Western Digital Corporation
Western Digital Corporation 0QZF.L Peers
See (0QZF.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0QZF.L | £56.07 | +1.05% | 19.6B | 9.71 | £5.78 | +0.18% |
| MAW.L | £44,640.00 | -1.67% | 425.1B | 28.64 | £1,558.77 | +0.28% |
| 0HFB.L | £93.52 | +0.81% | 113.1B | 34.71 | £2.69 | +0.65% |
| 0Z4I.L | £61.50 | -2.54% | 66.7B | 11.51 | £5.34 | +0.78% |
| HHPD.L | £6.98 | N/A | 48.5B | 8.62 | £0.81 | +0.16% |
| 0R2X.L | £50.90 | -0.45% | 43.6B | 40.46 | £1.26 | +2.20% |
| 0J51.L | £18.08 | +0.54% | 23.7B | 6.49 | £2.79 | +2.88% |
| 0J2E.L | £25.16 | +0.73% | 23.6B | 4.49 | £5.60 | +4.49% |
| 0K6F.L | £106.76 | +1.77% | 22B | 26.10 | £4.09 | +1.96% |
| 0KSA.L | £55.48 | +0.96% | 18.1B | -227.38 | -£0.24 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
0QZF.L vs MAW.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, MAW.L has a market cap of 425.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while MAW.L trades at £44,640.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas MAW.L's P/E ratio is 28.64. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MAW.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to MAW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0HFB.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0HFB.L has a market cap of 113.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0HFB.L trades at £93.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0HFB.L's P/E ratio is 34.71. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0HFB.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0HFB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0Z4I.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0Z4I.L has a market cap of 66.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0Z4I.L trades at £61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0Z4I.L's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0Z4I.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0Z4I.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs HHPD.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, HHPD.L has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while HHPD.L trades at £6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas HHPD.L's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HHPD.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to HHPD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0R2X.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0R2X.L has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0R2X.L trades at £50.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0R2X.L's P/E ratio is 40.46. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0R2X.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0R2X.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0J51.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0J51.L has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0J51.L trades at £18.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0J51.L's P/E ratio is 6.49. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0J51.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is less volatile compared to 0J51.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0J2E.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0J2E.L has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0J2E.L trades at £25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0J2E.L's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0J2E.L's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0J2E.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0K6F.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0K6F.L has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0K6F.L trades at £106.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0K6F.L's P/E ratio is 26.10. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0K6F.L's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0K6F.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0KSA.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0KSA.L has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0KSA.L trades at £55.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0KSA.L's P/E ratio is -227.38. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0KSA.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0KSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0LHO.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0LHO.L has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0LHO.L trades at £79.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0LHO.L's P/E ratio is 44.19. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0LHO.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0LHO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0F0J.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0F0J.L has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0F0J.L trades at £58.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0F0J.L's P/E ratio is 71.83. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0F0J.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is less volatile compared to 0F0J.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0LJE.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0LJE.L has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0LJE.L trades at £152.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0LJE.L's P/E ratio is 39.71. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0LJE.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0LJE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0HI1.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0HI1.L has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0HI1.L trades at £121.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0HI1.L's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0HI1.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0HI1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0I14.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0I14.L has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0I14.L trades at £30.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0I14.L's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0I14.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0I14.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0VAG.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0VAG.L has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0VAG.L trades at £127.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0VAG.L's P/E ratio is 78.71. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0VAG.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0VAG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0QLW.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0QLW.L has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0QLW.L trades at £263.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0QLW.L's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0QLW.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0QLW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0J86.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0J86.L has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0J86.L trades at £70.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0J86.L's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0J86.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0J86.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0QK5.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0QK5.L has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0QK5.L trades at £100.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0QK5.L's P/E ratio is 3.17. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0QK5.L's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0QK5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0YQA.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0YQA.L has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0YQA.L trades at £21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0YQA.L's P/E ratio is 41.38. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0YQA.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0YQA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs SXS.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, SXS.L has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while SXS.L trades at £2,038.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas SXS.L's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SXS.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is less volatile compared to SXS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs RSW.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, RSW.L has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while RSW.L trades at £2,630.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas RSW.L's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RSW.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is less volatile compared to RSW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0GEG.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0GEG.L has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0GEG.L trades at £50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0GEG.L's P/E ratio is 39.40. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0GEG.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0GEG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0ROQ.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0ROQ.L has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0ROQ.L trades at £231.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0ROQ.L's P/E ratio is 26.61. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0ROQ.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0ROQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0RTL.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0RTL.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0RTL.L trades at £52.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0RTL.L's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0RTL.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0RTL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0M58.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0M58.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0M58.L trades at £26.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0M58.L's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0M58.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0M58.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0ZPV.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0ZPV.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0ZPV.L trades at £22.