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8239.HK's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 8239.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 0736.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 0736.HK has a market cap of 38.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 0736.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 0736.HK's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0736.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 0736.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 6878.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 6878.HK has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 6878.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 6878.HK's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6878.HK's ROE of -13.76%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 6878.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 8621.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 8621.HK has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 8621.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 8621.HK's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8621.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 8621.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 8001.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 8001.HK has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 8001.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 8001.HK's P/E ratio is 1.88. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8001.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is more volatile compared to 8001.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 8063.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 8063.HK has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 8063.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 8063.HK's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8063.HK's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 8063.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.
1601.HK vs 0766.HK Comparison
1601.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1601.HK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, 0766.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1601.HK is priced at HK$0.81, while 0766.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1601.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.68, whereas 0766.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1601.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0766.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1601.HK is less volatile compared to 0766.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1601.HK.