Voltabox AG
Voltabox AG (0RV4.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (0RV4.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0RV4.L | £4.03 | +2.28% | 82.3M | -5.01 | -£0.80 | N/A |
| 0YCP.L | £58.30 | +0.38% | 13.7B | 49.41 | £1.18 | N/A |
| 0MI0.L | £822.00 | +0.88% | 9B | N/A | N/A | +2.50% |
| 0HJH.L | £110.69 | -0.38% | 8.5B | 26.93 | £4.11 | +2.51% |
| 0HOU.L | £38.12 | +4.64% | 8.2B | 13.58 | £2.81 | +1.15% |
| 0JTQ.L | £93.64 | -3.77% | 5B | 25.69 | £3.65 | +3.29% |
| 0QLL.L | £8.81 | -4.34% | 2.5B | 2.88 | £3.06 | N/A |
| 0HW0.L | £1.53 | +2.14% | 1.4B | 23.48 | £0.07 | N/A |
| 0P49.L | £58.20 | -1.85% | 1.2B | 34.89 | £1.67 | +4.79% |
| TIFS.L | £199.60 | +0.00% | 983M | 39.92 | £0.05 | +0.87% |
Stock Comparison
0RV4.L vs 0YCP.L Comparison August 2025
0RV4.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RV4.L stands at 82.3M. In comparison, 0YCP.L has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0RV4.L is priced at £4.03, while 0YCP.L trades at £58.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RV4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -5.01, whereas 0YCP.L's P/E ratio is 49.41. In terms of profitability, 0RV4.L's ROE is +0.42%, compared to 0YCP.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RV4.L is more volatile compared to 0YCP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RV4.L.Check 0YCP.L's competition here
0RV4.L vs 0MI0.L Comparison August 2025
0RV4.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RV4.L stands at 82.3M. In comparison, 0MI0.L has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0RV4.L is priced at £4.03, while 0MI0.L trades at £822.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RV4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -5.01, whereas 0MI0.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0RV4.L's ROE is +0.42%, compared to 0MI0.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RV4.L is more volatile compared to 0MI0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RV4.L.Check 0MI0.L's competition here
0RV4.L vs 0HJH.L Comparison August 2025
0RV4.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RV4.L stands at 82.3M. In comparison, 0HJH.L has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0RV4.L is priced at £4.03, while 0HJH.L trades at £110.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RV4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -5.01, whereas 0HJH.L's P/E ratio is 26.93. In terms of profitability, 0RV4.L's ROE is +0.42%, compared to 0HJH.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RV4.L is more volatile compared to 0HJH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RV4.L.Check 0HJH.L's competition here
0RV4.L vs 0HOU.L Comparison August 2025
0RV4.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RV4.L stands at 82.3M. In comparison, 0HOU.L has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0RV4.L is priced at £4.03, while 0HOU.L trades at £38.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RV4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -5.01, whereas 0HOU.L's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, 0RV4.L's ROE is +0.42%, compared to 0HOU.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RV4.L is more volatile compared to 0HOU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RV4.L.Check 0HOU.L's competition here
0RV4.L vs 0JTQ.L Comparison August 2025
0RV4.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RV4.L stands at 82.3M. In comparison, 0JTQ.L has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0RV4.L is priced at £4.03, while 0JTQ.L trades at £93.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RV4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -5.01, whereas 0JTQ.L's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, 0RV4.L's ROE is +0.42%, compared to 0JTQ.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RV4.L is more volatile compared to 0JTQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RV4.L.Check 0JTQ.L's competition here
0RV4.L vs 0QLL.L Comparison August 2025
0RV4.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RV4.L stands at 82.3M. In comparison, 0QLL.L has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0RV4.L is priced at £4.03, while 0QLL.L trades at £8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RV4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -5.01, whereas 0QLL.L's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, 0RV4.L's ROE is +0.42%, compared to 0QLL.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RV4.L is more volatile compared to 0QLL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RV4.L.Check 0QLL.L's competition here
0RV4.L vs 0HW0.L Comparison August 2025
0RV4.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RV4.L stands at 82.3M. In comparison, 0HW0.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0RV4.L is priced at £4.03, while 0HW0.L trades at £1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RV4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -5.01, whereas 0HW0.L's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, 0RV4.L's ROE is +0.42%, compared to 0HW0.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RV4.L is more volatile compared to 0HW0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RV4.L.Check 0HW0.L's competition here
0RV4.L vs 0P49.L Comparison August 2025
0RV4.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RV4.L stands at 82.3M. In comparison, 0P49.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0RV4.L is priced at £4.03, while 0P49.L trades at £58.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RV4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -5.01, whereas 0P49.L's P/E ratio is 34.89. In terms of profitability, 0RV4.L's ROE is +0.42%, compared to 0P49.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RV4.L is more volatile compared to 0P49.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RV4.L.Check 0P49.L's competition here
