Booking Holdings Inc.

0W2Y.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0W2Y.L stands at 59.16B. In comparison, 0I1W.L has a market cap of 61.43B. Regarding current trading prices, 0W2Y.L is priced at $1,818.09, while 0I1W.L trades at $226.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0W2Y.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas 0I1W.L's P/E ratio is -10.88. In terms of profitability, 0W2Y.L's ROE is -1.20%, compared to 0I1W.L's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 0W2Y.L is more volatile compared to 0I1W.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0W2Y.L.

0W2Y.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0W2Y.L stands at 59.16B. In comparison, 0I50.L has a market cap of 29.22B. Regarding current trading prices, 0W2Y.L is priced at $1,818.09, while 0I50.L trades at $26.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0W2Y.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas 0I50.L's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, 0W2Y.L's ROE is -1.20%, compared to 0I50.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0W2Y.L is more volatile compared to 0I50.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0W2Y.L.

0W2Y.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0W2Y.L stands at 59.16B. In comparison, 0R1T.L has a market cap of 20.77B. Regarding current trading prices, 0W2Y.L is priced at $1,818.09, while 0R1T.L trades at $164.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0W2Y.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas 0R1T.L's P/E ratio is 117.57. In terms of profitability, 0W2Y.L's ROE is -1.20%, compared to 0R1T.L's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0W2Y.L is more volatile compared to 0R1T.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0W2Y.L.

0W2Y.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0W2Y.L stands at 59.16B. In comparison, JET2.L has a market cap of 3.58B. Regarding current trading prices, 0W2Y.L is priced at $1,818.09, while JET2.L trades at $1,666.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0W2Y.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas JET2.L's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, 0W2Y.L's ROE is -1.20%, compared to JET2.L's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 0W2Y.L is more volatile compared to JET2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0W2Y.L.

0W2Y.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0W2Y.L stands at 59.16B. In comparison, 0M1K.L has a market cap of 3.12B. Regarding current trading prices, 0W2Y.L is priced at $1,818.09, while 0M1K.L trades at $43.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0W2Y.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas 0M1K.L's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, 0W2Y.L's ROE is -1.20%, compared to 0M1K.L's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 0W2Y.L is more volatile compared to 0M1K.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0W2Y.L.

0W2Y.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0W2Y.L stands at 59.16B. In comparison, TUI.L has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, 0W2Y.L is priced at $1,818.09, while TUI.L trades at $563.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0W2Y.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas TUI.L's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, 0W2Y.L's ROE is -1.20%, compared to TUI.L's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, 0W2Y.L is more volatile compared to TUI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0W2Y.L.

0W2Y.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0W2Y.L stands at 59.16B. In comparison, MDOJ.L has a market cap of 2.10B. Regarding current trading prices, 0W2Y.L is priced at $1,818.09, while MDOJ.L trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0W2Y.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas MDOJ.L's P/E ratio is -14.82. In terms of profitability, 0W2Y.L's ROE is -1.20%, compared to MDOJ.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0W2Y.L is less volatile compared to MDOJ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0W2Y.L.

0W2Y.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0W2Y.L stands at 59.16B. In comparison, TRN.L has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, 0W2Y.L is priced at $1,818.09, while TRN.L trades at $268.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0W2Y.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas TRN.L's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, 0W2Y.L's ROE is -1.20%, compared to TRN.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0W2Y.L is less volatile compared to TRN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0W2Y.L.

0W2Y.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0W2Y.L stands at 59.16B. In comparison, OTB.L has a market cap of 438.13M. Regarding current trading prices, 0W2Y.L is priced at $1,818.09, while OTB.L trades at $280.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0W2Y.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas OTB.L's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, 0W2Y.L's ROE is -1.20%, compared to OTB.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0W2Y.L is less volatile compared to OTB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0W2Y.L.

0W2Y.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0W2Y.L stands at 59.16B. In comparison, 0G8Z.L has a market cap of 232.23M. Regarding current trading prices, 0W2Y.L is priced at $1,818.09, while 0G8Z.L trades at $3.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0W2Y.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas 0G8Z.L's P/E ratio is -66.07. In terms of profitability, 0W2Y.L's ROE is -1.20%, compared to 0G8Z.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0W2Y.L is more volatile compared to 0G8Z.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0W2Y.L.

0W2Y.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0W2Y.L stands at 59.16B. In comparison, HSW.L has a market cap of 141.24M. Regarding current trading prices, 0W2Y.L is priced at $1,818.09, while HSW.L trades at $113.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0W2Y.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas HSW.L's P/E ratio is 18.83. In terms of profitability, 0W2Y.L's ROE is -1.20%, compared to HSW.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0W2Y.L is more volatile compared to HSW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0W2Y.L.

0W2Y.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0W2Y.L stands at 59.16B. In comparison, TENG.L has a market cap of 53.25M. Regarding current trading prices, 0W2Y.L is priced at $1,818.09, while TENG.L trades at $55.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0W2Y.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas TENG.L's P/E ratio is 27.75. In terms of profitability, 0W2Y.L's ROE is -1.20%, compared to TENG.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0W2Y.L is more volatile compared to TENG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0W2Y.L.

0W2Y.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0W2Y.L stands at 59.16B. In comparison, INTO.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0W2Y.L is priced at $1,818.09, while INTO.L trades at $1.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0W2Y.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas INTO.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, 0W2Y.L's ROE is -1.20%, compared to INTO.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0W2Y.L is more volatile compared to INTO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0W2Y.L.