Morris Home Holdings Limited
Morris Home Holdings Limited 1575.HK Peers
See (1575.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1575.HK | HK$0.06 | -5.17% | 177.3M | -1.37 | -HK$0.04 | N/A |
| 0300.HK | HK$74.45 | -0.67% | 600B | 11.86 | HK$6.28 | +5.12% |
| 6690.HK | HK$22.45 | -0.22% | 227.3B | 9.85 | HK$2.28 | +4.68% |
| 0921.HK | HK$21.40 | -0.71% | 33.2B | 7.64 | HK$2.80 | +6.28% |
| 1999.HK | HK$4.31 | -0.69% | 16.7B | 8.13 | HK$0.53 | +6.96% |
| 1691.HK | HK$1.98 | -1.00% | 6.8B | 99.00 | HK$0.02 | N/A |
| 2519.HK | HK$8.29 | -0.12% | 3.4B | 5.88 | HK$1.41 | +3.27% |
| 0837.HK | HK$5.85 | -0.17% | 1.5B | 7.80 | HK$0.75 | +6.26% |
| 0531.HK | HK$0.48 | -1.04% | 1.4B | 47.50 | HK$0.01 | N/A |
| 1198.HK | HK$0.29 | +0.00% | 706.2M | -1.90 | -HK$0.15 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1575.HK vs 0300.HK Comparison
1575.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1575.HK stands at 177.3M. In comparison, 0300.HK has a market cap of 600B. Regarding current trading prices, 1575.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 0300.HK trades at HK$74.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1575.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.37, whereas 0300.HK's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, 1575.HK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0300.HK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1575.HK is more volatile compared to 0300.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1575.HK.
1575.HK vs 6690.HK Comparison
1575.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1575.HK stands at 177.3M. In comparison, 6690.HK has a market cap of 227.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1575.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 6690.HK trades at HK$22.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1575.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.37, whereas 6690.HK's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, 1575.HK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 6690.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1575.HK is more volatile compared to 6690.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1575.HK.
1575.HK vs 0921.HK Comparison
1575.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1575.HK stands at 177.3M. In comparison, 0921.HK has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1575.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 0921.HK trades at HK$21.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1575.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.37, whereas 0921.HK's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, 1575.HK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0921.HK's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 1575.HK is more volatile compared to 0921.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1575.HK.
1575.HK vs 1999.HK Comparison
1575.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1575.HK stands at 177.3M. In comparison, 1999.HK has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1575.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1999.HK trades at HK$4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1575.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.37, whereas 1999.HK's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, 1575.HK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 1999.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1575.HK is more volatile compared to 1999.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1575.HK.
1575.HK vs 1691.HK Comparison
1575.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1575.HK stands at 177.3M. In comparison, 1691.HK has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1575.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1691.HK trades at HK$1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1575.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.37, whereas 1691.HK's P/E ratio is 99.00. In terms of profitability, 1575.HK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 1691.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1575.HK is more volatile compared to 1691.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1575.HK.
1575.HK vs 2519.HK Comparison
1575.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1575.HK stands at 177.3M. In comparison, 2519.HK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1575.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 2519.HK trades at HK$8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1575.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.37, whereas 2519.HK's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, 1575.HK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 2519.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1575.HK is more volatile compared to 2519.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1575.HK.
1575.HK vs 0837.HK Comparison
1575.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1575.HK stands at 177.3M. In comparison, 0837.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1575.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 0837.HK trades at HK$5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1575.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.37, whereas 0837.HK's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, 1575.HK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0837.HK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1575.HK is more volatile compared to 0837.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1575.HK.
1575.HK vs 0531.HK Comparison
1575.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1575.HK stands at 177.3M. In comparison, 0531.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1575.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 0531.HK trades at HK$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1575.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.37, whereas 0531.HK's P/E ratio is 47.50. In terms of profitability, 1575.HK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0531.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1575.HK is more volatile compared to 0531.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1575.HK.
1575.HK vs 1198.HK Comparison
1575.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1575.HK stands at 177.3M. In comparison, 1198.HK has a market cap of 706.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1575.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1198.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1575.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.37, whereas 1198.HK's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, 1575.HK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 1198.HK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1575.HK is more volatile compared to 1198.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1575.HK.
1575.HK vs 1373.HK Comparison
1575.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1575.HK stands at 177.3M. In comparison, 1373.HK has a market cap of 666.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1575.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1373.HK trades at HK$0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1575.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.37, whereas 1373.HK's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, 1575.HK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 1373.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1575.HK is more volatile compared to 1373.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1575.HK.
1575.HK vs 1418.HK Comparison
1575.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1575.HK stands at 177.3M. In comparison, 1418.HK has a market cap of 507.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1575.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1418.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1575.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.37, whereas 1418.HK's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, 1575.HK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 1418.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1575.HK is more volatile compared to 1418.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1575.HK.
1575.HK vs 0229.HK Comparison
1575.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1575.HK stands at 177.3M. In comparison, 0229.HK has a market cap of 421.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1575.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 0229.HK trades at HK$0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1575.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.37, whereas 0229.HK's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, 1575.HK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0229.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1575.HK is more volatile compared to 0229.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1575.HK.
