Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (0R32.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (0R32.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0R32.L | £91.06 | -5.91% | 4.5B | 26.40 | £3.45 | N/A |
| 0R1O.IL | £204.70 | -0.80% | 1.7T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0JVQ.L | £225.26 | +0.54% | 126.2B | 18.29 | £12.31 | +2.05% |
| 0K0E.L | £2,364.00 | -0.58% | 119.8B | 647.49 | £3.65 | N/A |
| 0KAB.L | £98.62 | -0.57% | 84.3B | 3.16 | £31.25 | N/A |
| 0HJL.L | £3,799.00 | -1.62% | 64.1B | 33.82 | £113.30 | N/A |
| 0LD8.L | £99.19 | -4.84% | 45.9B | 8.34 | £12.11 | +4.51% |
| 0KXO.L | £136.24 | -2.10% | 44.9B | 30.52 | £4.50 | +1.13% |
| 0IC8.L | £113.32 | -1.05% | 23.6B | 17.23 | £6.56 | N/A |
| 0LIB.L | £507.70 | -1.58% | 23.4B | 25.80 | £20.15 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
0R32.L vs 0R1O.IL Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0R1O.IL has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0R1O.IL trades at £204.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0R1O.IL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0R1O.IL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to 0R1O.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0R1O.IL's competition here
0R32.L vs 0JVQ.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0JVQ.L has a market cap of 126.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0JVQ.L trades at £225.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0JVQ.L's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0JVQ.L's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to 0JVQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0JVQ.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0K0E.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0K0E.L has a market cap of 119.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0K0E.L trades at £2,364.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0K0E.L's P/E ratio is 647.49. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0K0E.L's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to 0K0E.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0K0E.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0KAB.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0KAB.L has a market cap of 84.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0KAB.L trades at £98.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0KAB.L's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0KAB.L's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to 0KAB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0KAB.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0HJL.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0HJL.L has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0HJL.L trades at £3,799.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0HJL.L's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0HJL.L's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to 0HJL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0HJL.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0LD8.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0LD8.L has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0LD8.L trades at £99.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0LD8.L's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0LD8.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to 0LD8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0LD8.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0KXO.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0KXO.L has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0KXO.L trades at £136.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0KXO.L's P/E ratio is 30.52. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0KXO.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to 0KXO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0KXO.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0IC8.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0IC8.L has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0IC8.L trades at £113.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0IC8.L's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0IC8.L's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is less volatile compared to 0IC8.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0IC8.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0LIB.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0LIB.L has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0LIB.L trades at £507.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0LIB.L's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0LIB.L's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to 0LIB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0LIB.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0IC7.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0IC7.L has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0IC7.L trades at £106.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0IC7.L's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0IC7.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is less volatile compared to 0IC7.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0IC7.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0LXC.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0LXC.L has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0LXC.L trades at £186.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0LXC.L's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0LXC.L's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is less volatile compared to 0LXC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0LXC.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0IUX.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0IUX.L has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0IUX.L trades at £127.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0IUX.L's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0IUX.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to 0IUX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0IUX.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0R18.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0R18.L has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0R18.L trades at £64.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0R18.L's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0R18.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to 0R18.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0R18.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0HTQ.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0HTQ.L has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0HTQ.L trades at £56.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0HTQ.L's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0HTQ.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to 0HTQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0HTQ.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0IPD.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0IPD.L has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0IPD.L trades at £133.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0IPD.L's P/E ratio is 28.59. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0IPD.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to 0IPD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0IPD.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0QVE.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0QVE.L has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0QVE.L trades at £520.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0QVE.L's P/E ratio is 116.78. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0QVE.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to 0QVE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0QVE.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0JSC.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0JSC.L has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0JSC.L trades at £28.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0JSC.L's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0JSC.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to 0JSC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0JSC.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0RCW.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0RCW.L has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0RCW.L trades at £145.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0RCW.L's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0RCW.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to 0RCW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0RCW.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0IIW.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0IIW.L has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0IIW.L trades at £58.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0IIW.L's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0IIW.L's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is less volatile compared to 0IIW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0IIW.L's competition here
0R32.L vs DFIB.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, DFIB.L has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while DFIB.L trades at £9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas DFIB.L's P/E ratio is -32.75. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to DFIB.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to DFIB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check DFIB.L's competition here
0R32.L vs JD.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JD.L has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while JD.L trades at £84.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas JD.L's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to JD.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to JD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check JD.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0SOM.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0SOM.L has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0SOM.L trades at £22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0SOM.L's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0SOM.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to 0SOM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0SOM.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0KTF.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0KTF.L has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0KTF.L trades at £200.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0KTF.L's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0KTF.L's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is less volatile compared to 0KTF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0KTF.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0H9G.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0H9G.L has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0H9G.L trades at £52.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0H9G.L's P/E ratio is 6.02. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0H9G.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to 0H9G.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0H9G.L's competition here