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0ZPV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0ZPV.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is less volatile compared to 0ZPV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0QHK.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0QHK.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0QHK.L trades at £79.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0QHK.L's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0QHK.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is less volatile compared to 0QHK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0SE5.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0SE5.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0SE5.L trades at £72.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0SE5.L's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0SE5.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0SE5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0JI9.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0JI9.L has a market cap of 971M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0JI9.L trades at £1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0JI9.L's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0JI9.L's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0JI9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0H38.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0H38.L has a market cap of 965.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0H38.L trades at £5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0H38.L's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0H38.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0H38.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs RPI.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, RPI.L has a market cap of 921.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while RPI.L trades at £476.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas RPI.L's P/E ratio is 95.32. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RPI.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is less volatile compared to RPI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0QKB.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0QKB.L has a market cap of 917.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0QKB.L trades at £806.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0QKB.L's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0QKB.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0QKB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs DSCV.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, DSCV.L has a market cap of 646.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while DSCV.L trades at £673.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas DSCV.L's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DSCV.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is less volatile compared to DSCV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0QDT.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0QDT.L has a market cap of 615.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0QDT.L trades at £6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0QDT.L's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0QDT.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0QDT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0QPR.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0QPR.L has a market cap of 592.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0QPR.L trades at £136.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0QPR.L's P/E ratio is 53.02. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0QPR.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is less volatile compared to 0QPR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs JDG.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, JDG.L has a market cap of 525.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while JDG.L trades at £7,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas JDG.L's P/E ratio is 51.30. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JDG.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to JDG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0H0U.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0H0U.L has a market cap of 482.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0H0U.L trades at £41.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0H0U.L's P/E ratio is 820.59. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0H0U.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0H0U.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0IF4.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0IF4.L has a market cap of 466.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0IF4.L trades at £5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0IF4.L's P/E ratio is 180.60. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0IF4.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0IF4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0NNU.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0NNU.L has a market cap of 426.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0NNU.L trades at £64.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0NNU.L's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0NNU.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0NNU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0OC9.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0OC9.L has a market cap of 345.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0OC9.L trades at £53.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0OC9.L's P/E ratio is 29.71. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0OC9.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0OC9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0FRI.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0FRI.L has a market cap of 312.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0FRI.L trades at £14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0FRI.L's P/E ratio is 73.58. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0FRI.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0FRI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0K17.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0K17.L has a market cap of 286.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0K17.L trades at £1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0K17.L's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0K17.L's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is less volatile compared to 0K17.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0DUI.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0DUI.L has a market cap of 281.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0DUI.L trades at £9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0DUI.L's P/E ratio is 4.62. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0DUI.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0DUI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0K6M.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0K6M.L has a market cap of 196.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0K6M.L trades at £0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0K6M.L's P/E ratio is 102.16. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0K6M.L's ROE of +6.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0K6M.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0NFS.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0NFS.L has a market cap of 191.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0NFS.L trades at £3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0NFS.L's P/E ratio is 4.38. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0NFS.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0NFS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0MTP.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0MTP.L has a market cap of 180.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0MTP.L trades at £0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0MTP.L's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0MTP.L's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is less volatile compared to 0MTP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs TTG.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, TTG.L has a market cap of 171M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while TTG.L trades at £96.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas TTG.L's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TTG.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to TTG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs SRT.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, SRT.L has a market cap of 166.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while SRT.L trades at £66.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas SRT.L's P/E ratio is -16.62. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SRT.L's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is less volatile compared to SRT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0Y2A.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0Y2A.L has a market cap of 159.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0Y2A.L trades at £57.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0Y2A.L's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0Y2A.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is less volatile compared to 0Y2A.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs GHH.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, GHH.L has a market cap of 140.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while GHH.L trades at £546.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas GHH.L's P/E ratio is 27.30. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GHH.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is less volatile compared to GHH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs QTX.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, QTX.L has a market cap of 123M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while QTX.L trades at £254.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas QTX.L's P/E ratio is 25.40. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QTX.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is less volatile compared to QTX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs SOLI.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, SOLI.L has a market cap of 110.