1575.HK vs 2222.HK Comparison
1575.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1575.HK stands at 177.3M. In comparison, 2222.HK has a market cap of 390.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1575.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 2222.HK trades at HK$0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1575.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.37, whereas 2222.HK's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, 1575.HK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 2222.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1575.HK is more volatile compared to 2222.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1575.HK.
1575.HK vs 0776.HK Comparison
1575.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1575.HK stands at 177.3M. In comparison, 0776.HK has a market cap of 339.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1575.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 0776.HK trades at HK$0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1575.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.37, whereas 0776.HK's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, 1575.HK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0776.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1575.HK is less volatile compared to 0776.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1575.HK.
1575.HK vs 6822.HK Comparison
1575.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1575.HK stands at 177.3M. In comparison, 6822.HK has a market cap of 269.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1575.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 6822.HK trades at HK$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1575.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.37, whereas 6822.HK's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, 1575.HK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 6822.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1575.HK is more volatile compared to 6822.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1575.HK.
1575.HK vs 0684.HK Comparison
1575.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1575.HK stands at 177.3M. In comparison, 0684.HK has a market cap of 203.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1575.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 0684.HK trades at HK$0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1575.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.37, whereas 0684.HK's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, 1575.HK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0684.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1575.HK is more volatile compared to 0684.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1575.HK.
1575.HK vs 2381.HK Comparison
1575.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1575.HK stands at 177.3M. In comparison, 2381.HK has a market cap of 192M. Regarding current trading prices, 1575.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 2381.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1575.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.37, whereas 2381.HK's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, 1575.HK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 2381.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1575.HK is more volatile compared to 2381.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1575.HK.
1575.HK vs 1715.HK Comparison
1575.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1575.HK stands at 177.3M. In comparison, 1715.HK has a market cap of 124.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1575.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1715.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1575.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.37, whereas 1715.HK's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, 1575.HK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 1715.HK's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, 1575.HK is more volatile compared to 1715.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1575.HK.
1575.HK vs 2127.HK Comparison
1575.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1575.HK stands at 177.3M. In comparison, 2127.HK has a market cap of 76.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1575.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 2127.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1575.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.37, whereas 2127.HK's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, 1575.HK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 2127.HK's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 1575.HK is more volatile compared to 2127.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1575.HK.
1575.HK vs 0396.HK Comparison
1575.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1575.HK stands at 177.3M. In comparison, 0396.HK has a market cap of 75.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1575.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 0396.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1575.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.37, whereas 0396.HK's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, 1575.HK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0396.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1575.HK is more volatile compared to 0396.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1575.HK.
1575.HK vs 8547.HK Comparison
1575.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1575.HK stands at 177.3M. In comparison, 8547.HK has a market cap of 59.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1575.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 8547.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1575.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.37, whereas 8547.HK's P/E ratio is 3.60. In terms of profitability, 1575.HK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 8547.HK's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 1575.HK is less volatile compared to 8547.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1575.HK.
1575.HK vs 8125.HK Comparison
1575.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1575.HK stands at 177.3M. In comparison, 8125.HK has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1575.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 8125.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1575.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.37, whereas 8125.HK's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, 1575.HK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 8125.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1575.HK is more volatile compared to 8125.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1575.HK.
1575.HK vs 1237.HK Comparison
1575.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1575.HK stands at 177.3M. In comparison, 1237.HK has a market cap of 37.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1575.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1237.HK trades at HK$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1575.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.37, whereas 1237.HK's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, 1575.HK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 1237.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1575.HK is more volatile compared to 1237.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1575.HK.
1575.HK vs 8118.HK Comparison
1575.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1575.HK stands at 177.3M. In comparison, 8118.HK has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1575.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 8118.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1575.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.37, whereas 8118.HK's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, 1575.HK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 8118.HK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1575.HK is more volatile compared to 8118.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1575.HK.
1575.HK vs 8392.HK Comparison
1575.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1575.HK stands at 177.3M. In comparison, 8392.HK has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, 1575.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 8392.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1575.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.37, whereas 8392.HK's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, 1575.HK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 8392.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1575.HK is more volatile compared to 8392.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1575.HK.
1575.HK vs 8222.HK Comparison
1575.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1575.HK stands at 177.3M. In comparison, 8222.HK has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1575.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 8222.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1575.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.37, whereas 8222.HK's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, 1575.HK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 8222.HK's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, 1575.HK is more volatile compared to 8222.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1575.HK.
1575.HK vs 1678.HK Comparison
1575.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1575.HK stands at 177.3M. In comparison, 1678.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1575.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1678.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1575.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.37, whereas 1678.HK's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, 1575.HK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 1678.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1575.HK is less volatile compared to 1678.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1575.HK.
1575.HK vs 0449.HK Comparison
1575.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1575.HK stands at 177.3M. In comparison, 0449.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1575.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 0449.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1575.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.37, whereas 0449.HK's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, 1575.HK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 0449.HK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1575.HK is more volatile compared to 0449.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1575.HK.
1575.HK vs 8101.HK Comparison
1575.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1575.HK stands at 177.3M. In comparison, 8101.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1575.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 8101.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1575.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.37, whereas 8101.HK's P/E ratio is 2.19. In terms of profitability, 1575.HK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 8101.HK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1575.HK is less volatile compared to 8101.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1575.HK.