Morgan Stanley
Morgan Stanley 0QYU.L Peers
See (0QYU.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0QYU.L | £131.38 | +0.46% | 210.8B | 16.72 | £7.86 | +2.82% |
| 0L3I.L | £87.93 | +0.26% | 159.8B | 31.74 | £2.77 | +1.18% |
| 0KYY.L | £519.51 | +0.89% | 159.3B | 37.11 | £14.00 | +0.72% |
| 0QZZ.L | £991.03 | +0.98% | 153.5B | 24.90 | £39.80 | +2.60% |
| 0R3C.L | £148.80 | N/A | 127.1B | 14.89 | £10.00 | +0.97% |
| 0HT4.L | £197.59 | +2.36% | 126.5B | 7.73 | £25.57 | +1.21% |
| 0Z1W.L | £122.77 | +2.08% | 109.3B | 26.52 | £4.63 | +0.58% |
| 0JC3.L | £178.51 | -0.04% | 102.4B | 24.79 | £7.20 | +1.03% |
| 0HR2.L | £274.08 | -0.84% | 98.8B | 35.87 | £7.64 | +3.83% |
| 0K36.L | £489.08 | +0.02% | 88B | 46.34 | £10.56 | +0.73% |
Stock Comparison
0QYU.L vs 0L3I.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0L3I.L has a market cap of 159.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0L3I.L trades at £87.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0L3I.L's P/E ratio is 31.74. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0L3I.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0L3I.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0KYY.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0KYY.L has a market cap of 159.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0KYY.L trades at £519.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0KYY.L's P/E ratio is 37.11. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0KYY.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0KYY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0QZZ.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0QZZ.L has a market cap of 153.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0QZZ.L trades at £991.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0QZZ.L's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0QZZ.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0QZZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0R3C.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0R3C.L has a market cap of 127.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0R3C.L trades at £148.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0R3C.L's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0R3C.L's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is less volatile compared to 0R3C.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0HT4.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0HT4.L has a market cap of 126.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0HT4.L trades at £197.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0HT4.L's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0HT4.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0HT4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0Z1W.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0Z1W.L has a market cap of 109.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0Z1W.L trades at £122.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0Z1W.L's P/E ratio is 26.52. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0Z1W.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0Z1W.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0JC3.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0JC3.L has a market cap of 102.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0JC3.L trades at £178.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0JC3.L's P/E ratio is 24.79. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0JC3.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0JC3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0HR2.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0HR2.L has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0HR2.L trades at £274.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0HR2.L's P/E ratio is 35.87. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0HR2.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0HR2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0K36.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0K36.L has a market cap of 88B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0K36.L trades at £489.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0K36.L's P/E ratio is 46.34. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0K36.L's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0K36.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0HLQ.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0HLQ.L has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0HLQ.L trades at £89.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0HLQ.L's P/E ratio is 22.26. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0HLQ.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0HLQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0IBC.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0IBC.L has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0IBC.L trades at £202.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0IBC.L's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0IBC.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0IBC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0K4T.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0K4T.L has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0K4T.L trades at £85.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0K4T.L's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0K4T.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0K4T.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0KU1.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0KU1.L has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0KU1.L trades at £145.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0KU1.L's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0KU1.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0KU1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0L9G.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0L9G.L has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0L9G.L trades at £98.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0L9G.L's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0L9G.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0L9G.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0QOQ.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0QOQ.L has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0QOQ.L trades at £1,075.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0QOQ.L's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0QOQ.L's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0QOQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0HQN.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0HQN.L has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0HQN.L trades at £222.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0HQN.L's P/E ratio is 47.62. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0HQN.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0HQN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0RH1.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0RH1.L has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0RH1.L trades at £82.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0RH1.L's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0RH1.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0RH1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0LC3.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0LC3.L has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0LC3.L trades at £58.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0LC3.L's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0LC3.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0LC3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0K91.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0K91.L has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0K91.L trades at £107.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0K91.L's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0K91.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0K91.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0KNY.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0KNY.L has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0KNY.L trades at £93.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0KNY.L's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0KNY.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0KNY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0HHP.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0HHP.L has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0HHP.L trades at £22.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0HHP.L's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0HHP.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0HHP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0RT6.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0RT6.L has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0RT6.L trades at £21.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0RT6.L's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0RT6.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0RT6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0HD0.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0HD0.L has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0HD0.L trades at £36.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0HD0.L's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0HD0.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0HD0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0QI9.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0QI9.L has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0QI9.L trades at £79.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0QI9.L's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0QI9.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0QI9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0SAY.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0SAY.L has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0SAY.L trades at £51.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0SAY.L's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0SAY.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0SAY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0QLD.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0QLD.L has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0QLD.L trades at £481.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0QLD.L's P/E ratio is 37.54. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0QLD.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0QLD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0UAN.