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while SOLI.L trades at £195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas SOLI.L's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SOLI.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is less volatile compared to SOLI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs KETL.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, KETL.L has a market cap of 102.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while KETL.L trades at £44.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas KETL.L's P/E ratio is 44.55. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KETL.L's ROE of +5.96%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to KETL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs XAR.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, XAR.L has a market cap of 95.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while XAR.L trades at £120.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas XAR.L's P/E ratio is -8.61. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XAR.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is less volatile compared to XAR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs SDI.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, SDI.L has a market cap of 81.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while SDI.L trades at £78.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas SDI.L's P/E ratio is 26.07. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SDI.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is less volatile compared to SDI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0QNQ.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0QNQ.L has a market cap of 66.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0QNQ.L trades at £1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0QNQ.L's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0QNQ.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is less volatile compared to 0QNQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0OJJ.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0OJJ.L has a market cap of 64.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0OJJ.L trades at £3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0OJJ.L's P/E ratio is -12.70. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0OJJ.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0OJJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs WPHO.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, WPHO.L has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while WPHO.L trades at £47.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas WPHO.L's P/E ratio is -47.00. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WPHO.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is less volatile compared to WPHO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs KMK.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, KMK.L has a market cap of 39.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while KMK.L trades at £6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas KMK.L's P/E ratio is -6.15. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KMK.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is less volatile compared to KMK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0I0B.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0I0B.L has a market cap of 32M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0I0B.L trades at £0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0I0B.L's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0I0B.L's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0I0B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs LST.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, LST.L has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while LST.L trades at £3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas LST.L's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LST.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is less volatile compared to LST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0IH3.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0IH3.L has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0IH3.L trades at £0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0IH3.L's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0IH3.L's ROE of -5.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is less volatile compared to 0IH3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs CPX.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, CPX.L has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while CPX.L trades at £0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas CPX.L's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CPX.L's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is less volatile compared to CPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs STAR.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, STAR.L has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while STAR.L trades at £6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas STAR.L's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STAR.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is less volatile compared to STAR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs ZYT.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, ZYT.L has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while ZYT.L trades at £44.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas ZYT.L's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZYT.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is less volatile compared to ZYT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs TRAK.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, TRAK.L has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while TRAK.L trades at £8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas TRAK.L's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRAK.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to TRAK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs HDT.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, HDT.L has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while HDT.L trades at £75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas HDT.L's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HDT.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to HDT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs NNN.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, NNN.L has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while NNN.L trades at £0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas NNN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NNN.L's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0QZF.L has daily volatility of 2.55 and NNN.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0QZF.L vs MSYS.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, MSYS.L has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while MSYS.L trades at £0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas MSYS.L's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MSYS.L's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to MSYS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs TRAC.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, TRAC.L has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while TRAC.L trades at £1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas TRAC.L's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRAC.L's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is less volatile compared to TRAC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs TWD.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, TWD.L has a market cap of 899.3K. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while TWD.L trades at £0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas TWD.L's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TWD.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to TWD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs PIP.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, PIP.L has a market cap of 453.9K. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while PIP.L trades at £1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas PIP.L's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PIP.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is less volatile compared to PIP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0I17.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0I17.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0I17.L trades at £168.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0I17.L's P/E ratio is 36.09. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0I17.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0I17.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs OTAQ.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, OTAQ.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while OTAQ.L trades at £5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas OTAQ.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OTAQ.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0QZF.L has daily volatility of 2.55 and OTAQ.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0QZF.L vs ECM.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, ECM.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while ECM.L trades at £1,047.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas ECM.L's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ECM.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to ECM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs 0NEB.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, 0NEB.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while 0NEB.L trades at £13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas 0NEB.L's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0NEB.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to 0NEB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.
0QZF.L vs PPIX.L Comparison
0QZF.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QZF.L stands at 19.6B. In comparison, PPIX.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0QZF.L is priced at £56.07, while PPIX.L trades at £8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QZF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.71, whereas PPIX.L's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, 0QZF.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PPIX.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QZF.L is more volatile compared to PPIX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QZF.L.