0R32.L vs FRAS.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, FRAS.L has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while FRAS.L trades at £678.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas FRAS.L's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to FRAS.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to FRAS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check FRAS.L's competition here
0R32.L vs ROO.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ROO.L has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while ROO.L trades at £177.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas ROO.L's P/E ratio is 59.13. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ROO.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to ROO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check ROO.L's competition here
0R32.L vs DNLM.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, DNLM.L has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while DNLM.L trades at £1,199.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas DNLM.L's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to DNLM.L's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to DNLM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check DNLM.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0IQK.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0IQK.L has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0IQK.L trades at £24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0IQK.L's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0IQK.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to 0IQK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0IQK.L's competition here
0R32.L vs JET.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JET.L has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while JET.L trades at £1,134.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas JET.L's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to JET.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to JET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check JET.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0QK3.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0QK3.L has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0QK3.L trades at £35.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0QK3.L's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0QK3.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to 0QK3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0QK3.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0HSU.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0HSU.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0HSU.L trades at £14.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0HSU.L's P/E ratio is 2.41. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0HSU.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is less volatile compared to 0HSU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0HSU.L's competition here
0R32.L vs SMWH.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SMWH.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while SMWH.L trades at £1,033.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas SMWH.L's P/E ratio is 206.60. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SMWH.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to SMWH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check SMWH.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0JRL.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0JRL.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0JRL.L trades at £10.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0JRL.L's P/E ratio is 1.61. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0JRL.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is less volatile compared to 0JRL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0JRL.L's competition here
0R32.L vs CURY.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CURY.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while CURY.L trades at £111.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas CURY.L's P/E ratio is 22.30. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CURY.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to CURY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check CURY.L's competition here
0R32.L vs PETS.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PETS.L has a market cap of 993M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while PETS.L trades at £220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas PETS.L's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to PETS.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is less volatile compared to PETS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check PETS.L's competition here
0R32.L vs MOON.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MOON.L has a market cap of 689.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while MOON.L trades at £210.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MOON.L's P/E ratio is -70.17. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MOON.L's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to MOON.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check MOON.L's competition here
0R32.L vs AO.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AO.L has a market cap of 521.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while AO.L trades at £91.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas AO.L's P/E ratio is 45.80. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to AO.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is less volatile compared to AO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check AO.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0KDU.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0KDU.L has a market cap of 434.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0KDU.L trades at £8.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0KDU.L's P/E ratio is 0.99. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0KDU.L's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is less volatile compared to 0KDU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0KDU.L's competition here
0R32.L vs THG.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, THG.L has a market cap of 420M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while THG.L trades at £30.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas THG.L's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to THG.L's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is less volatile compared to THG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check THG.L's competition here
0R32.L vs BOO.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BOO.L has a market cap of 364.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while BOO.L trades at £26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas BOO.L's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to BOO.L's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is less volatile compared to BOO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check BOO.L's competition here
0R32.L vs ASC.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ASC.L has a market cap of 364.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while ASC.L trades at £305.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas ASC.L's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ASC.L's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is less volatile compared to ASC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check ASC.L's competition here
0R32.L vs CARD.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CARD.L has a market cap of 354.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while CARD.L trades at £101.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas CARD.L's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CARD.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is less volatile compared to CARD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check CARD.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0RA5.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0RA5.L has a market cap of 342.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0RA5.L trades at £1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0RA5.L's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0RA5.L's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to 0RA5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0RA5.L's competition here
0R32.L vs HFD.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, HFD.L has a market cap of 311.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while HFD.L trades at £142.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas HFD.L's P/E ratio is -9.51. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to HFD.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to HFD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check HFD.L's competition here
0R32.L vs DEBS.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, DEBS.L has a market cap of 233.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while DEBS.L trades at £16.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas DEBS.L's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to DEBS.L's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is less volatile compared to DEBS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check DEBS.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0ROF.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0ROF.L has a market cap of 229.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0ROF.L trades at £11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0ROF.L's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0ROF.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to 0ROF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0ROF.L's competition here
0R32.L vs BWNG.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BWNG.L has a market cap of 185.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while BWNG.L trades at £39.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas BWNG.L's P/E ratio is 39.70. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to BWNG.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to BWNG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check BWNG.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0OQX.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0OQX.L has a market cap of 97.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0OQX.L trades at £6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0OQX.L's P/E ratio is -4.89. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0OQX.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to 0OQX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0OQX.L's competition here
0R32.L vs SCS.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SCS.L has a market cap of 95.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while SCS.L trades at £270.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas SCS.L's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SCS.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to SCS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check SCS.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0RP3.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0RP3.L has a market cap of 77.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0RP3.L trades at £1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0RP3.L's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0RP3.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to 0RP3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0RP3.L's competition here