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0UAN.L has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0UAN.L trades at £14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0UAN.L's P/E ratio is 5.05. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0UAN.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0UAN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0RPW.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0RPW.L has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0RPW.L trades at £36.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0RPW.L's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0RPW.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0RPW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0RGB.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0RGB.L has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0RGB.L trades at £117.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0RGB.L's P/E ratio is -10.01. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0RGB.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0RGB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0JXQ.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0JXQ.L has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0JXQ.L trades at £57.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0JXQ.L's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0JXQ.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is less volatile compared to 0JXQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0HA8.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0HA8.L has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0HA8.L trades at £84.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0HA8.L's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0HA8.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0HA8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0QJX.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0QJX.L has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0QJX.L trades at £14.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0QJX.L's P/E ratio is 25.15. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0QJX.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is less volatile compared to 0QJX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0IZM.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0IZM.L has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0IZM.L trades at £6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0IZM.L's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0IZM.L's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0IZM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0RP0.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0RP0.L has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0RP0.L trades at £19.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0RP0.L's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0RP0.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0RP0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0J4M.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0J4M.L has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0J4M.L trades at £18.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0J4M.L's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0J4M.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0J4M.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0J2Z.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0J2Z.L has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0J2Z.L trades at £25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0J2Z.L's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0J2Z.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0J2Z.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0QPJ.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0QPJ.L has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0QPJ.L trades at £100.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0QPJ.L's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0QPJ.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0QPJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0RL4.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0RL4.L has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0RL4.L trades at £30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0RL4.L's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0RL4.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0RL4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0O2B.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0O2B.L has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0O2B.L trades at £48.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0O2B.L's P/E ratio is 116.03. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0O2B.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0O2B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs GCVG.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, GCVG.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while GCVG.L trades at £33.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas GCVG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GCVG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to GCVG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0R25.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0R25.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0R25.L trades at £3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0R25.L's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0R25.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0R25.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0HHU.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0HHU.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0HHU.L trades at £16.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0HHU.L's P/E ratio is -10.73. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0HHU.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0HHU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0K5R.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0K5R.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0K5R.L trades at £13.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0K5R.L's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0K5R.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0K5R.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0A26.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0A26.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0A26.L trades at £12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0A26.L's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0A26.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0A26.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0QOC.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0QOC.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0QOC.L trades at £174.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0QOC.L's P/E ratio is -15.54. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0QOC.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0QOC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0N5Z.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0N5Z.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0N5Z.L trades at £28.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0N5Z.L's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0N5Z.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0N5Z.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0KH0.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0KH0.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0KH0.L trades at £10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0KH0.L's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0KH0.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0KH0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0NDP.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0NDP.L has a market cap of 955.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0NDP.L trades at £8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0NDP.L's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0NDP.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is less volatile compared to 0NDP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs JPXU.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, JPXU.L has a market cap of 663.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while JPXU.L trades at £215.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas JPXU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JPXU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to JPXU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs PEYS.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, PEYS.L has a market cap of 551.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while PEYS.L trades at £797.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas PEYS.L's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PEYS.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to PEYS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0J0N.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0J0N.L has a market cap of 520.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0J0N.L trades at £9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0J0N.L's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0J0N.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0J0N.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0JD3.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0JD3.L has a market cap of 500.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0JD3.L trades at £7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0JD3.L's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0JD3.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0JD3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0JTZ.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0JTZ.L has a market cap of 481.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0JTZ.L trades at £35.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0JTZ.L's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0JTZ.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0JTZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0RG7.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0RG7.L has a market cap of 467M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0RG7.L trades at £82.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0RG7.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0RG7.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0RG7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0DK7.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0DK7.L has a market cap of 430.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0DK7.L trades at £10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0DK7.L's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0DK7.