0RV4.L vs TIFS.L Comparison August 2025
0RV4.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RV4.L stands at 82.3M. In comparison, TIFS.L has a market cap of 983M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RV4.L is priced at £4.03, while TIFS.L trades at £199.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RV4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -5.01, whereas TIFS.L's P/E ratio is 39.92. In terms of profitability, 0RV4.L's ROE is +0.42%, compared to TIFS.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RV4.L is more volatile compared to TIFS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RV4.L.Check TIFS.L's competition here
0RV4.L vs 0QOB.L Comparison August 2025
0RV4.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RV4.L stands at 82.3M. In comparison, 0QOB.L has a market cap of 831M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RV4.L is priced at £4.03, while 0QOB.L trades at £143.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RV4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -5.01, whereas 0QOB.L's P/E ratio is 29.22. In terms of profitability, 0RV4.L's ROE is +0.42%, compared to 0QOB.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RV4.L is more volatile compared to 0QOB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RV4.L.Check 0QOB.L's competition here
0RV4.L vs ABDP.L Comparison August 2025
0RV4.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RV4.L stands at 82.3M. In comparison, ABDP.L has a market cap of 321.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RV4.L is priced at £4.03, while ABDP.L trades at £1,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RV4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -5.01, whereas ABDP.L's P/E ratio is 30.43. In terms of profitability, 0RV4.L's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ABDP.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RV4.L is more volatile compared to ABDP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RV4.L.Check ABDP.L's competition here
0RV4.L vs 0F8V.L Comparison August 2025
0RV4.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RV4.L stands at 82.3M. In comparison, 0F8V.L has a market cap of 220.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RV4.L is priced at £4.03, while 0F8V.L trades at £8.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RV4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -5.01, whereas 0F8V.L's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, 0RV4.L's ROE is +0.42%, compared to 0F8V.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RV4.L is more volatile compared to 0F8V.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RV4.L.Check 0F8V.L's competition here
0RV4.L vs 0G68.L Comparison August 2025
0RV4.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RV4.L stands at 82.3M. In comparison, 0G68.L has a market cap of 169.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RV4.L is priced at £4.03, while 0G68.L trades at £10.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RV4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -5.01, whereas 0G68.L's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, 0RV4.L's ROE is +0.42%, compared to 0G68.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RV4.L is more volatile compared to 0G68.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RV4.L.Check 0G68.L's competition here
0RV4.L vs 0QZ7.L Comparison August 2025
0RV4.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RV4.L stands at 82.3M. In comparison, 0QZ7.L has a market cap of 138.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RV4.L is priced at £4.03, while 0QZ7.L trades at £2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RV4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -5.01, whereas 0QZ7.L's P/E ratio is 6.57. In terms of profitability, 0RV4.L's ROE is +0.42%, compared to 0QZ7.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RV4.L is more volatile compared to 0QZ7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RV4.L.Check 0QZ7.L's competition here
0RV4.L vs 0GOX.L Comparison August 2025
0RV4.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RV4.L stands at 82.3M. In comparison, 0GOX.L has a market cap of 72.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RV4.L is priced at £4.03, while 0GOX.L trades at £3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RV4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -5.01, whereas 0GOX.L's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, 0RV4.L's ROE is +0.42%, compared to 0GOX.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RV4.L is more volatile compared to 0GOX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RV4.L.Check 0GOX.L's competition here
0RV4.L vs 0ND3.L Comparison August 2025
0RV4.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RV4.L stands at 82.3M. In comparison, 0ND3.L has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RV4.L is priced at £4.03, while 0ND3.L trades at £1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RV4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -5.01, whereas 0ND3.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0RV4.L's ROE is +0.42%, compared to 0ND3.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RV4.L is more volatile compared to 0ND3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RV4.L.Check 0ND3.L's competition here
0RV4.L vs CAR.L Comparison August 2025
0RV4.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RV4.L stands at 82.3M. In comparison, CAR.L has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RV4.L is priced at £4.03, while CAR.L trades at £47.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RV4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -5.01, whereas CAR.L's P/E ratio is -23.70. In terms of profitability, 0RV4.L's ROE is +0.42%, compared to CAR.L's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RV4.L is more volatile compared to CAR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RV4.L.Check CAR.L's competition here