0R32.L vs MRK.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MRK.L has a market cap of 63.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while MRK.L trades at £60.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MRK.L's P/E ratio is -60.50. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MRK.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is less volatile compared to MRK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check MRK.L's competition here
0R32.L vs IGR.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, IGR.L has a market cap of 60M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while IGR.L trades at £63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas IGR.L's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to IGR.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to IGR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check IGR.L's competition here
0R32.L vs G4M.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, G4M.L has a market cap of 53.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while G4M.L trades at £257.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas G4M.L's P/E ratio is 64.25. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to G4M.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is less volatile compared to G4M.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check G4M.L's competition here
0R32.L vs PROC.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PROC.L has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while PROC.L trades at £45.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas PROC.L's P/E ratio is 45.50. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to PROC.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is less volatile compared to PROC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check PROC.L's competition here
0R32.L vs WRKS.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, WRKS.L has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while WRKS.L trades at £58.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas WRKS.L's P/E ratio is 4.46. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to WRKS.L's ROE of +1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is less volatile compared to WRKS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check WRKS.L's competition here
0R32.L vs ANG.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ANG.L has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while ANG.L trades at £45.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas ANG.L's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ANG.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is less volatile compared to ANG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check ANG.L's competition here
0R32.L vs HRN.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, HRN.L has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while HRN.L trades at £15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas HRN.L's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to HRN.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is less volatile compared to HRN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check HRN.L's competition here
0R32.L vs MTC.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MTC.L has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while MTC.L trades at £3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MTC.L's P/E ratio is 3.32. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MTC.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is less volatile compared to MTC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check MTC.L's competition here
0R32.L vs SOS.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SOS.L has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while SOS.L trades at £6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas SOS.L's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SOS.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is less volatile compared to SOS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check SOS.L's competition here
0R32.L vs PODP.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PODP.L has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while PODP.L trades at £6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas PODP.L's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to PODP.L's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to PODP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check PODP.L's competition here
0R32.L vs MMAG.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MMAG.L has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while MMAG.L trades at £8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MMAG.L's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MMAG.L's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to MMAG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check MMAG.L's competition here
0R32.L vs SCHO.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SCHO.L has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while SCHO.L trades at £44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas SCHO.L's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SCHO.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is less volatile compared to SCHO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check SCHO.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0DQK.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0DQK.L has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0DQK.L trades at £6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0DQK.L's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0DQK.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to 0DQK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0DQK.L's competition here
0R32.L vs DISP.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, DISP.L has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while DISP.L trades at £0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas DISP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to DISP.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to DISP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check DISP.L's competition here
0R32.L vs UBG.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, UBG.L has a market cap of 488.7K. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while UBG.L trades at £0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas UBG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to UBG.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to UBG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check UBG.L's competition here
0R32.L vs ITS.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ITS.L has a market cap of 406.9K. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while ITS.L trades at £0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas ITS.L's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ITS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to ITS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check ITS.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0IJU.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0IJU.L has a market cap of 749. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0IJU.L trades at £0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0IJU.L's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0IJU.L's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to 0IJU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0IJU.L's competition here
0R32.L vs MADE.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MADE.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while MADE.L trades at £0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MADE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MADE.L's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0R32.L has daily volatility of 3.37 and MADE.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check MADE.L's competition here
0R32.L vs MYSL.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MYSL.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while MYSL.L trades at £2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MYSL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MYSL.L's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0R32.L has daily volatility of 3.37 and MYSL.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check MYSL.L's competition here
0R32.L vs SGI.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SGI.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while SGI.L trades at £1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas SGI.L's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SGI.L's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is less volatile compared to SGI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check SGI.L's competition here
0R32.L vs DC.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, DC.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while DC.L trades at £137.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas DC.L's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to DC.L's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to DC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check DC.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0R3D.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0R3D.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0R3D.L trades at £72.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0R3D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0R3D.L's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is more volatile compared to 0R3D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0R3D.L's competition here
0R32.L vs 0M1U.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0M1U.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while 0M1U.L trades at £72.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas 0M1U.L's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to 0M1U.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is less volatile compared to 0M1U.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check 0M1U.L's competition here
0R32.L vs STU.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, STU.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while STU.L trades at £115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas STU.L's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to STU.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 0R32.L is less volatile compared to STU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0R32.L.Check STU.L's competition here
0R32.L vs MEAL.L Comparison August 2025
0R32.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0R32.L stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MEAL.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0R32.L is priced at £91.06, while MEAL.L trades at £1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0R32.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MEAL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0R32.L's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MEAL.L's ROE of -41.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0R32.L has daily volatility of 3.37 and MEAL.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check MEAL.L's competition here