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0DK7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0OPJ.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0OPJ.L has a market cap of 386.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0OPJ.L trades at £6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0OPJ.L's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0OPJ.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0OPJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0R7T.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0R7T.L has a market cap of 373.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0R7T.L trades at £10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0R7T.L's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0R7T.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0R7T.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0E1L.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0E1L.L has a market cap of 328.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0E1L.L trades at £1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0E1L.L's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0E1L.L's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0E1L.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0QNE.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0QNE.L has a market cap of 314.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0QNE.L trades at £18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0QNE.L's P/E ratio is 2.16. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0QNE.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0QNE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0K7X.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0K7X.L has a market cap of 281.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0K7X.L trades at £10.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0K7X.L's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0K7X.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0K7X.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0HO6.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0HO6.L has a market cap of 248M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0HO6.L trades at £3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0HO6.L's P/E ratio is 5.12. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0HO6.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0HO6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0RWM.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0RWM.L has a market cap of 209.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0RWM.L trades at £41.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0RWM.L's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0RWM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is less volatile compared to 0RWM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs OIT.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, OIT.L has a market cap of 203.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while OIT.L trades at £152.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas OIT.L's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OIT.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is less volatile compared to OIT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs JARA.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, JARA.L has a market cap of 131.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while JARA.L trades at £77.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas JARA.L's P/E ratio is -38.50. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JARA.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is less volatile compared to JARA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0R4W.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0R4W.L has a market cap of 107.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0R4W.L trades at £5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0R4W.L's P/E ratio is -454.55. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0R4W.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0R4W.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0QLZ.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0QLZ.L has a market cap of 99.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0QLZ.L trades at £7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0QLZ.L's P/E ratio is 2.30. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0QLZ.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is less volatile compared to 0QLZ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs AJG.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, AJG.L has a market cap of 71.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while AJG.L trades at £172.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas AJG.L's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AJG.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0QYU.L has daily volatility of 1.93 and AJG.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0QYU.L vs 0XWD.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0XWD.L has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0XWD.L trades at £1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0XWD.L's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0XWD.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0XWD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0LHX.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0LHX.L has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0LHX.L trades at £2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0LHX.L's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0LHX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0LHX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs 0HKM.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, 0HKM.L has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while 0HKM.L trades at £4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas 0HKM.L's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0HKM.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to 0HKM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs SSIF.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, SSIF.L has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while SSIF.L trades at £4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas SSIF.L's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SSIF.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is less volatile compared to SSIF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs FTFX.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, FTFX.L has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while FTFX.L trades at £24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas FTFX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FTFX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to FTFX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs BHGU.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, BHGU.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while BHGU.L trades at £19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas BHGU.L's P/E ratio is 3.81. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BHGU.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to BHGU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs SLS.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, SLS.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while SLS.L trades at £732.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas SLS.L's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SLS.L's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to SLS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs AIF.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, AIF.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while AIF.L trades at £367.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas AIF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AIF.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is less volatile compared to AIF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs ANW.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, ANW.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while ANW.L trades at £398.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas ANW.L's P/E ratio is 1.21. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ANW.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to ANW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs JESC.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, JESC.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while JESC.L trades at £499.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas JESC.L's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JESC.L's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is less volatile compared to JESC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs WESG.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, WESG.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while WESG.L trades at £35.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas WESG.L's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WESG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to WESG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs SIGB.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, SIGB.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while SIGB.L trades at £0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas SIGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SIGB.L's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to SIGB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs ELTA.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, ELTA.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while ELTA.L trades at £63.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas ELTA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ELTA.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is less volatile compared to ELTA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.
0QYU.L vs NUC.L Comparison
0QYU.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QYU.L stands at 210.8B. In comparison, NUC.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0QYU.L is priced at £131.38, while NUC.L trades at £191.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QYU.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.72, whereas NUC.L's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, 0QYU.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NUC.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QYU.L is more volatile compared to NUC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QYU.L.