Kuros Biosciences AG
Kuros Biosciences AG 0RHR.L Peers
See (0RHR.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Biotechnology Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0RHR.L | £24.55 | -1.30% | 890.4M | -106.72 | -£0.23 | N/A |
| 0QW0.L | £352.20 | -1.36% | 13.4B | -31.93 | -£11.03 | N/A |
| 0A8K.L | £31.24 | +0.03% | 8.3B | -53.04 | -£0.59 | N/A |
| 0H22.L | £44.54 | N/A | 2.5B | -9.78 | -£4.56 | N/A |
| 0HI3.L | £16.99 | +2.27% | 2.3B | -15.80 | -£1.08 | N/A |
| 0RC7.L | £84.70 | -18.94% | 1.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0RC6.L | £73.87 | N/A | 1.6B | 14.69 | £5.03 | +0.77% |
| GNS.L | £1,990.00 | +0.20% | 1.3B | -331.67 | -£0.06 | +1.61% |
| 0K1R.L | £14.49 | +2.11% | 1.2B | -2.82 | -£5.14 | N/A |
| ONT.L | £120.00 | -0.99% | 1.2B | -7.50 | -£0.16 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
0RHR.L vs 0QW0.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, 0QW0.L has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while 0QW0.L trades at £352.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas 0QW0.L's P/E ratio is -31.93. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0QW0.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is more volatile compared to 0QW0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs 0A8K.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, 0A8K.L has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while 0A8K.L trades at £31.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas 0A8K.L's P/E ratio is -53.04. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0A8K.L's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is more volatile compared to 0A8K.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs 0H22.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, 0H22.L has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while 0H22.L trades at £44.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas 0H22.L's P/E ratio is -9.78. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0H22.L's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is more volatile compared to 0H22.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs 0HI3.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, 0HI3.L has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while 0HI3.L trades at £16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas 0HI3.L's P/E ratio is -15.80. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0HI3.L's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to 0HI3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs 0RC7.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, 0RC7.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while 0RC7.L trades at £84.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas 0RC7.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0RC7.L's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to 0RC7.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs 0RC6.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, 0RC6.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while 0RC6.L trades at £73.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas 0RC6.L's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0RC6.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to 0RC6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs GNS.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, GNS.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while GNS.L trades at £1,990.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas GNS.L's P/E ratio is -331.67. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GNS.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to GNS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs 0K1R.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, 0K1R.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while 0K1R.L trades at £14.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas 0K1R.L's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0K1R.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to 0K1R.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs ONT.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, ONT.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while ONT.L trades at £120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas ONT.L's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ONT.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to ONT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs ERGO.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, ERGO.L has a market cap of 771.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while ERGO.L trades at £1,348.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas ERGO.L's P/E ratio is 48.14. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ERGO.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is more volatile compared to ERGO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs 0A8E.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, 0A8E.L has a market cap of 723.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while 0A8E.L trades at £4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas 0A8E.L's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0A8E.L's ROE of +1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to 0A8E.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs 0AAJ.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, 0AAJ.L has a market cap of 702.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while 0AAJ.L trades at £21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas 0AAJ.L's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0AAJ.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is more volatile compared to 0AAJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs 0RQE.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, 0RQE.L has a market cap of 394.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while 0RQE.L trades at £11.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas 0RQE.L's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0RQE.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to 0RQE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs OXB.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, OXB.L has a market cap of 364.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while OXB.L trades at £343.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas OXB.L's P/E ratio is -8.18. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OXB.L's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to OXB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs PRTC.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, PRTC.L has a market cap of 333.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while PRTC.L trades at £139.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas PRTC.L's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PRTC.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to PRTC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs FARN.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, FARN.L has a market cap of 265.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while FARN.L trades at £215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas FARN.L's P/E ratio is -8.96. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FARN.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to FARN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs ARIX.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, ARIX.L has a market cap of 183.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while ARIX.L trades at £142.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas ARIX.L's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ARIX.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is more volatile compared to ARIX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs 0I0X.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, 0I0X.L has a market cap of 183.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while 0I0X.L trades at £2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas 0I0X.L's P/E ratio is -7.58. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0I0X.L's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to 0I0X.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs 4BB.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, 4BB.L has a market cap of 171.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while 4BB.L trades at £1,110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas 4BB.L's P/E ratio is -11.81. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 4BB.L's ROE of +3.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is more volatile compared to 4BB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs BVXP.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, BVXP.L has a market cap of 143.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while BVXP.L trades at £2,750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas BVXP.L's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BVXP.L's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to BVXP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs AVCT.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, AVCT.L has a market cap of 124.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while AVCT.L trades at £32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas AVCT.L's P/E ratio is -3.61. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AVCT.L's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to AVCT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs SCLP.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, SCLP.L has a market cap of 108.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while SCLP.L trades at £10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas SCLP.L's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SCLP.L's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to SCLP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs HVO.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, HVO.L has a market cap of 75.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while HVO.L trades at £11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas HVO.L's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HVO.L's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to HVO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs REDX.