0RV4.L vs 0RPV.L Comparison August 2025
0RV4.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RV4.L stands at 82.3M. In comparison, 0RPV.L has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RV4.L is priced at £4.03, while 0RPV.L trades at £9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RV4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -5.01, whereas 0RPV.L's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, 0RV4.L's ROE is +0.42%, compared to 0RPV.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0RV4.L is more volatile compared to 0RPV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RV4.L.Check 0RPV.L's competition here
0RV4.L vs CTA.L Comparison August 2025
0RV4.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RV4.L stands at 82.3M. In comparison, CTA.L has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RV4.L is priced at £4.03, while CTA.L trades at £33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RV4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -5.01, whereas CTA.L's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, 0RV4.L's ROE is +0.42%, compared to CTA.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RV4.L is more volatile compared to CTA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RV4.L.Check CTA.L's competition here
0RV4.L vs TRT.L Comparison August 2025
0RV4.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RV4.L stands at 82.3M. In comparison, TRT.L has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RV4.L is priced at £4.03, while TRT.L trades at £138.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RV4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -5.01, whereas TRT.L's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, 0RV4.L's ROE is +0.42%, compared to TRT.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RV4.L is more volatile compared to TRT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RV4.L.Check TRT.L's competition here
0RV4.L vs SCE.L Comparison August 2025
0RV4.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RV4.L stands at 82.3M. In comparison, SCE.L has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RV4.L is priced at £4.03, while SCE.L trades at £1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RV4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -5.01, whereas SCE.L's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, 0RV4.L's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SCE.L's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RV4.L is more volatile compared to SCE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RV4.L.Check SCE.L's competition here
0RV4.L vs 0NFG.L Comparison August 2025
0RV4.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RV4.L stands at 82.3M. In comparison, 0NFG.L has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RV4.L is priced at £4.03, while 0NFG.L trades at £2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RV4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -5.01, whereas 0NFG.L's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, 0RV4.L's ROE is +0.42%, compared to 0NFG.L's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RV4.L is more volatile compared to 0NFG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RV4.L.Check 0NFG.L's competition here
0RV4.L vs AUTG.L Comparison August 2025
0RV4.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RV4.L stands at 82.3M. In comparison, AUTG.L has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RV4.L is priced at £4.03, while AUTG.L trades at £10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RV4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -5.01, whereas AUTG.L's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, 0RV4.L's ROE is +0.42%, compared to AUTG.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RV4.L is less volatile compared to AUTG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RV4.L.Check AUTG.L's competition here
0RV4.L vs STG.L Comparison August 2025
0RV4.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RV4.L stands at 82.3M. In comparison, STG.L has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RV4.L is priced at £4.03, while STG.L trades at £26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RV4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -5.01, whereas STG.L's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, 0RV4.L's ROE is +0.42%, compared to STG.L's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RV4.L is more volatile compared to STG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RV4.L.Check STG.L's competition here
0RV4.L vs SED.L Comparison August 2025
0RV4.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RV4.L stands at 82.3M. In comparison, SED.L has a market cap of 944.2K. Regarding current trading prices, 0RV4.L is priced at £4.03, while SED.L trades at £0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RV4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -5.01, whereas SED.L's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, 0RV4.L's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SED.L's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RV4.L is more volatile compared to SED.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RV4.L.Check SED.L's competition here
0RV4.L vs 0RT7.L Comparison August 2025
0RV4.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RV4.L stands at 82.3M. In comparison, 0RT7.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0RV4.L is priced at £4.03, while 0RT7.L trades at £19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RV4.L currently has a P/E ratio of -5.01, whereas 0RT7.L's P/E ratio is -24.12. In terms of profitability, 0RV4.L's ROE is +0.42%, compared to 0RT7.L's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0RV4.L has daily volatility of 9.02 and 0RT7.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check 0RT7.L's competition here