Vrain Solution Inc
Vrain Solution Inc 135A.T Peers
See (135A.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 135A.T | ¥2,801.00 | +0.00% | 26.7B | 63.90 | ¥41.27 | N/A |
| 4704.T | ¥9,977.00 | +0.00% | 1.3T | 39.75 | ¥245.31 | +1.89% |
| 3769.T | ¥9,341.00 | +0.00% | 698.2B | 34.85 | ¥264.10 | +1.35% |
| 4784.T | ¥1,864.00 | +0.00% | 469.3B | -4627.03 | -¥0.37 | +0.84% |
| 4686.T | ¥3,695.00 | +0.00% | 236.7B | 19.19 | ¥192.03 | +0.54% |
| 3778.T | ¥4,505.00 | +0.00% | 176.4B | 58.54 | ¥75.33 | +0.09% |
| 4180.T | ¥1,631.00 | +0.00% | 165.4B | 57.36 | ¥28.33 | +0.12% |
| 3993.T | ¥3,525.00 | +0.00% | 108.4B | 38.45 | ¥90.90 | N/A |
| 3854.T | ¥2,772.00 | +0.00% | 68.1B | 22.28 | ¥123.76 | +1.63% |
| 5036.T | ¥1,475.00 | +0.00% | 67.1B | 16.62 | ¥88.58 | +2.04% |
Stock Comparison
135A.T vs 4704.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 4704.T has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 4704.T trades at ¥9,977.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 4704.T's P/E ratio is 39.75. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 4704.T's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 4704.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 3769.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 3769.T has a market cap of 698.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 3769.T trades at ¥9,341.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 3769.T's P/E ratio is 34.85. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 3769.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 3769.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 4784.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 4784.T has a market cap of 469.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 4784.T trades at ¥1,864.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 4784.T's P/E ratio is -4627.03. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 4784.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is less volatile compared to 4784.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 4686.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 4686.T has a market cap of 236.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 4686.T trades at ¥3,695.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 4686.T's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 4686.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 4686.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 3778.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 3778.T has a market cap of 176.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 3778.T trades at ¥4,505.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 3778.T's P/E ratio is 58.54. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 3778.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is less volatile compared to 3778.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 4180.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 4180.T has a market cap of 165.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 4180.T trades at ¥1,631.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 4180.T's P/E ratio is 57.36. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 4180.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 4180.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 3993.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 3993.T has a market cap of 108.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 3993.T trades at ¥3,525.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 3993.T's P/E ratio is 38.45. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 3993.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is less volatile compared to 3993.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 3854.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 3854.T has a market cap of 68.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 3854.T trades at ¥2,772.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 3854.T's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 3854.T's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 3854.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 5036.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 5036.T has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 5036.T trades at ¥1,475.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 5036.T's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 5036.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 5036.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 4687.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 4687.T has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 4687.T trades at ¥1,341.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 4687.T's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 4687.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 4687.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 4431.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 4431.T has a market cap of 57.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 4431.T trades at ¥3,050.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 4431.T's P/E ratio is 43.26. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 4431.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 4431.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 4419.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 4419.T has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 4419.T trades at ¥1,164.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 4419.T's P/E ratio is 85.50. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 4419.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is less volatile compared to 4419.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 4475.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 4475.T has a market cap of 56.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 4475.T trades at ¥1,812.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 4475.T's P/E ratio is 47.46. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 4475.T's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is less volatile compared to 4475.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 4435.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 4435.T has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 4435.T trades at ¥4,365.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 4435.T's P/E ratio is 64.11. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 4435.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 4435.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 4417.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 4417.T has a market cap of 47B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 4417.T trades at ¥3,225.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 4417.T's P/E ratio is 55.54. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 4417.T's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 4417.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 147A.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 147A.T has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 147A.T trades at ¥856.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 147A.T's P/E ratio is 65.79. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 147A.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 147A.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 3915.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 3915.T has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 3915.T trades at ¥2,949.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 3915.T's P/E ratio is 36.41. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 3915.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 3915.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 3694.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 3694.T has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 3694.T trades at ¥542.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 3694.T's P/E ratio is 29.02. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 3694.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 3694.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 4847.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 4847.T has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 4847.T trades at ¥1,114.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 4847.T's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 4847.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 4847.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 5132.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 5132.T has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 5132.T trades at ¥3,535.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 5132.T's P/E ratio is 92.24. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 5132.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is less volatile compared to 5132.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 3741.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 3741.T has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 3741.T trades at ¥5,190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 3741.T's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 3741.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 3741.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 3040.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 3040.T has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 3040.T trades at ¥1,310.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 3040.T's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 3040.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 3040.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 3677.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 3677.T has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 3677.T trades at ¥927.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 3677.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 3677.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 3677.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 3850.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 3850.T has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 3850.T trades at ¥3,845.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 3850.T's P/E ratio is 54.54. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 3850.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 3850.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 3992.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 3992.T has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 3992.T trades at ¥506.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 3992.T's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 3992.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 3992.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 4434.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 4434.T has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 4434.T trades at ¥2,378.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 4434.T's P/E ratio is 27.54. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 4434.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 4434.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 3914.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 3914.T has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 3914.T trades at ¥2,707.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 3914.T's P/E ratio is 37.36. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 3914.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 3914.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 4493.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 4493.T has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 4493.T trades at ¥1,775.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 4493.T's P/E ratio is 27.85. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 4493.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 4493.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 4488.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 4488.T has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 4488.T trades at ¥3,595.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 4488.T's P/E ratio is 50.32. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 4488.T's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 4488.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 2428.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 2428.T has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 2428.T trades at ¥716.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 2428.T's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 2428.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 2428.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 4811.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 4811.T has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 4811.T trades at ¥3,420.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 4811.T's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 4811.T's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is less volatile compared to 4811.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 4414.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 4414.T has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 4414.T trades at ¥2,078.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 4414.T's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 4414.T's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 4414.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 5582.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 5582.T has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 5582.T trades at ¥2,543.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 5582.T's P/E ratio is 28.44. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 5582.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is less volatile compared to 5582.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 3665.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 3665.T has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 3665.T trades at ¥303.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 3665.T's P/E ratio is 28.83. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 3665.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 3665.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 3695.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 3695.T has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 3695.T trades at ¥2,483.