Adyen N.V.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, KSPI.IL has a market cap of 23.61B. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while KSPI.IL trades at $122.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSPI.IL's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KSPI.IL's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is more volatile compared to KSPI.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, KSPI.L has a market cap of 15.61B. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while KSPI.L trades at $43.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSPI.L's P/E ratio is 4.48. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KSPI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to KSPI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, DARK.L has a market cap of 3.69B. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while DARK.L trades at $576.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DARK.L's P/E ratio is 44.37. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DARK.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is more volatile compared to DARK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, 0RUL.L has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while 0RUL.L trades at $27.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0RUL.L's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to 0RUL.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is more volatile compared to 0RUL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, MCRO.L has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while MCRO.L trades at $532.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCRO.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MCRO.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is more volatile compared to MCRO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, BYIT.L has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while BYIT.L trades at $525.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYIT.L's P/E ratio is 25.02. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BYIT.L's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to BYIT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, KAPE.L has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while KAPE.L trades at $285.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KAPE.L's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KAPE.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is more volatile compared to KAPE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, SPT.L has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while SPT.L trades at $184.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPT.L's P/E ratio is 92.20. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SPT.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to SPT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, BOKU.L has a market cap of 490.82M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while BOKU.L trades at $165.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOKU.L's P/E ratio is 165.50. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BOKU.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to BOKU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, PAY.L has a market cap of 479.68M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while PAY.L trades at $680.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAY.L's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PAY.L's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to PAY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, WPS.L has a market cap of 408.77M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while WPS.L trades at $59.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPS.L's P/E ratio is -9.87. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WPS.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to WPS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, FNX.L has a market cap of 227.87M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while FNX.L trades at $230.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNX.L's P/E ratio is 20.91. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FNX.L's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to FNX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, WNWD.L has a market cap of 186.17M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while WNWD.L trades at $210.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WNWD.L's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WNWD.L's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to WNWD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, BLTG.L has a market cap of 174.54M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while BLTG.L trades at $225.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLTG.L's P/E ratio is 56.25. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BLTG.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0YP5.L has daily volatility of 1.26 and BLTG.L has daily volatility of N/A.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, BKS.L has a market cap of 138.34M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while BKS.L trades at $205.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKS.L's P/E ratio is 68.50. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BKS.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to BKS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, SEE.L has a market cap of 91.99M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while SEE.L trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEE.L's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SEE.L's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to SEE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, CNS.L has a market cap of 91.93M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while CNS.L trades at $17.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNS.L's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CNS.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to CNS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, BGO.L has a market cap of 74.91M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while BGO.L trades at $97.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGO.L's P/E ratio is -10.83. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BGO.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to BGO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, INSG.L has a market cap of 38.38M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while INSG.L trades at $32.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INSG.L's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to INSG.L's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to INSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, PCIP.L has a market cap of 35.50M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while PCIP.L trades at $49.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCIP.L's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PCIP.L's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to PCIP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, IOM.L has a market cap of 28.49M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while IOM.L trades at $25.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOM.L's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IOM.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to IOM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, SYS.L has a market cap of 18.73M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while SYS.L trades at $22.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYS.L's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SYS.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to SYS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, FIN.L has a market cap of 18.66M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while FIN.L trades at $32.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIN.L's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FIN.L's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to FIN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, GLAN.L has a market cap of 16.88M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while GLAN.L trades at $33.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLAN.L's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GLAN.L's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is more volatile compared to GLAN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, CYK.L has a market cap of 11.45M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while CYK.L trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYK.L's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CYK.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to CYK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, BRSD.L has a market cap of 7.82M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while BRSD.L trades at $3.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRSD.L's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BRSD.L's ROE of -3.87%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0YP5.L has daily volatility of 1.26 and BRSD.L has daily volatility of N/A.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, SWG.L has a market cap of 7.27M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while SWG.L trades at $30.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWG.L's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SWG.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to SWG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, ECSC.L has a market cap of 5.16M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while ECSC.L trades at $51.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECSC.L's P/E ratio is -5.73. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ECSC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is more volatile compared to ECSC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, OSI.L has a market cap of 2.81M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while OSI.L trades at $2.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSI.L's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OSI.L's ROE of +23.85%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is more volatile compared to OSI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, CCS.L has a market cap of 1.95M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while CCS.L trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCS.L's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CCS.L's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is more volatile compared to CCS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, CTAI.L has a market cap of 1.76M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while CTAI.L trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTAI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CTAI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to CTAI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, CLCO.L has a market cap of 1.69M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while CLCO.L trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLCO.L's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CLCO.L's ROE of +5.97%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to CLCO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, RCGH.L has a market cap of 1.58M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while RCGH.L trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCGH.L's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RCGH.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to RCGH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, MODE.L has a market cap of 1.21M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while MODE.L trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MODE.L's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MODE.L's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to MODE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, FCS.L has a market cap of 1.09M. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while FCS.L trades at $20.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCS.L's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FCS.L's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0YP5.L has daily volatility of 1.26 and FCS.L has daily volatility of N/A.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, CTEA.L has a market cap of 407280.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while CTEA.L trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTEA.L's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CTEA.L's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to CTEA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, EQN.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while EQN.L trades at $179.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQN.L's P/E ratio is 0.78. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EQN.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to EQN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, FLX.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while FLX.L trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FLX.L's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0YP5.L has daily volatility of 1.26 and FLX.L has daily volatility of N/A.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, MMX.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while MMX.L trades at $8.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMX.L's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MMX.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to MMX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, SUMO.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while SUMO.L trades at $512.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUMO.L's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SUMO.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is more volatile compared to SUMO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, AVST.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while AVST.L trades at $716.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVST.L's P/E ratio is 31.16. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AVST.L's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is less volatile compared to AVST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, SFTL.IL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while SFTL.IL trades at $1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFTL.IL's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SFTL.IL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is more volatile compared to SFTL.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, CALL.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while CALL.L trades at $79.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CALL.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CALL.L's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is more volatile compared to CALL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, WJA.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while WJA.L trades at $7.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WJA.L's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WJA.L's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is more volatile compared to WJA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.

0YP5.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0YP5.L stands at 46.18B. In comparison, PRSM.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0YP5.L is priced at $1,657.00, while PRSM.L trades at $1,274.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0YP5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRSM.L's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, 0YP5.L's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PRSM.L's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 0YP5.L is more volatile compared to PRSM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0YP5.L.