Zehnder Group AG
Zehnder Group AG (0R6S.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (0R6S.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0R6S.L | £72.25 | +0.35% | 789.6M | 13.55 | £5.23 | +1.41% |
| CRH.L | £7,262.00 | +1.82% | 49.8B | 20.64 | £3.57 | +1.64% |
| 0LRK.L | £279.87 | +2.45% | 37.1B | 62.30 | £4.51 | +0.67% |
| 0JZ0.L | £607.23 | +6.74% | 36.4B | 57.40 | £10.52 | +0.52% |
| 0QKY.L | £41.60 | -0.71% | 24.8B | 11.18 | £3.72 | +118.22% |
| 0QQ2.L | £495.10 | -0.89% | 18B | 23.70 | £20.89 | +2.03% |
| 0JZ1.L | £69.28 | +1.48% | 14.5B | 30.94 | £2.24 | +1.73% |
| 0Y5C.L | £165.60 | +0.42% | 14.3B | 31.91 | £5.22 | +1.19% |
| 0RH9.L | £182.40 | +0.00% | 4.4B | 15.38 | £11.86 | +2.19% |
| 0M6J.L | £108.40 | +1.31% | 1.7B | 5.62 | £18.76 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
0R6S.L vs CRH.L Comparison August 2025
0R6S.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R6S.L stands at 789.6M. In comparison, CRH.L has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R6S.L is priced at £72.25, while CRH.L trades at £7,262.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R6S.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas CRH.L's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, 0R6S.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRH.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R6S.L is less volatile compared to CRH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R6S.L.Check CRH.L's competition here
0R6S.L vs 0LRK.L Comparison August 2025
0R6S.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R6S.L stands at 789.6M. In comparison, 0LRK.L has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R6S.L is priced at £72.25, while 0LRK.L trades at £279.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R6S.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas 0LRK.L's P/E ratio is 62.30. In terms of profitability, 0R6S.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0LRK.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R6S.L is more volatile compared to 0LRK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R6S.L.Check 0LRK.L's competition here
0R6S.L vs 0JZ0.L Comparison August 2025
0R6S.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R6S.L stands at 789.6M. In comparison, 0JZ0.L has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R6S.L is priced at £72.25, while 0JZ0.L trades at £607.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R6S.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas 0JZ0.L's P/E ratio is 57.40. In terms of profitability, 0R6S.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0JZ0.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R6S.L is more volatile compared to 0JZ0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R6S.L.Check 0JZ0.L's competition here
0R6S.L vs 0QKY.L Comparison August 2025
0R6S.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R6S.L stands at 789.6M. In comparison, 0QKY.L has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R6S.L is priced at £72.25, while 0QKY.L trades at £41.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R6S.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas 0QKY.L's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, 0R6S.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0QKY.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R6S.L is more volatile compared to 0QKY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R6S.L.Check 0QKY.L's competition here
0R6S.L vs 0QQ2.L Comparison August 2025
0R6S.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R6S.L stands at 789.6M. In comparison, 0QQ2.L has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R6S.L is priced at £72.25, while 0QQ2.L trades at £495.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R6S.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas 0QQ2.L's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, 0R6S.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0QQ2.L's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R6S.L is more volatile compared to 0QQ2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R6S.L.Check 0QQ2.L's competition here
0R6S.L vs 0JZ1.L Comparison August 2025
0R6S.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R6S.L stands at 789.6M. In comparison, 0JZ1.L has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R6S.L is priced at £72.25, while 0JZ1.L trades at £69.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R6S.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas 0JZ1.L's P/E ratio is 30.94. In terms of profitability, 0R6S.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0JZ1.L's ROE of -4.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R6S.L is more volatile compared to 0JZ1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R6S.L.Check 0JZ1.L's competition here
0R6S.L vs 0Y5C.L Comparison August 2025
0R6S.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R6S.L stands at 789.6M. In comparison, 0Y5C.L has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R6S.L is priced at £72.25, while 0Y5C.L trades at £165.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R6S.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas 0Y5C.L's P/E ratio is 31.91. In terms of profitability, 0R6S.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0Y5C.L's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R6S.L is more volatile compared to 0Y5C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R6S.L.Check 0Y5C.L's competition here
0R6S.L vs 0RH9.L Comparison August 2025
0R6S.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R6S.L stands at 789.6M. In comparison, 0RH9.L has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R6S.L is priced at £72.25, while 0RH9.L trades at £182.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R6S.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas 0RH9.L's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, 0R6S.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0RH9.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R6S.L is more volatile compared to 0RH9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R6S.L.Check 0RH9.L's competition here
0R6S.L vs 0M6J.L Comparison August 2025
0R6S.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R6S.L stands at 789.6M. In comparison, 0M6J.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R6S.L is priced at £72.25, while 0M6J.L trades at £108.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R6S.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas 0M6J.L's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, 0R6S.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0M6J.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R6S.L is more volatile compared to 0M6J.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R6S.L.Check 0M6J.L's competition here
0R6S.L vs SRC.L Comparison August 2025
0R6S.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R6S.L stands at 789.6M. In comparison, SRC.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R6S.L is priced at £72.25, while SRC.L trades at £114.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R6S.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas SRC.L's P/E ratio is 58.50. In terms of profitability, 0R6S.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SRC.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R6S.L is less volatile compared to SRC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R6S.L.Check SRC.L's competition here