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 3695.T's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 3695.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 3695.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 4374.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 4374.T has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 4374.T trades at ¥2,478.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 4374.T's P/E ratio is 30.54. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 4374.T's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 4374.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 4268.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 4268.T has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 4268.T trades at ¥838.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 4268.T's P/E ratio is 135.16. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 4268.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 4268.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 9558.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 9558.T has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 9558.T trades at ¥2,160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 9558.T's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 9558.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 9558.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 2315.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 2315.T has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 2315.T trades at ¥63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 2315.T's P/E ratio is 37.35. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 2315.T's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is less volatile compared to 2315.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 5129.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 5129.T has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 5129.T trades at ¥580.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 5129.T's P/E ratio is -15.72. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 5129.T's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is less volatile compared to 5129.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 3633.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 3633.T has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 3633.T trades at ¥1,510.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 3633.T's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 3633.T's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 3633.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 4430.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 4430.T has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 4430.T trades at ¥1,594.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 4430.T's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 4430.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 4430.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 4667.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 4667.T has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 4667.T trades at ¥1,356.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 4667.T's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 4667.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 4667.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 173A.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 173A.T has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 173A.T trades at ¥1,650.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 173A.T's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 173A.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 173A.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 3623.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 3623.T has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 3623.T trades at ¥1,060.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 3623.T's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 3623.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 3623.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 7351.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 7351.T has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 7351.T trades at ¥730.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 7351.T's P/E ratio is 31.65. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 7351.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 7351.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 4270.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 4270.T has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 4270.T trades at ¥2,686.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 4270.T's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 4270.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 4270.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 4496.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 4496.T has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 4496.T trades at ¥779.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 4496.T's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 4496.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is less volatile compared to 4496.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 281A.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 281A.T has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 281A.T trades at ¥890.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 281A.T's P/E ratio is 79.33. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 281A.T's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 281A.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 145A.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 145A.T has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 145A.T trades at ¥1,010.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 145A.T's P/E ratio is 361.71. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 145A.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is less volatile compared to 145A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 3927.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 3927.T has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 3927.T trades at ¥940.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 3927.T's P/E ratio is 129.26. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 3927.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 3927.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 3680.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 3680.T has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 3680.T trades at ¥301.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 3680.T's P/E ratio is -8.28. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 3680.T's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 3680.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 137A.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 137A.T has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 137A.T trades at ¥1,432.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 137A.T's P/E ratio is 30.89. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 137A.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 137A.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 9417.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 9417.T has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 9417.T trades at ¥413.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 9417.T's P/E ratio is -16.94. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 9417.T's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 9417.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 3999.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 3999.T has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 3999.T trades at ¥833.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 3999.T's P/E ratio is 39.99. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 3999.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 3999.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 4391.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 4391.T has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 4391.T trades at ¥1,237.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 4391.T's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 4391.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 4391.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 3858.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 3858.T has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 3858.T trades at ¥390.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 3858.T's P/E ratio is 165.94. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 3858.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 3858.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 3627.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 3627.T has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 3627.T trades at ¥335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 3627.T's P/E ratio is -27.57. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 3627.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 3627.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 6662.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 6662.T has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 6662.T trades at ¥253.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 6662.T's P/E ratio is -12.11. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 6662.T's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 6662.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 6659.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 6659.T has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 6659.T trades at ¥67.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 6659.T's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 6659.T's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is less volatile compared to 6659.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 4494.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 4494.T has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 4494.T trades at ¥785.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 4494.T's P/E ratio is 49.09. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 4494.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 4494.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 5126.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 5126.T has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 5126.T trades at ¥1,960.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 5126.T's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 5126.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 5126.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 195A.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 195A.T has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 195A.T trades at ¥1,038.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 195A.T's P/E ratio is 27.19. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 195A.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 195A.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 4178.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 4178.T has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 4178.T trades at ¥785.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 4178.T's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 4178.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 4178.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 3987.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 3987.T has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 3987.T trades at ¥516.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 3987.T's P/E ratio is -111.43. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 3987.T's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 3987.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 2351.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 2351.T has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 2351.T trades at ¥315.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 2351.T's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 2351.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is less volatile compared to 2351.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 3042.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 3042.T has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 3042.T trades at ¥300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 3042.T's P/E ratio is -48.54. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 3042.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 3042.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 4288.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 4288.T has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 4288.T trades at ¥536.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 4288.T's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 4288.T's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 4288.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 5252.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 5252.T has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 5252.T trades at ¥1,300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 5252.T's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 5252.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 5252.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 4378.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 4378.T has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 4378.T trades at ¥599.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 4378.T's P/E ratio is -63.14. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 4378.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 4378.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.
135A.T vs 4073.T Comparison
135A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 135A.T stands at 26.7B. In comparison, 4073.T has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 135A.T is priced at ¥2,801.00, while 4073.T trades at ¥587.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
135A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 63.90, whereas 4073.T's P/E ratio is -14.11. In terms of profitability, 135A.T's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 4073.T's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 135A.T is more volatile compared to 4073.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 135A.T.