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, REDX.L has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while REDX.L trades at £15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas REDX.L's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to REDX.L's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is more volatile compared to REDX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs ETX.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, ETX.L has a market cap of 56.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while ETX.L trades at £9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas ETX.L's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ETX.L's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is more volatile compared to ETX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs SBTX.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, SBTX.L has a market cap of 43.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while SBTX.L trades at £18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas SBTX.L's P/E ratio is -18.75. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SBTX.L's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to SBTX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs OBI.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, OBI.L has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while OBI.L trades at £9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas OBI.L's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OBI.L's ROE of -6.84%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to OBI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs 0HUZ.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, 0HUZ.L has a market cap of 39.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while 0HUZ.L trades at £0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas 0HUZ.L's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0HUZ.L's ROE of -3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to 0HUZ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs 0RA2.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, 0RA2.L has a market cap of 35.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while 0RA2.L trades at £1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas 0RA2.L's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0RA2.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to 0RA2.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs MTPH.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, MTPH.L has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while MTPH.L trades at £18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas MTPH.L's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MTPH.L's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is more volatile compared to MTPH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs C4XD.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, C4XD.L has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while C4XD.L trades at £12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas C4XD.L's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to C4XD.L's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is more volatile compared to C4XD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs FUM.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, FUM.L has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while FUM.L trades at £9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas FUM.L's P/E ratio is -9.29. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FUM.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to FUM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs OKYO.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, OKYO.L has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while OKYO.L trades at £1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas OKYO.L's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OKYO.L's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is more volatile compared to OKYO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs TRX.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, TRX.L has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while TRX.L trades at £31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas TRX.L's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TRX.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to TRX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs 0V43.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, 0V43.L has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while 0V43.L trades at £0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas 0V43.L's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0V43.L's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is more volatile compared to 0V43.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs SAR.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, SAR.L has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while SAR.L trades at £14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas SAR.L's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SAR.L's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to SAR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs POLB.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, POLB.L has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while POLB.L trades at £3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas POLB.L's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to POLB.L's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to POLB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs AREC.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, AREC.L has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while AREC.L trades at £43.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas AREC.L's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AREC.L's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to AREC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs IMM.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, IMM.L has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while IMM.L trades at £2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas IMM.L's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IMM.L's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to IMM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs OPTI.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, OPTI.L has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while OPTI.L trades at £12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas OPTI.L's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OPTI.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to OPTI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs NSCI.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, NSCI.L has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while NSCI.L trades at £53.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas NSCI.L's P/E ratio is -4.83. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NSCI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is more volatile compared to NSCI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs SNG.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, SNG.L has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while SNG.L trades at £0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas SNG.L's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SNG.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to SNG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs IXI.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, IXI.L has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while IXI.L trades at £11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas IXI.L's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IXI.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is more volatile compared to IXI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs BVX.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, BVX.L has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while BVX.L trades at £10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas BVX.L's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BVX.L's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is more volatile compared to BVX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs 0HTC.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, 0HTC.L has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while 0HTC.L trades at £5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas 0HTC.L's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0HTC.L's ROE of +499.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to 0HTC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs OBD.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, OBD.L has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while OBD.L trades at £0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas OBD.L's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OBD.L's ROE of -3.87%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to OBD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs HEMO.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, HEMO.L has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while HEMO.L trades at £177.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas HEMO.L's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HEMO.L's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to HEMO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs FAB.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, FAB.L has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while FAB.L trades at £6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas FAB.L's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FAB.L's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to FAB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs CIZ.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, CIZ.L has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while CIZ.L trades at £1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas CIZ.L's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CIZ.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to CIZ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs APTA.