0R6S.L vs BREE.L Comparison August 2025
0R6S.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R6S.L stands at 789.6M. In comparison, BREE.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R6S.L is priced at £72.25, while BREE.L trades at £363.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R6S.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas BREE.L's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, 0R6S.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BREE.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R6S.L is less volatile compared to BREE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R6S.L.Check BREE.L's competition here
0R6S.L vs JHDA.L Comparison August 2025
0R6S.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R6S.L stands at 789.6M. In comparison, JHDA.L has a market cap of 655.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R6S.L is priced at £72.25, while JHDA.L trades at £75.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R6S.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas JHDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0R6S.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JHDA.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R6S.L is more volatile compared to JHDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R6S.L.Check JHDA.L's competition here
0R6S.L vs IBST.L Comparison August 2025
0R6S.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R6S.L stands at 789.6M. In comparison, IBST.L has a market cap of 584.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R6S.L is priced at £72.25, while IBST.L trades at £148.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R6S.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas IBST.L's P/E ratio is 37.05. In terms of profitability, 0R6S.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IBST.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R6S.L is less volatile compared to IBST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R6S.L.Check IBST.L's competition here
0R6S.L vs MSLH.L Comparison August 2025
0R6S.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R6S.L stands at 789.6M. In comparison, MSLH.L has a market cap of 510.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R6S.L is priced at £72.25, while MSLH.L trades at £204.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R6S.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas MSLH.L's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, 0R6S.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MSLH.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R6S.L is less volatile compared to MSLH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R6S.L.Check MSLH.L's competition here
0R6S.L vs FORT.L Comparison August 2025
0R6S.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R6S.L stands at 789.6M. In comparison, FORT.L has a market cap of 419.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R6S.L is priced at £72.25, while FORT.L trades at £197.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R6S.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas FORT.L's P/E ratio is 28.43. In terms of profitability, 0R6S.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FORT.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R6S.L is less volatile compared to FORT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R6S.L.Check FORT.L's competition here
0R6S.L vs MBH.L Comparison August 2025
0R6S.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R6S.L stands at 789.6M. In comparison, MBH.L has a market cap of 101.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R6S.L is priced at £72.25, while MBH.L trades at £107.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R6S.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas MBH.L's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, 0R6S.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MBH.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R6S.L is less volatile compared to MBH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R6S.L.Check MBH.L's competition here
0R6S.L vs STCM.L Comparison August 2025
0R6S.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R6S.L stands at 789.6M. In comparison, STCM.L has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R6S.L is priced at £72.25, while STCM.L trades at £16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R6S.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas STCM.L's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, 0R6S.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STCM.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R6S.L is less volatile compared to STCM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R6S.L.Check STCM.L's competition here
0R6S.L vs 0P000147QB.L Comparison August 2025
0R6S.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R6S.L stands at 789.6M. In comparison, 0P000147QB.L has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R6S.L is priced at £72.25, while 0P000147QB.L trades at £99.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R6S.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas 0P000147QB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0R6S.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0P000147QB.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R6S.L is more volatile compared to 0P000147QB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R6S.L.Check 0P000147QB.L's competition here
0R6S.L vs PU12.L Comparison August 2025
0R6S.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R6S.L stands at 789.6M. In comparison, PU12.L has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R6S.L is priced at £72.25, while PU12.L trades at £24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R6S.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas PU12.L's P/E ratio is 1.41. In terms of profitability, 0R6S.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PU12.L's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R6S.L is less volatile compared to PU12.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R6S.L.Check PU12.L's competition here
0R6S.L vs ECOB.L Comparison August 2025
0R6S.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R6S.L stands at 789.6M. In comparison, ECOB.L has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R6S.L is priced at £72.25, while ECOB.L trades at £4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R6S.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas ECOB.L's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, 0R6S.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ECOB.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R6S.L is less volatile compared to ECOB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R6S.L.Check ECOB.L's competition here
0R6S.L vs 97GM.L Comparison August 2025
0R6S.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R6S.L stands at 789.6M. In comparison, 97GM.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0R6S.L is priced at £72.25, while 97GM.L trades at £0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R6S.L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas 97GM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0R6S.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 97GM.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R6S.L is more volatile compared to 97GM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R6S.L.Check 97GM.L's competition here