Adyen N.V.
Adyen N.V. 0YP5.L Peers
See (0YP5.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0YP5.L | £1,657.00 | +0.50% | 51.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KSPI.IL | £122.85 | +1.87% | 23.6B | 15.83 | £7.76 | N/A |
| KSPI.L | £43.35 | -1.46% | 15.6B | 4.48 | £9.67 | N/A |
| DARK.L | £576.80 | +0.07% | 3.7B | 44.37 | £0.13 | N/A |
| 0RUL.L | £27.95 | +1.35% | 2.1B | 22.78 | £1.23 | N/A |
| MCRO.L | £532.00 | +0.11% | 1.8B | -0.01 | -£640.20 | N/A |
| BYIT.L | £507.00 | -0.29% | 1.2B | 23.05 | £0.22 | +2.33% |
| KAPE.L | £285.00 | +0.71% | 1.2B | 19.00 | £0.15 | N/A |
| SPT.L | £191.20 | -0.52% | 1.1B | 95.60 | £0.02 | N/A |
| WPS.L | £89.40 | +3.23% | 617.3M | -14.90 | -£0.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
0YP5.L vs KSPI.IL Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, KSPI.IL has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while KSPI.IL trades at £122.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSPI.IL's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KSPI.IL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is more volatile compared to KSPI.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs KSPI.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, KSPI.L has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while KSPI.L trades at £43.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSPI.L's P/E ratio is 4.48. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KSPI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to KSPI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs DARK.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, DARK.L has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while DARK.L trades at £576.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DARK.L's P/E ratio is 44.37. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DARK.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is more volatile compared to DARK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs 0RUL.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, 0RUL.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while 0RUL.L trades at £27.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0RUL.L's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to 0RUL.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is more volatile compared to 0RUL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs MCRO.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, MCRO.L has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while MCRO.L trades at £532.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCRO.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MCRO.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is more volatile compared to MCRO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs BYIT.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, BYIT.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while BYIT.L trades at £507.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYIT.L's P/E ratio is 23.05. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BYIT.L's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to BYIT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs KAPE.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, KAPE.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while KAPE.L trades at £285.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KAPE.L's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KAPE.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is more volatile compared to KAPE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs SPT.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, SPT.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while SPT.L trades at £191.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPT.L's P/E ratio is 95.60. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SPT.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to SPT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs WPS.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, WPS.L has a market cap of 617.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while WPS.L trades at £89.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPS.L's P/E ratio is -14.90. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WPS.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to WPS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs PAY.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, PAY.L has a market cap of 570.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while PAY.L trades at £813.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAY.L's P/E ratio is 31.27. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PAY.L's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to PAY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs BOKU.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, BOKU.L has a market cap of 563.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while BOKU.L trades at £189.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOKU.L's P/E ratio is 189.98. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BOKU.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to BOKU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs FNX.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, FNX.L has a market cap of 221.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while FNX.L trades at £223.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNX.L's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FNX.L's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to FNX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs WNWD.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, WNWD.L has a market cap of 186.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while WNWD.L trades at £210.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WNWD.L's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WNWD.L's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to WNWD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs BLTG.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, BLTG.L has a market cap of 174.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while BLTG.L trades at £225.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLTG.L's P/E ratio is 56.25. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BLTG.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0YP5.L has daily volatility of 1.26 and BLTG.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0YP5.L vs BKS.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, BKS.L has a market cap of 154.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while BKS.L trades at £230.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKS.L's P/E ratio is 76.67. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BKS.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to BKS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs SEE.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, SEE.L has a market cap of 125.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while SEE.L trades at £2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEE.L's P/E ratio is -2.56. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SEE.L's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to SEE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs CNS.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, CNS.L has a market cap of 76.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while CNS.L trades at £15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNS.L's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CNS.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to CNS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs BGO.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, BGO.L has a market cap of 71.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while BGO.L trades at £92.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGO.L's P/E ratio is -23.12. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BGO.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to BGO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs PCIP.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, PCIP.L has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while PCIP.L trades at £52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCIP.L's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PCIP.L's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to PCIP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs IOM.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, IOM.L has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while IOM.L trades at £30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOM.L's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IOM.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to IOM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs INSG.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, INSG.L has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while INSG.L trades at £27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INSG.L's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to INSG.L's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to INSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs FIN.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, FIN.L has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while FIN.L trades at £31.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIN.L's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FIN.L's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to FIN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs SYS.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, SYS.L has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while SYS.L trades at £21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYS.L's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SYS.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to SYS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs GLAN.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, GLAN.L has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while GLAN.L trades at £33.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLAN.L's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GLAN.L's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is more volatile compared to GLAN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs CYK.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, CYK.L has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while CYK.L trades at £2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYK.L's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CYK.L's ROE of -15.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to CYK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs SWG.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, SWG.L has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while SWG.L trades at £45.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWG.L's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SWG.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to SWG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs BRSD.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, BRSD.L has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while BRSD.L trades at £3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRSD.L's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BRSD.L's ROE of -3.87%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0YP5.L has daily volatility of 1.26 and BRSD.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0YP5.L vs ECSC.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, ECSC.L has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while ECSC.L trades at £51.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECSC.L's P/E ratio is -5.73. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ECSC.L's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is more volatile compared to ECSC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs CTAI.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, CTAI.L has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while CTAI.L trades at £0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTAI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CTAI.L's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to CTAI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs OSI.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, OSI.L has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while OSI.L trades at £2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSI.L's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OSI.L's ROE of +23.85%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is more volatile compared to OSI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs CCS.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, CCS.L has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while CCS.L trades at £1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCS.L's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CCS.L's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is more volatile compared to CCS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs RCGH.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, RCGH.L has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while RCGH.L trades at £1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCGH.L's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RCGH.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to RCGH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs MODE.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, MODE.L has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while MODE.L trades at £1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MODE.L's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MODE.L's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is more volatile compared to MODE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs CLCO.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, CLCO.L has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while CLCO.L trades at £0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLCO.L's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CLCO.L's ROE of +5.97%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to CLCO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs FCS.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, FCS.L has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while FCS.L trades at £20.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCS.L's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FCS.L's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0YP5.L has daily volatility of 1.26 and FCS.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0YP5.L vs CTEA.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, CTEA.L has a market cap of 407.3K. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while CTEA.L trades at £0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTEA.L's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CTEA.L's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to CTEA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs SFTL.IL Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, SFTL.IL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while SFTL.IL trades at £1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFTL.IL's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SFTL.IL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is more volatile compared to SFTL.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs FLX.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, FLX.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while FLX.L trades at £0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FLX.L's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0YP5.L has daily volatility of 1.26 and FLX.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0YP5.L vs EQN.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, EQN.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while EQN.L trades at £179.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQN.L's P/E ratio is 0.78. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EQN.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to EQN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs SUMO.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, SUMO.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while SUMO.L trades at £512.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUMO.L's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SUMO.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is more volatile compared to SUMO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs PRSM.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, PRSM.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while PRSM.L trades at £1,274.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRSM.L's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PRSM.L's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is more volatile compared to PRSM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs AVST.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, AVST.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while AVST.L trades at £716.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVST.L's P/E ratio is 31.16. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AVST.L's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to AVST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs WJA.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, WJA.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while WJA.L trades at £7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WJA.L's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WJA.L's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is more volatile compared to WJA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs MMX.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, MMX.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while MMX.L trades at £8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMX.L's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MMX.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to MMX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.
0YP5.L vs CALL.L Comparison
0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, CALL.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at £1,657.00, while CALL.L trades at £79.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CALL.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CALL.L's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is more volatile compared to CALL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.