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, APTA.L has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while APTA.L trades at £0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas APTA.L's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to APTA.L's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to APTA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs TCF.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, TCF.L has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while TCF.L trades at £0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas TCF.L's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TCF.L's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to TCF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs EVG.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, EVG.L has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while EVG.L trades at £0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas EVG.L's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EVG.L's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is more volatile compared to EVG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs GENF.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, GENF.L has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while GENF.L trades at £0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas GENF.L's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GENF.L's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to GENF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs 0R02.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, 0R02.L has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while 0R02.L trades at £0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas 0R02.L's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0R02.L's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to 0R02.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs DEST.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, DEST.L has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while DEST.L trades at £3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas DEST.L's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DEST.L's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is more volatile compared to DEST.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs ROQ.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, ROQ.L has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while ROQ.L trades at £1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas ROQ.L's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ROQ.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to ROQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs 0QSS.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, 0QSS.L has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while 0QSS.L trades at £0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas 0QSS.L's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0QSS.L's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to 0QSS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs NFX.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, NFX.L has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while NFX.L trades at £0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas NFX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NFX.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to NFX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs RENE.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, RENE.L has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while RENE.L trades at £3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas RENE.L's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RENE.L's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is more volatile compared to RENE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs 0QNV.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, 0QNV.L has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while 0QNV.L trades at £0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas 0QNV.L's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0QNV.L's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is more volatile compared to 0QNV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs CRTX.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, CRTX.L has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while CRTX.L trades at £19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas CRTX.L's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CRTX.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to CRTX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs VAL.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, VAL.L has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while VAL.L trades at £0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas VAL.L's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VAL.L's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to VAL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs PYC.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, PYC.L has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while PYC.L trades at £0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas PYC.L's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PYC.L's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to PYC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs ONC.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, ONC.L has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while ONC.L trades at £1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas ONC.L's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ONC.L's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to ONC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs OCTP.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, OCTP.L has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while OCTP.L trades at £0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas OCTP.L's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OCTP.L's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is more volatile compared to OCTP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs 0QGJ.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, 0QGJ.L has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while 0QGJ.L trades at £0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas 0QGJ.L's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0QGJ.L's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to 0QGJ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs 0R55.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, 0R55.L has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while 0R55.L trades at £0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas 0R55.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0R55.L's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to 0R55.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs OVB.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, OVB.L has a market cap of 938K. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while OVB.L trades at £1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas OVB.L's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OVB.L's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is more volatile compared to OVB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs 0RGO.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, 0RGO.L has a market cap of 78.7K. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while 0RGO.L trades at £0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas 0RGO.L's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0RGO.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is more volatile compared to 0RGO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs SLN.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, SLN.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while SLN.L trades at £535.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas SLN.L's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SLN.L's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to SLN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs RMS.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, RMS.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while RMS.L trades at £0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas RMS.L's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RMS.L's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to RMS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs ABC.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, ABC.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while ABC.L trades at £1,226.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas ABC.L's P/E ratio is 2.04. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ABC.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0RHR.L has daily volatility of 0.61 and ABC.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0RHR.L vs DDDD.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, DDDD.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while DDDD.L trades at £16.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas DDDD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DDDD.L's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0RHR.L has daily volatility of 0.61 and DDDD.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0RHR.L vs TILS.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, TILS.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while TILS.L trades at £58.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas TILS.L's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TILS.L's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 0RHR.L is less volatile compared to TILS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0RHR.L.
0RHR.L vs ORPH.L Comparison
0RHR.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0RHR.L stands at 890.4M. In comparison, ORPH.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0RHR.L is priced at £24.55, while ORPH.L trades at £10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0RHR.L currently has a P/E ratio of -106.72, whereas ORPH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0RHR.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ORPH.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0RHR.L has daily volatility of 0.61 and ORPH.L has daily volatility of N/A.